European dermatology forum: Updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - Part 2.

BACKGROUND: Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multidisciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well-known documented conditions such as graft-vs.-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines were divided into two parts: PART I covers Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, chronic graft-vs.-host disease and acute graft-vs.-host disease, while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn's disease, use of ECP in paediatric patients, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.

European dermatology forum - updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - part 1.

BACKGROUND: Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well-known documented conditions such as graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines are divided in two parts: PART I covers cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, chronic graft-versus-host disease and acute graft-versus-host disease while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn's disease, use of ECP in paediatrics practice, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.

A consensus-based practical and daily guide for the treatment of acne patients.

BACKGROUND: Many current guidelines provide detailed evidence-based recommendations for acne treatment. OBJECTIVE: To create consensus-based, simple, easy-to-use algorithms for clinical acne treatment in daily office-based practice and to provide checklists to assist in determining why a patient may not have responded to treatment and what action to take. METHODS: Existing treatment guidelines and consensus papers were reviewed. The information in them was extracted and simplified according to daily clinical practice needs using a consensus-based approach and based on the authors' clinical expertise. RESULTS: As outcomes, separate simple algorithms are presented for the treatment of predominant comedonal, predominant papulopustular and nodular/conglobate acne. Patients with predominant comedonal acne should initially be treated with a topical retinoid, azelaic acid or salicylic acid. Fixed combination topicals are recommended for patients with predominant papulopustular acne with treatment tailored according to the severity of disease. Treatment recommendations for nodular/conglobate acne include oral isotretinoin or fixed combinations plus oral antibiotics in men, and these options may be supplemented with oral anti-androgenic hormonal therapy in women. Further decisions regarding treatment responses should be evaluated 8 weeks after treatment initiation in patients with predominant comedonal or papulopustular acne and 12 weeks after in those with nodular/conglobate acne. Maintenance therapy with a topical retinoid or azelaic acid should be commenced once a patient is clear or almost clear of their acne to prevent the disease from recurring. The principal explanations for lack of treatment response fall into 5 main categories: disease progression, non-drug-related reasons, drug-related reasons, poor adherence, and adverse events. CONCLUSION: This practical guide provides dermatologists with treatment algorithms adapted to different clinical features of acne which are simple and easy to use in daily clinical practice. The checklists to establish the causes for a lack of treatment response and subsequent action to take will facilitate successful acne management.

Pharmacokinetic profile of methotrexate in psoriatic skin via the oral or subcutaneous route using dermal microdialysis showing higher methotrexate bioavailability in psoriasis plaques than in non-lesional skin.

AIMS: The aim of this pilot study was to use microdialysis to evaluate levels of Methotrexate (MTX) directly in psoriatic skin following oral or subcutaneous administration of MTX to elaborate a complete pharmacokinetic profile within the dermal skin. METHODS: Six patients with chronic plaque psoriasis on the arm undergoing treatment with MTX were included in a mono-centre clinical trial. Patients were under treatment with p.o. or s.c. MTX (7.5 and 15 mg) for at least 3 months. Interstitial fluid was collected ex vivo via dermal microdialysis from lesional or non-lesional skin and via intravenous microdialysis as well as blood serum every hour up to 10 h after methotrexate administration every hour. MTX was analysed via liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) of methotrexate from peripheral blood was up to four times higher than from microdiaylsis, which detection of free unbound MTX. The AUC from dialysates in psoriatic lesional skin was higher than in non-lesional psoriatic skin, and the AUC levels from i.v. microdialysis were non-significantly higher than those from lesional psoriatic skin. Pharmacokinetic profiles were individually quite different and did not primarily depend on the dose or the means (p.o. vs. s.c.) in which it was administered. CONCLUSION: Dermal microdialysis is a valid tool to evaluate levels of methotrexate in the skin of psoriasis patients. Drug levels and bioavailability of methotrexate were higher in lesional than non-lesional psoriatic skin. The individual AUC of MTX was not primarily dependent on the route or dose of administration.

Expression of epidermal stem cell markers in skin and adnexal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal stem cells are multipotent cells that maintain the skin epidermis. Potential markers for stem cells have been identified in mammalian skin from mouse experiments; however, it is unclear if stem cells also contribute to tumour formation in human skin. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the expression of potential stem cell markers, such as leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor (Lgr) 5, Lgr6, leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domain protein 1 (Lrig1) and cytokeratin 15 (CK15) in basal cell carcinomas and tumours of the skin appendages. METHODS: We tested 45 human basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), including superficial, nodular, adenoid, infiltrating and sclerosing types, and 38 human tumours of skin appendages, including 13 sebaceous adenomas and carcinomas, 20 eccrine sweat gland tumours and five pilomatricomas, for the expression of hair follicle stem cell markers such as Lgr5, Lrig1, CK15, ß-catenin and SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9 (SOX9), and compared these findings with those of healthy age-matched human epidermis. RESULTS: We detected the expression of stem cell markers in all tumours tested. Regarding Lgr5, Lrig1, CK15 and SOX9, expression seemed to be lower in more aggressive tumour types, such as in the most advanced parts of infiltrating BCC, in sebaceous carcinoma and late-stage porocarcinoma, compared with less aggressive superficial or nodular BCC or early-stage porocarcinoma and sebaceous gland tumours. In aggressive, sclerosing BCC, Lrig1 and Lgr5 were downregulated but CK15, SOX9 and nuclear ß-catenin were upregulated. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of potential stem cell markers of the epidermis and hair follicles was observed in skin tumours of appendages and BCCs. However, during tumour progression, many of these markers seemed to be downregulated.

Understanding innate immunity and inflammation in acne: implications for management.

Acne has long been understood to have a complex physiological basis involving several main factors: hormonally-stimulated sebum production, abnormal keratinization of the pilosebaceous duct, and an inflammatory immune response to Propionibacterium acnes. Recent studies at the molecular and cellular level have begun clarifying how all of these factors interact, and the role of the innate immune system is better appreciated. Inflammation has been demonstrated in all acne lesions - the preclinical microcomedo, comedones, inflammatory lesions, 'post-inflammatory' erythema or hyperpigmentation, and scarring. Inflammation localized to the pilosebaceous unit can be considered the defining feature of acne and should be addressed via multiple therapeutic pathways. Clinicians tend to think oral antibiotics should be used to 'calm' inflammatory acne, but there is good evidence showing that topical retinoids also have anti-inflammatory properties as a class effect. For best therapeutic outcomes, most patients with acne should be treated first line with a topical retinoid plus an antimicrobial agent, as has been demonstrated in thousands of patients involved in clinical trials and recommended by the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne for more than a decade. Moving away from reliance on antibiotic therapy for acne is particularly important in an era of worsening antimicrobial resistance and worldwide calls to reduce antibiotic use. Improved understanding about the role of P. acnes and the innate immune system in acne should help clinicians in designing efficacious treatment strategies.

Safety and efficacy of adapalene 0.1% / benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in the long-term treatment of predominantly moderate acne with or without concomitant medication - results from the non-interventional cohort study ELANG.

BACKGROUND: Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease requiring long-term treatment. The fixed-dose combination adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% (adapalene-BPO) is indicated for the once-daily topical treatment of Acne vulgaris when comedones, papules and pustules are present. OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of this non-interventional study were to assess long-term efficacy and safety of adapalene-BPO in moderate to severe acne with and without concomitant medication. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe acne received adapalene-BPO alone or in combination with concomitant medication over a course of 9 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was changes in acne severity according to the Leeds Revised Acne Grading System; secondary endpoints included treatment success assessed by the patient and safety. RESULTS: In total, 5131 patients were eligible for efficacy and 5141 for safety evaluation. The majority of patients (78.8%) received adapalene-BPO alone. About 21.2% received adapalene-BPO in combination with another agent, mostly topical antibiotics (8.8%) or systemic antibiotics (8.7%). Mean (±SD) acne severity improved from 5.6 ± 1.5 at baseline to 3.3 ± 1.9 at month 3, and further to 1.9 ± 1.9 at month 9 (both P < 0.0001). The degree of improvement correlated significantly with the severity at baseline. After 3 and 9 months of treatment, the facial skin was cleared completely (no more visible acne lesions) in 420 (8.2%) and 1326 patients (25.8%), respectively. A therapeutic effect was noted by the patients after a median time of 3 weeks (range: from 1 day to 12 weeks). No serious adverse events were reported. Facial skin irritations, mostly mild to moderate, occurred in 49.5% of patients and led to discontinuation in only 1.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: In consistence with previous clinical findings, the use of adapalene-BPO in daily practice routine is safe and effective in the long-term management of patients with moderate to severe acne.

Effect of adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% topical gel on quality of life and treatment adherence during long-term application in patients with predominantly moderate acne with or without concomitant medication - additional results from the non-interventional cohort study ELANG.

BACKGROUND: In addition to physical long-lasting effects such as permanent scarring and disfigurement, acne has acute and long-term psychosocial effects that affect the individual's quality of life. As with other chronic diseases, treatment success is often compromised by poor adherence. OBJECTIVE: Two main objectives of this non-interventional study were to assess the long-term effect of the fixed-dose combination adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% (adapalene-BPO gel) on quality of life and treatment adherence. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe facial acne receiving adapalene-BPO alone or in combination with other drugs were enrolled in this non-interventional study. Data were documented at baseline and after 3 and 9 months of adapalene-BPO treatment. The secondary outcomes reported here include quality of life determined by the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI), treatment adherence assessed by the ECOB (Elaboration d'un outil d'evaluation de l'observance des traitements medicamenteux) questionnaire, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: In total, 5131 patients were included in the efficacy evaluation. After 9 months, mean (±SD) quality of life (CADI) improved significantly from 5.9 ± 3.0 to 2.4 ± 2.7 (P < 0.0001). Patients with more severe acne at baseline tended to achieve a greater improvement in quality of life. Long-term adherence was found to be good in 83.9% of patients. Adherence had a significant effect on efficacy and quality of life (P < 0.0001 respectively). The vast majority of patients (92.1%) reported subjective improvement at the interim analysis. Accordingly, most patients (84.8%) were satisfied or very satisfied with adapalene-BPO by the end of the observation period. CONCLUSION: The clinical improvement of the disease led to an increase in quality of life among acne patients. The treatment success may be a motivation factor for patients to stay adherent over the long-term treatment course, indicating the qualification of adapalene-BPO topical gel as an appropriate medication also in the long-term usage.

From new findings in acne pathogenesis to new approaches in treatment.

Acne is a chronic disease of the pilosebaceous unit which is most common during adolescence. Four factors are believed to play a key role in the development of acne lesions: excess sebum production, disturbed keratinization within the follicle, colonization of the pilosebaceous duct by Propionibacterium acnes, and the release of inflammatory mediators into the skin. Consequently, in order to effectively and rapidly reduce acne lesions, treatments need to address as many of these underlying factors as possible. Currently, about half of patients have poor adherence to acne treatments. To overcome this limitation, treatments need to be developed which are well tolerated by patients, and easy for them to use, handle and apply. Topical monotherapies for acne such as retinoids and antimicrobials by themselves have a restricted range of actions against the pathogenic factors of acne. Instead, the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne Group recommends combination therapy with a topical retinoid and an antimicrobial agent as the preferred approach for almost all acne patients. The principal advantage of such combinations is that they target more of the underlying pathogenic factors of acne than individual monotherapies and this results in faster and more complete clearing of acne lesions. Fixed-dose combinations are also more convenient than applying two medications separately, which leads to improved adherence with the regimen. By normalizing desquamation, the retinoid component of these combinations allows entry of the antimicrobial agent into the pilosebaceous unit resulting in faster clearance of P. acnes. In conclusion, topical retinoid/antimicrobial fixed-dose combinations represent a rational approach for the treatment of acne. They should be considered as the cornerstone of acne management and should be used much more in the future.

Selective regional perfusion of the bilateral external carotid arteries with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and melphalan to treat metastatic malignant melanoma of the scalp.

We present the case of a 79-year-old patient with extensive metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) of the scalp. Cutaneous MM of the head and neck often presents a therapeutic challenge. Radical surgical procedures and conventional chemotherapy are often unfeasible and contraindicated because of the difficult anatomy, the extent of the tumour process, and systemic toxicity. In our patient, selective intra-arterial perfusion with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and melphalan was performed after catheterization of both bilateral external carotid arteries with an arterial port system. PLD 4.5 mg/m(2) and melphalan (1.35 mg/m(2), followed by 2.7 mg/m(2) after reaching tolerance) were given as short-term infusions at two-weekly intervals into the right and left external carotid arteries, respectively. After eight applications with tolerable side-effects, no MM cells were detected; however, infiltrates of lymphocytes and melanophages were seen. This case suggests that intra-arterial chemotherapy may be a useful treatment for metastatic melanoma of the scalp.

Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide, a unique fixed-dose combination topical gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a transatlantic, randomized, double-blind, controlled study in 1670 patients.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy utilizing agents with complementary mechanisms of action is recommended by acne guidelines to help simultaneously target multiple pathogenic factors. A unique, topical, fixed-dose combination gel with adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5% has recently been developed for the once-daily treatment of acne. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1%-BPO 2.5% fixed-dose combination gel (adapalene-BPO) relative to adapalene 0.1% monotherapy (adapalene), BPO 2.5% monotherapy (BPO), and the gel vehicle (vehicle) in a large population for the treatment of acne vulgaris. METHODS: In total, 1670 subjects were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive adapalene-BPO, adapalene, BPO or vehicle for 12 weeks (1 : 1 : 1 : 1 randomization). Evaluations included success rate (subjects 'clear' or 'almost clear'), percentage change in lesion count from baseline, cutaneous tolerability and adverse events. RESULTS: Adapalene-BPO was significantly more effective than corresponding monotherapies, with significant differences in percentage lesion count change observed as early as 1 week. Cutaneous tolerability profile was similar to adapalene. Adverse events were more frequent with the combination therapy (mainly due to an increase in mild-to-moderate dry skin), occurred early in the study, and were transient. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene-BPO provides significantly greater and synergistic efficacy and a faster onset of action with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of acne vulgaris when compared with the corresponding vehicle and the adapalene and BPO monotherapies.

A review of the European Directive for prescribing systemic isotretinoin for acne vulgaris.

Since the introduction of generic oral isotretinoin there have been discussions around harmonizing the summary of product characteristics of each formulation. As a result of these discussions, a European Directive concerned with the prescribing of oral isotretinoin has been introduced and the FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) has recently implemented new regulations. The aims of this article are to summarize the history of the processes involved, outline the new recommendations and discuss the impact of these changes in clinical practice.