Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Oral Health ; 22(1): 214, 2022 05 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641977

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This in vitro study aims to compare rotary files (Fanta and Zuanba) with manual K files according to the amount of dentin removed and canal transportation in primary mandibular second molars by CBCT images. METHODS: This experimental study was conducted on 60 extracted human second primary molars. That were divided into three groups according to root canal preparation group "I" instrumented with manual K-files, group "II" instrumented with rotary Fanta files, and group "III" instrumented with rotary Zuanba files. After root canal preparation, teeth were scanned before and after mechanical preparation with CBCT scanner. Then the amount of dentin removed was determined at three levels, including the coronal, middle and apical levels. Data were statically analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULT: No statistically significant difference in the amount of dentin removed were noted between the manual and the rotary groups at the coronal and apical RC levels (P = 0.420) and (P = 0.819) respectively but significant difference was noted at the middle third (P = 0.043). Regarding RC transportation, no significant difference was noted among the three groups with the exception of the apical RC level (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Although no significant differences were noted between rotary and manual files, the rotary files showed better performance.


Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar , Preparo de Canal Radicular , Criança , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Instrumentos Odontológicos/efeitos adversos , Cavidade Pulpar/diagnóstico por imagem , Dentina/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(8): 4915-4925, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483869

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The current study was carried out to (1) evaluate premixed bioceramic (BC) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) sealing properties in a laboratory and (2) compare the performance of these two materials in repairing an immediate iatrogenic furcal perforation of primary molars both clinically and radiographically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro sections including eighty mandibular second primary molars were sorted into 4 equal groups: (1) an intact furcation area group, (2) an artificial perforation group (unrepaired), (3) an artificial perforation group repaired with MTA, and (4) an artificial perforation group repaired with premixed BC. The dye extraction method was used to assess the sealing ability of the material. Clinically, the study was designed as an equivalent parallel randomized controlled trial. Seventy-six mandibular second primary molars with immediate furcal perforation were sealed with MTA and premixed BC. Teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Although the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.058), the premixed BC group had better sealing ability than the MTA group [mean difference = 0.020; 95% CI (-0.001, 0.040)]. Clinically and radiographically, the two materials had an equivalent success rate in the first 3 months [ARR = 0.05; 95% CI (-0.07, 0.17)] but inequivalent success rates at 6 and 12 months with premixed BC performing better than MTA. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings confirm that premixed BC is a promising material that can be used to repair a furcal perforation of primary molars. Premixed BC has better sealing properties and better performance at the clinical and radiographic levels than MTA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: (1) Accidental furcal perforation in primary molars is one of the worst problems that results in diminishing the lifetime expectancy of primary teeth if not properly treated. Though new BC repair materials have been introduced to enhance healing and tissue inductive properties, there is an obvious shortage in clinical trials covering this area. The present study is a premier study that assesses a recently introduced premixed BC material in the furcal perforation of primary teeth and compares its outcomes with those of the widely used MTA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov PRS reference #NCT04137861.


Assuntos
Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular , Compostos de Alumínio/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Dente Molar/diagnóstico por imagem , Dente Molar/cirurgia , Óxidos/uso terapêutico , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Silicatos/uso terapêutico , Dente Decíduo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA