Yard Work and Gardening: A Pastime with Potential for Craniofacial Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Yard and garden tools are increasingly used by Americans. Despite the growing popularity of gardening as a leisure activity, the rate of injury associated with these tools remains remarkedly high. Previous research has highlighted the risks associated with improper handling of tools and associated potential long-term consequences. This retrospective study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the craniofacial injuries caused by yard and garden equipment. The investigation will emphasize the need for improved safety measures and regulations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Publicly available data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database were utilized to identify craniofacial injuries related to yard and garden tool handling during a 10-year period (2013-2022). Study population included patients aged 1 to 85+ years who visited emergency departments secondary to these injuries. Data analysis involved queries for specific products and diagnostic codes related to craniofacial injuries. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 588,384 craniofacial injuries associated with yard and garden tools were recorded, averaging 58,838 injuries annually. Men accounted for a significantly higher proportion of injuries (69.2%) compared to women (30.8%). Elderly population, particularly those aged 60 to 64 years, experienced the highest incidence of craniofacial injuries. Cranium was the most commonly affected anatomical location, comprising 34% of all injuries. Lacerations and contusions were the most frequent injury diagnoses. Greenhouse or gardening supplies and lawnmowers are the most common causative agents, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study highlights the persistent incidence of craniofacial injuries associated with yard and garden tool handling emphasizing the need for standardized safety regulations and guidelines. Sociological and demographic factors, such as differences in gardening habits and behavioral patterns between genders, contribute to the observed disparities in injury rates. Understanding the underlying factors contributing to these craniofacial injuries is crucial to promoting safer practices and reducing the overall burden associated with yard and garden tools.

Epidemiology of Craniofacial Injuries from Exercise and Weightlifting: A 10-Year Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Exercise is the cornerstone of a healthy lifestyle. It is recognized for enhancing cardiovascular health and bolstering mental well-being. While the fitness industry grows, the incidence of exercise-related injuries continues to rise. This study examines craniofacial injuries resulting from exercise and weightlifting over the past decade. The goal is to uncover trends, demographics, diagnoses, and patient dispositions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review was conducted using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database. Emergency department visits for craniofacial injuries associated with exercise and weightlifting between 2013 and 2022 were analyzed. One-sample t-tests and the Mann-Kendall test were used to evaluate injury prevalence and significant trends. RESULTS: Over the past decade, 582,972 craniofacial injuries related to exercise and weightlifting were documented. Men accounted for 55.7% of cases. Annual incidence increased by 32.7% between 2013 and 2022. It was statistically significant. Adolescents aged 15 to 19 displayed the highest injury rate. Head injuries were most common (45%), followed by face (26%), neck (21%), mouth (4%), eye (3%), and ear (1%). Diagnoses included internal injury (25.2%), laceration (24.8%), contusions/abrasions (12.9%), and strain/sprain (11.9%). Hospitalization was required for only 8.5% of patients. DISCUSSION: This study elucidates the need for injury prevention strategies. Vulnerable subgroups such as males, adolescents, and the elderly demand targeted prevention efforts. Future research should explore specific mechanisms of injury to identify high-risk exercise. This study promotes the need for safe exercise practices and increases awareness of craniofacial injury risks associated with physical activity.

Craniofacial Injuries in Swimming and Water Sports: Implications for Prevention.

INTRODUCTION: Water-related recreational activities, including swimming and diving, are widespread. However, they carry a significant risk of craniofacial injuries. Despite the popularity of these activities, comprehensive data on injuries beyond drowning remain scant. This study addresses this gap by providing valuable epidemiological insight into the nature, prevalence, and demographic patterns of craniofacial injuries related to water sports activities. METHODS: The authors queried the NEISS database for craniofacial injuries related to swimming, diving, and water sports from 2013 to 2022. Data were analyzed for demographics, anatomic locations of injuries, and the activities leading to these injuries. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2022, a total of 952,111 craniofacial injuries were associated with swimming and water sports. Of these, 510,706 (53.6%) were male patients, and 441,405 (46.4%) were female. This indicates that males were 1.16 times more likely to sustain such injuries. The age groups most affected were 0 to 9 and 10 to 19 years. Anatomic locations impacted were as follows: ears (58.1%), head (16.8%), face (13.9%), neck (4.8%), eyeballs (4.4%), and mouth (2%). Leading causes were identified as swimming and water sports activities (66.5%), swimming pools and equipment (28.2%), diving or diving boards (4.7%), and scuba diving (0.5%). Notably, 89.2% of patients with diving-related injuries and 99.1% with swimming-related injuries were not admitted to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers critical epidemiological data to supplement targeted prevention strategies and resource allocation in managing craniofacial injuries associated with water activities. The findings highlight the urgent need for specialized care and serve as a foundation for future preventive initiatives.

Melatonin Exerts Prominent, Differential Epidermal and Dermal Anti-Aging Properties in Aged Human Eyelid Skin Ex Vivo.

Human skin aging is associated with functional deterioration on multiple levels of physiology, necessitating the development of effective skin senotherapeutics. The well-tolerated neurohormone melatonin unfolds anti-aging properties in vitro and in vivo, but it remains unclear whether these effects translate to aged human skin ex vivo. We tested this in organ-cultured, full-thickness human eyelid skin (5-6 donors; 49-77 years) by adding melatonin to the culture medium, followed by the assessment of core aging biomarkers via quantitative immunohistochemistry. Over 6 days, 200 µM melatonin significantly downregulated the intraepidermal activity of the aging-promoting mTORC1 pathway (as visualized by reduced S6 phosphorylation) and MMP-1 protein expression in the epidermis compared to vehicle-treated control skin. Conversely, the transmembrane collagen 17A1, a key stem cell niche matrix molecule that declines with aging, and mitochondrial markers (e.g., TFAM, MTCO-1, and VDAC/porin) were significantly upregulated. Interestingly, 100 µM melatonin also significantly increased the epidermal expression of VEGF-A protein, which is required and sufficient for inducing human skin rejuvenation. In aged human dermis, melatonin significantly increased fibrillin-1 protein expression and improved fibrillin structural organization, indicating an improved collagen and elastic fiber network. In contrast, other key aging biomarkers (SIRT-1, lamin-B1, p16INK4, collagen I) remained unchanged. This ex vivo study provides proof of principle that melatonin indeed exerts long-suspected but never conclusively demonstrated and surprisingly differential anti-aging effects in aged human epidermis and dermis.

Jumping Trends In Trampoline-Related Craniofacial Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: In 1990, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended the sale of trampolines cease in the United States. The risk of traumatic injury is well-documented, yet trampolines remain a growing source of recreation. Trampoline parks, in particular, are becoming a common entertainment attraction that can result in serious injury. There is currently a paucity of literature characterizing craniofacial injuries from trampoline use and plans to prevent these injuries. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was conducted to analyze emergency department visits for trampoline-related craniofacial injuries in 1 to 20 year olds between 2013 and 2022. RESULTS: An estimated 206,866 trampoline-related craniofacial injuries occurred. Males suffered injuries 1.67 times more frequently than females. Injured sites included the head (41.0%), face (23.2%), neck (20.4%), mouth (11.9%), eyeball (2.0%), and ear (1.4%). The most common diagnoses were lacerations (28.9%), internal injuries (23.2%), strain/sprains (14.8%), contusions/abrasions (13.0%), and concussions (8.7%). Head internal injuries and facial lacerations significantly increased over the observed time period. DISCUSSION: Trampolines are a rising source of craniofacial trauma for America's youth. Children between 3 and 11 years old were disproportionately affected. Regulation over trampoline safety features remains limited in the United States. Future studies should aim to characterize the mechanisms of these injuries for the development of targeted safety measures.