Liver toxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy including efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in a cohort of HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of grade 3 or 4 transaminase elevations (TEs) in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients who started a three-antiretroviral drug regimen including efavirenz or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) and the influence of pre-existing significant hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All pre-treated or treatment-naive HIV/HCV co-infected patients who started an antiretroviral regimen including two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors along with efavirenz or a PI/r in seven Spanish centres from January 2007 to December 2009 were included in this prospective study. RESULTS: Of 262 patients included in this study, 76 (29%) individuals began antiretroviral therapy (ART) including efavirenz and 186 (71%) a PI/r-based combination. The median (interquartile) follow-up was 14.0 (6.2-23.7) months. A total of 20 (7.6%) patients presented grade 3-4 TEs. Four (1.5%) subjects discontinued ART due to this adverse event. Grade 3-4 TEs were observed in 5 (6.6%) subjects receiving efavirenz and 15 (8.1%) treated with PI/r (P = 0.681). Three (6.5%) patients in the efavirenz group with significant fibrosis developed grade 3-4 TEs versus 2 (8.7%) without pre-existing significant fibrosis (P = 0.743). In the PI/r group, the corresponding figures were 10 (8.8%) and 5 (9.3%), respectively (P = 0.931). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of grade 3-4 TEs associated with efavirenz-based ART combinations under clinical practice conditions is low and similar to that found in patients receiving PI/r currently used in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. The baseline fibrosis stage does not have an impact on the development of TEs caused by these antiretroviral drugs in this population.

Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV and hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients with advanced immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients with severe immunodeficiency in a clinical cohort. BACKGROUND. A total of 542 HIV-infected patients receiving treatment with pegylated IFN plus RBV from June 2001 through April 2007 were included in this study. The outcome variables were sustained virologic response (SVR) rate and the emergence of AIDS-defining events during HCV infection therapy. SVR rates among patients with a CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3). The association between SVR and potential predictors was analyzed. RESULTS: Ten (26%) of 39 individuals with a baseline CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) and 198 (39%) of 503 with baseline CD4 cell counts >or=250 CD4 cells/mm(3) achieved SVR (P = .09). In a nested case-control study with populations matched at a 1:2 ratio, the SVR rate was 26% in the CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) group and 32% in the CD4 cell count >250 cells/mm(3) group (P = .5). Baseline CD4 cell count (250 cells/mm(3) vs >250 cells/mm(3)) was not associated with SVR in the multivariate analysis. Two (5%) individuals in the CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) group experienced opportunistic events during follow-up. In the CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) group, severe hematological toxicity and pegylated IFN or RBV dosage reductions occurred in 16 (41%) and 12 (31%) patients, respectively. In the CD4 cell count >250 cells/mm(3) group, severe hematological toxicity and pegylated IFN or RBV dosage reductions occurred in 29% (P = .1) and 20% (P = .1) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of pegylated IFN plus RBV in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients with advanced immunosuppression is substantial and not significantly different to that observed in the overall coinfected population. HCV therapy is generally safe in the population of coinfected patients with advanced immunosuppression.

Fast fibrosis progression between repeated liver biopsies in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus.

UNLABELLED: A few studies have assessed the observed fibrosis progression between serial liver biopsies (LB) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) / hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. Approximately half of the patients progressed at least one fibrosis stage over a short period of time. The risk factors for this fast progression need clarification. Because of this, we evaluated the observed fibrosis progression rates of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients and the risk factors for accelerated progression. Overall, 135 HIV-infected patients with positive serum HCV RNA, without other possible causes of liver disease, who underwent two LB, separated at least by 1 year, were included in this retrospective cohort study. The median (Q1-Q3) time between both LBs was 3.3 (2.0-5.2) years. Patients showed the following changes in fibrosis stage: regression >or =1 stage: 23 (17%), no change: 52 (39%), progression 1 stage: 38 (28%), and progression > or =2 stages: 22 (16%). Seventeen (13%) patients had cirrhosis in the second biopsy. Factors independently associated with progression > or =1 stage were undetectable plasma HIV RNA during the follow-up (relative risk [RR] [95% confidence interval, 95% CI] 0.61 [0.39-0.93], P = 0.03), moderate-to-severe lobular necroinflammation (1.77 [1.16-2.7], P = 0.009), time between biopsies (1.11 [1.08-1.2], P = 0.01), and end of treatment response to anti-HCV therapy (0.41 [0.19-0.88], P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Fibrosis progresses with high frequency in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients over a period of time of 3 years. Absent-to-mild lobular necroinflammation at baseline, achievement of response with anti-HCV treatment, and effective antiretroviral therapy are associated with slower fibrosis progression.

Eficacia y seguridad de asociar ezetimiba a dosis bajas de atorvastatina en la hipercolesterolemia asociada al tratamiento antirretroviral en pacientes con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe to low-doses atorvastatin for highly active antiretroviral therapy-related hypercholesterolaemia

Estudio prospectivo, abierto, de pacientes con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) con dislipemia asociada al tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) para analizar la eficacia y la seguridad de la ezetimiba junto a dosis bajas de atorvastatina en pacientes que no alcanzan el objetivo de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL) con atorvastatina. Se analizaron las modificaciones en el perfil lipídico, riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) a 10 años (ecuación de Framingham), parámetros inmunovirológicos y concentraciones de creatincinasa y transaminasa glutámico pirúvica a las 24 semanas de añadir ezetimiba al tratamiento. Se incluyeron a 27 pacientes, 13 (48%) alcanzaron el objetivo de cLDL y hubo una reducción del colesterol total, cLDL y del porcentaje de pacientes con un RCV a 10 años > 10%. El recuento de linfocitos CD4 aumentó y todos mantuvieron la carga viral del VIH indetectable. No se observaron efectos adversos. El uso de ezetimiba junto a dosis bajas de atorvastatina es eficaz y seguro para el tratamiento de la hipercolesterolemia asociada al TAR (AU)

Prospective, open-label study of HIV-patients with HAART-related dyslipidaemia to analyse the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin in HIV-patients on HAART who do not reach LDL-C goals with atorvastatin. Changes in plasma levels of lipids, cardiovascular risk (CVR) at 10 years (Frahmingam equation), immunovirological parameters, CK and ALT levels were analysed. Twenty seven patients were included, thirteen (48%) achieved LDL-C goals, and a reduction was observed in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and the percentage of patients with a 10 year CVR > 10%. mean CD4 cells count increased, and all patients maintained undetectable HIV viral load. No adverse events were observed. Adding ezetimibe to low-dose atorvastatin is safe and effective for HAART-related hypercholesterolaemia (AU)

Liver stiffness as a predictor of esophageal varices requiring therapy in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Liver stiffness (LS) measured by transient elastometry is associated with portal pressure in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-monoinfected patients and could predict the presence of esophageal varices in these subjects. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of LS to predict esophageal varices requiring preventive therapy for bleeding in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. METHODS: One hundred two HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis (LS >or= 14 kPa) underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) examination. The diagnostic performance of LS for esophageal varices requiring therapy (>or=F2 or F1 with red signs or Child-Pugh-Turcotte class C) was assessed by receiver operating receptor characteristic curves. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (19%) harbored varices requiring therapy. LS in patients with and without varices needing treatment was 48 (33-71) kPa and 32 (18-48) kPa (P = 0.004). The area under the receptor operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) of LS for the occurrence of varices that should be treated was 0.71 (0.60 to 0.82). There was no cutoff level of LS with good positive predictive value for the presence of varices requiring therapy, but LS of 21 kPa had a negative predictive value of 100%. Twenty-six percent of patients with LS measurement and UGE showed LS <21 KPa. CONCLUSIONS: LS is higher in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis who show esophageal varices requiring therapy than in those who do not. A cutoff value of LS of 21 kPa could be useful to identify patients with very low probability of varices at risk for bleeding. UGE for screening could be spared in these patients until LS increases above 21 kPa.

Insulin resistance is not a relevant predictor of sustained virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the possible influence of baseline insulin resistance in sustained virological response. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five consecutive individuals from a multicentric cohort of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who underwent therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin were included. The main outcome variable was sustained virological response, defined as undetectable plasma HCV RNA at week 24 after the end of the therapy. Insulin resistance was determined using the HOMA method. RESULTS: Sustained virological response was achieved in 55 (36%) patients. Forty-two (38%) patients with a HOMA lower than 4 developed sustained virological response vs 13 (29%) of those with a HOMA above 4 (p=0.27). Analyses restricted to patients harbouring genotype 1 or 4 showed similar rates of sustained virological response among patients with a HOMA below and above 4 [19 (27%) vs 7 (24%); p=0.8]. In the multivariate analysis, genotype 3 [AOR 9.26; 95% CI 3.03-28.30; p<0.0001], a baseline HCV viral load below 600.000IU/mL [AOR 2.97; 95% CI 1.03-8.57; p=0.04] and baseline LDL cholesterol above 100mg/dL [AOR 6.62; 95% CI 1.97-22.19; p=0.002] were independently associated with sustained virological response. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin resistance is not a relevant predictor of sustained virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients receiving abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine as nucleoside analogue backbone.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infected patients receiving a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] backbone consisting of abacavir plus lamivudine with that observed in subjects who receive tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine. METHODS: A total of 256 subjects, enrolled in a cohort of 948 HIV-infected patients who received pegylated interferon and ribavirin from October 2001 to January 2006, were included in this study. All patients were taking one protease inhibitor or one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone during HCV therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in both backbone groups were compared. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 20 out of 70 (29%) individuals under abacavir and 83 out of 186 (45%) under tenofovir showed SVR (P = 0.02). N(t)RTI backbone containing tenofovir was an independent predictor of SVR in the multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), 2.6 (1.05-6.9); P = 0.03]. The association between abacavir use and lower SVR was chiefly seen in patients with plasma HCV-RNA load higher than 600 000 IU/mL and genotype 1 or 4. Among patients treated with ribavirin dose <13.2 mg/kg/day, 3 (20%) of those under abacavir versus 22 (52%) under tenofovir reached SVR (P = 0.03), whereas the rates were 31% and 38% (P = 0.4), respectively, in those receiving >/=13.2 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected patients who receive abacavir plus lamivudine respond worse to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin than those who are given tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone, especially in those receiving lower ribavirin doses.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin for retreatment of chronic HCV infection in HIV co-infected patients failing a previous standard interferon-based regimen.

BACKGROUND: Combination of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin is the standard treatment for HCV infection in HIV co-infected patients. However, data available on the efficacy of this therapy in co-infected patients who failed a former interferon-based regimen are limited. METHODS: We analysed the efficacy and safety of the Peg-IFN alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus ribavirin combination in a multicentre observational cohort study including 54 HCV/HIV co-infected patients who had failed to respond to or relapsed on interferon-based treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR), defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL 24 weeks after completion of therapy. RESULTS: By intention-to-treat analysis, 30% of the patients achieved an SVR. Viral eradication by genotype was 18.9% (7/37) genotype 1; 57.1% (8/14) genotype 3 and 33.3% (1/3) genotype 4. The only independent predictor of SVR was genotype 3 (odds ratio: 5.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-19.8). Fourteen (38%) patients with genotype 1 had undetectable viral load at week 48 of treatment. Nevertheless, 50% of them relapsed during the follow-up period. Severe adverse events or progression of HIV infection did not occur during the study; however, 39% of the patients required Peg-IFN dose reduction because of intolerance or haematological toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Combined Peg-IFN and ribavirin achieved a substantial rate of SVR in HCV/HIV co-infected patients who failed a prior standard interferon-based regimen. The decision to retreat any co-infected patient should be individual-based. More aggressive strategies may be necessary to avoid the high relapse rate observed among patients with genotype 1.

Baseline serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels predict response to hepatitis C virus therapy in HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients.

BACKGROUND: High levels of serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are associated with better response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in hepatitis C virus monoinfected patients. There are no data concerning this topic in HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients in whom lipid disorders are particularly common. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between baseline lipid levels and sustained virologic response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in coinfected patients. METHODS: A total of 260 HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients under treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin and who had a baseline serum lipid profile were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (24%) patients with genotypes 1-4 and 64 (63%) with genotypes 2-3 achieved sustained virologic response. Forty-nine (44%) patients with serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels 100 mg/dl or more showed sustained virologic response compared with 53 (36%) with lower values [adjusted odds ratio: 2.51; 95% confidence interval: 1.40-4.87; P = 0.003]. This association was independent of the remaining predictors of sustained virologic response which were genotypes 2-3, plasma hepatitis C virus RNA 600,000 IU/ml or less, exposure to at least 80% of the planned therapy and lack of concomitant antiretroviral therapy. The rate of sustained virologic response in patients with genotype 1 and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at least 100 mg/ml was 31% compared with 17% in those with lower values (adjusted odds ratio: 2.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-4.66; P = 0.040). The corresponding figures in subjects with genotypes 2-3 were 73 and 58% [2.71 (0.99-7.46); P = 0.054]. No other lipid was associated with response. CONCLUSION: Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels predict sustained virologic response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients. This might be used to improve the rate of sustained virologic response in this setting.

Influence of concomitant antiretroviral therapy on the rate of sustained virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in hepatitis C virus/HIV-coinfected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. METHODS: Three hundred and ten HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment, 258 of them with concurrent ART, were included in this retrospective multicentre study. The predictors of SVR were evaluated. RESULTS: SVR was shown by 114 (37%) subjects. HCV genotype 2 or 3, plasma HCV-RNA load lower than 600 000 IU/mL, an exposure to the therapy against HCV infection > or =80% of the planned dose and baseline CD4 cell counts higher than or equal to 300/mm(3) were predictors of SVR. Likewise, patients without ART and those receiving a combination including tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine plus a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) showed a higher SVR rate than the subjects who were on other ART strategies at baseline [44%, 44% and 29%, respectively; adjusted odd ratio (95% CI) for no ART = 1.96 (1.07-4.76), P = 0.025, and for ART including tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine plus a PI or a NNRTI = 2.08 (1.16-3.70), P = 0.014]. CONCLUSIONS: The ART strategy on starting therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a predictor of SVR in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Subjects without ART and those receiving combinations of a PI or a NNRTI with a nucleos(t)ide backbone of tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine respond better than those who receive other regimens.

The use of transient elastometry for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection.

BACKGROUND: Transient elastometry (TE) is accurate for detecting significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-monoinfected patients. However, this procedure has been insufficiently validated in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HCV coinfection. The purpose of this study was to validate reported cutoff values of TE that discriminate significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in HIV-HCV-coinfected subjects. METHODS: Liver stiffness measurements were obtained for 169 HIV-HCV-coinfected adult patients who had undergone a liver biopsy or who had received a nonhistologic diagnosis of cirrhosis within 12 months before or after a liver stiffness measurement. Patients had received no prior therapy for HCV infection. RESULTS: TE measurements ranged from 3.6 kPa to 75 kPa. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.93) for significant liver fibrosis and 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.99) for cirrhosis. To diagnose significant liver fibrosis, a cutoff value of 7.2 kPa was associated with a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 75%. Thirty-four patients (20%) were misclassified when this cutoff value was used. Thirteen (24%) of 54 patients with liver stiffness values <7.2 kPa had significant liver fibrosis detected by liver biopsy. To diagnose cirrhosis, a cutoff value of 14.6 kPa was associated with a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 94%. Thus, 13 patients (10%) had disease that was misclassified using this cutoff value. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the diagnostic accuracy of TE was high for detecting cirrhosis and good for diagnosis of significant liver fibrosis. However, the performance of TE was low for discriminating mild fibrosis from significant liver fibrosis, which might limit the applicability of this technique in clinical practice.

Rapid virological response at week 4 predicts response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical applicability of early viral kinetics at week 4 in predicting sustained virological response (SVR) of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is unclear. Our objective was to determine if rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4 of therapy with peg-IFN and RBV could predict SVR among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. METHODS: HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in whom an HCV viral load determination had been carried out at week 4 of therapy were included in the study. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of RVR (undetectable serum HCV RNA at 4 week) for SVR were calculated in the study population. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to determine the best cutoff of HCV RNA decrease to predict treatment failure. RESULTS: A total of 101 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were included. RVR and SVR were observed in 39 (39%) and in 49 (48%) individuals, respectively. Of patients with RVR, 37/39 patients achieved SVR (PPV: 95%), whereas 50/62 individuals without RVR did not show SVR (NPV: 81%). The highest NPV (96%) was reached by using a cutoff level of HCV RNA decrease of 0.6 log10. By applying this cutoff level, treatment could have been discontinued in 25 (25%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: An undetectable serum HCV RNA determination at week 4 of treatment with peg-IFN plus RBV is a reliable predictor of SVR in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. In addition, a decrease of HCV RNA less than 0.6 log10 at this point of treatment could identify an appreciable proportion of individuals who will fail to achieve SVR.

Clinical progression of hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy.

UNLABELLED: Little is known about the natural history of liver disease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected subjects under highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The objectives of this study were to obtain information about the mortality, the incidence of hepatic decompensations, and the predictors thereof in this population. In a multicenter cohort study, the time to the first hepatic decompensation and the survival of 1,011 antiretroviral naïve, HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who started HAART and who were followed prospectively were analyzed. After a median (Q1-Q3) follow-up of 5.3 (2.9-7.1) years, 59(5.83%) patients developed a hepatic decompensation and 69 (6.82%) died, 30 (43%) of them because of liver disease. The factors independently associated [HR (95% CI)] with the occurrence of hepatic decompensations were age older than 33 years [2.11 (1.18-3.78)], female sex [2.11 (1.07-4.15)], Centers for Disease Control stage C [2.14 (1.24-3.70)], a diagnosis of cirrhosis at baseline [10.86 (6.02-19.6)], CD4 cell gain lower than 100/mm3 [4.10 (2.18-7.69)] and less than 60% of the follow-up with undetectable HIV viral load [5.23 (2.5-10.93)]. Older age [2.97 (1.18-7.50)], lack of HCV therapy [11.32 (1.44-89.05)], hepatitis D virus coinfection [16.15 (2.45-106.48)], a diagnosis of cirrhosis at recruitment [13.69 (5.55-34.48)], hepatic encephalopathy [62.5 (21.27-200)] and lower CD4 cell gain [3.63 (1.45-9.09)] were associated with mortality due to liver failure. CONCLUSION: End-stage liver disease is the primary cause of death in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients under HAART. Higher increase of CD4 cell counts, lack of markers of serious liver disease and therapy against HCV are factors associated with better hepatic outcome.

Predictors of severe haematological toxicity secondary to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients.

BACKGROUND: Haematological adverse events related to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy could affect the patients' quality of life; however, the risk factors for severe haematological toxicity associated with this therapy in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV are unclear. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of severe haematological toxicity among HIV-HCV-coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN plus RBV. METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study included 237 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients on PEG-IFN plus RBV. Predictors of severe anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and overall haematological toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty (34%) individuals showed an episode of severe haematological toxicity. Severe anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 32 (13%), 42 (18%) and 26 (11%) patients, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, zidovudine use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-10; P = 0.001), baseline body weight < 65 kg (AOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5; P = 0.024), cirrhosis (AOR 5; 95% CI 1.6-16.6; P = 0.006), PEG-IFN-alpha2a (AOR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.6; P = 0.029) and pretreatment haemoglobin level < 14 g/dl (AOR 2.7; 95% CI 1.3-5.5; P = 0.005) were associated with any kind of severe haematological toxicity. Likewise, haemoglobin level < 13 g/dl, neutrophil counts < 2,500 cells/mm3 and platelet counts < 175,000 cells/mm3 were independent predictors of severe anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Zidovudine treatment, cirrhosis, baseline low body weight, use of PEG-IFN-alpha2a, and baseline haemoglobin level < 14 g/dl are predictors of overall severe haematological toxicity secondary to PEG-IFN plus RBV in HIV-infected individuals. Low pretreatment levels of each haematological series predict a significant decrease of their values during therapy.

Incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens among HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens among human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients with known stage of liver fibrosis. METHODS: All HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were monitored for a period of 12 months after starting nelfinavir-containing regimens and, with an available liver biopsy, were included in a retrospective study. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included in the study. Nine (10.9%) HIV/HCV-coinfected patients showed an episode of severe hepatotoxicity during the study period. Eight (9.8%) individuals showed grade 3 or 4 change in levels of serum alanine aminotransferase and one subject presented with an event of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Six (18.2%) of 33 patients with advanced liver fibrosis and three (6%) of 49 individuals without advanced liver fibrosis showed an episode of severe hepatotoxicity (P = 0.1). In the multivariate analysis, only nevirapine use during nelfinavir therapy [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 8.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-54.1; P = 0.01] was independently associated with risk of development of severe liver toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens is low among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with known stage of liver fibrosis. In addition, our findings show that concomitant nevirapine use is associated with an increased risk of severe hepatotoxicity in these subjects. Likewise, the proportion of severe liver toxicity tended to be higher in individuals with advanced liver fibrosis.

Survival and prognostic factors of HIV-infected patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: To find the survival and the predictors of death of HIV-infected patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD). DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study set in the infectious diseases units of four tertiary care public hospitals in Andalucía, Spain. From a multicentric cohort of 2664 HIV/HCV-co-infected patients, all consecutive patients with HCV-related cirrhosis who presented with the first hepatic decompensation from January 1997 to June 2004 were followed-up and 153 patients were included. The survival and the demographic, HIV-related and liver-related factors associated with death were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-five (62%) patients died during the follow-up. In 79 (85%) individuals, the cause of death was liver related. The median survival time was 13 months. Independent predictors of survival were Child score [hazard ratio (HR), 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.37; P = 0.001], CD4+ cell count at decompensation lower than 100 cells/microl (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.52-4.06; P < 0.001) and hepatic encephalopathy as the first hepatic decompensation (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.41-4.27; P = 0.001). HAART was prescribed to 101 (66%) patients. The cumulative probability of survival in patients under HAART was 60% at 1 year and 40% at 3 years, versus 38 and 18%, respectively, in patients not treated with HAART (P < 0.0001). The HR (95% CI) of death in patients on HAART was 0.5 (0.3-0.9), (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The survival of HIV/HCV-co-infected patients with ESLD is extremely poor. Immunosuppression and markers of severe liver disease predict liver-related mortality in these patients. HAART seems to be associated with a reduced liver-related mortality.

Incidence of and factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma among hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfected patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

We compared the incidence of and factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-monoinfected subjects and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-coinfected individuals, both with decompensated cirrhosis. In a retrospective study, a cohort of 180 individuals with HIV coinfection and 1037 HCV-monoinfected patients with decompensated HCV-related cirrhosis from eight centres in Spain were analyzed. HCC was found in 234 (23%) HCV-monoinfected subjects and in four (2%) HIV-coinfected subjects (p<0.001). At the time of the first hepatic decompensation, 188 (17%) and 4 (2%) (p<0.001) patients in the former and in the latter group, respectively, showed HCC. Fifty-four (11%) patients without HCC at baseline developed such a disease during follow-up. There were no incident cases among the HIV-coinfected population. The density of incidence (95% IC) of HCC in HIV/HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients was 0 (0-1.70) and 3.31 (2.70-4.64) cases per 100 person-years (p<0.001), respectively. Lack of HIV infection [adjusted odds risk (AOR) (95% IC)=16.7 (3.9-71.1)] and high alanine aminotransferase levels [AOR (95% IC)=2.5 (1.1-5)] were the only two independent predictors of the emergence of HCC. In the group of patients in whom the date of HCV infection could be estimated, the time elapsed until HCC diagnosis was shorter among HIV-coinfected subjects. The incidence of HCC in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis after the first hepatic decompensation is lower in HIV-coinfected patients. This is probably due to the fact that HIV infection shortens the survival of HCV-coinfected patients with end-stage liver disease to such an extent that HCC not had a chance to emerge.

Antiretroviral therapy based on protease inhibitors as a protective factor against liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Cohort studies have shown that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can improve liver-related mortality in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. A reduction in the accelerated liver fibrosis progression observed in HIV infection induced by HAART could explain these findings. A few studies have assessed the impact of HAART on liver fibrosis, but with contradictory results. Therefore, we evaluated the associations between the use of different antiretroviral drug classes and HAART combinations, and liver fibrosis in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C. Six hundred and eighty-three HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, who underwent a liver biopsy and who had not received anti-HCV treatment were included. Age at HCV infection < 23years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.3-0.9, P = 0.05) and protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART versus no use of HAART (AOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.9, P = 0.01) were negatively associated with advanced fibrosis (> or = F3). PI-based HAART versus no use of HAART (AOR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.7, P = 0.001) was negatively associated with fibrosis progression rate > or = 0.2 units/year and independently of age at HCV infection and CD4+ T-cell counts. Fifteen (17%) patients treated only with PIs and zidovudine plus lamivudine showed > or = F3, compared with 65 (37%) patients without HAART (P = 0.001). Forty (31%) patients on PI and stavudine plus lamivudine showed > or = F3 (P = 0.3, when compared with patients with no HAART). The use of PI-based HAART in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is associated with less severe fibrosis and slower progression of fibrosis. The nucleoside analogue backbone in a HAART regimen may influence this association.

HIV coinfection shortens the survival of patients with hepatitis C virus-related decompensated cirrhosis.

The impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection on the survival of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is unknown. Because HIV infection is no longer considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation in some countries, it has become a priority to address this topic. The objective of this study was to compare the survival of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HCV. In a retrospective cohort study, the survival of 1,037 HCV monoinfected and 180 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis after the first hepatic decompensation was analyzed. Of the group, 386 (37%) HCV-monoinfected and 100 (56%) HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects died during the follow-up. The median survival time of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients was 16 and 48 months, respectively (P < .001). The relative risk (95% CI) of death for HIV-infected patients was 2.26 (1.51-3.38). Other independent predictors of survival were age older than 63 years (2.25 [1.53-3.31]); Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B versus class A (1.95 [1.41-2.68]) and class C versus class A (2.78 [1.66-4.70]); hepatitis D virus infection (1.56 [1.12-4.77]); model for end-stage liver disease score, (1.05 [1.01-1-11]); more than one simultaneous decompensation (1.23 [1.12-3.33]); and the type of the first hepatic decompensation, with a poorer prognosis associated with encephalopathy compared with portal hypertensive gastrointestinal bleeding (2.03 [1.26-3.10]). In conclusion, HIV coinfection reduces considerably the survival of patients with HCV-related ESLD independently of other markers of poor prognosis. This fact must be taken into account to establish the adequate timing of liver transplantation in HIV-coinfected subjects.