Clinical coaching in primary care: Capable of improving control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

AIMS: Few clinical coaching studies are both endorsed by real cases and focused on reducing suboptimal diabetes control. We evaluated the effectiveness of coaching on improving type 2 diabetes goals after 3 years of implementation in primary care. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with follow up was conducted during 2008-2011. Coaching consisted of guiding family doctors to improve their clinical abilities, and it was conducted by a medical doctor trained in skill building, experiential learning, and goal setting. Effectiveness was assessed by means of fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin outcomes. The main analysis consisted of 1×3 and 2×3 repeated measures ANOVAs. RESULTS: A significant coaching×time interaction was observed, indicating that the difference in glucose between primary care units with and without coaching increased over time (Wilks' lambda multivariate test, P<0.0001). Coaching increased 1.4 times (95%CI 1.3, 1.5) the possibility of reaching the fasting glucose goal after controlling for baseline values. There was also a significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin (Bonferroni-corrected p-value for pairwise comparisons, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A correctible and even preventable contributing component in diabetes care corresponds to physicians' performance. After 3 years of implementation, coaching was found to be worth the effort to improve type 2 diabetes control in primary care.

Prediabetes, diabetes, and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although underlying mechanisms have been described to account for the association between prediabetes and diabetes with breast cancer, reported results have been inconsistent. We undertook this study to determine whether prediabetes and diabetes are risk factors for breast cancer in Mexican women with no family history of breast cancer in the mother, daughters, or sisters. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out during 2011-2013. "Case" referred to patients with a histopathological diagnosis of breast cancer (incident and primary cases) (n = 240); "controls" were those with a BI-RADS 1 or 2 mammography result (n = 406). Categorization of prediabetes and diabetes was based on self-reporting or fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin blood sampling results. Reproductive and sociodemographic data were collected by interview. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariate unconditional binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Prediabetes increased the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women (adjusted OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.10-3.96) as did diabetes (adjusted OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.55-5.26). A history of diabetes preceding breast cancer by ≥7 years and <7 years were both associated with an increased risk for breast cancer (adjusted OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.40-5.60 and 3.00, 95% CI 1.50-5.90, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in Mexico evaluating prediabetes and diabetes as breast cancer risk factors in women with no first-degree relatives with breast cancer. Our findings suggest that women with prediabetes and diabetes should be considered a more vulnerable population for early breast cancer detection.

Obesidad central única y combinada con sobrepeso/obesidad en preescolares mexicanos

La circunferencia de cintura (CC) constituye una herramienta útil para identificar niños con mayor riesgo de complicaciones relacionadas con grasa abdominal. Se determinó la magnitud de obesidad central, única y combinada con sobrepeso/obesidad en infantes 1-5 años de edad. También se identificaron valores percentilares suavizados de CC específicos para edad y sexo, y se compararon con datos disponibles de otros países. Se realizó un estudio transversal en niños de 8 guarderías en Monterrey, México (n=903; 431 niños y 472 niñas). Debido a que el riesgo por obesidad abdominal inicia con CC en percentil 75, se consideraron dos puntos de corte, percentil 75 y 90. Se definió sobrepeso con base en índice de masa corporal para edad y sexo en percentil 85-94; y obesidad, en percentil ≥95. El análisis consistió de prevalencias puntuales e intervalos de confianza de 95%. El software LMS Chart Maker Light se utilizó para suavizar los valores percentilares de CC. La media de edad de la población fue 2,7±1,0 años. Los mexicanos registraron diferencias de 1 cm de CC más que los afro-americanos; y hasta 4 cm menos que los méxico-norteamericanos. La combinación de obesidad central con CC percentil ≥75 con sobrepeso/obesidad, fue 25,1% (IC95% 22,3-28,0) y única 15,4% (IC95% 13,0-17,8). La prevalencia de obesidad abdominal única con CC percentil ≥90, fue de 4.4% (IC95% 3.0, 5.8). Las estancias infantiles representan una oportunidad para desafiar la obesidad central. La CC puede ser utilizada desde edad temprana para tamizaje y atención a niños con mayor riesgo cardiovascular.

Central: single and combined with overweight/ obesity in preeschool Mexican children. Waist circumference (WC) is a useful measure for identifying children at higher risk of complications related with abdominal fat. We determined the magnitude of central adiposity, single and combined with overweight and obesity in infants 1-5 years old. We also identified smoothed age-and sex-specific WC percentile values, which were compared with other countries available data. This was a cross-sectional study in children of 8 day care centers located in Monterrey, Mexico (n=903, 431 boys and 472 girls). Because the risk due to abdominal obesity begins at WC percentile ≥75, we considered two thresholds, percentile 75 y 90. Overweight was defined based on body mass index at percentile 85-94 for age and sex; and obesity, at percentile ≥95. Analysis consisted of point prevalence and 95% confidence intervals. The LMS Chart Maker Light software was used for smoothing WC percentile values. The study population mean age was 2.7±1.0 years. Mexican children’s WC was 1 cm above that of Afro-American; and it was up to 4 cm below that Mexican-American. Prevalence of central obesity with WC at percentile 75 combined with overweight/obesity was 25.1% (95%CI 22.3-28.0) and single, 15.4% (95CI% 13.0- 17.8). Prevalence of single abdominal obesity with WC at percentile ≥90 was 4.4% (IC95% 3.0, 5.8). Day care centers represent a key opportunity for defying central obesity. WC can be used since early age for screening and caring children at higher cardiovascular risk.

[Single central obesity and combined with overweight/obesity in preeschool Mexican children]. / Obesidad central única y combinada con sobrepesolobesidad en preescolares mexicanos.

Waist circumference (WC) is a useful measure for identifying children at higher risk of complications related with abdominal fat. We determined the magnitude of central adiposity, single and combined with overweight and obesity in infants 1-5 years old. We also identified smoothed age-and sex-specific WC percentile values, which were compared with other countries available data. This was a cross-sectional study in children of 8 day care centers located in Monterrey, Mexico (n = 903, 431 boys and 472 girls). Because the risk due to abdominal obesity begins at WC percentile > or = 75, we considered two thresholds, percentile 75 y 90. Overweight was defined based on body mass index at percentile 85-94 for age and sex; and obesity, at percentile > or = 95. Analysis consisted of point prevalence and 95% confidence intervals. The LMS Chart Maker Light software was used for smoothing WC percentile values. The study population mean age was 2.7 +/- 1.0 years. Mexican children's WC was 1 cm above that of Afro-American; and it was up to 4 cm below that Mexican-American. Prevalence of central obesity with WC at percentile 75 combined with overweight/obesity was 25.1% (95% CI 22.3-28.0) and single, 15.4% (95 CI% 13.0-17.8). Prevalence of single abdominal obesity with WC at percentile > or = 90 was 4.4% (IC 95% 3.0, 5.8). Day care centers represent a key opportunity for defying central obesity. WC can be used since early age for screening and caring children at higher cardiovascular risk.