A glimpse into relapsed refractory multiple myeloma treatment in real-world practice in Spain: the GeminiS study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incorporation of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in real-world (RW) practice for the treatment of patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in a setting with other treatment alternatives. METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, ambispective study of RRMM treated with or without a mAb. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were included. For the group treated without mAb, the median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) to relapse was 22.4 (17.8-27.0) months; partial response or better (≥PR) and complete response or better (≥CR) was observed in 74.1% and 24.1% of patients, respectively; and median time to first response in first relapse was 2.0 months and in second relapse was 2.5 months. For the group of patients treated with mAb in first or second relapse, the median PFS was 20.9 (95% CI, could not be evaluated) months; the ≥ PR and ≥ CR rates were 76,2% and 28.6%, respectively; and the median time to first response in first relapse was 1.2 month and in second relapse was 1.0 months. The safety profiles for the combinations were consistent with those expected. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of mAb in RW practice for the treatment of RRMM has shown good quality and speed of response with a similar safety profile shown in randomized clinical trials.

Subcutaneous bortezomib in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma nontransplant eligible: Retrospective evaluation.

Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone combination is one of the standards of care for nontransplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. However, bortezomib intravenous (twice weekly for 4 cycles then weekly for 5 cycles) results in ~13% of patients with grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy. Bortezomib subcutaneous (SQ) and weekly delivery, improves tolerability without impairment of efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SQ bortezomib-based combinations in nontransplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma in a real-world setting. A total of 135 patients (median age [range] = 76 [58-89], International Staging System-III = 54%, median follow-up = 14.8 months [1-40], Intensive group [twice weekly bortezomib] = 65%, Optimized group [weekly bortezomib] = 35%) were included and evaluable for safety, whereas 121 were evaluable for effectiveness. Overall response rate (95% CI) was 61% (53%, 71%) (complete response = 27%, very good partial response = 13%, and partial response = 21%) and median progression-free survival was 22.2 months (95% CI: 16.1-not reached). The 3-year overall survival was 75%. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (18%), neutropenia (17%), and anemia (11%). Peripheral neuropathy of any grade was observed in 44% of patients (2% with grade 3). Comparison between regimens (Intensive vs Optimized) showed similar overall response rate (57% vs 70%) and PFS (25 vs 19 months). A similar safety profile was observed between regimens. Thus, SQ bortezomib showed similar effectiveness and better tolerability as compared with results from intravenous bortezomib studies, and showing no differences either in effectiveness or safety in different bortezomib-based combinations.