Eficacia y seguridad de la combinación de dosis fija montelukast-desloratadina 10 mg/5 mg cápsula en adultos mexicanos con rinitis alérgica persistente: Estudio controlado, aleatorizado, doble ciego y multicéntrico / Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of montelukast-desloratadine 10 mg/5 mg capsule in Mexican adults with persistent allergic rhinitis: A double blind, randomized, controlled and multicenter study

Objetivo: El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de la combinación de dosis fija montelukast/desloratadina 10mg/5mg cápsula versus la combinación de montelukast/loratadina 10 mg/10 mg tableta en adultos con diagnóstico de rinitis alérgica persistente. Material y métodos: El presente fue un estudio clínico aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego, prospectivo, longitudinal, multicéntrico, con brazos paralelos. Sujetos con diag nóstico de rinitis alérgica persistente que cumplieran criterios de elegibilidad y firmaran consentimiento informado fueron enrolados para recibir uno de los dos tratamientos cada 24 horas vía oral durante 6 semanas. La eficacia se estableció mediante la evaluación clínica a través de escalas clínicas validadas en idioma español, siendo la variable primaria de eficacia la diferencia de puntuación del cuestionario SNOT-20 al final del tratamiento, mientras que la frecuencia y características de los eventos adversos fue considerada la variable de seguridad. Resultados: Se aleatorizaron 86 pacientes, 74 de ellos fueron analizados por protocolo. Los cuestionarios sobre síntomas de la enfermedad e indicadores de calidad de vida con ambos tratamientos mostraron que más del 90% de los pacientes no presentaron síntomas o solo fueron leves al final del estudio, por lo que ambos tratamientos me joraron significativamente (p < 0.05) la sintomatología de la enfermedad. Los eventos adversos presentados fueron leves a moderados. Conclusiones: El presente estudio demostró que la eficacia de montelukast/deslora tadina 10mg/5mg no es inferior al medicamento comparador. Por tanto, el tratamiento de prueba representa una alternativa eficaz y segura para el tratamiento de segunda línea de la rinitis alérgica persistente en pacientes que las monoterapias o primeras líneas de tratamiento no ofrecen mejoría clínicamente relevante.

Objective: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fixed dose combination of montelukast/desloratadine 10 mg/5 mg capsule versus the combination of montelukast/loratadine 10 mg/10 mg tablet in adults diagnosed with persistent allergic rhinitis. Materials and methods: The present study was a multicenter, controlled, prospective, longitudinal, randomized, double-blind clinical trial with parallel arms. Patients diagnosed with persistent allergic rhinitis who met eligibility criteria and signed informed consent were enrolled in the study to receive one of the two treatments every 24 hours orally for 6 weeks. Efficacy was established by clinical evaluation through clinical scales vali dated in Spanish, being the primary efficacy variable the difference in the score of the SNOT-20 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test) questionnaire at the end of treatment; and the frequency and characteristics of adverse events were considered the safety variable. Results: 86 patients were randomized, 74 of which were analyzed per protocol. Ques tionnaires about the symptoms of the disease and quality of life indicators with both treatments showed that more than 90% of patients had mild symptoms or no symptoms at all at the end of the study. So, both treatments significantly improved (p < 0.05) the symptoms of the disease. Adverse events were mild to moderate. Conclusions: The present study showed that the efficacy of montelukast/desloratadine 10 mg/5 mg is not inferior to the comparator. Therefore, the study treatment represents an effective and safe alternative for the second-line treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis in patients in whom monotherapies or first-line treatments don't offer clinically relevant improvement.

Comparación del efecto de omeprazol como monoterapia y su combinación con bicarbonato de sodio en el tratamiento de la pirosis moderada a severa: ensayo clínico controlado, aleatorizado y doble ciego / Comparison of the effect of omeprazole monotherapy and its combination with sodium bicarbonate in the treatment of moderate to severe heartburn: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial

Heartburn occurs in 75% of patients with digestive discomfort of any origin and is one of the main symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Treatment focuses on lifestyle modification and symptomatology management with various drugs; when heartburn is moderate to severe, a proton pump inhibitor is more suitable. Omeprazole (OMZ) combined with sodium bicarbonate (BC) has demonstrated significant and sustained suppression of acid secretion. The objective was to compare the effect of sequential OMZ/BC therapy compared to OMZ monotherapy for the improvement of heartburn in Mexican individuals. The study was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study including 277 subjects with moderate to severe heartburn. Patients received 7 days of OMZ/BC and 7 days of OMZ (OMZ/BC7) or 14 days of OMZ (OMZ14). The primary endpoint was defined as the change in the number of days a week that the patient has heartburn, it was evaluated at 14 days. Both treatments reduced time (days) with heartburn by less than 4 days (OMZ14 3.9 vs. 4.2 days OMZ/BC7), as well as duration, number of events and intensity of heartburn. The treatments improved the quality of life, and the control of the symptoms. The proportion of adverse events was lower with OMZ/BC. The non-inferiority of OMZ/BC7 with respect to OMZ14 was verified.

La pirosis se presenta en el 75% de los pacientes con molestias digestivas de cualquier origen y es uno de los principales síntomas de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. El tratamiento se enfoca en la modificación del estilo de vida y el manejo de la sintomatología con diversos fármacos; cuando la pirosis es moderada a severa, un inhibidor de la bomba de protones es más adecuado. El omeprazol (OMZ) combinado con bicarbonato de sodio (BC) ha demostrado supresión significativa y sostenida de la secreción ácida. El objetivo fue comparar el efecto de la terapia secuencial de OMZ/BC en comparación con el tratamiento continuo de OMZ para la mejoría de la pirosis en individuos mexicanos. Estudio clínico multicéntrico, doble ciego, controlado, aleatorizado que incluyó 277 sujetos con pirosis moderada a severa. Los pacientes recibieron 7 días de OMZ/BC y 7 días de OMZ (OMZ/BC7) o 14 días de OMZ (OMZ14). La variable primaria fue definida como el cambio del número de días a la semana que el paciente presenta pirosis, se evaluó a los 14 días. Ambos tratamientos redujeron los días con pirosis en menos 4 días (OMZ14 3,9 vs. 4,2 días OMZ/BC7), así como la duración, el número de eventos e intensidad de la pirosis. Los tratamientos mejoraron los indicadores de calidad de vida, y el control del padecimiento. La proporción de eventos adversos fue menor con OMZ/BC. Se comprobó la no-inferioridad de OMZ/BC7 respecto OMZ14.

Naproxen, paracetamol and pamabrom versus paracetamol, pyrilamine and pamabrom in primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. / Naproxeno, paracetamol y pamabrom versus paracetamol, pirilamina y pamabrom en dismenorrea primaria: estudio aleatorizado, doble ciego.

INTRODUCTION: Dysmenorrhea is caused by the discharge of prostaglandins into the uterine tissue; therefore, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the established initial therapy for dysmenorrhea. Dysmenorrhea therapy may include the administration of drug monotherapy or combination therapy. However, clinical scientific evidence on the efficacy of medications with two or three drugs combined is scarce or nonexistent. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of two oral fixed-dose combinations for the relief of the symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea among Mexican women. One of the combinations is widely used in Mexico (paracetamol, pyrilamine and pamabrom) and the selected comparison was a medication with naproxen sodium, paracetamol and pamabrom based on the pathophysiology of primary dysmenorrhea. METHODS: This was a single-centre, double blind, experimental, parallel group, randomized trial. Female patients with primary dysmenorrhea, older than 17 years and with pain intensity greater than 45 mm on a visual analogue scale, were included. The patients were then randomized to receive tablets with naproxen sodium, paracetamol and pamabrom or tablets with paracetamol, pyrilamine and pamabrom for one menstrual cycle. Patient evaluations of symptomatology and pain intensity were recorded throughout one menstrual period. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were utilized. RESULTS: An intention-to-treat population of 91 women, with a mean age of 21.3 ± 3.2 years, received paracetamol, pyrilamine and pamabrom tablets, and 98 participants, with a mean age of 21.0 ± 3.2 years, received naproxen sodium, paracetamol and pamabrom tablets. The participants’ assessments of pain on the Visual Analogue Scale during the menstrual cycle demonstrated a significant reduction in both treatment groups (p<0.05). There is no significant difference in efficacy between both groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that both drug combinations were not different in reducing dysmenorrheic pain. Likewise, both treatments were well tolerated. Therefore, both treatments may be used for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La dismenorrea primaria es causada por la descarga de las prostaglandinas en el tejido uterino. Por lo tanto, los fármacos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos son la terapia inicial para la dismenorrea. El tratamiento para la dismenorrea puede incluir la administración de monoterapia o la combinación de fármacos. Sin embargo, la evidencia clínica científica sobre la eficacia de los medicamentos con dos o tres fármacos combinados es escasa o ausente. OBJETIVO: Evaluar y comparar la eficacia y seguridad de dos combinaciones, en dosis fija y oral para el alivio de los síntomas de la dismenorrea primaria en mujeres mexicanas. Basados en la fisiopatología de la dismenorrea primaria, se utilizó una combinación comercializada en México de paracetamol, pirilamina y pamabrom. El comparador seleccionado fue un medicamento que contiene naproxeno sódico, paracetamol y pamabrom. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio en un solo centro, a doble ciego, experimental, paralelo y aleatorizado. Las pacientes con dismenorrea primaria que se incluyeron fueron mayores de 17 años de edad y con una intensidad del dolor mayor a 45 milímetros en una escala visual analógica. Las pacientes fueron aleatorizadas para recibir tabletas con naproxeno sódico, paracetamol y pamabrom o tabletas con paracetamol, pirilamina y pamabrom para un ciclo menstrual. Se evaluó la intensidad de la sintomatología y el dolor de las pacientes a lo largo de un período menstrual. Se utilizó análisis estadístico descriptivo e inferencial. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó una población con intención de tratar de 91 mujeres, con una edad media de 21,3 ± 3,2 años la cual recibió tabletas de paracetamol, pirilamina y pamabrom. Otras 98 participantes, con una edad media de 21,0 ± 3,2 años, recibieron tabletas de naproxeno sódico, paracetamol y pamabrom. Las evaluaciones de dolor de las participantes con la escala visual analógica durante el ciclo menstrual demostraron una reducción significativa en ambos grupos de tratamiento (p<0,05). No hubo diferencia significativa en la eficacia entre los dos grupos (p>0,05). CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados mostraron que ambas combinaciones de fármacos no fueron diferentes en reducir el dolor dismenorreico. Del mismo modo, ambos tratamientos fueron bien tolerados. Por lo tanto, ambos tratamientos se pueden utilizar para el tratamiento de la dismenorrea primaria.

Relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of piroxicam 20 mg: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Piroxicam is an NSAID indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid diseases. Although there are generic formulations of oral piroxicam marketed in Mexico, a literature search did not identify published data concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Mexican population. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the bioequivalence of a generic (test) and a reference formulation of oral piroxicam 20 mg and to generate data regarding the oral bioavailability of this drug in a Mexican population. METHODS: This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy Mexican adult volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive the test formulation followed by the reference formulation, or vice versa, with a 15-day washout period between doses. Study drugs were administered after a 10-hour overnight fast. For pharmacokinetic analysis, blood samples were drawn at 0 (baseline), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 168 hours after administration. Plasma concentrations of piroxicam were determined using HPLC. The test and reference formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the geometric mean test/reference ratios were within a predetermined range of 80% to 125%. Tolerability was determined using clinical assessment, monitoring of vital signs, laboratory analysis, and subject interviews regarding adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 28 subjects were enrolled (15 men, 13 women; mean [SD] age, 24 [4] years [range, 19-35 years]; weight, 63.0 [8.9] kg [range, 47.5-81.9 kg]; height, 165 [10] cm [range, 149-179 cm]; and body mass index, 23.2 [1.4] kg/m(2) [range, 20.6-26.0 kg/m(2)]). The 90% CIs for piroxicam C(max), AUC(0-infinity), and AUC(0-infinity)) were 89.98% to 101.04%, 91.46% to 101.19%, and 93.51% to 105.86%, respectively. Thirteen subjects reported a total of 17 AEs during the study. None of the AEs were considered serious or related to the administered formulations. The most common AE was local postvenipuncture ecchymosis, reported in 8 subjects (28.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In this small study in healthy Mexican adult subjects, a single 20-mg dose of the test formulation of orally administered piroxicam met the regulatory requirements to assume bioequivalence, based on the rate and extent of absorption. Both formulations were well tolerated. Mexican national registry code: CE-PEC.0875.

Quantification of 4-aminopyridine in plasma by capillary electrophoresis with electrokinetic injection.

A rapid and sensitive CE method for the determination of 4-aminopyridine in human plasma using 3,4-diaminopyridine as an internal standard was developed and validated. The analytes were extracted from 0.5-mL aliquots of human plasma by liquid-liquid extraction, using 8 mL of ethyl ether, and injected electrokinetically into capillary electrophoresis equipment. The instrumental conditions were obtained and optimized by Design of Experiments (DOE--factorial and response surface model), having as factors: separation voltage, ionic strength (buffer concentration), pH and temperature. The response variables were migration time, resolution, tailing factor and drug peak area. After obtaining mathematically predicted values for the response variables with best factors combinations, these were reproduced experimentally in good agreement with predicted values. In addition to optimal separation conditions obtained by Design of Experiments, sensitivity was improved using electrokinetic injection at 10 kV for 10 s, and a capillary with 50 cm effective length and 100 microm I.D. The final instrumental conditions were voltage at 19 kV, capillary temperature at 15 degrees C, wavelength at 254 nm, and phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 2.5 as the background electrolyte. This assay was linear over a concentration range of 2.5-80 ng/mL with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 ng/mL. The relative standard deviation for the assay precision was <7% and the accuracy was >95%. This method was successfully applied to the quantification of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) in plasma samples from patients with spinal cord injury.

Bioavailability of two oral-tablet and two oral-suspension formulations of naproxen sodium/paracetamol (acetaminophen): single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover comparisons in healthy Mexican adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: Naproxen sodium/paracetamol (acetaminophen) is a combination for the treatment of symptomatic pain and fever marketed both as a prescription and an over-the-counter product in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: The aim of these 2 studies was to compare the bioavailability and to determine the bioequivalence of 2 test formulations (an oral-tablet formulation containing the combination of naproxen sodium/paracetamol 275/300 mg and an oral-suspension formulation containing the combination of naproxen sodium/paracetamol 375/300 mg per 15 mL) with their corresponding listed reference-drug formulations in Mexico (a list issued by Mexican health authorities). METHODS: Two separate, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover, postmarketing studies were conducted. For each study, a different set of eligible subjects was selected comprising healthy Mexican adults of either sex, and subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1 test formulation of the combination of naproxen sodium/paracetamol followed by the corresponding reference-drug formulation, or vice versa, with a 1-week washout period between doses. After a 12-hour overnight fast, subjects received a single dose of naproxen sodium/paracetamol 275/300-mg tablet or naproxen sodium/paracetamol 375/300 mg per 15 mL suspension, depending on the study. For the analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, including C(max), AUC from time 0 (baseline) to 48 hours (AUC(0-48)), and AUC from baseline to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), blood samples were drawn at baseline and at 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after administration. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of the C(max) and AUC were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%. Tolerability was determined by clinical assessment, monitoring vital signs, laboratory analysis results, and subject interviews regarding adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 26 subjects (15 men, 11 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [8] years [range, 20-50 years]; weight, 63.1 [9] kg [range, 51.4-84.4 kg]; height, 164 [9] cm [range, 149-179 cm]; and body mass index [BMI], 23.53 [2.18] kg/m(2) [range, 18.54-26.82 kg/m(2)]) were enrolled to receive the suspension-dosage formulation; 13 subjects received the suspension-test formulation first. A total of 26 subjects (13 men, 13 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [8] years [range, 18-43 years]; weight, 64.3 [7.7] kg [range, 50.6-80.7 kg]; height, 165 [9] cm [range, 151-181 cm]; and BMI, 23.64 [2.43] kg/m(2) [range, 18.02-26.42 kg/m(2)]) were enrolled to receive the tablet-dosage formulation; 13 subjects received the tablet-test formulation first. No significant period or sequence effects were detected based on analysis of variance. For the suspension-dosage formulation, the 90% CIs for naproxen C(max), AUC(0-48), and AUC(0-infinity) were 93.06% to 104.00%, 93.50% to 98.44%, and 92.14% to 98.99%, respectively, and were 90.09% to 105.90%, 88.58% to 99.34%, and 91.43% to 101.55%, respectively, for paracetamol. For the tablet-dosage formulation, the 90% CIs for naproxen C(max), AUC(0-48), and AUC(0-infinity) were 102.83% to 117.15%, 96.59% to 104.26%, and 96.01% to 102.90%, respectively, and were 94.04% to 121.09%, 95.48% to 105.64%, and 96.64% to 105.42%, respectively, for paracetamol. CONCLUSIONS: In these 2 small studies in healthy Mexican adult subjects, a single dose of naproxen sodium/paracetamol 275/300 mg of the test formulation of the tablet-dosage formulation or a single dose of naproxen sodium/paracetamol 375/300 mg per 15 mL of the test formulation of the suspension-dosage formulation was found to be bioequivalent to the corresponding reference formulations according to the regulatory definition of bioequivalence based on the rate and extent of absorption. All formulations were generally well tolerated.

Development and validation of a high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method, with densitometry, for quantitative analysis of ketorolac tromethamine in human plasma.

Ketorolac tromethamine is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is widely used in the treatment of moderate to severe pain. A new method was developed and validated for quantifying ketorolac (the free acid of the tromethamine salt) in human plasma by high-performance thin-layer chromatography. The stationary phase was silica gel 60, and the composition of the mobile phase was n-butanol-chloroform-acetic acid-ammonium hydroxide-water (9 + 3 + 5 + 1 + 2, v/v). The densitometric analysis of ketorolac was performed at 323 nm. The method was validated for precision (repeatability and reproducibility), accuracy, and sensitivity. Repeatability was 10.11% [coefficient of variation (CV)] and reproducibility was 12.18% (CV) as the maximum variation. Accuracy was determined at 3 different concentration levels, and results were within +/-15% of the predetermined range. Data were fitted by a linear mathematical function (linear regression). The calibration graph was linear in the range of 200-2000 ng/mL. Average recovery was 73.67%. The method proved to be accurate, precise, and sensitive for the ketorolac tromethamine quantification.

Bioavailability of two sublingual formulations of ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Ketorolac tromethamine (ie, ketorolac) is an NSAID that appears to have several mechanisms of action, including inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, modulatory effect on opioid receptors, and nitric oxide synthesis. Ketorolac is used in the treatment of pain. There are various generic formulations of sublingual ketorolac available in Mexico. However, a literature search did not identify published data concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Mexican population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability of 2 sublingual formulations of ketorolac 30-mg tablets in healthy Mexican adult volunteers. METHODS: This was a randomized-sequence, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover (2 dosing periods x 2 treatments) study comparing the bioavailability of two 30-mg sublingual tablet formulations of ketorolac. Healthy Mexican adult (aged, 18-55 years) men and women were eligible for inclusion. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of the test formulation or the reference formulation. After a 12-hour overnight fast, subjects received a single dose of the corresponding formulation. There was a 7-day washout period between administration periods. Plasma samples were obtained over a 24-hour period after administration. Plasma ketorolac concentrations were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including Cmax, AUC0-24, and AUC0-infinity. Blood samples were drawn immediately after sublingual placement of the drug and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, and 90 minutes and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125% and if P for the 90% CIs was <0.05. Tolerability was assessed by vital sign monitoring, laboratory analysis results, and subject interviews. RESULTS: A total of 27 subjects (18 women, 9 men; mean [SD] age, 27 [9] years [range, 18-47 years]; weight, 61 [8] kg [48-79 kg]; height, 163 [8] cm [150-180 cm]) were enrolled and completed the study. Fourteen subjects received the test formulation first. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding differences in natural log Cmax, AUC0-24, and AUC0-infinity were 95.94% to 114.66%, 98.34% to 105.90%, and 99.25% to 108.36%, respectively (all, (P) < 0.05), meeting the predetermined criteria for bioequivalence. Sixteen subjects experienced a total of 20 adverse events (AEs) during the study. None of the AEs were considered serious. One AE (nausea) appeared to be related to use of the reference formulation. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study in 27 healthy Mexican adult volunteers, the test formulation of a single, 30-mg sublingual tablet of ketorolac appeared to be bioequivalent to the reference formulation based on the rate and extent of absorption. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Bioavailability of two single-dose oral formulations of omeprazole 20 mg: an open-label, randomized sequence, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Omeprazole is a proton-pump inhibitor that acts to reduce acid secretion in the stomach and is used for treating various acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. There are several generic formulations of omeprazole available in Mexico; however, a literature search failed to identify published data concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Mexican population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability of 2 oral formulations of omeprazole 20-mg capsules, marketed for use in Mexico, in healthy volunteers: Inhibitron (test formulation) and LosecA 20 mg (reference formulation). METHODS: This study used a single-dose, open-label, randomized sequence, 2 x 2 crossover (2 administration periods x 2 treatments) design to compare the 2 formulations. Eligible subjects were healthy adult Mexican volunteers of both sexes. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 20-mg dose of the test formulation followed by the reference formulation, or vice versa, with a 7-day washout period between administration periods. After a 12-hour (overnight) fast, subjects received a single, 20-mg dose of the corresponding formulation. Plasma samples were obtained over a 12-hour period after administration. Plasma omeprazole concentrations were analyzed by a nonstereospecific high-performance liquid chromatography method. For analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including C(max), AUC from time 0 (baseline) to time t (AUC(0-t)), and AUC from baseline to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), blood samples were drawn at baseline and 0.17, 0.33, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2, 2.50, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after administration. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the natural log (ln)-transformed ratios of C(max) and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 80% to 125%, and if P

Bioavailability of two oral suspension and two oral tablet formulations of acyclovir 400 mg: two single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparisons in healthy Mexican adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: Acyclovir is an important antiviral drug, used extensively for treatment of herpes simplex and varicella zoster. Six oral generic formulations of acyclovir are available in Mexico; however, a literature search failed to identify data information concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Mexican population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of these 2 studies was to compare the bioavailability of 4 oral formulations of acyclovir 400 mg--2 tablet formulations and 2 suspension formulations--with their corresponding listed drug references in Mexico (a list issued by Mexican Health Authorities). METHODS: Two separate, single-dose, open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover studies were conducted at the Centro de Estudios Científicos y Clínicos Pharma, S.A. de C.V. (clinical unit), Mexico City, Mexico. For each study, a different set of eligible subjects were selected. They included healthy Mexican volunteers of either sex. For each study, subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1 test formulation of acyclovir 400 mg followed by the reference formulation, or vice versa, with a 1-week washout period between doses. After a 12-hour (overnight) fast, subjects received a single 400-mg dose (tablet or 10-mL suspension) of the corresponding formulation. For the analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including C(max), AUC from time 0 (baseline) to time t (AUC(0-t)), and AUC from baseline to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), blood samples were drawn at baseline, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the natural logarithm (ln)-transformed ratios of Cmax and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 80% to 125% and if P

Bioequivalence of two commercial preparations of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole: a randomized, single-dose, single-blind, crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is a combination of 2 antimicrobial agents that act synergistically, sequentially blocking 2 chemical reactions essential to bacterial survival. TMP/SMX is effective against organisms that are resistant to its separate components. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability of 2 commercial preparations of T:MP/SMX 40/200 mg per 5-ml, oral suspension, used in Mexico for the treatment of bacterial infection. METHODS: This study used a single-dose, randomized,single-blind, 2 x 2 crossover (2 dosing periods x 2 treatments) design to compare the 2 preparations. Healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 55 years received the trial and reference preparations in randomized sequence, under fasting conditions, with a 7-day washout period between dosing periods. Each preparation was administered as a single-dose 10-ml, oral suspension delivering 80 tng of TMP and 400 mg of SMX (equivalent to 2 doses of TMP/SMX 40/200 rig per 5 ml.). Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of C(max) AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-1) were determined for each component of each preparation. Schuirmann's unilateral double t test was performed. Null hypotheses indicating bioin-equivalence (P > 0.05) were rejected. Bioequivalence was determined if the quotient of the parameters of C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were between 80% and 125%, at a power of 80% (alpha > 0.08). RESULT: Twenty-three of the 24 enrolled subjects completed the study. The subjects were all Hispanic, the mean (SD) age was 25 (6) years, and the mean (SD) body mass index was 22.54 (2.59) kg/m(2). Plasma concentration-time values of TMP and SMX were similar with both preparations. The null hypotheses of Schuirmann's unilateral double t test were rejected, and results of the analyses of the PK parameters obtained 95% CIs within the predetermined range of bioequivalence (80%-125 degrees 10). The trial and reference preparations were statistically interchangeable and appeared to be bioequivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Based on similar PK profiles and statistical analyses, the trial and reference preparations were statistically interchangeable and appeared to be bioequivalent in this population of 23 healthy male volunteers in Mexico.

Bioavailability of two oral formulations of loratadine 20 mg with concomitant ketoconazole: an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Loratadine is a long-acting antihistamine with selective peripheral histamine H(1)-receptor antagonistic activity and fewer sedative effects compared with conventional antihistamines, and is widely used in Mexico. Although several generic formulations of loratadine are available in Mexico, based on a literature search, information concerning the bioavailability of each formulation in the Mexican population is not available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability and tolerability of 2 oral formulations of loratadine 20 mg (two 10-mg tablets) used in Mexico: Sensibit (test formulation; Laboratorios Liomont S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico) and Clarityne (reference formulation; Schering-Plough S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study was conducted at Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico. Eligible subjects were healthy male Mexican volunteers aged > or=18 years. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single 20-mg dose (two 10-mg tablets) of the test or reference formulation, followed by a 2-week washout period, followed by the same dose of the alternate formulation. A 400-mg dose of ketoconazole (2 doses in 24 hours) was administered to each subject before the administration of each formulation, and a 200-mg dose of ketoconazole was given together with each formulation (ie, a total of 600 mg of ketoconazole was administered). Doses were administered after a 12-hour overnight fast. For analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including C(maX), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity), blood samples were drawn at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16, and 22 hours after dosing. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the geometric mean ratios of C(maX) and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 80% to 125%. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs and subject interview regarding the potential presence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Thirty-two subjects were enrolled in the study (mean age, 22 years [range, 18-28 years]; mean weight, 68.9 kg [range, 58-79 kg]; mean height, 170.8 cm [range, 158-183 cm]). Sixteen subjects received the test formulation first. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of CmaX, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were 81.43% to 106.01%, 83.12% to 100.23%, and 84.06% to 101.10% (all, P < 0.05), meeting the predetermined criteria for bioequivalence. Similar results were found for data without a logarithmic transformation. No AEs were reported throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study in healthy Mexican volunteers, a single, 20-mg dose of the test formulation of loratadine was found to be bioequivalent to that of the reference formulation based on the rate and extent of absorption when concomitantly administered with ketoconazole. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Bioavailability of two oral formulations of azithromycin 500 mg: a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: Azithromycin is related to erythromycin but is more active against gram-negative bacteria and less active against streptococci and staphylococci compared with erythromycin. For these reasons, and because of convenience of dosing (QD for 3 days), azithromycin is widely used in Mexico. Although several generic formulations of azithromycin are available in Mexico, information concerning the bioavailability of each formulation in the Mexican population is not available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability and tolerability of 2 oral formulations of azithromycin 500 mg used in Mexico: Macrozit (trademark of Laboratorios Liomont, S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico; test formulation) and Azitrocin (trademark of Pfizer, S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico; reference formulation). METHODS: This 2 x 2, crossover, randomized, open-label study was conducted at the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Universidad Autóma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico. Eligible subjects were healthy volunteers of either sex and with the following characteristics: age > or =19 to 25 years, weight 54 to 77 kg, and height 159 to 177 cm. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive Macrozit followed by Azitrocin, or vice versa, with a 3-week washout period between doses. After a 12-hour (overnight) fast, subjects received a single, 500-mg dose of each formulation. For analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity), blood samples were drawn at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after dosing. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the logarithm (ln)-transformed ratios of C(max) and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 80% to 125% and if P < or = 0.05 for the 90% CIs. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring and subject interview regarding the potential presence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled in the study; 27 completed it (14 men, 13 women; mean age, 21.7 years). Fourteen subjects received the test formulation first. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were 80.67 to 107.21, 91.39 to 107.59, and 90.61 to 106.19 (all, P < 0.05). Similar results were found for data without a logarithmic transformation. No AEs were found throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study in healthy Mexican volunteers, a single, 500-mg dose of Macrozit was found to be bioequivalent to that of Azitrocin based on the rate and extent of absorption. Both formulations were well tolerated.