Laminin-6 assembles into multimolecular fibrillar complexes with perlecan and participates in mechanical-signal transduction via a dystroglycan-dependent, integrin-independent mechanism.

Mechanical ventilation is a valuable treatment regimen for respiratory failure. However, mechanical ventilation (especially with high tidal volumes) is implicated in the initiation and/or exacerbation of lung injury. Hence, it is important to understand how the cells that line the inner surface of the lung [alveolar epithelial cells (AECs)] sense cyclic stretching. Here, we tested the hypothesis that matrix molecules, via their interaction with surface receptors, transduce mechanical signals in AECs. We first determined that rat AECs secrete an extracellular matrix (ECM) rich in anastamosing fibers composed of the alpha3 laminin subunit, complexed with beta1 and gamma1 laminin subunits (i.e. laminin-6), and perlecan by a combination of immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting analyses. The fibrous network exhibits isotropic expansion when exposed to cyclic stretching (30 cycles per minute, 10% strain). Moreover, this same stretching regimen activates mitogen-activated-protein kinase (MAPK) in AECs. Stretch-induced MAPK activation is not inhibited in AECs treated with antagonists to alpha3 or beta1 integrin. However, MAPK activation is significantly reduced in cells treated with function-inhibiting antibodies against the alpha3 laminin subunit and dystroglycan, and when dystroglycan is knocked down in AECs using short hairpin RNA. In summary, our results support a novel mechanism by which laminin-6, via interaction with dystroglycan, transduces a mechanical signal initiated by stretching that subsequently activates the MAPK pathway in rat AECs. These results are the first to indicate a function for laminin-6. They also provide novel insight into the role of the pericellular environment in dictating the response of epithelial cells to mechanical stimulation and have broad implications for the pathophysiology of lung injury.

Complex interactions between the laminin alpha 4 subunit and integrins regulate endothelial cell behavior in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo.

The alpha4 laminin subunit is a component of the basement membrane of blood vessels where it codistributes with the integrins alphavbeta3, alpha3beta1, and alpha6beta1. An antibody against the G domain (residues 919-1207; G(919-1207)) of the alpha4 laminin subunit inhibits angiogenesis in a mouse-human chimeric model, indicating the functional importance of this domain. Additional support for the latter derives from the ability of recombinant G(919-1207) to support endothelial cell adhesion. In particular, endothelial cell adhesion to G(919-1207) is half-maximal at 1.4 nM, whereas residues 919-1018 and 1016-1207 of the G domain are poor cellular ligands. Function blocking antibodies against integrins alphavbeta3 and beta1 and a combination of antibodies against alpha3 and alpha6 integrin subunits inhibit endothelial cell attachment to G(919-1207). Moreover, both alphavbeta3 and alpha3beta1 integrin bind with high affinity to G(919-1207). Together, our studies demonstrate that the G domain of laminin alpha4 chain is a specific, high affinity ligand for the alphavbeta3 and alpha3beta1 integrin heterodimers and that these integrins, together with alpha6beta1, function cooperatively to mediate endothelial cell-alpha4 laminin interaction and hence blood vessel development. We propose a model based on these data that reconcile apparent discrepancies in the recent literature with regard to the role of the alphavbeta3 integrin in angiogenesis.

Microfilament-dependent movement of the beta3 integrin subunit within focal contacts of endothelial cells.

To gain insight into the dynamic properties of focal contacts, we induced expression of green fluorescent protein-tagged beta3 integrin (GFP-beta3) and actinin-1 (GFP-actinin-1) in endothelial cells. Both tagged proteins localize with alpha(v)beta3 integrin in focal contacts distributed towards the periphery of transfected cells. Labeled focal contacts migrate at about 0.1 mm/min in stationary live endothelial cells. We compared beta3 integrin and actinin-1 dynamics in focal contacts by using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Recovery of signal in bleached focal contacts that have incorporated actinin-1 is rapid and occurs within less than 4 min. This recovery is energy-dependent. In contrast, recovery of bleached focal contacts that contain GFP-beta3 integrin takes longer than 30 min. Yet, when a narrow stripe of fluorescence is bleached across a beta3 integrin-labeled focal contact, recovery is complete within 16 min. The latter recovery is energy-dependent and is blocked not only by actin-filament disrupting drugs but also by a myosin light chain kinase inhibitor. Thus, integrins are not immobile when incorporated into focal contacts, as some have suggested. We propose that integrins are mobile within the confines of focal contacts and that this mobility is supported by an actin-associated molecular motor.