Satisfaction with medical rehabilitation in patients with orthopedic impairment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient satisfaction after orthopedic impairment at 80 to 180 days after inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective design examining records from facilities subscribing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSmr). SETTING: Information submitted to UDSmr from 1997 to 1998 by 177 hospital and rehabilitation facilities from 40 states. PARTICIPANTS: The sample (N=7781) was 72.63% female and 88.60% non-Hispanic white, with a mean age +/- standard deviation of 73.07+/-11.81 years, and average length of stay (LOS) of 13.84+/-10.48 days. INTERVENTION: Usual rehabilitation care. Main outcome measures Level of satisfaction 80 to 180 days after discharge as well as motor, cognitive, and subscale ratings for the FIM trade mark instrument. Predictor variables included gender, age, English language, marital status, discharge setting, LOS, rehospitalization, FIM gain, and primary payer. RESULTS: A logistic regression model was used to predict patient satisfaction at follow-up. Five statistically significant (P<.05) variables were found and correctly classified 94.9% of the patients. Discharge motor FIM rating, rehospitalization, age, patient's primary language, and discharge setting were associated with increased satisfaction. Discharge motor FIM ratings were significantly associated with increased satisfaction in patients with joint replacements and lower-extremity fractures. CONCLUSION: unctional and demographic variables were identified as predictors of satisfaction in patients with orthopedic impairments.

Effect of functional gain on satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between gain in motor and cognitive functional status with patient satisfaction 3-6 mo after rehabilitation discharge. DESIGN: Patient satisfaction and changes in functional status were examined in 18,375 patients with stroke who received inpatient medical rehabilitation. Information was obtained from 144 hospitals and rehabilitation facilities contributing records to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation and the National Follow-up Services. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed significant (P < 0.05) differences in satisfaction responses based on whether information was collected from patient self-report or from a family member proxy, and the two subsets were analyzed separately. Logistic regression revealed the following significant predictors of satisfaction for data collected from stroke patients: cognitive and motor gain, rehospitalization, who the patient was living with at follow-up, age, and follow-up therapy. In the patient-reported data subset, compared with patients who showed improved cognitive or motor functional status, those with no change, respectively, had a 31% and 33% reduced risk of dissatisfaction. In addition, rehospitalized patients had a higher risk of dissatisfaction. For the proxy reported data subset, significant influences on satisfaction were health maintenance, rehospitalization, stroke type, ethnicity, cognitive FIM gain, length of stay, and follow-up therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ratings of satisfaction with rehabilitation services were affected by change in functional status and whether the information was collected from patient rating or proxy response.

Disparity in health services and outcomes for persons with hip fracture and lower extremity joint replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Examine disparity in health services and outcomes for adults with a hip fracture or lower extremity joint replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study examined 28,522 patient records including 12,328 (mean age 76.6 years) with hip fracture and 16,194 (mean age 71.8 years) with joint replacement. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic white and black patients were significantly (P < 0.05) more likely to be discharged home alone and responsible for their own care than were Asian or Hispanic patients. Sixty-four percent of Hispanic patients received inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture and 36% after hip or knee arthroplasty. In contrast, 58% of non-Hispanic white persons, 67% of black persons, and 56% of Asian persons received inpatient medical rehabilitation after hip or knee joint replacement. CONCLUSION: Disparity in outcomes appeared to be related to family structure and social support.

The reliability of upper- and lower-extremity strength testing in a community survey of older adults.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the stability (test-retest reliability) of strength measures in older adults obtained by nontherapist lay examiners by using a hand-held portable muscle testing device (Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester). DESIGN: A prospective relational design was used to collect test-retest data for 1 male subject by using 27 lay raters who completed intensive training in manual muscle. SETTING: Data were collected from older Mexican-American adults living in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven lay raters who completed intensive training in manual muscle testing for a field-based assessment and interview of older adults and 63 Mexican-American subjects completing wave 4 of the Hispanic Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly. INTERVENTIONS: Training involved reviewing a manual describing each testing position followed by approximately 6 hours of instruction and practice supervised by an experienced physical therapist. Lay raters then collected test-retest information on older Mexican-American subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Stability (test-retest) for a portable manual muscle testing device. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed for the 27 lay raters examining 1 male subject (2 trials) and 12 lay raters assessing 63 older Mexican-American adults (1 practice and 2 trials recorded). The ICC values for the first 27 lay raters ranged from .74 to.96. The ICC values for the latter 12 lay raters ranged from .87 to.98. No differences were found in ICC values between male or female subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Stable and consistent information for upper- and lower-extremity strength was collected from the older adults participating in this study. The results suggest reliable information can be obtained by lay raters using a portable manual muscle testing device if the examiners receive intensive training.

Prediction of follow-up living setting in patients with lower limb joint replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The living setting to which older adults are discharged from medical rehabilitation has important social and economic implications. This study was undertaken to develop statistical models to predict living setting after medical rehabilitation in persons with lower limb joint replacement. DESIGN: Information submitted from 1994 through 1998 to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation was examined. Hip replacement was experienced by 42% of the patients, 51% experienced a knee replacement, and 7% received some combination or other lower limb procedure. RESULTS: Persons with hip replacements were slightly older than persons with knee replacements and had a longer length of stay. Logistic regression was used to develop a predictive model based on 60% of the cases. The model included five statistically significant predictor variables. CONCLUSION: Cognitive and basic motor function associated with activities of daily living, age, length of stay, and marital status were important variables in predicting if older adults would be living at home 80-180 days after rehabilitation for lower limb joint replacement.

Psychological assessment of persons with chronic pain.

Chronic pain is one of the most prevalent and costly health care problems and variability is the rule more than the exception in terms of pain related outcomes. Clearly, psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, post traumatic stress, excessive somatic thoughts and a variety of psychiatric syndromes are recognized as actively contributing to a patient's perceptions and responses to pain and can represent significant potential impediments to functioning and optimal health care outcome. As a result, it is becoming increasingly common, and even required by many programs, for individuals who seek treatment for pain to undergo a comprehensive assessment that evaluates not only their medical findings, but also beliefs about their condition, coping strategies, psychological adjustment, activity level and quality of life. Psychological assessment instruments that provide information about a person's physiological, behavioral, and cognitive-affective functioning in terms of vulnerabilities and strengths can be a valuable tool for treatment providers. In the present paper, a biopsychosocial conceptual model is employed to provide an overview of a method and approach in evaluating patients with chronic pain, toward the goal of facilitating optimal outcome and management of pain syndromes.