Comparative Long-term Study of a Large Series of Patients with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Loco-Regional Recurrence, Metastasis, and Survival.

Our aim was to compare histologic and immunohistochemical features, surgical treatment and clinical course, including disease recurrence, distant metastases, and mortality between patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). We included 1,745 patients operated for 1,789 breast tumors, with 1,639 IDC (1,600 patients) and 145 patients with ILC and 150 breast tumors. The median follow-up was 76 months. ILC was significantly more likely to be associated with a favorable phenotype. Prevalence of contralateral breast cancer was slightly higher for ILC patients than for IDC patients (4.0% versus 3.2%; p = n.s). ILC was more likely multifocal, estrogen receptor positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) negative, and with lower proliferative index compared to IDC. Considering conservative surgery, ILC patients required more frequently re-excision and/or mastectomy. Prevalence of stage IIB and III stages were significantly more frequent in ILC patients than in IDC patients (37.4% versus 25.3%, p = 0.006). Positive nodes were significantly more frequent in the ILC patients (44.6% versus 37.0%, p = 0.04). After adjustment for tumor size and nodal status, frequencies of recurrence/metastasis, disease-free and specific survival were similar among patients with IDC and patients with ILC. In conclusion, women with ILC do not have worse clinical outcomes than their counterparts with IDC. Management decisions should be based on individual patient and tumor biologic characteristics rather than on lobular versus ductal histology.

Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Sentinel Node Biopsy: Additional Axillary Tumor Burden as a Function of the Total Number of Excised Sentinel Nodes-A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have challenged the long-standing assumption that breast cancer prognosis is determined by lymph node regional status. We assessed locoregional relapse, distant metastases, and mortality alongside additional axillary disease in breast cancer patients undergoing sentinel node (SN) biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study assessed 1070 women with clinical T1-T2 invasive breast cancer with negative clinical/ultrasound axillae. RESULTS: A total of 25.1% of patients had positive SN biopsy findings, of whom 69.2% had only 1 involved SN. The rate of axillary recurrence was 0.7%, with no significant differences found between patients with positive or negative SN (0.6% vs. 1.1%). There were also no significant differences in the rate of distant metastases or breast cancer-specific mortality. If we had applied the Z0011 trial suggestions, residual axillary disease would have reached 16.2%: 13.5% in patients over 50% and 21.3% in patients under 50. The rate of residual axillary disease would have been 25.2% in patients with only 1 SN (20.2% in patients over 50% and 38.2% in patients under 50). In patients with 2 SN, residual disease would have ranged from 12.0% in patients over 50% to 19.0% in patients under 50. From 3 SN on, residual disease seems negligible. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in locoregional relapse, distant metastases, or mortality between patients with negative and positive SN. Patients with 3 or more SN have no additional axillary disease. In patients younger 50, one must be extremely cautious if the Z0011 suggestions are to be applied, especially if there is only 1 SN.