Pronóstico del trasplante cardiaco en pacientes con miocardiopatía hipertrófica y restrictiva. Análisis de un registro nacional / Prognosis after heart transplant in patients with hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathy. A nationwide registry analysis

Introducción y objetivos: Existe controversia acerca de los resultados del trasplante cardiaco en pacientes con miocardiopatía hipertrófica (MCH) o restrictiva (MCR). Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de receptores adultos de un primer trasplante cardiaco entre 1984 y 2021 incluidos en un registro nacional. La mortalidad al primer y quinto año postrasplante en receptores con MCH y MCR se comparó con la de receptores con miocardiopatía dilatada (MCD). Resultados: Se incluyó a 3.703 pacientes (3.112 MCD; 331 MCH y 260 MCR) con seguimiento mediano de 5,0 años (3,1-5,0). En comparación con la MCD, el riesgo ajustado de mortalidad a 1 año fue: MCH: hazard ratio (HR)=1,38; intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC95%), 1,07-1,78; p=0,01, MCR: HR=1,48; IC95%, 1,14-1,93; p=0,003. El riesgo ajustado a 5 años fue: MCH: HR=1,17; IC95%, 0,93-1,47; p=0,18; MCR: HR=1,52; IC95%, 1,22-1,89; p<0,001. En los últimos 20 años, la MCR mejoró significativamente la supervivencia a 1 año (R2 ajustada=0,95) y a 5 años (R2=0,88); la MCH mejoró la supervivencia a 5 años (R2=0,59) y a 1 año permaneció estable (R2=0,16). Conclusiones: Se asoció la MCR y la MCH a peor pronóstico precoz postrasplante que la MCD. La diferencia desfavorable se mantuvo para la supervivencia a 5 años solo para la MCR. Se observa una tendencia temporal a mejor pronóstico precoz y tardío para la MCR, y solo para el tardío en la MCH. (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Posttransplant outcomes among recipients with a diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) remain controversial. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a nationwide registry of first-time recipients undergoing isolated heart transplant between 1984 and 2021. One-year and 5-year mortality in recipients with HCM and RCM were compared with those with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Results: We included 3703 patients (3112 DCM; 331 HCM; 260 RCM) with a median follow-up of 5.0 [3.1-5.0] years. Compared with DCM, the adjusted 1-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.38; 95%CI, 1.07-1.78; P=.01, RCM: HR, 1.48; 95%CI, 1.14-1.93; P=.003. The adjusted 5-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.17; 95%CI, 0.93-1.47; P=.18; RCM: HR, 1.52; 95%CI, 1.22-1.89; P<.001. Over the last 20 years, the RCM group showed significant improvement in 1-year survival (adjusted R2=0.95) and 5-year survival (R2=0.88); the HCM group showed enhanced the 5-year survival (R2=0.59), but the 1-year survival remained stable (R2=0.16). Conclusions: Both RCM and HCM were linked to a less favorable early posttransplant prognosis compared with DCM. However, at the 5-year mark, this unfavorable difference was evident only for RCM. Notably, a substantial temporal enhancement in both early and late mortality was observed for RCM, while for HCM, this improvement was mainly evident in late mortality. (AU)

Prognosis after heart transplant in patients with hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathy. A nationwide registry analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Posttransplant outcomes among recipients with a diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) remain controversial. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a nationwide registry of first-time recipients undergoing isolated heart transplant between 1984 and 2021. One-year and 5-year mortality in recipients with HCM and RCM were compared with those with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). RESULTS: We included 3703 patients (3112 DCM; 331 HCM; 260 RCM) with a median follow-up of 5.0 [3.1-5.0] years. Compared with DCM, the adjusted 1-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.38; 95%CI, 1.07-1.78; P=.01, RCM: HR, 1.48; 95%CI, 1.14-1.93; P=.003. The adjusted 5-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.17; 95%CI, 0.93-1.47; P=.18; RCM: HR, 1.52; 95%CI, 1.22-1.89; P<.001. Over the last 20 years, the RCM group showed significant improvement in 1-year survival (adjusted R2=0.95) and 5-year survival (R2=0.88); the HCM group showed enhanced the 5-year survival (R2=0.59), but the 1-year survival remained stable (R2=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Both RCM and HCM were linked to a less favorable early posttransplant prognosis compared with DCM. However, at the 5-year mark, this unfavorable difference was evident only for RCM. Notably, a substantial temporal enhancement in both early and late mortality was observed for RCM, while for HCM, this improvement was mainly evident in late mortality.

Mitochondrial Heteroplasmy as a Marker for Premature Coronary Artery Disease: Analysis of the Poly-C Tract of the Control Region Sequence.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) differs from the nuclear genome in many aspects: a maternal inheritance pattern; being more prone to acquire somatic de novo mutations, accumulative with age; and the possible coexistence of different mtDNA alleles (heteroplasmy). Mitochondria are key cellular organelles responsible for energy production and involved in complex mechanisms, including atherosclerosis. In this scenario, we aimed to evaluate mtDNA variants that could be associated with premature cardiovascular disease. We evaluated 188 consecutive patients presenting with premature myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI) confirmed by coronary angiogram. mtDNA polymorphisms and clinical data were evaluated and compared with 271 individuals from the same population (control group). Tobacco consumption (80.85% vs. 21.21%, p < 0.01) and dyslipidemia (38.83% vs. 28.41%, p = 0.02) were significantly more frequent among STEMI patients. Moreover, C16223T mtDNA mutation and poly-C heteroplasmy were significantly more frequent among premature STEMI male patients than in controls. The OR associated C16223T mtDNA with the increased presence of cardiovascular risk factors. Our data suggest that mtDNA 16223T and heteroplasmy may be associated with unstable premature atherosclerosis disease in men. Moreover, the presence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) was associated with C16223T mtDNA, with a cumulative effect. Protective mitochondrial pathways are potential therapeutic targets. Preventing exposure to the damaging mechanisms associated with CVRFs is of utmost importance.

Different Phenotypes in Monozygotic Twins, Carriers of the Same Pathogenic Variant for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a monogenic disease with autosomal dominant inheritance. Genotype−phenotype relationships are complex, with variable penetrance even within the same family. The involvement of other modulating genetic and environmental factors is unknown. We aimed to analyze the HCM in monozygotic twins, carriers of the same founder pathogenic variant MYBPC3 p.G263*. The relationship was verified using the PowerPlex 16 HS System kit. Phenotypic differences and environmental differences (overloading conditions, coexistence and location, lifestyle, sport, and intensity) were analyzed. Three pairs of twins genetically identical for all markers and carriers of MYBPC3 G263* were identified. No environmental differences were identified. One of the 89-year-old twins had symptomatic severe obstructive HCM that required septal ablation, while her twin has remained asymptomatic with mild phenotype >80 years. A 49-year-old twin had a severe phenotype of obstructive HCM and pending myectomy, while his twin had a mild asymptomatic phenotype. In the last pair of twins, one presented a much larger left ventricular hypertrophy than his identical twin. In summary, we present three pairs of HCM twin patients sharing not only the genetic cause of the inherited disease but the entire genetic background. Despite identical genetic information and the absence of other known clinical, environmental, or lifestyle differences, the severity of the HCM phenotype is strikingly different. These unexplained differences should prompt the study of other unknown modulating factors, either epigenetic or environmental.

KCNH2 p.Gly262AlafsTer98: A New Threatening Variant Associated with Long QT Syndrome in a Spanish Cohort.

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an inherited (autosomal dominant) channelopathy associated with susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias due to malfunction of ion channels in cardiomyocytes, that could lead to sudden death (SD). Most pathogenic variants are in the main 3 genes: KCNQ1 (LQT1), KCNH2 (LQT2) and SCN5A (LQT3). Efforts to improve the understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationship are essential to improve the medical clinical practice. In this study, we identified all index patients referred for NGS genetic sequencing due to LQTS, in a Spanish cohort, who were carriers of a new pathogenic variant (KCNH2 p.Gly262AlafsTer98). Genetic and clinical family screening was performed in order to describe its phenotypic characteristics. We identified 22 relatives of Romani ethnicity, who were carriers of the variant. Penetrance reached a 100% and adherence to medical treatment was low. There was a high rate of clinical events, particularly arrhythmic events and SD (1 in every 4 patients presented syncope, 1 presented an aborted SD, 2 obligated carriers suffered SD before the age of 40 and 4 out of 6 carriers of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) had appropriate ICD therapies. Correct adherence to medical treatment in all carriers should be specially encouraged in this population. ICD implantation decision in non-compliant patients, and refusing left cardiac sympathetic denervation, should be carefully outweighed.