Comparison of a triple antigen and a single antigen recombinant vaccine for adult hepatitis B vaccination.

Hepatitis B and its sequelae are a major public health problem. Vaccines have been available for almost 20 years; however the disease still remains a global problem. Many factors contribute to the failure to control hepatitis B, including the limited nature of the vaccination programs implemented initially. Only relatively recently has mass childhood vaccination begun to be implemented and vaccination of high-risk groups, other than healthcare workers, is still not general policy. Additional factors contributing to continued persistence of hepatitis B in the developed world are that the present vaccines are not fully used by those recommended to be vaccinated and even when vaccination is carried out appropriately, there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups who have inadequate response to current vaccines, and those who are unwilling or unable to comply with protracted multi-dose vaccine regimens, could be improved if there were a more potent vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Adults who had never been vaccinated against hepatitis B were randomised to receive a vaccination course of either a present single antigen (S) vaccine (Recombivax-HB) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare Medeva Pharma plc). Doses were given at baseline and 1 month and 6 months later. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) levels were measured at 2, 4, 6, and 7 months after beginning vaccination. The primary efficacy parameter was the degree of protection, measured as the percentage of subjects with anti-HBs titres > or = 10 IU/L, 6 or 7 months (26 +/- 2 weeks) after beginning vaccination. A total of 303 adult subjects entered the study and were vaccinated. Of these, 11 failed to complete the study (4 on Hepacare and 7 on Recombivax-HB); however all but 2 (1 to receive the triple antigen vaccine and 1 to receive Recombivax-HB) were included in the intent-to-treat population for efficacy evaluation. Treatment randomisation was stratified at entry based on age (above and below 40 years old) and gender. The standard three-dose/6-month vaccination regimen of the single antigen vaccine protected 83% of subjects by 7 months after starting vaccination whereas the triple antigen vaccine as a two-dose/1-month regimen protected 88% within 6 months and as a three-dose/6-month regimen protected 97% by 7 months after starting vaccination. Thus the protection rate provided by the shortened (0, 1) regimen of the novel vaccine was "essentially equivalent" (i.e., not statistically inferior) to that provided by the full (0, 1, and 6) regimen of today's vaccine (88% vs. 81%, P < 0.001), and the protection rate provided by a three-dose/6-month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of the new vaccine was significantly superior to that provided by present vaccines (97% vs. 83% P < 0.001). The percentage of subjects protected increases with time after beginning vaccination and at all time points up to and including 6 months was significantly greater with the two-dose regimen of the triple antigen vaccine than with the single antigen vaccine regimen. In adults at risk for a reduced response to hepatitis B vaccination [i.e., older adults (>/=40), the obese, males, and smokers], the triple antigen vaccine produced a significantly greater percentage of protected subjects (P < 0.001) and higher geometric mean titre (P < 0.001). Indeed as a three-dose/6 month regimen, the triple antigen vaccine raised the level of protection in these vulnerable subgroups to that seen when a single antigen vaccine is used in the optimal younger adult group. Both vaccines were well tolerated and had similar safety profiles. The most frequently (> or = 10%) reported adverse events with the use of either vaccine were pain at the site of injection (38% vs. 41% vs. 20% for the two-dose Hepacare regimen, the three-dose Hepacare regimen, and the three-dose Recombivax-HB regimen, respectively), infections at the site of injection (1% vs. 14% vs. 9%), headache (9% vs. 13% vs. 11%), and nausea (7% vs. 11% vs. 3%). It is concluded that in healthy normal adults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine that contained S and pre-S antigens produced an enhanced immunological response. This was exemplified by the novel vaccine's ability to overcome factors such as advancing age (> or = 40 years), obesity, and smoking, each of which is known to reduce the potential for protection with present recombinant S only vaccines. A two-dose/1-month (0 and 1) regimen of this triple antigen vaccine was as effective as the standard three-dose/6 month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of present single antigen vaccines. (c) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Controversies in the medical management of persistent and recurrent acute otitis media. Recommendations of a clinical advisory committee.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the predominant bacterial pathogen associated with acute otitis media (AOM), causing an estimated 7 million cases annually in the United States. Bacterial resistance should be considered when selecting an antimicrobial agent for otitis media. Significant increases in drug-resistant S pneumoniae are documented worldwide, and less than 50% of S pneumoniae strains are fully susceptible to penicillin in some regions of the United States. Although amoxicillin is recommended for uncomplicated AOM, treatment guidelines should be flexible and adaptable, taking into consideration local and regional susceptibility patterns, the age of the patient, the frequency of prior infections, and the response to prior therapy. Resistant organisms are more prevalent in children younger than 2 years of age and in those who have recurrent or persistent AOM. Overdiagnosing AOM, selecting inappropriate empiric therapy, or both, leads to overuse and misuse of antibiotics and causes increased drug resistance. This article reviews persistent and recurrent AOM and discusses the pitfalls of diagnosis and the practical limitations of current treatment recommendations.

Clarithromycin suspension vs penicillin V suspension in children with streptococcal pharyngitis.

Clarithromycin, an advanced-generation macrolide antibiotic, has demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS). Potent activity against Streptococcus pyogenes and a favorable pharmacokinetic profile have made it a reasonable alternative for treatment of patients with streptococcal pharyngitis. The safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and penicillin V were compared in a randomized, investigator-blind study. Children 6 months to 12 years of age received 5 days of clarithromycin suspension 7.5 mg/kg twice daily (n = 268) or 10 days of penicillin V suspension 13.3 mg/kg three times daily (n = 260). Patients were evaluated for signs and symptoms of pharyngitis, and throat swabs for culture were obtained prior to therapy, at the end of therapy, and at follow-up. Clarithromycin and penicillin V produced comparable rates of clinical success (cure + improvement) at the posttreatment (97% and 94%) and follow-up (81% and 82%) evaluations. The GABHS eradication rate, however, was significantly higher with clarithromycin (94% vs 78%, P < .001). Both drugs were well tolerated; gastrointestinal complaints were similar and mild. Resistance did not occur with the short course of clarithromycin or the standard regimen of penicillin V. Five days' treatment with clarithromycin was superior to 10 days of penicillin in eradicating S. pyogenes.

Medical management of acute bacterial sinusitis. Recommendations of a clinical advisory committee on pediatric and adult sinusitis.

Acute sinusitis is commonly encountered in clinical practice and treated in the primary care setting. The clinician should recognize the subtle clinical presentation of acute bacterial sinusitis and initiate appropriate, aggressive treatment. Other upper respiratory tract disorders can confound the accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of sinusitis. Variable patterns of microbial resistance and antibiotic susceptibility and the dissociation between in vitro findings and clinical efficacy are a treatment challenge. This report is a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology and diagnosis of acute sinusitis, infectious agents, treatment methods, antibiotic resistance patterns, and costs associated with the management of sinusitis. Treatment algorithms are presented for adult and pediatric sinusitis.

Comparison of cefdinir and penicillin V in the treatment of pediatric streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.

BACKGROUND: Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis continues to be a prevalent pediatric infectious disease that requires prompt treatment for relief of symptoms and to prevent complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy/tolerability of cefdinir and penicillin V in the treatment of pediatric GABHS tonsillopharyngitis as demonstrated in two clinical trials of similar design. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded trials. PATIENTS: Children < or =12 years of age with sore throat, pharyngeal erythema and positive rapid streptococcal antigen test results. INTERVENTION: In Study A patients took cefdinir 7 mg/kg twice daily or 14 mg/kg once daily or penicillin V 10 mg/kg 4 times daily (all regimens for 10 days). In Study B patients took cefdinir 7 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days or penicillin V 10 mg/kg 4 times daily for 10 days. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and microbiologic evaluations were conducted at multiple times during and after therapy. RESULTS: Of 1274 patients 1122 were evaluable (679 patients received cefdinir; 443 received penicillin V). Clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates were superior in the combined cefdinir treatment groups (94.9 and 92.7%, respectively), whether given once or twice daily for 10 days or twice daily for 5 days, compared with the penicillin treatment group (88.5 and 70.9%, respectively; P<0.001 for both). Adverse event rates were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Cefdinir is a reliable and well-tolerated drug for the management of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis in children.

Comparison of the palatability of the oral suspension of cefdinir vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, cefprozil and azithromycin in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient adherence to therapeutic regimens is extremely important to successful treatment of acute otitis media. Among pediatric patients medication palatability, particularly that of oral suspensions, is essential for patient acceptance, therapeutic compliance and successful outcome. METHODS: A series of six randomized, single blind, crossover trials were conducted, each comparing cefdinir oral suspension with one of the following antibiotic oral suspensions: amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium; cefprozil; or azithromycin. Each medication comparison was evaluated in a single center and multicenter study. Subjects 4 to 8 years of age were asked to taste and smell each medication and assign preference using a visual "smile-face" scale. Ratings were converted to a numeric score ranging from 5 ("really good") to 1 ("really bad"). RESULTS: Among the 715 subjects 85% rated the taste of cefdinir as good or really good, the highest possible ratings; 63% of subjects assigned the same ratings to amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, cefprozil or azithromycin. Seventy-one percent rated the smell of cefdinir as good or really good; 64% assigned the same ratings to the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings from these trials, children 4 to 8 years of age preferred the taste and smell of cefdinir oral suspension to that of the comparator agents.

Growth of newborn, term infants fed soy formulas for 1 year.

Few studies have measured long-term growth in infants fed soy protein-based formulas. The effect of nucleotide (NT) supplementation of soy protein-based infant formulas on growth is unknown. Growth was therefore evaluated in healthy term infants fed a soy protein-based formula (SOY; n = 73), SOY with added NT (72 mg added NT/L) at human milk (HM) levels (SOYN, n = 73), or mixed feeding (MF, n = 67) in a randomized, masked, parallel 1-year feeding study. The MF group (a nonrandomized reference group) was fed HM exclusively from birth to 2 months of age followed by HM and/or a standard milk-based formula (Similac with Iron with no supplemental NTs) to 1 year of age. Results indicated that growth (weight, length, and head circumference) was normal and comparable among the three groups. All three groups had similar plasma albumin (at 2 months of age) and hemoglobin levels (at 12 months of age). Thus, this study demonstrated similar growth in the first year of life among infants fed MF feeding or soy formula with or without supplemental NTs.

Comparison of cefdinir and penicillin for the treatment of pediatric streptococcal pharyngitis.

This multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-masked study was performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of cefdinir for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. Children aged 1 through 12 years with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis and a positive result on a rapid screening test for Streptococcus pyogenes were randomly assigned to receive cefdinir 14 mg/kg QD, cefdinir 7 mg/kg BID, or penicillin V 10 mg/kg 4 times daily for 10 days. Seven hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled, and 682 were clinically and microbiologically assessable. All treatment groups had similar demographic characteristics (-50.0% male, predominantly white, median age 7 years). The eradication rates of S pyogenes, determined 4 to 9 days after completion of therapy, were 94.3% in the cefdinir QD group, 94.3% in the cefdinir BID group, and 70.0% in the penicillin V group (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.6%-30.9%, P < 0.001 for cefdinir QD vs penicillin; CI 17.5%-30.9%, P < 0.001 for cefdinir BID vs penicillin). Clinical cure rates were 97.4%, 96.0%, and 86.3% for the cefdinir QD, cefdinir BID, and penicillin groups, respectively (CI 6.1%-15.9%, P = 0.001 for cefdinir QD vs penicillin; CI 4.6%-14.8%, P = 0.001 for cefdinir BID vs penicillin). Adverse reactions occurred in 8.3%, 8.7%, and 7.6% of cefdinir QD, cefdinir BID, and penicillin patients, respectively (P = NS). Treatment with cefdinir, either QD or BID, was associated with higher eradication rates of S pyogenes and higher clinical cure rates. Both cefdinir and penicillin were well tolerated. Three patients, 1 receiving cefdinir BID and 2 receiving penicillin, discontinued the study drug because of adverse reactions.

Loracarbef versus clarithromycin in children with acute otitis media with effusion.

Two multicenter, randomized, single-masked, parallel-group studies compared loracarbef and clarithromycin with regard to efficacy, tolerability, and patient acceptance. Three hundred thirty-four children aged 6 months to 3 years with acute otitis media with effusion received loracarbef (15 mg/kg) or clarithromycin (7.5 mg/kg) orally twice daily for 10 days. Patients were assessed for the presence of the diagnostic signs and symptoms of otitis media with effusion by physical examination and pneumatic otoscopy at 48 hours pretreatment, 3 to 5 days after initiation of treatment, 0 to 3 days after the final dose (posttreatment), and 14 to 21 days later (termination). Symptoms were assigned numeric values. Symptomatic response was assessed at the posttherapy and termination visits. Tolerability was determined by assessing adverse events, and a patient acceptance survey was completed by each patient's caregiver. The combined results of these 2 studies showed that the efficacy and tolerability of loracarbef were comparable to those of clarithromycin. Adverse events were reported by 46.4% of loracarbef patients and 41.0% of clarithromycin patients, with no statistically significant difference between groups. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 57.9% of loracarbef patients were cured at the termination of the study, compared with 55.7% of clarithromycin patients. Improvement was seen in 4.1% of loracarbef patients and 2.7% of clarithromycin patients. Results of the patient acceptance survey showed a clear preference for loracarbef over clarithromycin. Difficulties with administration of treatment were reported by 36.3% of clarithromycin caregivers, compared with 7.8% of loracarbef caregivers (P < 0.001). A desire to stop treatment was reported by 23.8% of clarithromycin caregivers, compared with 7.8% of loracarbef caregivers (P < 0.001). Taste and texture issues were most frequently cited as reasons for nonacceptance.

Antibacterial management of acute and chronic sinusitis.

Sinusitis is a common disorder in both children and adults. It is responsible for significant absenteeism from school and work. Up to 10% of upper respiratory infections in children are complicated by acute sinusitis. Since antibacterial therapy is most often empirically chosen to treat the disorder, knowledge of the typical etiologic agents as well as awareness of the antibacterial susceptibility profiles in a given community are of paramount importance. The need for consistently bactericidal antibacterials, the recognition of the importance of nontypable Hemophilus influenzae unresponsive to first-generation cephalosporins, tetracyline-resistant Gram-positive cocci, and the increasing emergence of beta-lactamase-positive respiratory pathogens such as H. influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, now mandate the use of newer therapeutic agents for acute and chronic sinusitis.

Low-dose ranitidine for the relief of heartburn.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of adults in the USA suffer from heartburn or related symptoms monthly; more than 20% of these sufferers experience heartburn at least once per day. Although many rely on self-medication with antacids for the relief of their symptoms, treatments that decrease gastric volume as well as increase the pH of refluxed material should be more effective in relieving heartburn. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of low-dose regimens of ranitidine for the relief of heartburn. METHODS: Adults with at least a 3-month history of heartburn were eligible for this randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre dose-ranging study. Following a 1-week open-label run-in phase to document baseline heartburn frequency, subjects were randomized to receive treatment with one tablet of either ranitidine 75 mg (n = 491), ranitidine 25 mg (n = 504), or placebo (n = 494), to be taken as needed up to four times daily for 2 weeks for the relief of heartburn. RESULTS: The ranitidine 75 mg regimen was clinically (> 10 percentage points) and statistically (P < 0.05) significantly more effective than placebo for all measured efficacy end-points in relieving heartburn and reducing antacid consumption. In addition, the ranitidine 75 mg regimen was superior to placebo in providing heartburn relief within 30 min of dosing that lasted for up to 12 h. Ranitidine 25 mg was observed to be statistically superior (P < 0.05) but not clinically different from placebo, as defined a priori, in providing heartburn relief. All treatments were well tolerated and adverse events occurred no more frequently with the ranitidine regimens than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine 75 mg provides prompt relief of heartburn that lasts for up to 12 h and has a safety profile comparable to that of placebo.

Comparison of cefdinir and penicillin for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. Cefdinir Pharyngitis Study Group.

Cefdinir, an oral cephalosporin active against Streptococcus pyogenes (group A beta-hemolytic streptococci [GABHS]), is also resistant to degradation by most oropharyngeal beta-lactamases. This multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-masked study assessed the tolerability and efficacy of 2 dosing regimens of cefdinir in the treatment of pharyngitis due to GABHS. Adults and adolescents with pharyngitis due to GABHS received cefdinir 600 mg QD, cefdinir 300 mg BID, or penicillin V 250 mg QID each for 10 days. A throat culture and clinical assessment were obtained 4 to 9 days after completion of therapy. Of 919 patients enrolled, 644 (70.1%) were microbiologically assessable. The eradication rates 4 to 9 days after completion of therapy were 91.4% in the cefdinir QD group, 91.7% in the cefdinir BID group, and 83.4% in the penicillin group (P = 0.02 for cefdinir QD vs penicillin, P = 0.01 for cefdinir BID vs penicillin, P = 0.95 for cefdinir QD vs cefdinir BID). Clinical cure rates were also superior with cefdinir QD (94.8%, P = 0.02) and cefdinir BID (96.3%, P < 0.01) compared with penicillin (88.9%). Diarrhea was more common in the cefdinir groups (P < 0.001). Seventeen cefdinir patients and 4 penicillin patients discontinued therapy because of adverse reaction (P = 0.13). Ten days of treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis with cefdinir QD or BID is superior to treatment with penicillin V for the eradication of GABHS from the pharynx, although it is associated with a higher rate of adverse reactions.

Potential infectious disease complications of upper respiratory tract infections.

Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), particularly otitis media and sinusitis, are prevalent among children. With recurrent URTIs there is an increased likelihood of sequelae. Suppurative complications associated with URTIs, although rare, must be treated rapidly to prevent serious morbidity and mortality. Further, increase in antimicrobial resistance may be accompanied by an increased risk for complications because infecting pathogens may be more difficult to eradicate.

Five-day cefdinir treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis. Cefdinir Pharyngitis Study Group.

A multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-blind study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral cefdinir versus oral penicillin V for the treatment of pharyngitis due to group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS). Patients 13 years of age and older were randomized to receive either oral cefdinir (300 mg twice a day) for 5 days followed by placebo for 5 days or oral penicillin V (250 mg four times a day) for 10 days. Throat cultures were obtained, and signs and symptoms of pharyngitis were recorded at study admission and follow-up visits on study days 11 to 15, 16 to 20, and 25 to 31. Patients kept a diary to record medication intake and their assessment of throat pain at admission and at each day of study treatment. Five hundred fifty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 432 (77.4%) were clinically and microbiologically evaluable. The GABHS eradication rates 5 to 10 days after completion of therapy were 193 of 218 (88.5%) in the cefdinir group and 176 of 214 (82.2%) in the penicillin group (P = 0.053). Clinical cure rates were 89.0 and 84.6%, respectively (P = 0.80). By the time of the long-term follow-up visit, 2 to 3 weeks after completion of treatment, 156 of 191 (81.7%) of the assessable cefdinir patients and 152 of 195 (77.9%) of the penicillin patients remained free of GABHS. Both treatments were well tolerated, with adverse reaction rates of 18.3% in the cefdinir study arm and 15.0% in the penicillin study arm (P = 0.278). Five-day treatment with cefdinir is safe and effective therapy for GABHS pharyngitis. Based on its twice-a-day dosage and shorter course of therapy, leading to potentially greater patient compliance, cefdinir may be considered for use in the treatment of pharyngitis caused by GABHS.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and acceptability of cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute otitis media.

BACKGROUND: Use of a beta-lactamase stable antibiotic is called for in cases of acute otitis media (AOM) likely to be caused by beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae or Moraxella catarrhalis. Two beta-lactamase-stable agents commonly used for empirical treatment of AOM are amoxicillin/clavulanate and cefixime. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial compared cefixime (CFX; 8 mg/kg once daily) with amoxicillin/clavulanate (A/C; 40 mg/kg/day in three divided doses) for the treatment of children with AOM. Three hundred thirteen children were randomly assigned to a 10-day course of either CFX (n = 158) or A/C (n = 155). Based on history, physical examinations and otoscopic and tympanometric assessments, clinical responses were evaluated as cure, improvement, failure, relapse or nonevaluable. Compliance and patient/parent acceptability were also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall favorable clinical responses (cure plus improvement) were comparable post-therapy for the two treatments (CFX = 76%; A/C = 77%). Significant differences in response rates for both treatments were noted among different geographic regions, with the highest response rates observed in the Northeast and South. Acceptability of CFX was significantly better than that of A/C (P = 0.0001), and the adverse experience rate was lower (P = 0.001). The most frequently reported adverse experiences were diarrhea (CFX 15.2%, A/C 29.7%) and vomiting (CFX 3.2%, A/C 10.32%). Relapse rates were 26% for CFX and 29% for A/C. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that CFX has comparable clinical efficacy and a better adverse events profile than A/C when used to treat AOM of childhood.

Effectiveness of five days of therapy with cefuroxime axetil suspension for treatment of acute otitis media.

BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been considerable interest in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment regimens in patients with common bacterial infections. We conducted two independent, investigator-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trials, one of which included microbiologic evaluation of middle ear fluid obtained by tympanocentesis, comparing the efficacy and safety of 5 or 10 days of treatment with cefuroxime axetil suspension (CAE) with that of 10 days of treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension (AMX/CL) in children with acute otitis media. METHODS: A total of 719 pediatric patients from the ages of 3 months to 12 years were enrolled in the 2 studies. Patients received CAE for either 5 or 10 days at 30 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses (n = 242 and 235, respectively) or AMX/CL for 10 days at 40 mg/kg/day in 3 divided doses (n = 242). Patients in the CAE (5 days) group received placebo on Days 6 through 10. In the study that included tympanocentesis, bacteriologic assessments were based on middle ear fluid cultures obtained pretreatment and, when possible, after treatment in patients with an unsatisfactory clinical outcome. RESULTS: Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment middle ear fluid specimens of 177 of 244 (73%) patients undergoing tympanocentesis, with the primary pathogens being Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis (37, 35 and 12% of isolates, respectively). Pathogens were eradicated or presumed to be eradicated in 92% (24 of 26), 84% (32 of 38) and 95% (36 of 38) of bacteriologically evaluable patients treated with CAE for 5 or 10 days or with AMX/CL, respectively. A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) occurred in 69% (101 of 147), 70% (121 of 173) and 74% (131 of 177) of clinically evaluable patients treated with CAE (5 days), CAE (10 days) or AMX/CL, respectively. Treatment with AMX/CL was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events than was treatment with CAE for either 5 or 10 days (P < 0.001), primarily reflecting a higher incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events (34% vs. 17 and 12%, respectively; P < 0.001), particularly diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with CAE given twice daily for 5 days is equivalent to treatment for 10 days either with the same regimen of CAE or with AMX/CL given three times daily in pediatric patients with acute otitis media.

Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil suspension and amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute otitis media with effusion.

Two independent, investigator-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trials, one of which included microbiologic evaluation of middle-ear fluid obtained by use of tympanocentesis, compared the efficacy and safety of two oral antibiotics, cefuroxime axetil suspension and amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension, in the treatment of children 3 months to 12 years old diagnosed with acute otitis media with effusion (AOME). Four hundred seventy-seven pediatric patients with signs and symptoms of AOME were enrolled at 20 centers and were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of treatment with either cefuroxime axetil suspension 30 mg/kg per day in two divided doses (n = 235) or amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension 40 mg/kg per day in three divided doses (n = 242). Patients were assessed for their response to treatment once during treatment (at 3 to 5 days) and twice after treatment (at 1 to 4 days and at 14 to 18 days). In the study that included tympanocentesis, bacteriologic assessments were based on middle-ear fluid cultures obtained pretreatment, and, when possible, posttreatment in patients with an unsatisfactory clinical outcome. Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment middle-ear fluid specimens of 120 (73%) of 164 patients undergoing tympanocentesis, with the primary pathogens being Streptococcus pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis (27%, 24%, and 6% of isolates, respectively). Forty-four percent of the H influenzae isolates and 94% of the M catarrhalis isolates that were tested for beta-lactamase production were positive. A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was obtained in 70% of clinically assessable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.40). With respect to the eradication of bacterial pathogens, in the study that included tympanocentesis a satisfactory outcome (cure or presumed cure) was obtained in 84% (32 of 38) and 95% (36 of 38) of bacteriologically assessable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.26). Treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events than was treatment with cefuroxime axetil (37% vs 16%; P < 0.001), primarily reflecting a higher incidence of drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events (34% vs 12%; P < 0.001), particularly diarrhea. Eight patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and 11 patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group withdrew from the studies because of drug-related adverse events. These results indicate that cefuroxime axetil suspension 15 mg/kg twice daily is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension 13.3 mg/kg three times daily in the treatment of pediatric patients with AOME, but produces fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, particularly diarrhea.

Sequential, single-dose pharmacokinetic evaluation of meropenem in hospitalized infants and children.

Meropenem is a new carbapenem antibiotic which possesses a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against many of the pathogens responsible for pediatric bacterial infections. In order to define meropenem dosing guidelines for children, an escalating, single-dose, pharmacokinetic study at 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg of body weight was performed. A total of 73 infants and children in four age groups were enrolled in the study: 2 to 5 months, 6 to 23 months, 2 to 5 years, and 6 to 12 years. The first patients enrolled were those in the oldest age group, who received the lowest dose. Subsequent enrollment was determined by decreasing age and increasing dose. Complete studies were performed on 63 patients. No age- or dose-dependent effects on pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were noted. Mean pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were as follows: half-life, 1.13 +/- 0.15 h; volume of distribution at steady state, 0.43 +/- 0.06 liters/kg; mean residence time, 1.57 +/- 0.11 h; clearance, 5.63 +/- 0.75 ml/min/kg; and renal clearance, 2.53 +/- 0.50 ml/min/liters kg. Approximately 55% of the administered dose was recovered as unchanged drug in the urine during the 12 h after dosing. No significant side effects were reported in any patients. By using the derived pharmacokinetic parameter estimates, a dose of 20 mg/kg given every 8 h will maintain plasma meropenem concentrations above the MIC that inhibits 90% of strains tested for virtually all potentially susceptible bacterial pathogens.

Ceftibuten vs. penicillin V in group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Members of the Ceftibuten Pharyngitis International Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of a 10-day course of ceftibuten oral suspension (9 mg/kg once daily) were compared with those of penicillin V (25 mg/kg/day in 3 divided doses) in children 3 to 18 years old treated for symptomatic pharyngitis and scarlet fever caused by group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (Streptococcus pyogenes). The study was prospective, randomized, multicenter and investigator-blinded; patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (ceftibuten:penicillin V). Overall clinical success (cure/improvement) at the primary end point of treatment (5 to 7 days posttherapy) was achieved in 97% (285 of 294) of ceftibuten-treated patients vs. 89% (117 of 132) of penicillin V-treated patients (P < 0.01). Elimination of infecting streptococci 5 to 7 days posttherapy was achieved in 91% (267 of 294) of ceftibuten-treated patients vs 80% (105 of 132) of penicillin V-treated patients (P < 0.01). A significant rise in anti-streptolysin O or anti-DNase B was observed in approximately 30% of patients in both treatment groups. No patient developed rheumatic fever or nephritis. Treatment-related adverse events were similar between the two groups; mild vomiting (2%) was most frequently reported. These data suggest that once daily ceftibuten is as safe as and more effective than three times daily penicillin V for the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.

Effective short-course treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Ten days of penicillin V vs 5 days or 10 days of cefpodoxime therapy in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare bacteriologic and clinical efficacy and safety of 10 vs 5 days of cefpodoxime proxetil vs 10 days of penicillin V potassium for the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, observer-blind, multicenter study. PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Four hundred eighty-four children (age range, 2 to 17 years) with signs and symptoms of acute tonsillopharyngitis were enrolled; 377 had a positive throat culture for group A beta-hemolytic streptococci and were fully evaluable. One hundred twenty-one patients received cefpodoxime once a day for 10 days, 126 received cefpodoxime twice a day for 5 days, and 130 received penicillin V three times a day for 10 days. RESULTS: Cefpodoxime for 10 days vs cefpodoxime for 5 days vs penicillin V for 10 days produced bacteriologic eradication at the end of therapy in 95%, 90%, and 78% of the patients, respectively. The 10- and 5-day cefpodoxime treatment regimens were more efficacious than penicillin V (P = .003 and P = .02, respectively). The cumulative bacteriologic failure rate among assessable patients by the 32- to 38-day posttreatment visit was 20 (17%) of 121 patients who were treated with cefpodoxime for 10 days, 24 (19%) of 125 patients who were treated with cefpodoxime for 5 days, and 45 (35%) of 130 patients who were treated with penicillin V for 10 days (P = .001 and P = .005, respectively). Clinical cure or improvement was observed at the end of therapy in 96%, 94%, and 91% of the patients, respectively (P = not significant). Adverse events were infrequent and similar in all three treatment groups, with minor gastrointestinal side effects predominating. CONCLUSIONS: Five days of treatment with cefpodoxime is as efficacious in bacteriologic eradication and clinical response (cure plus improvement) as 10 days of cefpodoxime therapy, and both cefpodoxime regimens produced superior bacteriologic efficacy compared with a 10-day regimen of penicillin V in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children.