Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications.

Statistical shape modeling (SSM) is widely used in biology and medicine as a new generation of morphometric approaches for the quantitative analysis of anatomical shapes. Technological advancements of in vivo imaging have led to the development of open-source computational tools that automate the modeling of anatomical shapes and their population-level variability. However, little work has been done on the evaluation and validation of such tools in clinical applications that rely on morphometric quantifications(e.g., implant design and lesion screening). Here, we systematically assess the outcome of widely used, state-of-the-art SSM tools, namely ShapeWorks, Deformetrica, and SPHARM-PDM. We use both quantitative and qualitative metrics to evaluate shape models from different tools. We propose validation frameworks for anatomical landmark/measurement inference and lesion screening. We also present a lesion screening method to objectively characterize subtle abnormal shape changes with respect to learned population-level statistics of controls. Results demonstrate that SSM tools display different levels of consistencies, where ShapeWorks and Deformetrica models are more consistent compared to models from SPHARM-PDM due to the groupwise approach of estimating surface correspondences. Furthermore, ShapeWorks and Deformetrica shape models are found to capture clinically relevant population-level variability compared to SPHARM-PDM models.

Efficient Segmentation Pipeline Using Diffeomorphic Image Registration: A Validation Study.

Functional measurements of the left atrium (LA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is limited to a single CINE slice midway through the LA. Nonetheless, a full 3D characterization of atrial functional measurements would provide more insights into LA function. But this improved modeling capacity comes at a price of requiring LA segmentation of each 3D time point,a time-consuming and expensive task that requires anatomy-specific expertise.We propose an efficient pipeline which requires ground truth segmentation of a single (or limited) CINE time point to accurately propagate it throughout the sequence. This method significantly saves human effort and enable better characterization of LA anatomy. From a gated cardiac CINE MRI sequence we select a single CINE time point with ground truth segmentation, and assuming cyclic motion, we register other images corresponding to all time points using diffeomorphic registration in ANTs. The diffeomorphic registration fields allow us to map a given anatomical shape (segmentation) to each CINE time point, facilitating the construction of a 4D shape model.

Interatrial Septum and Appendage Ostium in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Population Study.

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is performed in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients to help prevent stroke. LAA closure using an occlusion implant is performed under imaging guidance. However, occlusion can be a complicated process due to the highly variable and heterogeneous LAA shapes across patients. Patient-specific implant selection and insertion processes are keys to the success of the procedure, yet subjective in nature. A population study of the angle of entry at the interatrial septum relative to the appendage can assist in both catheter design and patient-specific implant choice. In our population study, we analyzed the inherent clusters of the angles that were obtained between the septum normal and the LAA ostium plane. The number of inherent angle clusters matched the LAA four morphological classifications reported in the literature. Further, our exploratory analysis revealed that the normal from the ostium plane does not intersect the septum in all the samples under study. The insights gained from this study can help assist in making objective decisions during LAA closure.

On the Evaluation and Validation of Off-the-shelf Statistical Shape Modeling Tools: A Clinical Application.

Statistical shape modeling (SSM) has proven useful in many areas of biology and medicine as a new generation of morphometric approaches for the quantitative analysis of anatomical shapes. Recently, the increased availability of high-resolution in vivo images of anatomy has led to the development and distribution of open-source computational tools to model anatomical shapes and their variability within populations with unprecedented detail and statistical power. Nonetheless, there is little work on the evaluation and validation of such tools as related to clinical applications that rely on morphometric quantifications for treatment planning. To address this lack of validation, we systematically assess the outcome of widely used off-the-shelf SSM tools, namely ShapeWorks, SPHARM-PDM, and Deformetrica, in the context of designing closure devices for left atrium appendage (LAA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients to prevent stroke, where an incomplete LAA closure may be worse than no closure. This study is motivated by the potential role of SSM in the geometric design of closure devices, which could be informed by population-level statistics, and patient-specific device selection, which is driven by anatomical measurements that could be automated by relating patient-level anatomy to population-level morphometrics. Hence, understanding the consequences of different SSM tools for the final analysis is critical for the careful choice of the tool to be deployed in real clinical scenarios. Results demonstrate that estimated measurements from ShapeWorks model are more consistent compared to models from Deformetrica and SPHARM-PDM. Furthermore, ShapeWorks and Deformetrica shape models capture clinically relevant population-level variability compared to SPHARM-PDM models.