Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Card Fail ; 25(3): 166-172, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30412734

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adverse cardiovascular events after liver transplantation (LT) are relatively common and are a significant source of early mortality. Although new-onset systolic dysfunction after LT is a reported phenomenon, there is little data regarding its incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-center retrospective study included all adult patients from January 2002 to March 2015 with deceased-donor LT and available preoperative transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs). In total, 1,760 patients were included in the study, 602 (34.2%) of whom had a postoperative TTE. The primary end point was development of new-onset cardiomyopathy, defined as a new left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40% within 180days of transplant. Sixty-nine (11.4%) of the patients who received post-LT TTE had a reduction in LVEF to <40% within 6 months. Clinical parameters of donor and recipient did not show significant impact on development of post-LT LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Presence of wall motion abnormalities (P = .004) on preoperative TTE was predictive of development of post-LT LVSD. These patients did not have longer hospitalizations, but they had worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Post-LT LV systolic dysfunction occurs at higher rates than previously suspected and may develop more frequently in patients with underlying cardiac structural abnormalities, which appear to adversely affect post-LT survival.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Fígado/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 92(1): 61-67, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29045041

RESUMO

Severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) increases the complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by inhibiting optimal stent expansion, leading to an increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Coronary atherectomy modifies and debulks calcified plaque to facilitate PCI. Although there is no clear consensus, and further studies are needed, the decision to perform atherectomy should be based upon the presence of fluoroscopic CAC or with the use of intravascular imaging. The management of CAC in the modern era relies on rotational and orbital atherectomy to prepare the lesion to facilitate stent delivery and optimal expansion. While the two technologies differ in equipment, technique, and mechanism of action, the available literature suggests similar efficacy and safety of the two systems, although head-to-head comparisons are limited. While rotational and orbital atherectomy have been shown to have excellent procedural success in terms of facilitating stent delivery, no system has been shown to reduce long-term major adverse cardiovascular events, although the definitive trial for orbital atherectomy has not been completed. Additional trials are needed to find the population who would derive the most benefit of atherectomy and to compare the two systems in a prospective manner.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Aterectomia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Calcificação Vascular/terapia , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Aterectomia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Aterectomia Coronária/instrumentação , Aterectomia Coronária/mortalidade , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Stents , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/mortalidade
4.
Trends Cardiovasc Med ; 26(6): 485-92, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27038558

RESUMO

Heart failure is common and results in substantial morbidity and mortality. Current guideline-based therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists aim to interrupt deleterious neurohormonal pathways and have shown significant success in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure. Continued efforts to further improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have led to the first new-in-class medications approved for heart failure since 2005, ivabradine and sacubitril/valsartan. Ivabradine targets the If channels in the sinoatrial node of the heart, decreasing heart rate. Sacubitril/valsartan combines a neprilysin inhibitor that increases levels of beneficial vasodilatory peptides with an angiotensin receptor antagonist. On a background of previously approved, guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure, these medications have shown improved clinical outcomes ranging from decreased hospitalizations in a select group of patients to a reduction in all-cause mortality across all pre-specified subgroups. In this review, we will discuss the previously established guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the translational research that led to the development of these new therapies, and the results from the major clinical trials of ivabradine and sacubitril/valsartan.


Assuntos
Aminobutiratos/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Benzazepinas/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêutico , Tetrazóis/uso terapêutico , Aminobutiratos/efeitos adversos , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efeitos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/efeitos adversos , Benzazepinas/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Bifenilo , Canais de Cátion Regulados por Nucleotídeos Cíclicos/antagonistas & inibidores , Canais de Cátion Regulados por Nucleotídeos Cíclicos/metabolismo , Combinação de Medicamentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/metabolismo , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Ivabradina , Neprilisina/antagonistas & inibidores , Neprilisina/metabolismo , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inibidores de Proteases/efeitos adversos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos , Tetrazóis/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Valsartana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...