A Workflow Change in Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Leads to Improved Accuracy of Biomechanical Reconstruction Without Increased Risk of Complications.

BACKGROUND: During anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA), the femur may be an impediment for acetabular access, pushing reamers proximally and consequently altering the hip center. In an effort to address this, the senior author changed the surgical workflow from acetabulum first (AF) to femur first (FF). The objective of this study was to compare the precision of biomechanical hip reconstruction and clinical outcomes between the FF and AF techniques. METHODS: This is a retrospective, case-control study of 267 anterior THAs (132 AF and 135 FF). A normal, contralateral hip was used to determine the native biomechanical parameters. Using a calibrated software program, radiographic measurements were performed to calculate the hip center position, femoral offset, global offset, and leg length of the operative and native hips using 2-week postoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. Demographics, operative information, hemoglobin change, and complication data were obtained. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement survey at 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The groups exhibited similar demographic characteristics. The FF group demonstrated significantly more accurate and more precise reconstruction of horizontal and vertical hip centers, femoral offset, and leg length. There was no significant difference in operative time, hemoglobin change, complication rate, or Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The FF technique allowed for more accurate and precise reconstruction of the hip center, leg length, and offset in THA than the AF workflow. Furthermore, the FF approach demonstrated no significant differences in complication rate or blood loss, nor in clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study Level III.

Achieving a Balanced Knee in Robotic TKA.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with manual instruments provides a quantitatively balanced knee in approximately 50% of cases. This study examined the effect of combining robotics technology with real-time intra-operative sensor feedback on the number of quantitatively balanced cases in a consecutive series of 200 robotic-assisted primary TKAs. The robotics platform was used to plan the implant component position using correctable poses in extension and a manual, centrally pivoting the balancer in flexion, prior to committing to the femoral cuts. During the initial trialing, the quantitative state of balance was assessed using an instrumented tibial tray that measured the intra-articular loads in the medial and lateral compartments. These sensor readings informed a number of surgical corrections, including bone recuts, soft-tissue corrections, and cement adjustments. During initial trialing, a quantitatively balanced knee was achieved in only 65% of cases. After performing the relevant soft-tissue corrections, bone recuts, and cement adjustments, 87% of cases ended balanced through the range of motion. Meanwhile, this resulted in a wide range of coronal alignment conditions, ranging from 6° valgus to 9° varus. It is therefore concluded that gaps derived from robotics navigation are not indicative for a quantitatively balanced knee, which was only consistently achieved when combining the robotics platform with real-time feedback from intra-operative load sensors.

The Actis and Corail Femoral Stems Provide for Similar Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of new devices for total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers surgeons the ability to address deficits in the portfolio. However, once introduced, data regarding the performance of devices is not publicly available until their use is widespread. PURPOSE/QUESTIONS: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic performance, including patient reported outcomes and radiographic evidence of osseointegration, subsidence, and stress shielding, of the newer Actis femoral component to the Corail stem (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA), which has an extensive clinical history. METHODS: This short-term, retrospective cohort study was a single surgeon series of 330 anterior approach THAs, consisting of 165 cases using the Actis stem and 165 cases using the Corail stem. Both devices were cementless, titanium, tapered, hydroxyapatite-coated stems. They differed in geometry, neck choices, broach philosophy, and collar availability. Data was obtained for 1 year following THA. Functional outcomes were measured with the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR.) survey. Complications were recorded from patient charts, and radiographic analysis was performed for signs of osseointegration, subsidence, and stress shielding. RESULTS: The groups shared similar demographic characteristics except the Actis population was younger with fewer women. The complication rate did not significantly vary, and no patient required revision within the first year. Radiographically, one patient in each group demonstrated subsidence. No cases exhibited radiolucent lines, and the prevalence of stress shielding at 1 year was comparable. HOOS, JR. scores did not significantly vary at 8 weeks or 1 year. CONCLUSION: The Actis stem does not carry an increased risk of device-related complications compared with the Corail implant. Although aspects of bone remodeling differed between groups, Actis achieved radiographic signs of bone ingrowth at the 1-year mark and performed well clinically, with equivalent patient reported outcome scores to the Corail stem.

Does It Matter: Total Hip Arthroplasty or Lumbar Spinal Fusion First? Preoperative Sagittal Spinopelvic Measurements Guide Patient-Specific Surgical Strategies in Patients Requiring Both.

BACKGROUND: In patients requiring both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and lumbar spinal fusion (LSF), consideration of preoperative sagittal spinopelvic measurements can aid in the prediction of postfusion compensatory changes in pelvic tilt (PT) and inform adjustments to traditional THA cup anteversion. This study aims to identify relationships between spinopelvic measurements and post-THA hip instability and to determine if procedure order reveals a difference in hip dislocation rate. METHODS: Patients at a single practice site who received both THA and LSF between 2005 and 2015 (292: 158 = LSF prior to THA, 134 = THA prior to LSF) were retrospectively reviewed for incidents of THA instability. Those with complete radiograph series (89) had their sagittal (standing) spinopelvic profiles measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years postoperatively. Measured parameters included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PT, and sacral slope (SS). RESULTS: No significant differences in dislocation rates between operative order groups were elicited (7/73 LSF first, 4/62 THA first; Z = 0.664, P = .509). Compared to nondislocators, dislocators had lower LL (-10.9) and SS (-7.8), and higher PT (+4.3) and PI-LL (+7.3). Additional risk factors for dislocation included sacral fusion (relative risk [RR] = 3.0) and revision fusion (RR = 2.7) . Predictive power of the model generated through multiple regression to characterize individual profiles of post-LSF PT compensation based on perioperative measurements was most significant at 1 year (R2 = 0.565, F = 0.000456, P = .028) and 2 years (R2 = 0.741, F = 0.031, P = .001) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In performing THA after LSF, it is theoretically ideal to proceed with THA at a postfusion interval of at least 1 year, beyond which further compensatory PT change is minimal. However, the order of surgical procedure revealed no statistical difference in hip instability rates. In cases characterized by large PI-LL mismatch (larger or less predictable compensation profiles) or large SS or LL loss (considerably atypical muscle recruitment), consideration of full functional anteversion range between sitting and standing positions to account for abnormalities not appreciated with standing radiographic assessment alone may be warranted.

Survivorship of the Modular Femoral Revision Stem.

The geriatric population represents a rapidly growing segment of society with prolonged life expectancies and more active lifestyles. Many of these patients have already undergone primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are presenting with aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or periprosthetic fractures. Therefore, the demand for hip revision procedures is expected to grow. Currently, there are many modular implant options available for use in complicated revision THA. Early results of modular femoral revision systems are promising for the treatment of the deficient femur in complex revision THA. The objective of this study was to evaluate component survivorship of a modular femoral revision system in revision THA. A retrospective review was conducted using electronic health records of patients who underwent revision THA performed by 1 of 3 surgeon investigators from 2010 through 2014. The authors included all patients who underwent a revision THA using a specific modular femoral revision system. The authors evaluated component survivorship and time to re-revision THA. Fifty-one revision THAs were included. Seven patients required a second revision THA (13.7%; 95% confidence interval, 4%-23%). Mean time to re-revision THA was 4.88±3.9 months. Kaplan-Meier survivorship using re-revision for any reason was 86.3% at 60 months. This study showed excellent component survivorship of the specific modular femoral revision system in revision THA. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):294-298.].

Are Patients More Satisfied With a Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly recognized as an important tool in quantifying the clinical success of arthroplasty surgery. The aim of this study is to measure post-operative joint awareness and satisfaction in patients with and without a quantitatively balanced knee following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: In this multi-center study, a total of 318 eligible patients were assigned to one of the 2 patient groups: sensor-guided TKA or surgeon-guided TKA. In the sensor-guided group, quantitative balancing was performed according to intercompartmental tibiofemoral load measurements measured by an instrumented tibial trial component. In contrast, for the surgeon-guided group, the knees were balanced according to the surgeons' standard manual techniques while blinding the surgeon to the sensor measurements. Patients were blinded to their allocation and filled out the validated Forgotten Joint Score and 2011 Knee Society Satisfaction questionnaires at 6 weeks and 6 months. For the purposes of this study, the subjects were pooled and stratified by their state of soft tissue balance, based on the mediolateral load differential through the range of motion. RESULTS: In the surgeon-guided group, approximately 50% of the cases yielded a quantitatively balanced knee. Significantly more balanced knees were observed in the sensor-guided group (84.0%). More importantly, for both outcome measures, the balanced group of patients reported significantly better outcomes scores. CONCLUSION: This demonstrates that using sensor feedback during knee arthroplasty surgery results in a more reproducible procedure, resulting in a higher percentage of balanced patients who in turn demonstrate superior clinical outcomes compared to unbalanced patients.

Is it safe? Outpatient total joint arthroplasty with discharge to home at a freestanding ambulatory surgical center.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is trending toward shorter hospitalizations; as a result, there are many ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) starting to perform outpatient TJA. However, there are limited studies examining the safety of outpatient TJA in the freestanding ASC setting. This study aims to evaluate 30-day and 90-day complication rates in patients who underwent outpatient TJA at a freestanding, independent ASC with direct discharge to home. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review using health records was performed on the first 115 TJAs performed between August 2015 and March 2017 by one of the 4 orthopedic surgeons. Before the first TJA, the ASC had developed a multidisciplinary TJA pathway. RESULTS: Of the 115 TJAs, 37 (32%) were total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 53 (46%) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), and 25 (22%) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, with a mean age of 57 ± 7 years and body mass index of 30 ± 5 kg/m2. There were no intraoperative or direct ASC-related complications. There was 1 instance (0.9%) of a postoperative minimally displaced intertrochanteric femur fracture after THA due to a fall treated nonoperatively complication within 30 days of surgery. Of the 90-day complication events, there were 2 patients (2%) with postoperative arthrofibrosis of the knee after TKA requiring manipulation under anesthesia, 1 postoperative patellar tendon rupture during therapy after TKA requiring surgical repair and 1 delayed hematogenous infection after international travel after THA requiring 2-staged exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient TJA with discharge to home at a freestanding, independent ASC is a safe option after development of a multidisciplinary TJA pathway.

Alarmingly High Rate of Implant Fractures in One Modular Femoral Stem Design: A Comparison of Two Implants.

BACKGROUND: Reports of implant fracture at the modular junction have been seen in modular neck designs, stem-sleeve modular femoral stems, and diaphyseal engaging bi-body modular stems. To date, however, there has never been a direct comparison between 2 different implant designs from the same modular family. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of implant failure of 2 such stem-sleeve modular femoral stem designs, the S-ROM and Emperion, to further identify factors which increase the risk of this mode of failure. METHODS: A retrospective, single surgeon, review of our institutional database was performed to compare the 2 groups of patients. RESULTS: A total of 1168 total hip arthroplasty procedures were included in our analysis, 547 (47%) with Emperion and 621 (53%) with S-ROM. Eight (1.5%) fractures in 7 patients occurred in the Emperion group compared to 1 (0.2%) fracture in the S-ROM group (P = .015). CONCLUSION: The precise cause of the stem fractures in our study remains unknown and is likely multifactorial. Given the unexpectedly high rate of catastrophic implant failures in the form of stem fracture at the stem-sleeve junction, we recommend more judicious use of modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Transitioning to the Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Safe in the Current Health Care Climate?

BACKGROUND: The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has recently gained interest for its quicker short-term recovery despite concerns about increased complications and operative time, especially during the steep learning curve period. The primary goal of this study was to determine if the transition from a posterior approach to a direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty can be achieved without harming patient safety. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort single-surgeon study of consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties performed over a transition period from posterior to direct anterior (DA) approach. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (211 anterior, 201 posterior) were included with no significant demographic differences between cohorts. There were no significant differences between the DA and posterior group in 30-day readmission rates (2.84% vs 2.49%, P = .823), 90-day readmission rates (4.27 vs 5.97, P = .432), complication rate (6.16% vs 3.48%, P = .206), or revision rate (1.90% vs 2.99%, P = .535). The DA group had a significantly lower percentage of cases outside the goal abduction angle range (35°-50°) than the posterior group (9.52%, n = 20 vs 19.6%, n = 39, P < .01). The number of cases outside the goal leg length discrepancy range (±10 mm) was not significantly different (P = .846) between the DA (12.9%) and posterior (13.6%) groups. CONCLUSION: This single-surgeon study demonstrates that the DA approach can be transitioned to safely with no significant increase in complications or readmissions over a high-volume experienced surgeon's first 200 cases. Furthermore, our results endorse the consistency of the DA approach during the learning curve period in regard to component positioning compared to posterior approach.

Perioperative differences in conventional and computer-assisted surgery in bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Performing bilateral total knee arthroplasties (bTKAs), sequential or staged, is a topic of debate among surgeons. To our knowledge, no studies have compared computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and conventional (CON) procedures for sequential bTKAs. We retrospectively reviewed 124 (62 CAS, 62 CON) sequential bTKAs. CAS-bTKAs required significantly fewer blood transfusions (P = .001) and had significantly better postoperative day 1 (POD-1) hemoglobin (Hgb) levels (P = .001) and POD-2 Hgb levels (P = .01). Mean total blood transfusion units were 0.9 for the CAS group and 1.7 for the CON group. Postoperative range of motion, tourniquet time, length of stay, number of readmissions, and number of reoperations were not significantly different (P > .05). The statistically significant differences between the groups may have resulted from violation of the femoral intramedullary canal during the CON technique.

Rotating platform revision total knee arthroplasty.

Although revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures are successful in relieving pain and restoring function in failed knees, long-term results are inferior to primary procedures. Mobile bearing (MB) revision knees can potentially improve functional performance. Clinical results of 44 MB rotating platform (RP) revision TKAs demonstrated mean knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) activity of daily living score of 77 2 years postoperatively. Clinical results were put into context through wear testing which demonstrated improved wear performance compared with fixed bearing (FB) revision knees. The RP construct is a good choice for revision TKA because it permits the surgeon to align the tray for fixation, not compromise rotation of the tibial insert, and reduce transmission of shear stresses to the bone, cement and implant interface, which is a known cause of failure.

Mid-term survivorship results for a rotating-platform knee prosthesis.

Interest in mobile-bearing knee prostheses is increasing in the US market. We studied results at 2 to 5 years with a mobile-bearing system that includes a cobalt-chrome tibial tray and femoral component with a polyethylene cruciate-retaining tibial component insert that allows rotation around a central axis and can be used with cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized femoral components. The inserts used in this study were cruciate retaining and did not include the posterior-stabilized design. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the function and safety of this prosthesis along with the lack of spinout, which is a major concern in the mobile-bearing knee. Four hundred thirty-five knees constituted the study cohort and underwent survivorship analysis and complication reporting. Routine clinic evaluations included pre- and postoperative radiographs and Knee Society knee and function scores at 6 and 12 weeks and every 2 years. The most recent follow-up data within 2 to 5 years was included for the study along with survey data. Flexion at most recent follow-up averaged 125°. Knee Society score at most recent visit averaged 88 of 100. Knee Society function score averaged 83 of 100. Radiographic results were available for 226 knees, with 97.3% assessed as normal and 6 with these issues: patella stress fracture (3), aseptic tibial loosening (1), patellar osteolysis (1), and patella aseptic loosening (1). In comparison with the fixed-bearing knee equivalent, this mobile-bearing knee demonstrated at least equivalent results in terms of survivorship, function, and patient satisfaction in the short- and mid-term.

Intraoperative molds to create an articulating spacer for the infected knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Chronic infections in TKA have been traditionally treated with a two-stage protocol incorporating a temporary antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. The use of a static as opposed to an articulating spacer is controversial. Some surgeons believe a static spacer results in a higher rate of infection eradication, whereas others believe an articulating spacer provides equivalent rates of infection control with improved function between stages and the potential for better eventual range of motion. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined the rates of infection control and postoperative function for an articulating all-cement antibiotic spacer fashioned intraoperatively from prefabricated silicone molds. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 60 patients with an infected TKA using the same cement-on-cement articulating spacer. A minimum of 4 g antibiotic per package of cement was used when making the spacer. Complications and pre- and postoperative knee flexion, extension, and Knee Society scores were recorded. Bone loss associated with the spacer was determined radiographically and by intraoperative inspection of the bony surfaces at the second stage. Minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 35 months; range, 24-51 months). RESULTS: Seven patients (12%) became reinfected, four with an organism different from that identified at the index resection arthroplasty. One spacer femoral component broke between stages but did not require any specific treatment. We identified no bone loss between stages and no complications related to the cement-on-cement articulation. The mean pretreatment Knee Society scores of 53 improved to 79. The mean preoperative flexion of 90.6º improved to 101.3º at final followup. CONCLUSIONS: An articulating antibiotic spacer was associated with control of a deep periprosthetic infection in 88% of patients while allowing range of motion between stages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dislocation of an S-ROM total hip arthroplasty secondary to traumatic femoral stem dissociation from the metaphyseal sleeve.

Modular total hip arthroplasty component dissociation has been reported. We describe a case of recurrent instability secondary to femoral stem dissociation from the proximal metaphyseal sleeve and resultant traumatic retroversion of the neck. Femoral stem revision was necessary for treatment of this rare complication.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

Although total hip arthroplasty is a common and highly successful procedure, its long-term durability has been undermined by the cellular response to polyethylene wear debris and the subsequent effects on periprosthetic bone. Research elucidating the effects of sterilization on polyethylene wear has facilitated the development of a more wear-resistant material-highly cross-linked polyethylene. Laboratory testing has demonstrated that highly cross-linked polyethylene has markedly improved wear resistance compared with conventional polyethylene under a variety of conditions. Early clinical data have supported these results. To make informed decisions about this already widely available and frequently used product, the practicing orthopaedic surgeon should have a basic understanding of the production process as well as knowledge of the most current laboratory and clinical data.

Optimizing range of motion in cruciate-retaining mobile-bearing tka: experience with 2000 cases.

We describe experience with 2000 cruciate-retaining Sigma RP total knee arthroplasties performed between September 2000 to January 2006. All procedures were performed with a midvastus arthrotomy, medioposterior release, and posterior condylar clean-out technique. This implant design uses a congruent polyethylene bearing to diminish contact stress while allowing rotation between the polyethylene bearing surface and tibial tray. Of the 2000 knees, 1596 had follow-up data at one year. Seven hundred-twenty-seven had an average flexion of 123 degrees, 692 had an average Knee Society Score of 94, and 672 had an average function score of 86.

The use of reinfusion drains after total knee arthroplasty in patients treated with low molecular weight heparin for thromboembolic prophylaxis.

The effect of closed-suction drainage with red-cell reinfusion on patients receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been previously studied. Therefore, our goals were to determine the effect of reinfusion drains and LMWH on allogeneic transfusions and wound complications after TKA by comparing patients treated with and without drains. Overall, transfusion rates were lower in the drain group (40% vs 15%, P=.04). Patients with reinfusion drains had a significantly higher rate of allogeneic transfusion (15.8%) than those predonating autologous blood and no drain (5.4%, P=.0003). The drain group had lower rates of wound complications (P=not significant). We were unable to demonstrate the efficacy of red-cell reinfusion as a substitute for autologous donation in TKA.