Call to Action: Addressing Pediatric Fall Safety in Ambulatory Environments.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric falls in the ambulatory environment are a patient safety concern. Historically, fall safety efforts have focused on inpatient settings and are not transferrable to ambulatory environments. Minimal research and absence of ambulatory-specific guidelines from regulatory and global benchmarking bodies contribute to the void of knowledge. Consequently, there has been minimal progress in developing fall reduction strategies for the ambulatory environment. PURPOSE: To review research evidence and findings from environmental assessments that included interprofessional stakeholder feedback to make recommendations for improving fall safety in the pediatric ambulatory environment. METHODS: Implementation science was employed in two large pediatric quaternary hospitals to identify existing gaps and provided the foundation for translation of findings in the development of fall safety practice recommendations in the ambulatory environment. RESULTS: Recommendations from the findings included identified barriers and tangible interventions within three broad categories: equipment and furniture, environment, and people. Purposeful inclusion of all areas in the ambulatory environment, integration of high reliability concepts, and partnering with parents were identified as pertinent factors associated with these recommendations. CONCLUSION: This call to action recognizes the importance of utilizing an evidence-based approach for improvement and provides a framework for conducting an environmental assessment, which is an essential starting point to improve fall safety in the pediatric ambulatory environment. Guidance and support from research, regulatory and collaborative bodies, and healthcare organizations remains a critical need in improving fall safety.

Parents' Perception of Fall Risk and Incidence of Falls in the Pediatric Ambulatory Environment.

PURPOSE: To identify the parents' perspective of fall incidence and risks in the pediatric ambulatory environment. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective descriptive correlational study was conducted in two large quaternary pediatric hospitals. Parents who accompanied their children to the clinic appointment were surveyed about falls their child experienced while at the clinic. Parent reported falls were compared to those reported in adverse event reporting systems (AERS) for the same period. RESULTS: Data from 2327 completed parent surveys were analyzed. Parents reported 48 children fell and 139 falls. Only three falls were recorded in the AERS. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify predictors of falls and a nomogram was created from the final model to facilitate patient fall risk screening. Three predictors of falls were identified: children under the age of five, children described by their parents as falling more at home than other children of the same age, and children who had a medical condition that impacts their ability to walk. A nomogram is provided to estimate the probability of falling for patients under 18 years of age in the ambulatory environment. CONCLUSIONS: Parents may provide more reliable data regarding the incidence and risk factors for falls in the ambulatory environment than AERS, and it is possible to predict the probability of a fall given information from the parents. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Knowing who is at risk for falls creates opportunities for organizations to modify clinic procedures, train staff, and create physical environments that promote increased patient safety.

Bedside Usability Surveys: Adding Authentic User Detail to the Assessment.

Errors in healthcare are a leading cause of death in the United States. Equipment usability and user interfaces remain an area not fully elucidated. Infusion pumps play a vital role in care delivery, often essential for critical therapies. While pump function is comparatively simple, their programming, configuration, and form provide opportunity for error. Our purpose was to assess qualities nurses identified as important to pump operation by electronic survey. A self-developed usability survey was distributed to a random sample of 500 nurses, stratified by unit type and employed at the large academic quaternary care hospital. The overall response rate was 48% (n = 240). Descriptive and inferential statistics describe the responses and represent more than 5500 weekly infusions. Nurses described confident use of the system with some differences by unit type. Ninety percent of respondents indicated they have omitted use of the dose error reduction system, which should raise safety concerns. Users reported issues with the user interface and error prevention systems. Qualitative items elicited suggestions for improving aspects of the pump. Employing a usability survey in a clinical area proved to be a simple, inexpensive way to gather more information on the use and potential improvements of infusion pumps.

The great American cookie experiment: engaging staff nurses in research.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to engage staff nurses in research in an informative and fun way by determining nurses' preference for sugar-free chocolate chip cookies versus regular chocolate chip cookies. DESIGN AND METHODS: A descriptive, crossover, double-blinded study was performed using a convenience sample of 300 staff nurses. RESULTS: Nurses preferred the texture, flavor, and overall preference of the regular chocolate chip cookie as compared with the sugar-free chocolate chip cookie (p<0.001). IMPLICATIONS: The Great American Cookie Experiment remains a creative teaching strategy to enhance knowledge and engage nurses in the research process.

Review of evidenced-based practice for the prevention of pressure sores in burn patients.

Pressure ulcers represent a complex clinical problem, with a reported incidence of 2.7% to 29.5% in hospitalized patients and an etiology that is multifactorial. The prevention of pressure sores in the burn patient population is clearly an area of practice in need of guidelines for care. A multidisciplinary group of advanced burn care professionals have compiled, critiqued, and summarized herein the current evidence of practice in nursing, nutrition, and rehabilitation as it pertains to the prevention of pressure sores after burn injuries. A broad overview of risk factors and assessment scales is described, and current intervention practices and recommendations for care are provided based, whenever possible, on research findings. In addition, research questions are generated in an attempt to move the specialty of burns toward the formal investigation of pressure sores with the ultimate goal being the development of evidence-based practice guidelines.