Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 31(6): 375-9, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26364123

RESUMO

Programming infusion pumps has been recognised as a high-risk step and a source of adverse events (Nuckols et al., 2008; Hyman, 2010). Literature describing infusion pump loading dose errors and NORepinephrine complications is scarce (Girard et al., 2010). This case study presents the first ever report of an inadvertent overinfusion of NORepinephrine due to the loading dose option on the infusion pump, and resulting cardiac arrest of the patient. A patient was admitted to the emergency room and started on a NORepinephrine infusion inadvertently as a loading dose rather than a primary infusion. Historical values for the loading dose volume to be infused (VTBI) and primary rate were not adjusted during the setup. Eight hours and 58minutes later, the loading dose VTBI reached 0mL and the pump reverted to the historical primary rate of 999mL/hour. The event log showed that 37.1mL of NORepinephrine was infused resulting in an equivalent calculated bolus dose of 1.8mg administered in two minutes. The patient suffered a cardiac arrest and the infusion was stopped. No faults were found with the pump. Herein, we discuss our analysis of the pump event logs and propose further safety strategies and interventions.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Parada Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Erros de Medicação , Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/enfermagem , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Bombas de Infusão , Masculino , Norepinefrina/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia/enfermagem , Insuficiência Respiratória/enfermagem
2.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 10(3): 181-93, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19320576

RESUMO

OBJECT: Ischemia is an important factor in the pathophysiology of secondary damage after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and, in the setting of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, can be the primary cause of paralysis. Lowering the intrathecal pressure (ITP) by draining CSF is routinely done in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery but has not been evaluated in the setting of acute traumatic SCI. Additionally, while much attention is directed toward maintaining an adequate mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in the acute postinjury phase, little is known about what is happening to the ITP during this period when spinal cord perfusion pressure (MABP - ITP) is important. The objectives of this study were to: 1) evaluate the safety and feasibility of draining CSF to lower ITP after acute traumatic SCI; 2) evaluate changes in ITP before and after surgical decompression; and 3) measure neurological recovery in relation to the drainage of CSF. METHODS: Twenty-two patients seen within 48 hours of injury were prospectively randomized to a drainage or no-drainage treatment group. In all cases a lumbar intrathecal catheter was inserted for 72 hours. Acute complications of headache/nausea/vomiting, meningitis, or neurological deterioration were carefully monitored. Acute Spinal Cord Injury motor scores were documented at baseline and at 6 months postinjury. RESULTS: On insertion of the catheter, mean ITP was 13.8 +/- 1.3 mm Hg (+/- SD), and it increased to a mean peak of 21.7 +/- 1.5 mm Hg intraoperatively. The difference between the starting ITP on catheter insertion and the observed peak intrathecal pressure after decompression was, on average, an increase of 7.9 +/- 1.6 mm Hg (p < 0.0001, paired t-test). During the postoperative period, the peak recorded ITP in the patients randomized to the no-drainage group was 30.6 +/- 2.3 mm Hg, which was significantly higher than the peak intraoperative ITP (p = 0.0098). During the same period, the peak recorded ITP in patients randomized to receive drainage was 28.1 +/- 2.8 mm Hg, which was not statistically higher than the peak intraoperative ITP (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The insertion of lumbar intrathecal catheters and the drainage of CSF were not associated with significant adverse events, although the cohort was small and only a limited amount of CSF was drained. Intraoperative decompression of the spinal cord results in an increase in the ITP measured caudal to the injury site. Increases in intrathecal pressure are additionally observed in the postoperative period. These increases in intrathecal pressure result in reduced spinal cord perfusion that will otherwise go undetected when measuring only the MABP. Characteristic changes in the observed intrathecal pressure waveform occur after surgical decompression, reflecting the restoration of CSF flow across the SCI site. As such, the waveform pattern may be used intraoperatively to determine if adequate decompression of the thecal sac has been accomplished.


Assuntos
Cateterismo , Pressão do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/fisiologia , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Drenagem , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Vértebras Cervicais , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Vértebras Torácicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...