Removal of movement-induced EEG artifacts: current state of the art and guidelines.

Objective:Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technique used to record cortical neurons' electrical activity using electrodes placed on the scalp. It has become a promising avenue for research beyond state-of-the-art EEG research that is conducted under static conditions. EEG signals are always contaminated by artifacts and other physiological signals. Artifact contamination increases with the intensity of movement.Approach:In the last decade (since 2010), researchers have started to implement EEG measurements in dynamic setups to increase the overall ecological validity of the studies. Many different methods are used to remove non-brain activity from the EEG signal, and there are no clear guidelines on which method should be used in dynamic setups and for specific movement intensities.Main results:Currently, the most common methods for removing artifacts in movement studies are methods based on independent component analysis. However, the choice of method for artifact removal depends on the type and intensity of movement, which affects the characteristics of the artifacts and the EEG parameters of interest. When dealing with EEG under non-static conditions, special care must be taken already in the designing period of an experiment. Software and hardware solutions must be combined to achieve sufficient removal of unwanted signals from EEG measurements.Significance:We have provided recommendations for the use of each method depending on the intensity of the movement and highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of the methods. However, due to the current gap in the literature, further development and evaluation of methods for artifact removal in EEG data during locomotion is needed.

Removal of movement-induced EEG artifacts: current state of the art and guidelines.

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technique used to record cortical neurons' electrical activity using electrodes placed on the scalp. It has become a promising avenue for research beyond state-of-the-art EEG research that is conducted under static conditions. EEG signals are always contaminated by artifacts and other physiological signals. Artifact contamination increases with the intensity of movement. In the last decade (since 2010), researchers have started to implement EEG measurements in dynamic setups to increase the overall ecological validity of the studies. Many different methods are used to remove non-brain activity from the EEG signal, and there are no clear guidelines on which method should be used in dynamic setups and for specific movement intensities. Currently, the most common methods for removing artifacts in movement studies are methods based on independent component analysis (ICA). However, the choice of method for artifact removal depends on the type and intensity of movement, which affects the characteristics of the artifacts and the EEG parameters of interest. When dealing with EEG under non-static conditions, special care must be taken already in the designing period of an experiment. Software and hardware solutions must be combined to achieve sufficient removal of unwanted signals from EEG measurements. We have provided recommendations for the use of each method depending on the intensity of the movement and highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of the methods. However, due to the current gap in the literature, further development and evaluation of methods for artifact removal in EEG data during locomotion is needed.

Induced stabilization of center of mass decreases variability of center of pressure regardless of visual or tactile information.

Traditional theories claim that center of pressure (COP) is oscillating to minimize the center of mass (COM) movements, contrary to exploratory theories which propose that COP oscillates to increase sensory information flow from the environment. The aim of this work was to better understand the underlying postural control mechanisms, specifically the interplay of COP oscillations and sensory information flow on keeping the COM stable. Eighteen volunteers took part of the experiment divided into three parts based on sensory conditions: eyes opened, eyes closed and eyes closed with lightly touching a fixed object with one finger. Throughout each part the participants had to quietly stand for 335 s. In the middle of each part, we stabilized their COM for 105 s using a robotized waist-pull system. We recorded whole-body kinematics, COP oscillations, electromyographic activity of soleus and tibialis anterior muscles and the force applied by the finger during light touch conditions. The variability of COP significantly decreased when the COM was stabilized in all sensory conditions. The interaction between sensory condition and stabilization was also significant with different decline of COP variability between quiet standing and stabilization part in all three different sensory conditions. Ankle and knee angle variability decreased significantly while the hip angle variability did not. Our findings suggest that COP is not moving to explore the environment, but to attenuate oscillations of the COM. However, possible functional aspect of movement variability to keep the COM stable still remains.

Inter-Individual Variability in Postural Control During External Center of Mass Stabilization.

Understanding the relation between the motion of the center of mass (COM) and the center of pressure (COP) is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of maintaining body equilibrium. One way to investigate this is to stabilize COM by fixing the joints of the human and looking at the corresponding COP reactions. However, this approach constrains the natural motion of the human. To avoid this shortcoming, we stabilized COM without constraining the joint movements by using an external stabilization method based on inverted cart-pendulum system. Interestingly, this method only stabilized COM of a subgroup of participants and had a destabilizing effect for others which implies significant variability in inter-individual postural control. The aim of this work was to investigate the underlying causes of inter-individual variability by studying the postural parameters of quiet standing before the external stabilization. Eighteen volunteers took part in the experiment where they were standing on an actuated cart for 335 s. In the middle of this period we stabilized their COM in anteroposterior direction for 105 s. To stabilize the COM, we controlled the position of the cart using a double proportional-integral-derivative controller. We recorded COM position throughout the experiment, calculated its velocity, amplitude, and frequency during the quiet standing before the stabilization, and used these parameters as features in hierarchical clustering method. Clustering solution revealed that postural parameters of quiet standing before the stabilization cannot explain the inter-individual variability of postural responses during the external COM stabilization. COM was successfully stabilized for a group of participants but had a destabilizing effect on the others, showing a variability in individual postural control which cannot be explained by postural parameters of quiet-stance.

Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work.

Overhead work is a frequent cause of shoulder work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Exoskeletons offering arm support have the potential to reduce shoulder strain, without requiring large scale reorganization of the workspace. Assessment of such systems however requires to take multiple factors into consideration. This paper presents a thorough in-lab assessment of PAEXO, a novel passive exoskeleton for arm support during overhead work. A list of evaluation criteria and associated performance metrics is proposed to cover both objective and subjective effects of the exoskeleton, on the user and on the task being performed. These metrics are measured during a lab study, where 12 participants perform an overhead pointing task with and without the exoskeleton, while their physical, physiological and psychological states are monitored. Results show that using PAEXO reduces shoulder physical strain as well as global physiological strain, without increasing low back strain nor degrading balance. These positive effects are achieved without degrading task performance. Importantly, participants' opinions of PAEXO are positive, in agreement with the objective measures. Thus, PAEXO seems a promising solution to help prevent shoulder injuries and diseases among overhead workers, without negatively impacting productivity.

Small, movement dependent perturbations substantially alter postural control strategy in healthy young adults.

Postural control is commonly investigated by observing responses to perturbations. We developed a perturbation paradigm mimicking self-generated errors in weight shifting, which are a common cause of falling among older adults. Our aim was to determine the effects of this small, but complex, perturbation on postural sway of healthy young adults and evaluate the role of vision and cognition during movement dependent perturbations. Fifteen participants stood hip-width apart with their eyes open, closed and while performing two different cognitive tasks. Participants were continuously perturbed by medial-lateral (ML) support surface translations corresponding to, and hence doubling, their own center of mass sway. We analyzed the standard deviation (SD), root mean square (RMS), range, and mean power frequency (MPF) of center of pressure displacements. ML postural sway increased due to the perturbation (SD p ≤ .001, range p < .001, RMS p ≤ .001, MPF p < .001). Cognitive load increased the ML sway range (p = .048). Lack of vision increased ML MPF (p = .001) and anterior-posterior (AP) range (p < .001), SD (p < .001), and RMS (p = .001). Significant interaction of vision with the perturbation was found for the ML range (p = .045) and AP SD (p = .018). The perturbation specifically affected ML postural sway. Increased MPF is indicative of a postural control strategy change, which was insufficient for fully controlling the increased sway. Despite being small, this type of perturbation appears to be challenging for young adults.