No Patient Left Behind: A Novel Paradigm to Fulfill Hepatitis C Virus Treatment for Rural Patients.

Background: This study evaluates a novel multidisciplinary program providing expanded access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment for rural Appalachian patients in South Carolina. This program identified patients via an opt-out emergency department screening program, and it aimed to achieve HCV cure by using community paramedics (CPs) to link and monitor patients from treatment initiation through 12-week sustained virologic response (SVR). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years who were HCV RNA positive were eligible for enrollment if they failed to appear for a scheduled HCV appointment or reported barriers to accessing office-based treatment. CPs provided home visits (initial and 4, 12, and 24 weeks) using a mobile Wi-Fi hotspot to support telemedicine appointments (compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) and perform focused physical assessments, venipuncture, and coordinated home delivery of medications. Statistics described participant characteristics, prevalence of SVR, and patient satisfaction results at 12 weeks posttreatment. Results: Thirty-four patients were eligible for SVR laboratory tests by 31 August 2023; the majority were male (61.7%) and White (64.7%) with an average age of 56 years (SD, 11.7). Twenty-eight (82.4%) completed treatment and achieved 12-week SVR. Six (17.6%) were lost to follow-up. Two-thirds strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the overall care that they received, and half strongly agreed that their overall health had improved. Conclusions: This CP-augmented treatment program demonstrated success curing HCV for rural patients who lacked access to office-based treatment. Other health care systems may consider this novel delivery model to treat hard-to-reach individuals who are HCV positive.

The Effect of Contrast Rationing on the Development of Acute Kidney Injury During the Global Contrast Shortage.

BACKGROUND: In April of 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a global shortage of intravenous contrast media (ICM), which led our health care system to implement rationing measures. STUDY OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine if the reduction in ICM use was associated with a change in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis to compare the incidence of AKI in patients who presented before and after ICM rationing. Adult patients who had a CT of the abdomen performed who had at least 2 creatinine measurements, at least 24 h apart, were included. The maximum increase in creatinine was determined by subtracting the maximal creatinine obtained within 7 days with the initial creatinine. The primary outcome was the development of AKI. RESULTS: A total of 2168 patients met inclusion criteria (1082 before; 1086 after). There was no significant difference in age, gender, comorbid conditions, disposition, or initial estimated glomerular filtration rate between groups. In the prerationing group, 87.7% of patients received ICM compared to 42.7% after. There was no significant difference in the development of AKI between groups (11.1% vs. 11.0%), including when stratified by baseline renal function and adjusted for age, sex, race, comorbid conditions, and emergency severity index. CONCLUSIONS: The dramatic reduction in ICM use that resulted from the global shortage was not associated with a change in the incidence of AKI. This reinforces the results of previous studies which have failed to find evidence of a relationship between ICM administration and AKI.

Using Community Paramedicine to Treat Hepatitis C Virus in Upstate South Carolina.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an infection of the liver that can lead to significant liver damage and hepatocellular carcinoma. Individuals born between 1945 and 1965 and individuals with intravenous drug use represent the largest HCV demographics and often experience barriers to treatment. In this case series, we discuss a novel partnership between community paramedics (CPs), HCV care coordinators, and an infectious disease physician to provide HCV treatment to individuals with barriers accessing care. METHODS: Three patients tested positive for HCV within a large hospital system in the upstate region of South Carolina. All of the patients were contacted to discuss their results and scheduled for treatment by the hospital's HCV care coordination team. Patients who expressed barriers to attending in-person appointments or were lost to follow-up were offered a telehealth appointment facilitated by CPs performing a home visit with the added ability to draw blood and perform a physical assessment guided by the infectious disease physician. All of the patients were eligible for and prescribed treatment. The CPs assisted with follow-up visits, blood draws, and other patient needs. RESULTS: Two of the three patients connected to care had an undetectable HCV viral load following 4 weeks of treatment, whereas the third was undetectable after 8 weeks. Only one patient reported a mild headache that was potentially linked to the medication, whereas the others did not report any adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlights the barriers experienced by some HCV-positive patients and a distinctive plan to address impediments to access for HCV treatment.

Prehospital Blood Administration in Pediatric Patients: A Case Report.

Prehospital blood administration programs have demonstrated success both on the battlefield and throughout civilian emergency medical services programs. While previous research often discusses the use of prehospital blood administration for adult trauma and medical patients, few studies have reported the benefits of prehospital blood administration for pediatric patients. This case report describes treatment received by a 7-year-old female gunshot victim who was successfully treated by a prehospital blood administration program in the southern United States.

Missed opportunities for diagnosis of HIV in the emergency department using non-risk-based testing strategy.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify the number of missed opportunities (MO) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diagnoses within our emergency departments (EDs) and assess any significant associated patient characteristics. Following current Centers for Disease Control guidelines, an opt-out HIV screening program was implemented in 2 of 7 EDs within a large Southern healthcare system. This study sought to differentiate the risk of MO in opt-out compared to clinician-initiated, risk-based ED screening protocols. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted from August 2019 to March 2022 of adult patients (≥18 years old) screened for HIV, comparing the ED screening method and characterization of all MOs. MO was defined as any ED visit, before HIV seropositivity, that included sexually transmitted infection screening and/or treatment with no HIV screening. Two EDs implemented generalized opt-out screening for all adult patients (>18 years old); whereas, the remaining 5 sites relied on clinician-initiated screening. Patient characteristics associated with an MO were evaluated by χ2, t tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 19,423 patients were screened for HIV, 142 of who tested positive. Of the 142 HIV-positive individuals, 12 (8.5%) had 1 MO and 3 of 12 (25%) had 2. The proportion of patients with a MO was significantly higher at clinician-initiated EDs as compared opt-out EDs (41.7% vs 13.9%, P = 0.01). After adjusting for demographics, individuals seen at clinician-initiated EDs were more likely to have a MO compared opt-out EDs (adjusted odds ratio, 4.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-18.27; P = 0.02). Conclusion: This novel study highlights the success and overall high positivity (0.7%) of an ED-based opt-out screening program. Taken together, the implementation of generalized opt-out screening within a large Southern healthcare system can rapidly increase overall screening, uncover a surprisingly high positivity rate, and decrease MOs for HIV diagnosis.

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Many emergency departments (EDs) have identified the importance of HIV prevention and have implemented steps to screen and offer preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The objective of this study was to systematically review existing literature that identifies PrEP eligibility in the ED and summarize outcomes along the PrEP cascade of care (awareness, interest, linkage to treatment, initiation, and retention) for patients in ED. METHODS: Four databases captured all PrEP-related studies in EDs from January 1, 2013 to January 27, 2022. Data were extracted on study characteristics and outcomes, and study quality was assessed using a modified quality assessment tool by the Effective Public Health Practice Project. RESULTS: Of the 218 articles, 16 were subjected to full-text review, and 7 met inclusion criteria. Although most studies identified patients who were PrEP eligible using criteria adapted from the 2017 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PrEP guidelines, the number and time frame for each criterion varied. Six studies reported outcomes on the PrEP cascade of care, showing a relatively high prevalence of awareness and interest but a very low prevalence of linkage and uptake. No studies documented retention in PrEP treatment. CONCLUSION: Although up to a third of patients in ED assessed in the current study were PrEP eligible, less than half of PrEP-eligible participants had prior knowledge of PrEP, and very few who expressed interest in the ED were ultimately linked to PrEP treatment or initiated PrEP. Future research is necessary to identify strategies to increase PrEP education, interest, and linkage to care from the ED.

Equine-assisted services for individuals with substance use disorders: a scoping review.

The implementation of equine-assisted services (EAS) during treatment for psychological disorders has been frequently documented; however, little is known about the effect of EAS on outcomes for populations with substance use disorder (SUD). The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize existing literature reporting the effects of EAS when incorporated into SUD treatment. This review followed guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist for scoping reviews. A search of four databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Academic OneFile) identified studies reporting quantitative and/or qualitative data for an EAS intervention that was implemented among a population receiving treatment for and/or diagnosed with SUD. Of 188 titles, 71 underwent full-text assessment and six met inclusion criteria. Three additional articles were identified through other sources. Quantitative data suggested a potential positive effect of EAS on SUD treatment retention and completion as well as participants' mental health; however, studies were limited by small sample sizes. Qualitative data indicated that in addition to participants developing bonds with the horses and perceiving EAS as welcomed breaks from traditional treatment, they experienced increased self-efficacy, positive emotional affect, and SUD treatment motivation. Due to methodological limitations and an overall dearth of available studies, the effectiveness of EAS as adjuncts to SUD treatment is inconclusive. Additional research is necessary before supporting broad implementation of EAS as adjuncts to SUD treatment.

Differences in Motivating Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Perceptions of Infection Risk among Healthcare and EMS Personnel in South Carolina.

OBJECTIVES: Although medical workers were prioritized to receive the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, many have declined. Even though studies have investigated differences in COVID-19-related attitudes and vaccination for workers in hospitals and long-term care facilities, none have included emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. We investigated the association between type of medical worker (EMS vs healthcare worker [HCW]) and COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine beliefs, vaccine motivators, personal protection behaviors, and risk perceptions. METHODS: The data for self-identified HCWs came from surveys distributed to randomly selected residents of South Carolina and EMS personnel recruited at a targeted surveillance testing event during the South Carolina EMS Symposium. Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests analyzed differences in the distribution of demographic characteristics and self-reported COVID-19 vaccination attitudes by medical workers. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between COVID-19 vaccination and type of medical worker, adjusting for age, sex, race, and frontline status, and assessed the associations among vaccine beliefs, vaccine motivators, personal protection behaviors, and risk perceptions by type of medical worker, adjusting for age, sex, race, frontline status, and vaccination status. RESULTS: Of the 126 respondents 57.9% were EMS, 42.1% were HCWs, and 73.6% of the cohort were self-reported frontline medical workers. Approximately two-thirds of respondents received a vaccine for COVID-19, with no significant differences between EMS and HCWs; however, EMS workers were significantly less likely to receive the vaccination out of concern about exposures at work/school (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.57), concern about exposures within the community (aOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.48), or to do their part to control the pandemic (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.69). EMS workers also were significantly less likely to wear a mask all/most of the time when outside the home (aOR 0.04, 95% CI 0.0-0.21) and less concerned about the spread of COVID-19 in their community as compared with HCWs (aOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: EMS personnel were significantly less concerned about the spread of COVID-19 in their community and significantly less likely to wear a mask all/most of the time while outside the home as compared with HCWs. Differences in the COVID-19-related attitudes and personal protection behaviors of EMS personnel should be used to develop targeted interventions to increase vaccine motivation and adherence to personal protection protocols.

Changes in Health-related Quality of Life for Hepatitis C Virus-Infected People Who Inject Drugs While on Opioid Agonist Treatment Following Sustained Virologic Response.

BACKGROUND: Although efforts to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) in people who inject drugs (PWID) yield high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR), the relationship between successful HCV treatment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among PWID is poorly understood. We examined HRQOL changes throughout HCV treatment and post-treatment for PWID achieving SVR. METHODS: Participants included 141 PWID who achieved SVR following HCV treatment onsite at 3 opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clinics in the Bronx, New York. EQ-5D-3L assesses 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), producing an index of HRQOL ranging from 0 to 1. EQ-5D-3L was measured at baseline; 4, 8, and 12 weeks during treatment; and 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment. Linear mixed effects regression models assessed changes in the mean EQ-5D-3L index over time. RESULTS: Mean EQ-5D-3L index baseline was 0.66 (standard error [SE] = 0.02). While over half the population reported no baseline problems with self-care (85.1%), usual activities (56.0%), and mobility (52.5%), at least two-thirds reported problems with pain/discomfort (78.0%) and anxiety/depression (66.0%). Twenty-four weeks post-treatment, proportions reporting pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression decreased by 25.7% and 24.0%, respectively. Mean EQ-5D-3L index significantly improved during treatment (P < .0001), and improvement was sustained following treatment completion, with mean EQ-5D-3L index of 0.77 (SE = 0.02) 12 weeks post-SVR. CONCLUSIONS: HCV treatment led to sustained improvement in HRQOL for PWID on OAT who achieved SVR. Future research is necessary to determine whether improvements in HRQOL can be sustained beyond 12 weeks post-SVR.

HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum Among Individuals Receiving Medication for Opioid Use Disorder, South Carolina, 2020-2021.

We implemented the HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care continuum among individuals receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We screened HIV-negative MOUD participants for PrEP eligibility by assessing injection drug use risk factors and sexual behaviors. Implementation of the PrEP care continuum was challenging; less than a third of MOUD participants were aware of PrEP, and very few initiated PrEP. Findings should promote the development of effective interventions to increase engagement in PrEP during MOUD treatment. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):34-37. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306566).

Effectiveness of peer recovery support services on stages of the opioid use disorder treatment cascade: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Peer recovery support services (PRSS) have been increasingly incorporated during the recovery process for opioid use disorder (OUD), yet little is known about the effects of PRSS on clinical outcomes of individuals who misuse opioids. This study systematically synthesized existing literature reporting the effectiveness of PRSS interventions on stages of the OUD treatment cascade. METHODS: A search conducted on five databases identified studies from database inception to January 26th 2021 that evaluated the effects of PRSS on PRSS engagement, medication for OUD (MOUD) initiation, MOUD retention, opioid and non-opioid misuse, and remission. Characteristics of PRSS interventions, study design, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed with the quality assessment tool for quantitative studies by the Effective Public Health Practice Project. RESULTS: Of 123 titles, 22 were subjected to full-text review and 12 ultimately met inclusion criteria. Only two studies were randomized control trials, half compared the outcomes of PRSS participants to those of a counterfactual group. Most PRSS were unstandardized and broadly described, involving linkage to treatment (91.7%) or follow-up support (91.7%). MOUD initiation was reported the most often (66.7%), followed by PRSS engagement (33.3%) and opioid use (25.0%). No studies reported findings for MOUD retention or remission. Findings for available outcomes were inconsistent and difficult to compare due to the heterogeneity of PRSS interventions and methodological limitations. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of PRSS interventions on stages of the OUD treatment cascade remain inconclusive. Additional research is necessary before supporting the implementation of PRSS on a broad scale.

Assessment of Co-Occurring Substance Use During Opiate Treatment Programs in the United States.

The effectiveness of opiate treatment programs (OTPs) can be significantly influenced by co-occurring substance use, yet there are no standardized guidelines for assessing the influence of co-occurring substance use on treatment outcomes. In this review, we aim to provide an overview on the status of the assessment of co-occurring substance use during participation in OTPs in the United States. We searched 4 databases-MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)-from database inception to November 2018 to select relevant publications on OTPs that assessed participants' co-occurring substance use. We used a standardized protocol to extract study, intervention, and co-occurring substance use characteristics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Of the 3,219 titles screened, 614 abstracts and 191 full-text original publications were assessed, leaving 85 eligible articles. Co-occurring substance use was most often assessed during opioid treatments using combined (pharmacological and behavioral) (n = 57 studies) and pharmacological (n = 25 studies) interventions. Cocaine, alcohol, marijuana, and benzodiazepines were frequently measured, while amphetamines and tobacco were rarely assessed. Great variation existed between studies in the timing and measurement of co-occurring substance use, as well as definitions for substances and polysubstance/polydrug use. Inconsistencies in the investigation of co-occurring substance use make comparison of results across studies challenging. Standardized measures and consensus on research on co-occurring substance use is needed to produce the evidence required to develop personalized treatment programs for persons using multiple substances and to inform best-practice guidelines for addressing polydrug use during participation in OTPs.

The Influence of Co-Occurring Substance Use on the Effectiveness of Opiate Treatment Programs According to Intervention Type.

This systematic review describes the influence of co-occurring substance use on the effectiveness of opiate treatment programs. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from database inception to November 28, 2018, to identify eligible opioid treatment studies in the United States that assessed the relationship between co-occurring substance use and treatment outcome (i.e., opioid abstinence and treatment retention). A total of 34 eligible studies were included. Overall, co-occurring substance use was associated with negative treatment outcomes regardless of intervention type. However, patterns varied by substance and intervention type. In particular, co-occurring use of cocaine or marijuana with opioids was associated with reduced treatment retention and opioid abstinence regardless of intervention type. Co-occurring use of amphetamines, compared with no use or reduced use of amphetamines, decreased treatment retention. Co-occurring use of alcohol was both positively and negatively associated with treatment outcomes. One study reported a significant positive association between sedative use and opioid abstinence. Generally, findings suggest that combined interventions reported better health outcomes compared with pharmacological or behavioral intervention studies alone. The findings of this review emphasize the need to comprehensively study and address co-occurring substance use to improve opiate treatment programs.