Anemia-related response end points in myelofibrosis clinical trials: current trends and need for renewed consensus.

JAK inhibitors are the current standard of care in myelofibrosis, but many do not address and may worsen anemia; thus, anemia-related responses have traditionally been overlooked as efficacy end points in pivotal clinical trials, leading to a lack of consistency and analytic detail in their reporting. Here we apply our experiences in the phase III trials of momelotinib, a JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor and the first therapy indicated by the US FDA for myelofibrosis patients with anemia, to highlight how application of different criteria impacts the anemia-related benefits reported for any potential treatment in myelofibrosis. We advocate for a convention of a new expert consensus panel to bring consistency and transparency to the definition of anemia-related response in myelofibrosis.

What is this Perspective about? Anemia (too few healthy red blood cells) is common in patients with myelofibrosis. While it is becoming more common to measure the anemia benefits associated with potential treatments for myelofibrosis in clinical trials, different definitions of anemia benefit are available. This Perspective reviews these definitions, the differences between them, and why consistency and clarity in measuring anemia benefit matter. The definitions used in clinical trials of momelotinib, a treatment for patients with myelofibrosis and anemia, are also explained to show how the anemia benefit observed in these trials could have changed if different definitions were used. What does this Perspective show? Definitions of anemia benefit may include the number of red blood cell transfusions a patient receives, the amount of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) in their blood, or a combination thereof. Considerations such as timing, the types of patients included, and other factors are not consistent across definitions and not always clearly reported. Results when different definitions of anemia benefit were followed in the momelotinib clinical trials show that the amount of benefit observed with treatments changes depending on which definition is used. What conclusions can be drawn from this Perspective? More consistency and clarity in the definitions of anemia benefit in myelofibrosis clinical trials are needed, suggesting that a new panel of experts should come together to discuss this topic.

Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, and Spain: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Introduction: Newer treatment options for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with efficacy and safety profiles that differ from traditional therapies have facilitated personalized management strategies to optimize patient outcomes. In the context of such personalized management, understanding how treatment characteristics influence patients' preferences is essential. This study assessed patients' preferences for RRMM treatment attributes and determined trade-offs between potential benefits, administration procedures, and adverse effects. Methods: Patients' preferences were evaluated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Patients with RRMM who reported failing two lines of anti-myeloma treatment (immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor [PI]) or ≥ 3 lines (including ≥1 PI, immunomodulatory agent, or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody), were recruited across the US, UK, Italy, Germany, France, and Spain. DCE attributes and levels were identified using a targeted literature review, a review of clinical data for relevant RRMM treatments, qualitative patient interviews, and input from clinical and myeloma patient experts. The DCE was administered within an online survey from February-June 2022. Preference data were analyzed using an error-component logit model and willingness to make trade-offs for potential benefits, and relative attribute importance scores were calculated. Results: Overall, 296 patients from the US (n = 100), UK (n = 49), Italy (n = 45), Germany (n = 43), France (n = 39), and Spain (n = 20) participated in the DCE. Mean (standard deviation) age was 63.8 (8.0) years, 84% had a caregiver, and patients had a median of 3 (range: 2-8) prior lines of therapy. Efficacy attributes most influenced patients' preferences, with increasing overall response rate (25-85%) and overall survival (6 months to 2 years) contributing to ~50% of treatment decision-making. Administration procedures were also considered important to patients. Avoiding individual side effects was considered relatively less important, with patients willing to tolerate increases in side effects for gains in efficacy. Patient characteristics such as rate of disease progression, sociodemographics, or clinical characteristics also influenced treatment preferences. Conclusion: Patients with RRMM were willing to tolerate increased risk of side effects for higher efficacy. Preferences and risk tolerance varied between patients, with preference patterns differing by certain patient characteristics. This highlights the importance of shared decision-making for optimal treatment selection and patient outcomes.

Patient-reported experiences during and following treatment with belantamab mafodotin for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the DREAMM-2 study.

Introduction: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are likely to be living with persistent symptoms, especially bone pain and fatigue, and experiencing restrictions in their physical and social functioning, which reduce health-related quality of life. Methods: This qualitative interview study evaluated patients' perspectives about living with RRMM and their treatment with belantamab mafodotin, using interviews embedded in the Phase II DREAMM-2 trial (NCT03525678) with belantamab mafodotin. Patients consented to participate in up to 2 recorded telephone interviews (at treatment cycle 4 [C4] and at end of treatment [EOT]) comprising open-ended questions. Results: A total of 142 interviews were conducted with 111 unique patients. At C4, common symptoms included neuropathy, fatigue, and bone or joint pain. Improvements in symptom severity were reported by patients who responded to belantamab mafodotin. Symptoms associated with visual impairment, eye irritation, and eye pain reported during the trial were reported to be at- or near-resolution by the EOT interview. Regarding impacts of underlying MM, patients most commonly expressed concerns about changes in daily performance and lifestyle for both responders (67.5% of all impact expressions) and non-responders (63.2%). Overall, interview participants reported being satisfied with belantamab mafodotin treatment. Discussion: This qualitative patient interview study provides valuable insight into patients' symptomatic experience with belantamab mafodotin for their RRMM treatment and may help healthcare providers better anticipate their patients' real-world experience and needs when prescribing this novel agent in the clinic.

Patient-reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Anemic and Symptomatic Patients With Myelofibrosis: Results From the MOMENTUM Study.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm that typically manifests with debilitating symptoms that progressively worsen, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. Fatigue is a multifactorial and burdensome MF-related symptom due to its severity, persistence, and prevalence, with anemia a contributing factor and major unmet need. Clinical trials of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib have shown consistent anemia benefits, in addition to improvements in MF-related symptoms. The phase 3 MOMENTUM trial in symptomatic and anemic patients met its primary end point, with a greater proportion having a Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Total Symptom Score (TSS) reduction ≥50% at week 24 with momelotinib versus danazol. To support the positive primary end point result, we conducted longitudinal, responder, and time-to-event analyses of patient-reported outcomes from MOMENTUM, as measured by the MFSAF, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessments. These analyses demonstrated rapid and durable response benefits with momelotinib, with achievement of first TSS response by day 29 and continued improvement over time. Improvements favored momelotinib versus danazol for each MFSAF individual item, and greater improvements were observed for disease- and cancer-related fatigue and physical functioning at week 24, with significant results for multiple items/domains across the 3 assessments. These findings are consistent in demonstrating that momelotinib provides substantial symptom benefit.

Patient-Reported Outcomes With Belantamab Mafodotin Treatment in Patients With Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

In the randomized phase II DREAMM-2 study, single-agent belantamab mafodotin demonstrated deep and durable responses and a manageable safety profile in triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from this study for patients treated with the approved dose of belantamab mafodotin (2.5 mg/kg q3w). Disease and treatment-related symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functioning, and patient-reported ocular changes were assessed using questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-MY20, Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], and the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 [NEI VFQ-25]) at baseline, during treatment (every 3 or 6 weeks), and at the end of treatment (EOT). Eye examinations were conducted at baseline, prior to each treatment cycle, and at EOT. Patients reported ocular symptoms in the OSDI and NEI VFQ-25 questionnaires, with the median time to worst severity of 45 to 64 days depending on symptoms considered. Some limitations in driving and reading were reported. Ocular symptoms were improved and median time to recovery was 23.5 to 44.0 days. EORTC-QLQ-C30 data suggest core MM symptoms (including fatigue and pain), overall HRQOL, and patient functioning were maintained while patients continued belantamab mafodotin treatment, even if meaningful worsening of vision-related symptoms occurred. These PRO results, together with the clinical efficacy of belantamab mafodotin, support its use in patients with RRMM and further evaluation of its use at earlier lines of therapy.

Single-agent belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final analysis of the DREAMM-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a high unmet treatment need. Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf), a first-in-class, B-cell maturation antigen-binding antibody-drug conjugate, eliminates myeloma cells through direct cell killing and an anti-myeloma immune response. METHODS: DREAMM-2 (NCT03525678) was a phase 2, two-arm, open-label trial in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM who had three or more prior therapies, were refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, and refractory or intolerant to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Belamaf was given at 2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, ocular symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS: This final analysis (cutoff date, March 31, 2022), N = 223, with median follow-up of 12.5 and 13.8 months, demonstrated an ORR of 32% and 35%, median PFS of 2.8 and 3.9 months, and median OS of 15.3 and 14.0 months in the 2.5 mg/kg and 3.4 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Median duration of response was 12.5 and 6.2 months. No new safety signals were observed; the most common Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were keratopathy (29% vs. 25%), thrombocytopenia (22% vs. 29%), and anemia (21% vs. 28%). HRQOL outcomes suggest that overall global health status/quality of life, physical and role functioning, and overall disease symptoms were maintained or improved during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This final analysis of DREAMM-2 confirms that in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, single-agent belamaf results in durable and clinically meaningful responses with a manageable safety profile.

Drivers of physician decision-making and patient perspectives across lines of therapy in multiple myeloma in the USA.

Aim: To explore treatment selection for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), which remains complex due to heterogeneity of available treatments and lack of defined standard of care. Patients & methods: The Adelphi Real World MM Disease Specific Programme surveyed physicians in the USA and their patients with MM to collect real-world data on patterns and perceptions of MM treatment across lines of therapy (LOT). Results: Triplets were the most common regimens across each LOT. Physicians reported efficacy-related factors, health insurance coverage, and clinical guidelines as key determinants of treatment choice regardless of LOT. Patients identified better quality of life as the most important treatment benefit. Conclusion: The DSP RW data highlight drivers of RRMM treatment choice from physicians' and patients' perspectives and need for a more holistic approach to guidelines and clinical trials that encompasses patient perspectives.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer of white blood cells. Treatments tend to become less effective when taken for long periods of time, meaning that patients often receive several different treatments over the course of their disease. Many different drugs and drug combinations are now available for patients with MM. As there is no standardized approach for the treatment of MM, it can be challenging for physicians to choose between the various complex treatment options for their patients, and the key factors that influence physicians' treatment choices remain unclear. In this study, we used information from a survey of physicians and their patients with MM in the USA to investigate which treatments were used most commonly and how physicians and patients made decisions about their treatment. We found that patients with MM were typically treated with a combination of three drugs which differed between patients. When deciding which treatment to prescribe to their patients, physicians primarily considered factors related to how well a treatment works and, in-turn, prolong a patient's life, but this was also considered by physicians to be an area for improvement. While patients also favored treatments associated with a longer life, they more commonly favored those associated with a better quality of life. These findings show that quality of life is important to patients receiving treatment for MM and should be taken into account by physicians when choosing a treatment for their patients.

Real-world patient-reported outcomes and concordance between patient and physician reporting of side effects across lines of therapy in multiple myeloma within the USA.

PURPOSE: We aimed to explore patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient and physician concordance of side effects perception across lines of therapy (LOT) in multiple myeloma (MM) within the United States of America (USA). METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World MM III Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of hemato-oncologists/hematologists and their patients with MM conducted in the USA between August 2020 and July 2021. Physicians reported patient characteristics and side effects. Patients reported side-effect bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using validated PRO tools (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire/-MM Module [EORTC QLQ-C30/-MY20], EQ-5D-3L and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Population physical item 5). Descriptive, linear regression and concordance analyses were performed. RESULTS: Records from 63 physicians and 132 patients with MM were analyzed. EORTC QLQ-C30/-MY20 and EQ-5D-3L scores were consistent across LOTs. Scores tended to be worse with higher side-effect bother; patients "very much" bothered by side effects had lower median (interquartile range) global health status scores (33.3 [25.0-50.0]) than those "not at all" bothered (79.2 [66.7-83.3]). Patient and physician concordance on side-effect reporting was poor to fair. Patients frequently reported fatigue and nausea as bothersome side effects. CONCLUSION: HRQoL of patients with MM was worse with greater side-effect bother. Discordant patient and physician reporting of side effects indicated a need for improved communication during management of MM.

Survival outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma in France: A retrospective cohort study using the Système National des Données de Santé national healthcare database.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at different treatment stages in France. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study used data from the French National Health Insurance database to study patients with MM (diagnosis 2013-2019). Patient outcomes included OS (all-cause mortality), time-to-next treatment (TTNT), and duration of therapy (DoT) from initial diagnosis, the start of different lines of therapy (LOTs), triple-class exposure (TCE), and subsequent treatment following TCE. The Kaplan-Meier method analyzed "time-to-event" data. RESULTS: From diagnosis, death rates increased from 1% at 1 month to 24% at 2 years; median OS was 63.8 months (N = 14 309). Median OS from the start of LOTs declined from 61.0 months (LOT1) to 14.8 months (LOT4). Median OS from TCE start was 14.7 months. There was a large variation in TTNT within LOTs (e.g., LOT1: bortezomib + lenalidomide: TTNT = 26.4 months, OS = 61.7 months; lenalidomide: TTNT = 20.0 months, OS = 39.6 months); DoT was similar for LOT1 and LOT2, then progressively declined at LOT4. Patients with stem cell transplant, younger age, and less comorbidity had better survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MM face a poor prognosis after relapse to multiple LOTs and TCE, demonstrating a worsening of survival outcomes. Access to novel therapies may improve outcomes.

A toolbox of different approaches to analyze and present PRO-CTCAE data in oncology studies.

BACKGROUND: The patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is used to assess symptomatic adverse events in oncology trials. Currently, no standard for PRO-CTCAE analysis exists. METHODS: Key methods of descriptive analysis and longitudinal modeling using PRO-CTCAE data from an oncology clinical trial, DRiving Excellence in Approaches to Multiple Myeloma-2 (DREAMM-2), a phase II trial of belantamab mafodotin in multiple myeloma (NCT03525678), were explored. Descriptive methods included maximum postbaseline ratings, mean change over time, ratings above a predefined cutoff, line graphs, and stacked bar charts to illustrate patient-reported adverse events at one timepoint or dynamics over time. Analysis methods involving modeling over time included toxicity over time (ToxT) (repeated measurement model, time-to-event, area under the curve analyses), generalized estimating equations (GEE), and ordinal log-linear models (OLLMs). RESULTS: Visualizations of PRO-CTCAE data highlighted different aspects of the data. Selection of the appropriate visualization will depend on the audience and message to be conveyed. Consistent results were obtained by all modeling approaches; no difference was found between dose groups of the DREAMM-2 study in any PRO-CTCAE item by the ToxT approach or the more sophisticated GEE and OLLM methods. Interpretation of GEE results was the most challenging. OLLM supported the interval nature of the PRO-CTCAE response scale in the DREAMM-2 study. All modeling approaches account for multiple testing (driven by the number of items). CONCLUSIONS: Descriptive analyses and longitudinal modeling approaches are complementary approaches to presenting PRO-CTCAE data. In modeling, the ToxT approach may be a good compromise compared with more sophisticated analyses.

Treatment patterns and overall survival of patients with double-class and triple-class refractory multiple myeloma: a US electronic health record database study.

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) resistant to multiple drug classes remain a high unmet need population. This longitudinal retrospective cohort study assessed real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in adults with RRMM. Patients who had three or more prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent (double-exposed) were further categorized as refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory agent (double-class refractory, n = 381) or additionally to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (triple-class refractory, n = 173). Treatment options are limited for patients with double-class or triple-class refractory disease. Retreatment is a part of standard of care. Bortezomib and lenalidomide had the highest retreatment rates among double-class and triple-class refractory patients. Survival outcomes remain poor among RRMM patients with median overall survival (OS) of 22.3 and 11.6 months for double-class refractory and triple-class refractory patients, respectively. This study highlights the need for novel efficacious therapies in this heavily pretreated RRMM population.

Assessing the treatment pattern, health care resource utilisation, and economic burden of multiple myeloma in France using the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS) database: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on health care resource utilisation (HCRU) and costs for French patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are limited due to the quickly evolving MM treatment landscape. This retrospective, national-level study quantified the MM economic burden in France. METHODS: The study included patients with newly diagnosed MM from the Système National des Données de Santé coverage claims database between 2013 and 2018 who received active treatment within 30 days of diagnosis. HCRU included hospitalisations, drugs, consultations, procedures, tests, devices, transport, and sick leave. Costs were annualized to 2019 prices. Drug treatments, reported by line of therapy (LOT), were algorithmically defined using drug regimen, duration of therapy, and gaps between treatments. Analyses were stratified by stem cell transplantation status and LOT. RESULTS: Among 6413 eligible patients, 6229 (97.1%) received ≥ 1 identifiable LOT; most received 1 (39.8%) or 2 LOT (27.5%) during follow-up. Average annual hospitalisation was 6.3 episodes/patient/year (median duration: 11.6 days). The average annual cost/patient was €58.3 K. Key cost drivers were treatment (€28.2 K; 39.5% of total HCRU within one year of MM diagnosis) and hospitalisations (€22.2 K; 48.6% of total HCRU costs in first year). Monthly treatment-related costs increased from LOT1 (€2.447 K) and LOT5 + (€7.026 K); only 9% of patients received LOT5 + . At LOT4 + , 37 distinct regimens were identified. Hospitalisation costs were higher in patients with stem cell transplantation than total population, particularly in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a high economic burden of MM in France (€72.37 K/patient/year in the first year) and the diversity of regimens used in late-line treatments.

Budget Impact of Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf) Adoption in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.

PURPOSE: Estimate the budget impact of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received ≥4 prior therapies, including an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, a proteasome inhibitor, and an immunomodulatory agent. METHODS: A budget impact analysis (BIA) was developed to estimate the cost difference between current (no belamaf) and projected (with belamaf) market scenarios over 3 years. Comparators were identified from a systematic literature review and included selinexor + dexamethasone or best supportive care. The number of treatment-eligible patients were estimated using an epidemiology model. Base-case analyses were conducted from a US commercial payer perspective (cost year: 2019). Model inputs included market share estimates, treatment duration, and costs of drug acquisition/administration, concomitant medications, adverse event (AE) management, treatment monitoring, and subsequent treatments based on published literature/cost databases. Budget impact, calculated as the difference in costs between current and projected scenarios over 3 years, was reported as cost per member per month (PMPM) and per member per year (PMPY). One-way sensitivity analysis assessed which key parameters most affected model outcomes. Alternative scenarios were tested (1- or 5-year time horizon; Medicare perspective; negligible cost of mental status change AE). RESULTS: In a hypothetical commercial payer health plan with 1 million members, 33 patients were identified as treatment-eligible over 3 years. Introducing belamaf for patients with RRMM resulted in an estimated budget-neutral PMPM cost of -$0.0003 and PMPY of -$0.004, based on n=9/33 patients receiving treatment. Sensitivity analyses showed that budget impact in the base case was most sensitive to changes in treatment duration and drug acquisition costs. Base-case results were consistent across all scenarios assessed. CONCLUSION: BIA indicates that adoption of belamaf in this patient population would be budget neutral for a US health plan.

DREAMM-2: Indirect Comparisons of Belantamab Mafodotin vs. Selinexor + Dexamethasone and Standard of Care Treatments in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Single-agent belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; BLENREP) demonstrated deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory agent, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 antibody (DREAMM-2; NCT03525678). METHODS: At the time of this study, STORM Part 2, NCT02336815 (selinexor plus low-dose dexamethasone; sel + dex) was systematically identified as the only feasible comparator to the DREAMM-2 cohort. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) evaluated efficacy and safety of belamaf (2.5 mg/kg; n = 97) versus sel + dex (80 mg + 20 mg, respectively; n = 123). Populations were weighted for clinically validated effect modifiers and prognostic factors. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), and safety. The relative efficacy of belamaf versus standard of care (SoC) on OS was estimated by a Bucher indirect treatment comparison using the MAIC-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for OS of belamaf (DREAMM-2) versus sel + dex (STORM Part 2) and a HR adjusted for refractoriness to carfilzomib and high-risk cytogenetics of sel + dex (STORM) versus SoC (MAMMOTH). RESULTS: Belamaf demonstrated improved OS (HR 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.34, 0.83; p = 0.005) and DoR (0.41; 0.21, 0.83; p = 0.013) versus sel + dex. There were no statistically significant differences in ORR, TTR, and PFS. Belamaf had a favorable safety profile for most evaluable hematologic (any-grade, Grade 3-4) and non-hematologic (any-grade) adverse events versus sel + dex. Significantly improved OS was observed with belamaf versus SoC (0.29; 0.16, 0.54; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Single-agent belamaf represents a new treatment option for triple-class refractory patients with RRMM.

Belantamab mafodotin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in heavily pretreated patients: a US cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) require several lines of therapy, with typically shorter remission duration with each additional line. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; DREAMM-2; NCT03525678) was compared with selinexor plus dexamethasone (SEL+DEX; STORM Part 2; NCT02336815) among patients with RRMM who have received at least four prior therapies. The base case used a US commercial payer's perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Efficacy data were based on parametric survival analysis of DREAMM-2 and matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison between DREAMM-2 and STORM Part 2, which assessed relative treatment effects between belamaf and SEL+DEX. Cost inputs included drug treatment, concomitant medications, adverse event management, subsequent treatments, and disease management. RESULTS: Belamaf decreased total treatment costs per patient by $14,267 and increased patient life years by 0.74 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.49 versus SEL+DEX. Patients receiving belamaf accrued 0.12 fewer progression-free life years versus patients on SEL+DEX. CONCLUSIONS: From a US commercial payer's perspective, belamaf had lower costs, and increased QALYs and life-year gain, compared with SEL+DEX. Belamaf is therefore likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with RRMM who have received four or more prior lines of therapy.

Patient Perspectives of the Social, Emotional and Functional Impact of Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, autoimmune disease of hair loss, which can significantly affect the emotional and psychological well-being of patients. A systematic literature review was conducted to better understand the burden of AA from the patient perspective. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched for published studies (2008-2018) reporting on assessments of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with AA. Qualitative, and quantitative data were collected. RESULTS: The review included 37 studies encompassing a range of clinical outcome assessment (COA) tools. None of the COA tools were specific for AA, and only one study used the Hairdex scale, which was designed to evaluate HRQoL in patients with disorders of the hair and scalp. All studies reported substantial impact on HRQoL due to AA, both overall and in domains related to personality (i.e. temperament and character), emotions and social functioning. Acute stress was also noted, and several studies identified lack of emotional awareness (alexithymia) in 23-50% of the patients with AA. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is well-established that patients with AA experience anxiety and depression, they also experience a decrease in HRQoL in many other areas, including personality, emotions, behaviors and social functioning, and these changes may be accompanied by acute stress and alexithymia. There is a need to achieve consensus on a core set of measures for AA and to develop and validate AA-specific measurement tools for use in future studies, to attain a clearer understanding of the impact of AA on patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number; CRD42019118646.

STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed published studies to better understand how AA affected people socially, emotionally and in their day-to-day functioning. We also looked at how healthcare providers measured these social, emotional and day-to-day effects on people with AA. Our review included 37 published studies that used several evaluation tools to measure the impacts of AA. These included a variety of questionnaires that were answered by people with AA. RESULTS: The studies reported that AA negatively affected the personality, emotions, behaviors and/or social functioning of many people with AA. However, none of the evaluation tools that were used in those studies were specific for AA, and most of the evaluation tools did not include questions about the hair or scalp. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that a group of people familiar with AA (practitioners, researchers and patients) work together to develop an evaluation tool that is designed specifically for people with AA. This evaluation tool can then be used in future studies to better understand how AA affects people socially, emotionally and in their day-to-day functioning.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease in which a person's immune system attacks their hair follicles, from which hairs grow, causing hair loss. Studies have shown that people with AA may have a lower quality of life, and studies have reported higher rates of depression and anxiety in people with AA than in people without AA.

Correction to: Development of a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measures for assessing symptoms and functioning in patients with heart failure.

The article Development of a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measures for assessing symptoms and functioning in patients with heart failure.

Development of a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measures for assessing symptoms and functioning in patients with heart failure.

PURPOSE: Heart failure (HF) is a common condition that places considerable burden on patients. We aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess the symptoms and impacts of HF. METHODS: Phase 1: a targeted literature review, expert interviews, and concept elicitation (CE) interviews with patients with HF (n = 26) were used to develop a conceptual model of the core symptoms and impacts of HF. To capture these concepts, three new fit-for-purpose PRO questionnaires were constructed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance. Phase 2: three 'waves' of cognitive interviews were conducted with patients with HF (n = 28) to validate and refine the questionnaires. RESULTS: Three key symptoms-shortness of breath, oedema, and fatigue-were identified across the literature review, expert interviews and CE interviews. Several additional symptoms, cognitive changes and impacts of HF were reported in the CE interviews and included in the conceptual model. A 10-item symptom questionnaire (Heart Failure-Daily Symptom Diary) was constructed; cognitive testing showed that the final PRO measure was easy to understand/complete and relevant to patients with HF, confirming content validity. Two HF impact questionnaires were developed (Assessing Dyspnoea's Impact on Mobility and Sleep and Heart Failure-Functional Status Assessment), but required refinement to ensure patient understanding. CONCLUSIONS: Patient input contributed to the development of a PRO instrument for assessing physical and cognitive symptoms important to patients with HF using novel measurement strategies. Inclusion of daily metrics offers differentiation from other qualified instruments and may provide clinical insight for improving lifestyles. Additionally, two draft PRO measures may, after further validation, be useful to assess the impacts of HF.

The Burden of Congestion in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Congestion is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. We characterized congestion in patients hospitalized for HF and examined the association between congestion severity at admission and postdischarge outcomes. Using the OPTIMIZE-HF registry linked to Medicare claims, we analyzed patients ≥65 years old hospitalized for HF from 2003 to 2004. Congestion severity was measured using a 15-point scale that scores dyspnea, orthopnea, fatigue, jugular venous pressure, rales, and edema. Patient characteristics and outcomes were described by congestion strata. Proportional hazards models were fit to examine associations between congestion and 1-year outcomes. Congestion scores for the 24,724 patients ranged from 0 to 14, with a median of 5 (Q1, Q3: 3, 7). At baseline, patients with the highest scores (≥7) had the highest rates of recent HF hospitalizations, EF ≤40%, and co-morbidities, including arrhythmias, diabetes mellitus, and renal insufficiency. Adjusting for patient characteristics, a 3-point congestion score increase was positively associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.09), all-cause rehospitalization (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04), and HF rehospitalization (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06, 1.12), but not emergency department visits (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97, 1.01). In conclusion, for patients hospitalized with HF, congestion was associated with rehospitalization and mortality.