Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of hyperactive delirium in advanced cancer patients between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care.

BACKGROUND: Hyperactive delirium is known to increase family distress and the burden on health care providers. We compared the prevalence and associated factors of agitated delirium in advanced cancer patients between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care on admission and at 3 days before death. METHODS: This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of two multicenter, prospective cohort studies of advanced cancer patients, which were performed at 23 palliative care units (PCUs) between Jan and Dec 2017, and on 45 palliative home care services between July and Dec 2017. RESULTS: In total, 2998 patients were enrolled and 2829 were analyzed in this study: 1883 patients in PCUs and 947 patients in palliative home care. The prevalence of agitated delirium between PCUs and palliative home care was 5.2% (95% CI: 4.2% - 6.3%) vs. 1.4% (0.7% - 2.3%) on admission (p < 0.001) and 7.6% (6.4% - 8.9%) vs. 5.4% (4.0% - 7.0%) 3 days before death (p < 0.001). However, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the place of care was not significantly associated with the prevalence of agitated delirium at 3 days before death after adjusting for prognostic factors, physical risk factors, and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of agitated delirium at 3 days before death between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care after adjusting for the patient background, prognostic factors, symptoms, and treatment.

Validation of the Simplified Palliative Prognostic Index Using a Single Item From the Communication Capacity Scale.

CONTEXT: Although the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) is a reliable and validated tool to predict the survival of terminally ill cancer patients, all clinicians cannot always precisely diagnose delirium. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to examine the predictive value of a simplified PPI. In the simplified PPI, a single item from the Communication Capacity Scale was substituted for the delirium item of the original. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted in Japan from September 2012 through April 2014 and involved 16 palliative care units, 19 hospital-based palliative care teams, and 23 home-based palliative care services. Palliative care physicians recorded clinical variables at the first assessment and followed up patients six months later. RESULTS: A total of 2425 subjects were recruited; 2343 had analyzable data. The C-statistics of the original and simplified PPIs were 0.801 and 0.800 for three week and 0.800 and 0.781 for six-week survival predictions, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for survival predictions using the simplified PPI were 72.9% and 67.6% (for three week) and 80.3% and 61.8% (for six week), respectively. CONCLUSION: The simplified PPI showed essentially the same predictive value as the original PPI and is an alternative when clinicians have difficulties in diagnosing delirium.

The Accuracy of Physicians' Clinical Predictions of Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

CONTEXT: Accurate prognoses are needed for patients with advanced cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of physicians' clinical predictions of survival (CPS) and assess the relationship between CPS and actual survival (AS) in patients with advanced cancer in palliative care units, hospital palliative care teams, and home palliative care services, as well as those receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in 58 palliative care service centers in Japan. The palliative care physicians evaluated patients on the first day of admission and followed up all patients to their death or six months after enrollment. We evaluated the accuracy of CPS and assessed the relationship between CPS and AS in the four groups. RESULTS: We obtained a total of 2036 patients: 470, 764, 404, and 398 in hospital palliative care teams, palliative care units, home palliative care services, and chemotherapy, respectively. The proportion of accurate CPS (0.67-1.33 times AS) was 35% (95% CI 33-37%) in the total sample and ranged from 32% to 39% in each setting. While the proportion of patients living longer than CPS (pessimistic CPS) was 20% (95% CI 18-22%) in the total sample, ranging from 15% to 23% in each setting, the proportion of patients living shorter than CPS (optimistic CPS) was 45% (95% CI 43-47%) in the total sample, ranging from 43% to 49% in each setting. CONCLUSION: Physicians tend to overestimate when predicting survival in all palliative care patients, including those receiving chemotherapy.

Tumor necrosis factor receptor regulation of bone marrow cell apoptosis during endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation.

Although inflammation-induced release of cells from the bone marrow (BM) is well established, less is known regarding inflammation-induced modulation of bone marrow cell numbers by apoptosis. The purpose of this study is to assess apoptosis of BM immature and mature myeloid cells and peripheral granulocytes, and to elucidate the role(s) of TNFR-p55 and TNFR-p75 as modulators of apoptosis in these cellular compartments in a mouse model of endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation. Gene knockout (p55(-/-), p75(-/-), and p55(-/-)/p75(-/-)), or wild-type (WT) mice were injected i.p. with saline (Sal) or LPS (4 microg/g) followed by collection of BM cells and peripheral blood after 24 h. Apoptosis was assessed by propidium iodide staining using two-color flow cytometry with differentiated granulocyte-specific Gr1-fluorescein isothiocyanate. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Neuman-Keuls post hoc test were used for statistical analyses. After i.p. LPS, apoptosis was induced to the higher level in BM Gr1(-) cells than in BM Gr1(+) cells and was not induced in peripheral Gr1(+) cells. Depletion of cell numbers in both BM Gr1(-) and Gr1(+) subpopulations after LPS treatment was consistent with increase of the apoptotic cell percentages in the groups. LPS-induced apoptosis was significantly lower in Gr1(-) cells from the -p55(-/-)/LPS and p55(-/-)/p75(-/-)/LPS mice but not from p75(-/-)/LPS mice as compared with WT/LPS mice, whereas there was no difference in apoptosis of BM Gr1(+) and peripheral Gr1(+) cells among WT groups and knockout groups. Thus, apoptosis of myeloid cells during endotoxemia is minimized because these cells undergo differentiation, which in turn may be because of the attenuation of the proapoptotic effect of TNFR-p55 shown herein to occur with myeloid differentiation. In contrast, TNFR-p75 seems to play a minimal role in apoptosis induction in Gr1(-) myeloid cells during endotoxemia. One explanation for a decrease in BM cell numbers during endotoxemia may be via induction of apoptosis in immature myeloid cells.

Modulation of the lipopolysaccharide receptor complex (CD14, TLR4, MD-2) and toll-like receptor 2 in systemic inflammatory response syndrome-positive patients with and without infection: relationship to tolerance.

The lipopolysaccharide (LPS) receptor complex consists of two interacting receptors (CD14 and TLR4) and an associated protein (MD-2). When engaged by LPS, as in gram-negative infection, this complex transduces a signal detected by MyD88 and passed onward by a cascade of the IRAKs, TRAF6, and NIK, resulting in activation of NF-kappaB. A similar cascade, mediated by TLR2, occurs with ligands derived from gram-positive bacteria. In vitro studies of human monocytes have shown that TLR4 mRNA is paradoxically upregulated in response to "tolerizing" doses of LPS. This study evaluated changes in vivo of blood monocyte CD14, TLR4, TLR2, and MD-2 mRNA by reverse transcription followed by real-time polymerase chain reaction in surgical intensive care unit patients and in normal controls. In addition cell-surface receptor expression of TLR2, TLR4, and CD14 was assessed by flow cytometry in patients and normal controls. Inflammation-induced acute tolerance to LPS was evaluated by ex vivo whole blood tumor necrosis factor alpha production and was significantly reduced in patients compared with controls, confirming LPS hyporesponsiveness. Monocyte mRNA and cell-surface receptor expression of TLR4 were increased 2.4-fold (P < 0.05) and 1.7-fold (P <.002), respectively, in patients compared with normal controls. Monocyte TLR2 mRNA, MD-2 mRNA and CD14 and TLR2 cell-surface expression were not significantly changed compared with controls. The present study suggests that the acute inflammatory condition associated with peripheral cellular LPS hyporesponsiveness is neither specific to prior infectious challenge nor can be ascribed to significant alterations in expression of the cell-surface LPS binding complex proteins.

Fas-mediated neutrophil apoptosis and associated A1 protein expression during systemic inflammation are regulated independently of both tumor necrosis factor receptors.

TNFR-1 (p55) and Fas share a death domain which is critical for apoptosis signaling whereas TNFR-p55 and TNFR-2 (p75) can activate NF-kappaB leading to anti-apoptotic proteins expression such as A1. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the role(s) of TNFR-p55 and TNFR-p75 in Fas-mediated neutrophil apoptosis and A1 expression in a mouse model of endotoxemia. Gene knockout (KO) (p55-/-, p75-/-, p55(-/-)/p75(-/-)) or wild type (WT) mice were injected i.p. with saline or LPS (4 microg/g) followed by collecting peripheral blood after 24 h. Neutrophil apoptosis was assessed by propidium iodide staining using two-color flow cytometry with granulocyte-specific Gr1-FITC after 6-h whole blood culture with or without Fas agonist Jo2 (300 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of cycloheximide (CHX, 30 microg/ml). Membrane-associated receptors (Fas, TNFR-p55 and TNFR-p75) and cytoplasmic A1 expression of freshly isolated neutrophils were assessed by one-color flow cytometry and western blotting respectively. Compared with the group-WT/Sal, Jo2 induced apoptosis only in the presence of CHX (J+C). J+C-induced apoptosis was significantly lower in the group-p55(-/-)/Sal and p55(-/-)/p75(-/-)/Sal but not in the group-p75(-/-)/Sal. J+C-induced apoptosis was inhibited similarly in all the LPS-injected WT and KO mice. Strong A1 expression was also induced similarly in all the LPS-injected WT and KO mice. Fas and TNFR-p55 expression was normal and TNFR-p75 was significantly increased in all the LPS-injected WT and KO mice although absence of the appropriate surface receptors was confirmed in the KO mice. We conclude that p55 normally plays a proapoptotic role, but p75 appears to play a minimal role in Fas-mediated neutrophil apoptosis. During endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation, both TNFR-p55 and TNFR-p75 appear to be of minimal importance for modulation of Fas-mediated apoptosis and associated A1 protein expression despite normal Fas/TNFR-p55 and increased TNFR-p75 expression in neutrophils.