Comparison Between Second- and Third-generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), administration of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is mandatory to prolong survival. To date, a comparison of second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs has not been reported as far as we are aware. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the survival time of patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced or recurrent NSCLC who had received afatinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, or osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, as the first-line treatment. RESULTS: Among the 49 patients included in the study, 15 received afatinib and 34 received osimertinib. No significant differences in overall survival were observed between the two groups [afatinib vs. osimertinib=36 vs. 33 months (hazard ratio=2.917, 95% confidence interval=0.780-10.905; p=0.112)]. T790M mutation was detected in three of the patients in the afatinib group, and all three subsequently received osimertinib. The median overall survival of these three patients and of the 12 without the mutation were 63 and 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no apparent difference in the effect on survival between second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, whereas the sequential administration of second- followed by third-generation EGFR-TKIs appeared to confer a better long-term prognosis.

Exacerbation of autoimmune myocarditis by an immune checkpoint inhibitor is dependent on its time of administration in mice.

BACKGROUND: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made an immense breakthrough in cancer therapeutics, they can exert unique, immune-related adverse events. Among them, myocarditis is less frequent, but it is serious and often follows a lethal course. METHODS: To examine the changes in cardiac autoimmunity after ICI administration, we developed a mouse experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) model via intraperitoneal administration of murine α-cardiac myosin heavy chain (MyHC-α) fragment. Thereafter, the mouse anti-PD-1 antibody (mPD1ab) was administered at two time points, subsequent to and concurrent with MyHC-α fragment administration. RESULTS: Severe EAM developed in 3 weeks; wide inflammatory lesions were observed in the cardiac sections. Furthermore, inflammatory/fibrotic genes, such as interleukin 1ß, interleukin 6, and collagen 1, were upregulated, although the cardiac function was not significantly affected. The subsequent administration of mPD1ab at 2 weeks post administration of the first MyHC-α fragment exacerbated EAM, whereas the administration of mPD1ab concurrent with MyHC-α fragment administration did not exacerbate EAM. The subsequent administration of mPD1ab significantly increased the infiltration of cluster of differentiation (CD)4- and F4/80-positive cells, whereas the concurrent administration of mPD1ab significantly decreased the infiltration of CD4-positive cells, indicating that the concurrent and subsequent administration of mPD1ab had opposite effects on immune/inflammatory cell infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the appearance of ICI-induced autoimmune myocarditis might be related to autoimmune system activity before ICI administration. Although ICIs do not adversely affect patients with normal immune systems, we propose that ICI administration should be avoided in patients with autoimmune disorders.

Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gefitinib With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L.

PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase has been an important target for non-small-cell lung cancer. Several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved, and both gefitinib and erlotinib are the most well-known first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This randomized phase III study was conducted to investigate the difference between these two EGFR-TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or erlotinib. This study aimed to investigate the noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-one patients were randomly assigned, including 401 patients (71.7%) with EGFR mutation. All baseline factors (except performance status) were balanced between the arms. Median PFS and overall survival times for gefitinib and erlotinib were 6.5 and 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.125; 95% CI, 0.940 to 1.347; P = .257) and 22.8 and 24.5 months (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 0.833 to 1.294; P = .768), respectively. The response rates for gefitinib and erlotinib were 45.9% and 44.1%, respectively. Median PFS times in EGFR mutation-positive patients receiving gefitinib versus erlotinib were 8.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.879 to 1.358; P = .424). The primary grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rash (2.2% for gefitinib v 18.1% for erlotinib) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (6.1%/13.0% for gefitinib v 2.2%/3.3% for erlotinib). CONCLUSION: The study did not demonstrate noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib in terms of PFS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma according to the predefined criteria.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung with cancer-associated retinopathy.

We report a rare case of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung with cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR). To our knowledge, only two cases of LCNEC with CAR have been reported, one in 1995 and another in 2013. CAR, typically associated with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), is one of the paraneoplastic syndromes with deterioration of visual acuity, visual field constriction, and photophobia. CAR is caused by an autoimmune system reaction against the same antigen in the tumor and retinal photoreceptor cells. To diagnose CAR, genetic retinal dystrophies or any other medical causes of retinopathy should be excluded, but there are no standard diagnostic criteria. Anti-retinal antibodies are known to be positive in CAR patients, and anti-recoverin antibodies are thought to be sensitive and specific to CAR. In our case, anti-recoverin antibodies were not detected by serum tests, but CAR could be diagnosed on the basis of ophthalmological findings including clinical symptoms, electroretinographic findings, and visual field tests. CAR with clinical features of rapid visual disorder should be considered in LCNEC patients as well as in SCLC patients.

Cytokeratin-positive rib osteosarcoma metastasizing to the small intestine.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a malignant tumor in which osteoid or bone is produced directly by tumor cells. Some OS cells are positive for cytokeratin (CK) and epithelial membrane antigen by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and this may lead to a misdiagnosis of metastatic carcinoma, particularly when the tumor location is unusual. On the other hand, gastrointestinal metastasis of OS is rare. We present the case of a 67-year-old Japanese man with a small intestinal intussusception due to metastasis of a CK-positive rib OS. The tumor cells were positive for CK, osteopontin and osteonectin by IHC and a diagnosis of a CK-positive chest wall OS metastasizing to the small intestine was considered. Osteoid or bone formation was histologically absent and therefore chest wall OS had to be differentially diagnosed from metastatic carcinoma of unknown origin. A postmortem histological analysis confirmed a rib OS. Awareness of CK-positive OS is important for making a correct diagnosis and for disease management and an immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor for expression of osteopontin and osteonectin may be used to support the diagnosis. In addition, this case shows that rib OS can metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract, albeit rarely, which may induce an intestinal intussusception.

A phase II study of cisplatin /S-1 in patients with carcinomas of unknown primary site.

BACKGROUND: Carcinomas of unknown primary site (CUPs) are heterogeneous tumors associated with a poor prognosis. This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination chemotherapy of S-1 and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with CUP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated CUPs were eligible for this trial. The treatment schedule consisted of oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2)) twice a day on days 1-21, and intravenous CDDP (60 mg/m(2)) on day 8. This schedule was repeated every 5 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 41.3% and 80.4%, respectively. The median overall survival time was 17.4 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 28.3%, 13.0%, and 2.2% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: CDDP plus S-1 combination chemotherapy is well tolerated and active first-line empiric therapies for patients with CUP.

[Serotonin syndrome in a patient with small cell lung cancer].

The patient was a 67-year-old male who had been treated for several years with 150 mg fluvoxamine maleate due to depression. He visited our hospital with primary symptoms of swelling of the right upper extremity and dyspnea in August, XXXX. As a result of examinations, he was diagnosed with stage IIIB extended small cell lung cancer(T4N3M0). One course of carboplatin/etoposide(CBDCA/VP-16)therapy was started on October 1. Since the tumor size was reduced, thoracic effusion disappeared, and superior vena cava syndrome was alleviated, the therapy was changed to cisplatin/irinotecan (CDDP/CPT-11)on October 23, and the 3rd course was initiated on November 22. Anxiety and tremor appeared on the 4th day of the 3rd course and because they were exacerbated, and myoclonus appeared, a diagnosis of serotonin syndrome was made on the 38th day, and the administration of fluvoxamine maleate was discontinued. The symptoms were alleviated after the discontinuation, and the 4th course could be implemented. In this patient, serotonin syndrome was considered to have been induced by serotonin secretion promoted by the CDDP administration, and by serotonin in the brain increasing abnormally due to the SSRI.

Gene amplification of ribosomal protein S6 kinase-1 and -2 in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The gene amplification of ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 and 2 (S6K1 and S6K2) and its clinical relevance in gastric cancer remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative genomic hybridization analysis and DNA copy number assay were performed for nine cancer cell lines. The gene amplification of S6K1 and S6K2 were determined using a DNA copy number assay of 213 gastric cancer tissues. RESULTS: S6K1 and S6K2 amplifications were observed in one and three cancer cell lines, respectively. No amplification of S6K1 was detected in the gastric cancer tissues, while S6K2 amplification was observed in 4.7% of the gastric carcinoma tissues. Patients with stage IV gastric cancer whose tumors exhibited amplification had a significantly shorter overall survival. CONCLUSION: S6K2 amplification was frequently observed in gastric cancer and was related to a poor prognosis. Our findings may provide novel insight into the dysregulation of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling by S6K2 amplification in gastric cancer.

First report of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the Src kinase inhibitor saracatinib (AZD0530) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Saracatinib (AZD0530) is a selective, oral Src inhibitor that has demonstrated antitumour activity in preclinical studies. METHODS: This open-label, dose-escalation, phase I study evaluated the safety and tolerability of saracatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00704366). Patients received continuous once-daily oral dosing with saracatinib starting 7 days after a single dose in ascending dose cohorts until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or disease progression. Pharmacokinetics and efficacy were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients received saracatinib at doses of 50 (n = 3), 125 (n = 6), and 175 mg (n = 3). Median durations of exposure were 65, 44, and 16 days in the 50, 125, and 175 mg cohorts, respectively. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (67 %), nausea (67 %), decreased appetite (58 %), lymphopenia (50 %) and pyrexia (50 %). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, and haemoglobin decreased (all 17 %). DLTs occurred in two patients, both in the 175 mg cohort: grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase increased with grade 3 gamma-glutamyltransferase increased (n = 1); and grade 3 hypoxia (n = 1). Following a single dose, saracatinib median t(max) across the doses was 2-4 h, and thereafter plasma concentrations declined in a biphasic manner, with mean terminal half-life of approximately 45 h. Geometric mean saracatinib exposures were 0.8-2.1 times greater than those reported in Caucasian patients. The best response was stable disease (50 mg, n = 2; 125 mg, n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Saracatinib was tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours at doses up to 125 mg.

Temporal changes in echocardiographic findings in cardiac and non-cardiac sarcoidosis patients.

OBJECTIVE: Echocardiography is used for the detection of cardiac sarcoid involvement in patients with non-cardiac sarcoidosis. Little information is available regarding temporal changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVDd) in non-cardiac sarcoidosis patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four sarcoidosis patients who received periodic follow-up with echocardiography at our institute were enrolled in this study. At the time of initial ultrasonography, 13 patients were diagnosed with cardiac sarcoid involvement. All of the remaining 41 patients with extra-cardiac sarcoidosis only had a LVEF of >50%. During the median follow-up period of 39 months, two (4.9%) of the non-cardiac sarcoidosis patients were diagnosed with cardiac sarcoid involvement; one patient showed a progressive decline in the LVEF over a short period of time. It was also found that two of 41 non-cardiac sarcoidosis patients showed declines in the LVEF of >10% per year; however, they were not diagnosed with cardiac sarcoidosis during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Rapid deterioration of left ventricular function may increase the suspicion of sarcoid involvement of the heart in non-cardiac sarcoidosis patients; however, we must be aware that a certain subfraction of patients may not demonstrate significant abnormalities in LVEF or LVDd on periodic echocardiographic follow-up.

Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy caused by gastric cancer.

Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy (PTTM) is a fatal cancer-related pulmonary complication with rapidly progressing dyspnea, and occasionally induces sudden death. Here, we describe a postmortem-diagnosed PTTM case caused by gastric cancer, with the complaint of progressing dyspnea for 5 days.He did not have any abdominal symptoms or cancer history. PTTM should be considered in patients with rapidly worsening respiratory conditions, even if there is no cancer history.

Phase II study of sequential triplet chemotherapy, irinotecan and cisplatin followed by amrubicin, in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Study 0301.

INTRODUCTION: Combination chemotherapy of irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, and cisplatin is a standard treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, inhibits topoisomerase II. We investigated a sequential triplet chemotherapy consisting of irinotecan and cisplatin followed by amrubicin in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged 20 to 70 years and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, measurable lesions, and adequate organ functions. Chemotherapy consisted of irinotecan 60 mg/m on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m on day 1 every 3 weeks for three cycles and then amrubicin 40 mg/m alone on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks for three cycles. RESULTS: From September 2004 to September 2006, 45 patients were enrolled, 43 were evaluable for response and survival, and 44 were evaluable for toxicity. Twenty-eight patients (64%) completed the full planned chemotherapy. One patient achieved complete response and 33 had partial response for an overall response rate of 79%. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months. Median overall survival was 15.4 months. Major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 57%, 7%, 0%, and 7% of patients during irinotecan/cisplatin cycles and in 91%, 27%, 9%, and 15% of patients during amrubicin cycles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential triplet chemotherapy, irinotecan and cisplatin followed by amrubicin, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. Further investigation of this treatment is warranted.

Phase II trial of amrubicin for second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0401).

BACKGROUND: Amrubicin is a synthetic anthracycline drug that is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase II. We have performed a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC who experienced disease recurrence after one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen were eligible for enrollment in the study. Amrubicin was administered by intravenous injection at a dose of 40 mg/m2 on 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-one enrolled patients received a total of 192 treatment cycles (median, 2; range, 1-15). Response was as follows: complete response, 0; partial response, seven (11.5%); stable disease, 20 (32.8%); and progressive disease, 34 (55.7%). Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months, whereas median overall survival was 8.5 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 32%. Hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (82.0%), leukopenia (73.8%), thrombocytopenia (24.6%), and anemia (27.9%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 18 patients (29.5%). One treatment-related death due to infection was observed. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: Amrubicin is a possible alternative for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, although a relevant hematological toxicity is significant, especially with a febrile neutropenia.

[Case of successfully treated acute respiratory distress syndrome complicated by ureteral stones].

We report a case of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli induced sepsis and treated successfully. A 56-year-old women admitted for high-fever, dyspnea, and disturbance of consciousness on September 11, 2006, was found in chest computed tomography (CT) on admission to have diffuse infiltration with bilateral pleural effusion. Abdominal CT on admission showed left hydronephrosis complicated with ureteral stones. Because of severe hypoxemia, mechanical ventilation was started from hospital day 1. She went into shock soon after admission. Under mechanical ventilation, she was administered several antibiotics and dopamine. Because sera endotoxins were elevated, she was treated by endotoxin adsorption therapy on hospital day 3. A urethral stent was indwelled in the ureter for drainage after endotoxin adsorption therapy. Because Escherichia coli was isolated from urine and blood cultures, she was diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by E. coli inducing septic shock. After therapy, her condition improved, and she was extubated on hospital day 9. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was conducted on hospital day 19 and she was discharged.

Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG 9904).

PURPOSE: Docetaxel has shown activity in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This randomized phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel versus vinorelbine (the current standard treatment) in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients age 70 years or older with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and performance status 2 or lower were eligible. Patients randomly received docetaxel 60 mg/m2 (day 1) or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) every 21 days for four cycles. The primary end point was overall survival. Overall disease-related symptom improvement was assessed using an eight-item questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 182 patients were enrolled. Median age was 76 years (range, 70 years to 86 years). There was no statistical difference in median overall survival with docetaxel versus vinorelbine (14.3 months v 9.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.780; 95% CI, 0.561 to 1.085; P = .138). There was a significant difference in median progression-free survival (5.5 months v 3.1 months; P < .001). Response rates were also significantly improved with docetaxel versus vinorelbine (22.7% v 9.9%; P = .019). The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia (82.9% for docetaxel; 69.2% for vinorelbine; P = .031) and leukopenia (58.0% for docetaxel; 51.7% for vinorelbine). Other toxicities were mild and generally well tolerated. Docetaxel improved overall disease-related symptoms over vinorelbine (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.20). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel improved progression-free survival, response rate, and disease-related symptoms versus vinorelbine. Overall survival was not statistically significantly improved at this time. Docetaxel monotherapy may be considered as an option in the standard treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

[A case of bullous pemphigoid associated with Pneumocystis pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus pneumonia].

A 68-year-old man was admitted to our hospital presenting cutaneous pruritic lesions consisting of tense blisters with serous content on his arms and legs. Histological findings of skin biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid in March 2005. After 10 weeks of prednisone therapy for bullous pemphigoid, he presented with increasing breathlessness and high fever. He was admitted to our hospital because of severe hypoxemia on May 29, 2005, and mechanical ventilation was started from the first hospital day. Chest computed tomography showed marked ground-glass opacities in both lungs. The levels of beta-D glucan and KL-6 in his sera were elevated. We suspected Pneumocystis pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus pneumonia. Under mechanical ventilation, he received steroid pulse therapy, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and ganciclovir. A polymerase chain reaction assay of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed Pneumocysitis DNA and Cytomegalovirus DNA. On the 12th hospital day, he was weaned from mechanical ventilation. Follow-up chest computed tomography showed marked resolution of diffuse ground-glass opacity in both lungs. We need to consider the development of Pneumocystis pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus pneumonia during steroid therapy for bullous pemphigoid.