RESUMO
Objective To determine the rate of salvage procedures and any other unplanned reoperations in patients with symptomatic Kienböck's disease who were treated with radial shortening osteotomy. In addition, we studied patient-reported outcome in the long term using Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) instruments. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent radial shortening osteotomy for stage 2 and 3A Kienböck's disease. Patients who had concomitant revascularization were grouped separately. We collected demographic data, data regarding type of surgery and reoperations, and radiographic data. Patient-reported outcome measures were the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) and Pain Interference instruments, the abbreviated Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), and the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for pain and satisfaction. Results We included 48 patients who had radial shortening osteotomy alone, and 17 patients who had a combined procedure of radial shortening and direct revascularization. The rate of unplanned reoperations was 33% (16 of 48) in those who had radial shortening osteotomy and 24% (4 of 17) in those who had a combined procedure. Six (13%) of 48 patients underwent proximal row carpectomy due to failed radial shortening osteotomy. No salvage procedures were performed after combined radial shortening/revascularization. Median PROMIS Physical Function CAT scores were 56 (interquartile range [IQR]: 44-56) and 56 (IQR: 41-56), respectively. Median PROMIS Pain Interference scores were 39 (IQR: 39-52) and 39 (IQR: 39-49), respectively. Median QuickDASH scores were 2.3 (IQR: 0-23) and 4.5 (IQR: 2.3-14), respectively. Conclusion Radial shortening osteotomy for symptomatic Kienböck's disease yields reasonable long-term function. We observed that approximately one in eight patients underwent salvage surgery after radial shortening, and this should be taken into account when making the initial decision to treat Kienböck's disease surgically. There appeared to be no benefit of direct revascularization in addition to radial shortening in terms of patient-reported outcome in the long term. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV, therapeutic study.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to (1) describe long-term patient-reported outcomes of surgically treated symptomatic radial sensory nerve neuromas on function, pain interference, pain intensity, and satisfaction; (2) assess which factors were associated with worse function, higher pain intensity, and more pain interference; and (3) describe the secondary surgery rate and factors associated with secondary surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients surgically treated for radial sensory nerve neuroma from 2002 to 2016 (n = 54). Twenty-five of these 54 patients completed a follow-up survey including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity, pain interference, and depression scales; numerical rating scale pain and satisfaction instruments; and the global rating scale of change, at a mean period of 10.7 ± 4.3 years after neuroma surgery. RESULTS: The mean PROMIS scores were 45.0 ± 12.1 for upper extremity, 55.5 ± 10.3 for pain interference, and 49.9 ± 10.2 for depression, and were within 1 SD of the general population. Eight patients (32 percent) reported symptoms as unchanged or worse following neuroma surgery. The median numerical rating scale pain was 3 (interquartile range, 1 to 6) and the global rating scale of change satisfaction was 10 (interquartile range, 7 to 10). Older patients (p = 0.002) and patients with higher PROMIS pain interference (p < 0.001), higher numerical rating scale for pain (p = 0.012), and lower global rating scale of change scores (p = 0.01) had worse PROMIS upper extremity scores. The secondary surgery rate was 20 percent and was associated with the presence of multiple neuromas (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radial sensory nerve neuromas remain difficult to treat. They have a high secondary surgery rate (20 percent), with only 68 percent of patients reporting improvement after surgical intervention. Patient-reported outcomes after surgery are similar to conditions of the general population; however, the range of outcomes is wide.
