Randomized phase II trial of cisplatin with mitomycin or doxorubicin for malignant mesothelioma by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a randomized phase II multicenter trial to evaluate the activity of two cisplatin-containing regimens (cisplatin and mitomycin [CM], or cisplatin and doxorubicin [CD]) in patients with malignant pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma (protocol CALGB 8435). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were entered between June 1984 and October 1986. Eligibility included a performance status of 0 to 2 by CALGB criteria, and no prior chemotherapy. Central pathology review was performed. Randomization was stratified according to the cell type (epithelial v mixed or sarcomatous) and the presence of measurable versus assessable disease. Of the 79 patients entered, 70 were included in this analysis (35 on CM and 35 on CD), including 48 with epithelial cell type and 22 with mixed or sarcomatous cell types. Sixty-six patients had pleural mesothelioma and four had peritoneal mesothelioma. There were 34 cases with measurable disease and 36 with assessable disease. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 26% for CM (two complete responses [CRs], three partial responses [PRs], and four regressions) and 14% for CD (four PRs and one regression). Median time to treatment failure was 3.6 months for CM and 4.8 months for CD, and median survival duration from study entry was 7.7 and 8.8 months, respectively, with no significant differences between treatments. Good performance status (0 or 1) was associated with significantly longer survival duration (P = .013). Both regimens were well tolerated and there were no treatment-related deaths due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Moderate antitumor activity has been observed with both regimens. In this randomized phase II trial, the overall response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appear to be similar for the two regimens tested.

Phase I/II trial of etoposide and carboplatin in extensive small-cell lung cancer. A report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with performance status 0-2 were treated with etoposide 200 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and carboplatin doses of 50, 100, or 125 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 in a Phase I format. Among the ten eligible patients treated with 125 mg/m2/day of carboplatin, grade 3 or 4 infection occurred in six patients, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in four patients, and there was one death with myelosuppression. Thus, this dose was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a Phase II trial was then conducted utilizing this treatment program. In the Phase II trials, 81% of the 48 eligible patients had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, 76% had grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and 55% had grade 3 or 4 anemia. There were three (6%) toxic deaths from myelosuppression. The objective response rate was 63% (17% complete responders) with a median response duration of 6.2 months for complete responders and 6.4 months for partial responders. Median survival was 12 months. The MTD defined by this Phase I trial represents a 67-100% increase in etoposide and a 25% increase in carboplatin compared to prior studies. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) plans to study further dose intensification of this regimen with colony-stimulating factors.

Intensive etoposide and carboplatin chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase II trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

From April 2 to July 9, 1989, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a Phase II study of etoposide and carboplatin in advanced (AJC Stage IIIb-IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whose performance status (PS) was 0-2. The combination was given at the maximum tolerated dose as defined in a prior CALGB study. Of 76 eligible patients with follow-up data, complete responses were achieved in three patients (4%) and partial responses, in five patients (7%). One patient (1%) with evaluable disease showed improvement. There was only one partial response in the PS 2 patients. Performance status was a predictive factor for response or improvement (p = 0.0368). A high incidence (74%) of severe or life-threatening hematologic toxicity and fatal sepsis in four patients was a reflection of the intensity of the chemotherapeutic regime. The median survival from study entry was 7.4 months. Thirty-seven percent of the patients survived beyond 1 year; the median survival for the PS 0-1 patients was 11.7 months for the PS 2 patients, 4.1 months. Median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months, but treatment had not failed in 9% of the patients after 1 year, all of whom were PS 0-1 at time of study entry. Although the response rate with this dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen was disappointing, the median survival of PS 0-1 patients was equivalent to that of Stage III NSCLC patients in prior CALGB studies. In patients with NSCLC who are treated with chemotherapy, PS may be as important a prognostic factor as stage, when median survival is used as an endpoint.

Intensive combination chemotherapy, concurrent chest irradiation, and warfarin for the treatment of limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B pilot study.

PURPOSE: In prior Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) studies, combined chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation was superior to chemotherapy alone in limited-disease (LD) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). A combined modality pilot study was performed to test the feasibility of adding warfarin to aggressive chemoradiotherapy for LD SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1, cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and etoposide (ACE) 80 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 was given every 21 days for the first three courses. The fourth and fifth courses substituted cisplatin 33 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 for the doxorubicin, with concurrent chest irradiation to a total of 4,000 cGy given in 20 fractions during a 4-week period followed by a boost of 1,000 cGy in five fractions during a 1-week period. Prophylactic cranial irradiation, 3,000 cGy was given concurrently in 10 fractions during a 2-week period. Courses 6 to 8 again used ACE chemotherapy, but courses 4 to 8 were given on a 28-day schedule with dose adjustment for hematologic or renal toxicity. Warfarin was given throughout the treatment period titrated to achieve a prothrombin time (PT) of 1.5 to 2 times the control. Patients with histologically proven limited-stage SCLC, good performance status, and normal renal, hematologic, and hepatic functions were eligible. RESULTS: Sixty-one of 66 patients entered onto the study were eligible and assessable. Fifty-four (89%) (95%) confidence interval [CI], 78% to 95%) experienced an objective response, 35 (57%) achieved a complete response (CR) (95% CI, 44% to 70%), and 17 (28%) achieved a partial response (95% CI, 16% to 39%). Median durations were CR, 26.3 months; failure-free survival, 11.8 months; and survival, 18 months. Forty-one percent of the patients were alive at 2 years, 33% were alive at 3 years, and 25% were alive at 4 or more years. Median follow-up for survivors is 5 years (range, 3.5 to 5.9 years). Severe or life-threatening myelosuppression occurred in 90%, infection occurred in 34%, fever without documented infection occurred in 26%, and pulmonary toxicity occurred in 6%. Another 6% of patients experienced severe or life-threatening hemorrhages. There were four treatment-related fatalities. The pulmonary toxicities have been associated with the resumption of ACE chemotherapy after chest irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: These highly encouraging response and survival results compare favorably with any prior CALGB group study. Although they are somewhat more toxic, they are comparable to the best published results. A randomized study that examines the role of warfarin is underway.

Carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: an update on the Cancer and Leukemia Group B experience.

Since 1984, the Respiratory Committee of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) has evaluated carboplatin, either alone or in combination, in five separate phase II studies for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and had not received previous treatment with chemotherapy. In 70 patients with stage IIIB or IV disease, carboplatin 400 mg/m2 administered intravenously once every 4 weeks produced a 16% overall response rate and an acceptable toxicity profile. Subsequently, combinations of carboplatin/cisplatin, carboplatin/etoposide, and carboplatin/vinblastine have been evaluated in similar patient groups. Response rates of 11%, 12%, and 20%, respectively, were obtained. Myelosuppressive toxicity was substantially greater with carboplatin/etoposide and carboplatin/vinblastine than with carboplatin alone. Carboplatin/vinblastine demonstrated efficacy similar to that of the cisplatin/vinblastine combination previously evaluated by CALGB for treatment of similar patients with advanced NSCLC; ease of administration and lack of significant nephrotoxicity also compared favorably with cisplatin-based therapy. In regional NSCLC patients, carboplatin 100 mg/m2/wk can be administered intravenously concurrently with 60 Gy thoracic radiotherapy given over 6 weeks. The impact of concurrent carboplatin added to a sequential chemotherapy-radiotherapy program for patients with regional NSCLC is currently under study by the CALGB Respiratory Committee.

Phase II trial of high-dose 24-hour continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Eighty-six eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer were treated on a Phase II, CALGB study with high-dose, 24-h continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil every 2 weeks. Objective responses were seen in 7 (8%) patients with 1 (1%) complete response and 6 (7%) partial responses. The median survival for these patients without prior chemotherapy was 3.8 months. Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity were acceptable for most patients. However, two patients experienced acute clinical deterioration characterized by worsening central nervous system and hemodynamic function beginning near the completion of chemotherapy treatment and resulting in death. Because of its potential for severe, unpredictable neurologic and cardiac toxicity, we do not recommend this dose and schedule of 5-FU for future trials.

Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin or 5-FU, cisplatin, and vinblastine for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized phase II study of the cancer and leukemia group B.

Two hundred forty-seven patients with previously untreated nonresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were entered in a prospective, randomized Phase II trial. Response assessment was possible in 232 patients, and 237 patients were evaluable for survival. Thirteen partial responses (11%) and 5 regressions (4%) of evaluable disease were obtained for the 116 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (C) (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5% to 21.5%). The median time to progression was 2.2 months and the median survival time was 4.6 months for 5-FU plus C. Twenty-three partial responses (20%) and 4 regressions (3%) of evaluable disease were obtained for the 116 patients treated with 5-FU, C, and vinblastine (V) (95% CI, 15.3% to 30.7%). The median time to progression was 2.8 months and the median survival time was 5.6 months for 5-FU, C, and V. The 5-FU and C doses were equivalent in the two treatment regimens. Sixteen of 85 patients (19%) with a performance status of 0 and 18 of 103 patients (17%) with a performance status of 1 responded, whereas only 2 of 44 patients (5%) with a performance status of 2 or greater responded (P = 0.009). Patients who had received locoregional radiation therapy had a lower overall response rate then those in the no prior radiation therapy group (P = 0.028). The median survival time for patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 was 6.3 months compared with 1.9 months for patients with a performance status of 2 or greater (P less than 0.001). Performance status also appeared to be a significant factor for time to progression. More frequent and severe leukopenia, fever, genitourinary (GU) toxicity, and pulmonary toxicity was reported with 5-FU, C, and V. There were three treatment-related deaths with 5-FU, C, and V and one treatment-related death with 5-FU plus C. Grade III/VI myelotoxicity was not influenced by prior radiation therapy or performance status. Neither regimen is active enough to be considered as standard therapy for advanced NSCLC.

Carboplatin and vinblastine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

Between July 2, 1987, and August 21, 1987, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a phase II evaluation of carboplatin (CBDCA) and vinblastine (VBL) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Of the 58 patients who entered the study, 55 were eligible and produced follow-up data. Chemotherapy, which was carried out in 28-day cycles, consisted of 4 mg/m2 VBL given on days 1 and 3 and 125 mg/m2 CBDCA given on days 1-3. Partial responses were observed in 10 cases (18%), and 1 patient (2%) exhibited regression of evaluable disease. No complete responses were achieved. The overall objective response rate was 20%. The median survival was 6.1 months, and the median time to treatment failure was 3.3 months. Life-threatening (grade 4) toxicity was mainly leukopenia (20%), followed by anemia (7%), infection (4%), thrombocytopenia (2%), fever (2%), nausea and vomiting (2%), and weight loss (2%). There were two deaths due to infection. The results of this study demonstrate that the combination CBDCA/VBL is active in advanced NSCLC; however, whether this combination is more active than either CBDCA or VBL alone is unknown.

Cisplatin-carboplatin therapy in extensive non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

The response to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by the renal and neurological toxicities of this agent. Carboplatin has modest activity in NSCLC and when given in conventional doses has a different spectrum of toxicity. Both drugs were administered to 76 eligible patients with advanced NSCLC. No patient had been previously treated with chemotherapy. Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and carboplatin 350 mg/m2 were administered every 28 days until disease progression occurred. There was 1 complete response and the overall response rate among the 68 evaluable for response patients was 13%. Neither histological subtype nor initial performance status was a significant factor influencing response. Median survival was 5.1 months with significant differences based on initial performance status but not on histological subtype. Severe or life-threatening leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% and 36% of the 76 patients, respectively. There were 2 toxic deaths, 1 each due to infection and haemorrhage. The efficacy of this combination is not different from that of carboplatin alone, and the combination may be of greater benefit in patients with more responsive tumours than NSCLC.

Carboplatin in malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Carboplatin (400 mg/m2) was given at 28-day intervals to 41 patients with malignant mesothelioma. In all, 40 patients were eligible and evaluable for response. Partial responses were seen in 2 cases (5%); regression of evaluable disease, in 1 patient (2%); and stable disease, in 19 subjects (48%). A median of two doses of carboplatin per patient resulted in mild toxicity. Leukopenia (less than or equal to 2,000 cells/microliters) and thrombocytopenia (less than 100,000 cells/microliters) were seen in only 6% and 20% of the patients, respectively. Median survival from study entry was estimated at 7.1 months, with a 1-year survival of 25% +/- 7%. Carboplatin given at a dose of 400 mg/m2 at 28-day intervals shows minor activity against malignant mesothelioma.