Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy node retrieval in the obese population.

Data are scarce comparing robotic and laparoscopic colectomy node retrieval based on body mass index or age. With differences in anastomosis, mobilization, and ligation between these approaches, obese and/or elderly patients undergoing robotic surgery may have differences in node yield compared to laparoscopy. A retrospective review was conducted between four institutions from February 1, 2019 through August 1, 2021, during which 144 right colectomies were performed. Benign pathology, open colectomies, and conversions to open were excluded. All included surgeons had at least five patients to ensure experience. The population was categorized by a robotic or laparoscopic approach. Records were reviewed focusing on age, body mass index, surgical approach, anastomosis, pathology, and node count. The node count was then compared by body mass index and age between the robotic or laparoscopic approach to identify differences. After applied exclusions and outlier analysis, our final sample consisted of 80 patients. Both body mass index and age were significant, (p = 0.002 and p = 0.005, respectively). Body mass index ≤ 25.0 and age < 60 years old had higher average node counts. These variables interacted, (p = 0.003); those with both < 60 years old and body mass index ≤ 25 showed the greatest number of nodes (36.9). Laparoscopy yielded more nodes in ≥ 60 years old than robotics (27.4 verses 20.9), though this was not significant (p = 0.68). Node retrieval in overweight and obese patients did not differ between approaches (p = 0.48). Both body mass index and age influence the number of nodes that can be extracted in right hemicolectomies by experienced surgeons.

Hybrid-based iliofemoral endarterectomy for severe and complete iliofemoral occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: Primary endovascular approaches are now the dominant modality for the treatment of iliac occlusive disease. However, stenting of the external iliac artery is plagued with high in-stent restenosis rates. This hybrid approach with fluoroscopic, retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomy combined with stenting was previously demonstrated to be both a safe and effective alternative to bypass and primary stenting alone for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II C and D lesions. In this study, early outcomes and hemodynamic improvements of this hybrid approach are evaluated with an expanded patient population. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective review of all hybrid-based retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomies from the common femoral artery extending to the proximal external iliac artery from January 1, 2010, to November 15, 2017. Data were collected from the electronic medical record and analyzed using standard quantitative statistical techniques. All preprocedure and postprocedure imaging was independently reviewed by two vascular surgeons. Variables included patient demographics, degree of ischemia, and stent characteristics. The primary outcomes were mortality and freedom from amputation, with secondary outcomes including changes in the ankle-brachial index and toe pressure. RESULTS: The procedure was performed on 63 limbs in 51 total patients. In 33 limbs, the indication was critical limb ischemia (tissue loss/gangrene = 17, rest pain = 16) and 30 for lifestyle-limiting claudication. The cohort consisted of 84% TASC D and 16% TASC C. External iliac stenting was required in 68% (modal diameter, 10 mm) and ipsilateral common iliac stenting was completed in 75% (modal diameter, 9 mm). The ankle-brachial index significantly improved from 0.42 ± 0.25 to 0.73 ± 0.27 (P < .001) as did toe pressure from 29 ± 27 mm Hg to 59 ± 34 mm Hg (P < .001). Thirteen limbs ultimately required an infrainguinal procedure. One patient experienced an intraoperative iliac perforation that resolved with stenting. One death occurred within 90 days. Ninety-five percent of patients remained free from amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive hybrid-based, retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomy with stenting is a safe and efficacious approach to severe iliac arterial occlusive disease, with excellent early outcomes. This series promulgates the hypothesis that extensive endarterectomy with selective iliac stenting yields superior results to external iliac stenting alone. Given the superb hemodynamic improvements in a larger patient population, this hybrid-based, extensive iliofemoral endarterectomy should be recommended as a minimally invasive, first-line treatment for severe iliac occlusive disease.