RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is rapidly becoming a standard of care for management of patients with severe Pierre Robin sequence. The tongue is brought forward to alleviate airway obstruction. This study will look at an institutional, multisurgeon experience with MDO over 10 years. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted. SETTING: All patients who underwent MDO at the authors' institution from 2012 to 2022 were included. Three craniofacial surgeons performed all interventions. PATIENTS: Demographics, preoperative and postoperative respiratory and feeding status, and distraction data were collected for 27 patients meeting inclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were avoidance of a gastrostomy tube, avoidance of a tracheostomy, discharge from hospital on room air, and complications. A significance value of 0.05 was utilized. RESULTS: The average age at MDO was 135 days, mean activation phase was 13.6 days, mean distraction length was 14.9 mm, and mean consolidation phase was 64.2 days. A longer activation phase was associated with discharge with a gastrostomy tube and a shorter activation phase was associated with discharge on full oral feeds. The ability to discharge on room air was associated with a shorter latency phase, shorter activation phase, and decreased distance of distraction. CONCLUSIONS: The goal of MDO is to achieve full oral feeds with no respiratory support. Several different latency periods were used in this study, and a short latency period was demonstrated to be safe.
RESUMO
This study analyzed patients undergoing multiple surgeries for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and reviewed their preoperative evaluations and techniques selected for subsequent surgeries. A retrospective chart review was performed including patients having undergone multiple surgeries for VPI at the authors' institution between 2012 and 2022. All patients were evaluated and managed at the author's institution under the direction of 4 senior surgeons. The objective of this study was to provide insight into preoperative evaluation, surgical technique selection, and other factors that may contribute to patients who require multiple VPI surgeries. Of 71 patients having undergone surgery for VPI, 8 required at least 1 additional operation for persistent VPI following the initial intervention. Six patients who initially underwent a superiorly based posterior pharyngeal flap (PPF) required additional surgery, and for those patients' subsequent operations, 5 different techniques were used throughout their treatment. Of the remaining 2 patients who had multiple VPI surgeries, 1 initially received autologous fat transfer and 1 initially underwent a furlow palatoplasty. Finally, 0 patients that initially underwent buccal flaps or collagen injection required further unplanned surgical intervention. This study demonstrates the importance of selecting an appropriate surgical approach when operating on patients following a failed VPI surgery. The algorithm developed from these findings emphasizes the importance of properly identifying the anatomical deficiency resulting from the failed intervention. A review of the advantages of nasopharyngoscopy as a preoperative evaluative technique of velopharyngeal form and function when compared to lateral barium video fluoroscopy was also included.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to explore the unexamined capabilities of ChatGPT in describing the surgical steps of a specialized operation, the Fisher cleft lip repair. DESIGN: A chat log within ChatGPT was created to generate the procedural steps of a cleft lip repair utilizing the Fisher technique. A board certified craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgeon then wrote the Fisher repair in his own words blinded to the ChatGPT response. Using both responses, a voluntary survey questionnaire was distributed to residents of plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS), general surgery (GS), internal medicine (IM), and medical students at our institution in a blinded study. SETTING: Authors collected information from residents (PRS, GS, IM) and medical students at one institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included understanding, preference, and author identification of the procedural prompts. RESULTS: Results show PRS residents were able to detect more inaccuracies of the ChatGPT response as well as prefer the CMF surgeon's prompt in performing the surgery. Residents with less expertise in the procedure not only failed to detect who wrote what procedure, but preferred the ChatGPT response in explaining the concept and chose it to perform the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In applications to surgical education, ChatGPT was found to be effective in generating easy to understand procedural steps that can be followed by medical personnel of all specialties. However, it does not have expert capabilities to provide the minute detail of measurements and specific anatomy required to perform medical procedures.
RESUMO
Background: Palatal fistulas are the most common postoperative complications in primary cleft palate surgery, with incidence rates ranging from 10% to 30%. Functional indications for repair include food regurgitating from the nose, food impaction resulting in malodor, and hypernasality with speech. Anterior palatal fistulas (APFs), in particular, present difficult reconstructive cases due to lack of available local tissue. Here, we describe a case series of 3 patients who underwent APF repair with a random pattern labial flap. Methods: The 3 patients included in this report underwent surgical repair of APF. The size of defects measured 2 × 1cm, 2.5 × 1.5cm, and 3 × 2cm. In each case, the labial flap was elevated on the free border of the superior lip mucosa and advanced through the alveolar cleft to cover the oral layer of the fistula. After 3 weeks, the proximal part of the pedicled flap was incised and inset to the alveolar ridge. Results: From 2020 through 2021, 2 lip flaps were successful in providing full coverage to the oral fistula. In one patient, a 3-year-old who did not cooperate with postoperative care, one of the flaps dehisced before division. Conclusions: APFs are common postoperative complications in patients with primary palate repairs and present difficult reconstructions due to lack of local tissue flaps. Here, we describe a 2-stage method in which a random pattern labial flap is used to provide oral fistula coverage. We recommend this procedure when multiple prior traditional attempts at closure have been unsuccessful and the patient can comply with postoperative care.
