Do proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques improve respiratory parameters and swallowing in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized-controlled study.

AIM: This study aims to investigate the effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) techniques on respiratory parameters, swallowing, functional capacity, fatigue, and quality of life in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). METHOD: Thirty-four PwMS were included and randomized into the PNF Group (mean age: 43.23±10.55/years) or Control Group (mean age:38.47±8.18/years). In the PNF group, head-neck, upper extremity, trunk, and breathing techniques were applied three days/eight weeks. The control group continued home-based breathing exercises. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow 25-75 % (%FEF 25-75), peak cough flow (PCF), maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP) were and two minutes walking test (2MWT) were measured. Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis (DYMUS), Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MusiQoL) were questioned. RESULTS: After treatment, MIP, MEP,%FEV1/FVCpred,%PEFpred,%FEF 25-75pred, PCF, DYMUS, EAT-10, FSS, and MUSIQoL were improved in the PNF group while MIP, MEP, PCF, DYMUS, EAT-10, MUSIQoL, and 2 MWT were improved in the control group (p < 0.05 for all). In the between-group analysis of the mean differences, the%FEV1pred was significantly different in favor of the PNF Group (p = 0.011), and MIP was significantly different in favor of the Control Group (p = 0.013). DISCUSSION: The PNF techniques can improve respiratory muscle strength, respiratory functions, cough efficiency, swallowing functions, and quality of life in mild to moderate PwMS. However, these improvements were not superior except for%FEV1pred compared to home-based breathing exercises.

COVID-19 vaccination-related headache showed two different clusters in the long-term course: a prospective multicenter follow-up study (COVA-Head Study).

BACKGROUND: Although acute headache following COVID-19 vaccination is widely acknowledged, the long-term progression of these headaches remains poorly understood. Our objective was to identify various phenotypes of prolonged or worsened headaches associated with COVID-19 vaccination and document any changes in these phenotypes over an extended period. Additionally, we aimed to document the diverse headache presentations among patients with pre-existing primary headaches. METHODS: A multinational, prospective observational study was conducted to investigate prolonged or worsened headaches associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Questionnaires assessing COVID-19 vaccination-related headaches at three time points (initial visit, 3rd month follow-up, and 6th month follow-up) were developed for the study. Headache specialists/clinicians evaluated patients using these questionnaires in a prospective manner. Repeated K-means cluster analysis was performed to identify patient profiles with prolonged or worsened headaches related to COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: Among the 174 patients included in the study, there was a female-to-male ratio of 128 (73.6%) to 46 (26.4%). The mean age of the patient group was 45.2 ± 13.3 years, and 107 patients (61.5%) had a pre-existing history of primary headaches. Through the analysis, two major clusters were identified based on headache characteristics at each visit. During the first visit (n = 174), Cluster 1 primarily comprised patients with a history of primary headaches, frontal localization of pain, throbbing pain type, more severe headaches accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, phonophobia, photophobia, and osmophobia, and worsened by physical activity. In contrast, Cluster 2 consisted of patients with longer headache durations (over one month) and a stabbing/pressing quality of pain. Patients in Cluster 1 had a higher prevalence of migraine as the pre-existing primary headache disorder compared to Cluster 2 (90.48% vs. 68.18%, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The identification of two distinct phenotypes of prolonged or worsened headaches related to COVID-19 vaccination can provide valuable clinical insights. Having an awareness of the potential worsening of headaches following COVID-19 vaccination, particularly in patients with a primary headache disorder such as migraine, can help clinicians and headache experts anticipate and adjust their treatment strategies accordingly. This knowledge can aid in preplanning treatment modifications and optimize patient care.

Headache Characteristics of Patients with COVID-19 in Turkey: Is COVID-19 Infection a Trigger for Migraine Headache?

Introduction: Headache is a common symptom in patients with Coronavirus-19 infection (COVID-19). In this research, we aim to assess the frequency, characteristics, and response to treatment of headache in patients with COVID-19 and its correlation with psychosocial features in Turkey. Methods: To describe the clinical features of headache in COVID-19 positive individuals. Patients were evaluated and followed up with face-to-face visits in a tertiary hospital during the pandemic period. Results: One hundred and seventeen of 150 patients (78%) had a headache diagnosed before and during the pandemic, 62 of 150 (41.3%) had a new type of headache. No significant differences were observed in terms of demographics, Beck Depression Score, Beck Anxiety Score, and quality of life scales (QOLS) between patients with and without headache (p>0.05). The most common triggering factor for headache was stress and fatigue in 59% (n=69), while the second most common (32.4%, n=38) was COVID-19 infection. 46.5% of the patients reported that the severity and frequency of their current headaches increased after the COVID-19 infection. Among new-onset headaches, the social functionality and pain score subgroups of the QOLS form were significantly lower in housewives and unemployed patients compared to the working group (p=0.018; p=0.039 respectively). Twelve of 117 patients had a mild to moderate, throbbing headache in the temporoparietal region, which did not fulfill the International Classification of Headache Disorders diagnosis criteria, but showed as a common feature among COVID-19 patients. Nineteen of 62 patients (30.9%) had a newly diagnosed migraine syndrome. Conclusion: The diagnosis incidence of migraine in patients with COVID-19 disease being more than other headaches types may suggest the existence of a common pathway in possible immune mechanisms.

The frequency and related factors of primary headaches in patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of primary headache and potential biomarkers in patients diagnosed with Hashimoto thyroiditis. METHODS: Patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis referred to the outpatient endocrinology clinic were included in the study. The demographic data, thyroid function test results, and autoantibody titers were recorded. The headache's clinical characteristics were also determined. The same researcher used the visual analog scale for headache severity rating in all patients. RESULTS: 155 patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis were included the study. There were 95 (61.3%) cases diagnosed with headache consisting of 20 (21.1%) migraine cases, 17 (17.9%) tension type headaches (TTHs), and 20 (21.1%) new daily persistent headaches (NDPHs). 38 of 155 (24.5%) had hypothyroidism related headaches (HRHs). There was no statistically significant relationship between the headache type and a high blood antibody level anti thyroid peroxidase antibody (p=0.135), while a positive correlation was found with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (p<0.001). Hashimoto patients with migraine (n=14, 70.0%) were found to have higher blood antibody levels, while these ratios were found as 86.8% (n=33) in HRH-patients, 76.5% (n=13) in TTH-patients, and 60.0% (n=12) in NDPH-patients. 86 of 155 (55.5%) patients reported new onset headaches after a Hashimoto's thyroiditis diagnosis, and the headaches persisted without hormone therapy in 48 (84.2%) of these patients. These patients diagnosed with primary headache and this was interpreted as demonstrating comorbidity between Hashimoto's disease and primary headaches. CONCLUSION: Detection of only the relationship between TSH level and headache suggested that different mechanisms play a role in the pathophysiology. In the diagnosis of primary headache, it is important to look into secondary reasons.

Autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic syndromes in Turkey: a multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS) are both rare groups of neurological diseases that are difficult to diagnose. AIM: We aimed to determine the common and distinct aspects of these two aetiologies of encephalitis as well as the characteristics of our patient group. METHODS: We respectively analysed the records of the patients including symptoms, demographic features, neurological examination, cranial-magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG) findings, cerebrospinal fluid results (CSF) findings. Autoimmune/paraneoplastic autoantibodies in blood and/or CSF were all documented. RESULTS: Forty-six patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria. Thirty-eight of them were diagnosed with AIE, and 8 of them were diagnosed with PNS. The PNS group had higher nonconvulsive status epilepticus than the AIE (2/8 vs 0/38; p=0.027). PNS patients were diagnosed with a malignancy in their follow-ups more than those in the AIE group [4/38 vs 8/8] (p<0.001). When the symptoms of antibody-positive and negative patients were compared in the AIE group, the rates of consciousness/memory problems (13/15 vs 11/23; p=0.020) and speech impairment (8/15 vs 2/23; p=0.004) were significantly higher in patients without antibodies (n: 15) than in antibody-positive patients (n: 23). In antibody-negative groups, the rates of memory problems in neurological examination (13/15 vs 12/23 p=0.028) and temporal findings on electroencephalography were more prominent than antibody-positive groups (1/23 vs 5/15; p=0.027). The number of patients with cerebellar signs was higher in antibody-positive patients (6/23 vs 0/15; p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Although the positivity of autoantibodies is critical in the diagnosis of AIE and PNS, even minor differences in clinical and laboratory findings of patients are helpful in the diagnosis, especially in the autoantibody-negative patients. Comparing the data with other population studies has shown that several inherited and environmental factors may contribute to the pathophysiology of AIE and PNS, as well as clinical and laboratory differences.

A case report with tuberculous meningitis during fingolimod treatment.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe a case study of tuberculous meningitis in a patient with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving fingolimod. CASE REPORT: A-Thirty-five-year-old woman with MS started interferon beta-1b treatment in 2016. Due to frequent relapses and disability accumulation, her treatment was switched to fingolimod in 2018. The patient presented with subacute headache, fever, confusion, nausea, and vomiting after one year of treatment with fingolimod. Her cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination yielded a lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein level, and decreased glucose levels. Her brain magnetic-resonance-images (MRI) showed contrast enhancement of meninges without any new demyelinating lesions. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was isolated in her CSF culture. After using anti-tuberculosis treatment for nine months, the patient's infection resolved entirely without any disability related to meningitis. Then, the fingolimod therapy was switched to glatiramer acetate. CONCLUSION: Herein, we report the first case with fingolimod-associated meningitis during Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a patient with MS. Clinicians should keep in mind that fingolimod treatment may reactivate latent tuberculosis, especially in endemic regions.