Clinical implementation of coverage probability planning for nodal boosting in locally advanced cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To implement coverage probability (CovP) for dose planning of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of pathologic lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: CovP constraints for SIB of the pathological nodal target (PTV-N) with a central dose peak and a relaxed coverage at the perimeter were generated for use with the treatment planning system Eclipse: PTV-N D98 >90%, CTV-N D98 >100% and CTV-N D50 >101.5% of prescribed dose. Dose of EBRT was 45Gy/25 fx with a SIB of 55-57.5Gy depending on expected dose from brachytherapy (BT). Twenty-five previously treated patients with 47 boosted nodes were analysed. Nodes were contoured on cone beam CT (CBCT) and the accumulated dose in GTV-NCBCT and volume of body, pelvic bones and bowel receiving >50Gy (V50) were determined. RESULTS: Nearly all nodes (89%) were visible on CBCT and showed considerable concentric regression during EBRT. Total EBRT and BT D98 was >57 GyEQD2 in 98% of the visible nodes. Compared to treatment plans aiming for full PTV-N coverage, CovP significantly reduced V50 of body, bones and bowel (p<0.001) CONCLUSION: CovP is clinically feasible for SIB of pathological nodes and significantly decreases collateral SIB dose to nearby OAR.

The potential of MRI-guided online adaptive re-optimisation in radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) using plan selection is being introduced clinically for bladder cancer, but the challenge of how to compensate for intra-fractional motion remains. The purpose of this study was to assess target coverage with respect to intra-fractional motion and the potential for normal tissue sparing in MRI-guided ART (MRIGART) using isotropic (MRIGARTiso), an-isotropic (MRIGARTanIso) and population-based margins (MRIGARTpop). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine bladder cancer patients treated in a phase II trial of plan selection underwent 6-7 weekly repeat MRI series, each with volumetric scans acquired over a 10 min period. Adaptive re-planning on the 0 min MRI scans was performed using density override, simulating a hypo-fractionated schedule. Target coverage was evaluated on the 10 min scan to quantify the impact of intra-fractional motion. RESULTS: MRIGARTanIso reduced the course-averaged PTV by median 304 cc compared to plan selection. Bladder shifts affected target coverage in individual fractions for all strategies. Two patients had a v95% of the bladder below 98% for MRIGARTiso. MRIGARTiso decreased the bowel V25 with 15-46 cc compared to MRIGARTpop. CONCLUSION: Online re-optimised ART has a considerable normal tissue sparing potential. MRIGART with online corrections for target shift during a treatment fraction should be considered in ART for bladder cancer.

Intra-fractional bladder motion and margins in adaptive radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The bladder is a tumour site well suited for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) due to large inter-fractional changes, but it also displays considerable intra-fractional motion. The aim of this study was to assess target coverage with a clinically applied method for plan selection ART and to estimate population-based and patient-specific intra-fractional margins, also relevant for a future re-optimisation strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine patients treated in a clinical phase II ART trial of daily plan selection for bladder cancer were included. In the library plans, 5 mm isotropic margins were added to account for intra-fractional changes. Pre-treatment and weekly repeat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) series were acquired in which a full three-dimensional (3D) volume was scanned every second min for 10 min (a total of 366 scans in 61 series). Initially, the bladder clinical target volume (CTV) was delineated in all scans. The t = 0 min scan was then rigidly registered to the planning computed tomography (CT) and plan selections were simulated using the CTV_0 (at t = 0 min). To assess intra-fractional motion, coverage of the CTV_10 (at t = 10 min) was quantified using the applied PTV. Population-based margins were calculated using the van Herk margin recipe while patient-specific margins were calculated using a linear model. RESULTS: For 49% of the cases, the CTV_10 extended more than 5 mm outside the CTV_0. However, in 58 of the 61 cases (97%) CTV_10 was covered by the selected PTV. Population-based margins of 14 mm Sup/Ant, 9 mm Post and 5 mm Inf/Lat were sufficient to cover the bladder. Using patient-specific margins, the overlap between PTV and bowel-cavity was reduced from 137 cm(3) with the plan selection strategy to 24 cm(3). CONCLUSION: In this phase II ART trial, 5 mm isotropic margin for intra-fractional motion was sufficient even though considerable intra-fractional motion was observed. In online re-optimised ART, population-based margin can be applied although patient-specific margins are preferable.