Bumping to a rollator walker: How pretibial hematomas create more costs than pretibial lacerations.

Pretibial lacerations (PL) and pretibial hematomas (PH) are debilitating traumas among the elderly and infirm. The injuries are frequently grouped together despite differences in treatment and symptoms. Patients are known to have multiple contacts in health care, perhaps because of inadequate treatment. Despite the burden, financial costs have not been assessed. Calculate and compare the treatment costs of PLs and PHs for differences and provide economic incentives to treat and diagnose patients optimally. From linkage to ICD10 diagnoses, we analysed NordDRG product invoices generated by the treatment of the patients. We calculated and compared the costs of treatment in both cohorts from the invoices. This method has not been previously used for analysing wound care costs. Mean treatment costs were 1800€ (PL) and 3300€ (PH). The total costs, emergency room, surgical treatment, and inpatient care of PHs were higher than PLs (P = .0486, P = .0002, P = .0058, P = .6526). PLs generate more costs from the outpatient clinic but were not statistically significant (P = .6533). PHs cause a higher economic burden than PLs. Costs arise from repeat ER visits and the need for surgeries because of delayed treatment. PLs have multiple contacts in the wound clinic. Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of both injuries is needed.

Skin Graft Donor Site Healing among Elderly Patients with Dermatoporosis - A Case Series.

We reviewed donor site wound healing among morbid ≥65-year-old patients after split-thickness skin graft (STSG) harvesting. Patients were treated for a pretibial laceration or hematoma in Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Finland, between 2015 and 2019. Twelve morbid patients with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 7.1 (range 4-12) and a mean age of 80.6 years (range 69-91) were studied. Nine patients were female. Eight had a chronic cutaneous fragility syndrome, eg, dermatoporosis. All donor site areas were located on the thigh and were less than 2% TBSA. One donor site infection occurred. STSG integration on the pretibial wound bed was successful with all patients, and none of the patients needed further operative treatment. Graft thickness varied between 0.010 to 0.014 inches. STSG donor sites healed within the normal range of 21 days in 50% of patients. Among two patients, healing took 25 days, and among four, 37 to 97 days. All donor sites healed via local wound care without the need for regrafting. 4Our study indicates that harvesting STSG from elderly and morbid patients with poor skin condition is safe and does not result in significant complications. Prolonged donor site healing can occur, which can be managed with regular local wound care.