Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BI 135585, a selective 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 (HSD1) inhibitor in humans: liver and adipose tissue 11ß-HSD1 inhibition after acute and multiple administrations over 2 weeks.

AIMS: To assess the safety and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of BI 135585, a selective 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 (11ß-HSD1) inhibitor, after single- and repeated-dose administration. METHODS: The single-dose study included open-label administration of 200 mg BI 135585 in healthy volunteers, while in the multiple-dose study, we carried out randomized, double-blind administration of 5-200 mg BI 135585 or placebo once daily over 14 days in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Assessments included 11ß-HSD1 inhibition in the liver (urinary tetrahydrocortisol (THF)/tetrahydrocotisone (THE) ratio) and in subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT) ex vivo and determination of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis hormone levels. RESULTS: No major safety issues occurred with BI 135585 administration. The HPA axis was mildly activated with slightly increased, but still normal adrenocorticotropic hormone levels, increased total urinary corticoid excretion but unchanged plasma cortisol levels. After multiple doses of 5-200 mg BI 135585, exposure (area under the curve) increased dose-proportionally and half-life was 55-65 h. The urinary THF/THE ratio decreased, indicating liver 11ß-HSD1 inhibition. Median 11ß-HSD1 enzyme inhibition in the AT reached 90% after a single dose of BI 135585, but was low (31% or lower) after 14 days of continuous treatment. CONCLUSIONS: BI 135585 was safe and well tolerated over 14 days and can be dosed once daily. Future studies are required to clarify the therapeutic potential of BI 135585 in view of its effects on 11ß-HSD1 inhibition in AT after single and multiple doses. Enzyme inhibition in the AT was not adequately predicted by the urinary THF/THE ratio.

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin(*).

AIM: This study assessed the influence of various degrees of renal impairment on the exposure of linagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor with a primarily non-renal route of excretion, in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Linagliptin pharmacokinetics was studied under single-dose and steady-state conditions in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment (with and without T2DM) and end-stage renal disease and compared with the pharmacokinetics in subjects with normal renal function (with and without T2DM). RESULTS: Renal excretion of unchanged linagliptin was <7% in all groups. Under single-dose conditions, the degree of renal impairment did not affect mean plasma linagliptin concentration-time profiles. These showed a similar decline and almost identical plasma concentrations 24 h postdosing in subjects with mild, moderate or severe renal impairment and in subjects with T2DM with and without renal impairment. Although there was a tendency towards slightly higher (20-60%) exposure in renally impaired subjects (with and without T2DM) compared with subjects with normal renal function, the steady-state AUC and C(max) values showed a large overlap and were not affected by the degree of renal impairment. The accumulation half-life of linagliptin ranged from 14-15 h in subjects with normal renal function to 18 h in severe renal impairment. Only a weak correlation (r(2) = 0.18) was seen between creatinine clearance and steady-state exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Renal impairment has only a minor effect on linagliptin pharmacokinetics. Consequently, there will be no need for adjusting the linagliptin dose in renally impaired patients with T2DM.

The oral DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin significantly lowers HbA1c after 4 weeks of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: After screening and a 14-day washout, subjects received linagliptin 2.5, 5 or 10 mg or placebo once-daily for 28 days in this randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled within-dose groups study. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients entered the study (linagliptin: 61; placebo: 16). Four patients withdrew prematurely. There was little evidence of linagliptin accumulation. Exposure, maximum and trough plasma concentrations of linagliptin increased less than dose-proportionally. Rapid and sustained inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 reached 91-93% across linagliptin doses at steady state. At the end of the 24-h dosing interval, inhibition was still high (82-90%). There were marked increases in plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 after 28 days of dosing. Compared to placebo, all linagliptin doses resulted in statistically significant decreases of the area under the glucose curve following a meal tolerance test on day 29, that is, 24 h after the last study drug intake. After 28 days of treatment with linagliptin the placebo-corrected mean change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (median baseline 7.0%) was -0.31% (2.5-mg dose), -0.37% (5-mg dose) and -0.28% (10-mg dose). The frequency of adverse events was similar for linagliptin (31%) and placebo (34%). There were no notable safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Linagliptin administration led to attenuation of postprandial glucose excursions and, despite a low HbA1c at baseline, statistically significant reductions in HbA1c after only 4 weeks of treatment. Linagliptin had a safety and tolerability profile similar to placebo in T2DM patients.

Linagliptin (BI 1356), a potent and selective DPP-4 inhibitor, is safe and efficacious in combination with metformin in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: The efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, linagliptin, added to ongoing metformin therapy, were assessed in patients with Type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA(1c) ≥ 7.5 to ≤ 10%; ≥ 58.5 to ≤ 85.8 mmol/mol) with metformin alone. METHODS: Patients (n=333) were randomized to receive double-blind linagliptin (1, 5 or 10 mg once daily) or placebo or open-label glimepiride (1-3 mg once daily). The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in HbA(1c) at week 12 in patients receiving combination therapy compared with metformin alone. RESULTS: Twelve weeks of treatment resulted in a mean (sem) placebo-corrected lowering in HbA(1c) levels of 0.40% (± 0.14); 4.4 mmol/mol (± 1.5) for 1 mg linagliptin, 0.73% (± 0.14); 8.0 mmol/mol (± 1.5) for 5 mg, and 0.67% (± 0.14); 7.3 mmol/mol (± 1.5) for 10 mg. Differences between linagliptin and placebo were statistically significant for all doses (1 mg, P = 0.01; 5 mg and 10 mg, P < 0.0001). The change in mean (sem) placebo-corrected HbA(1c) from baseline was -0.90% (± 0.13); -9.8 mmol/mol (± 1.4) for glimepiride. Adjusted and placebo-corrected mean changes in fasting plasma glucose were -1.1 mmol/l for linagliptin 1 mg (P = 0.002), -1.9 mmol/l for 5 mg and -1.6 mmol/l for 10 mg (both P < 0.0001). One hundred and six (43.1%) patients reported adverse events; the incidence was similar across all five groups. There were no hypoglycaemic events for linagliptin or placebo, whereas three patients (5%) receiving glimepiride experienced hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of linagliptin to ongoing metformin treatment in patients with Type 2 diabetes was well tolerated and resulted in significant and clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control, with 5 mg linagliptin being the most effective dose.

Effect of linagliptin (BI 1356) on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate any potential effect of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin (which is being developed to improve glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes) on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin (a lipid-lowering, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor). METHODS: This open-label, multiple-dose study was conducted in 20 healthy male Caucasian subjects. Simvastatin (40 mg/day) was administered alone for 6 days, followed by co-administration with linagliptin (10 mg/ day) for 6 days, followed by simvastatin single administration for a further 8 days. Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and its active metabolite simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid were determined on Day 6 (before co-administration of linagliptin) and Days 12, 16 and 20 (after co-administration of linagliptin). RESULTS: The geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval (CI)) following co-administration of linagliptin with simvastatin (Day 12) compared with administration of simvastatin alone (Day 6) for simvastatin AUC was 134.2% (119.4, 150.7) and for simvastatin acid AUC was 133.3% (118.1, 150.3). The GMR (90% CI) for simvastatin Cmax,ss was 110.0% (89.3, 135.6) and for simvastatin acid Cmax,ss was 120.7% (101.5, 143.6). 20 adverse events were reported by 11 subjects. Both simvastatin and linagliptin were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Linagliptin-mediated effects on simvastatin exposure are not considered to be clinically relevant in terms of patient tolerability or safety. Therefore, a dose adjustment of linagliptin is not necessary when these two agents are administered together and linagliptin co-administration is not expected to exert a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of other CYP3A4 substrates.