Deterministic risk assessment of firefighting water additives to aquatic organisms.

Past firefighting water additives were found to contain perfluorinated compounds that could persist in the environment resulting in potential adverse effects to biota. Since this revelation, manufacturers have introduced alternative firefighting water additives that are fluorine free, but few studies have investigated the fate and effects in the environment of these new additives. Firefighting water additives could enter aquatic ecosystems through run-off, leaching or direct application. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the potential effect that firefighting water additives could have on aquatic biota. This study investigated the toxicity of six firefighting water additives: Eco-Gel™, Thermo-Gel™, FireAde™, Fire-Brake™, Novacool Foam™, and F-500™ to aquatic biota. The toxicities of firefighting water additives to Lemna minor (duckweed), Daphnia magna (water flea), Hexagenia spp. larvae (mayfly), Lampsilis fasciola (wavy-rayed lampmussel) and Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout) were investigated through acute and chronic static and semi-static tests to estimate LC50 values for survival and EC50 values for immobility and/or reproduction endpoints. A large variation in toxicities among the firefighting water additives and among the test species was observed. Based on a worst-case exposure scenario of direct application, several firefighting water additives were found to pose a hazard to aquatic organisms. An exposure rate representative of a direct overhead application by a water bomber during a forest fire was used in the hazard assessment. For example, the hazard quotients determined for the D. magna acute toxicity tests ranged from 0.20 for Eco-Gel to 317 for F-500 in the forest pool (15 cm) scenario. This study presents the first deterministic risk assessment of firefighting water additives in aquatic ecosystems.

Preoperative and late postoperative psychosocial state following coronary artery bypass surgery.

In a prospective study of psychological and neurological reactions to coronary artery bypass surgery, 45 patients were examined preoperatively, postoperatively, and 21 to 27 months after, using a variety of neurological, psychiatric, and psychological investigations. Within the follow-up sample, three subgroups of patients could be identified by cluster analysis who differed with respect to their emotional status and life satisfaction. One group (24% of the total sample) was characterized by high levels of anxiety, depression and life dissatisfaction and appears as a risk population. The other groups could be described as either average (42%) or stable (33%). At the follow up, the risk group further indicated a preference for depressive coping styles, a slightly higher degree of cognitive impairment, more neurological and psychopathological symptoms (specifically giving-up and hostility), a considerably lower return-to-work rate, more subjective physical complaints and a poorer attitude toward the outcome. While postoperative measurements (obtained 2-3 and 6-8 days after surgery) as well as intraoperative parameters did not reveal significant group differences, the analysis yielded an increased impairment within the risk group already prior to surgery, especially emotional problems, specific health-related cognitions and a more fatalistic attitude. The results are in line with those of other studies investigating the late postoperative psychological status with regard to the proportion of patients showing psychological impairments as well as to their specific psychological characteristics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)