[Recommendations for Performing Bronchoscopy in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic - Update 12/2020]. / Empfehlungen zur Durchführung einer Bronchoskopie in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie: Update 12/2020.

The SARS-CoV-19 pandemic continues to be globally related with significant morbidity and mortality, making protective measures to prevent transmission of the virus still necessary. Healthcare employees are exposed to a higher risk of infection and this is particularly true when performing aerosol-generating procedures such as bronchoscopy.Since the publication of recommendations for performing a bronchoscopy in the times of COVID-19 more than six months ago, the risk situation has not changed significantly, but due to the considerable gain in knowledge in the meantime, an update of the recommendations was necessary.The updated recommendations include the reduction of aerosol formation, the personal protection of the people involved in the procedure, as well as measures to better organize the processes in the endoscopy suite in order to perform bronchoscopic procedures securely even in times of COVID-19.

[Recommendations for Performing Bronchoscopy in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic]. / Empfehlungen zur Durchführung einer Bronchoskopie in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie.

COVID-19, caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a new and ongoing infectious disease affecting healthcare systems worldwide. Healthcare worker are at high risk for COIVD-19 and many have been infected or even died in countries severely affected by COVID-19 like China or Italy. Bronchoscopy causes cough and aerosol production and has to be considered a significant risk for the staff to get infected. Particular recommendations should guide to prevent spreading COVID-19 and to protect healthcare worker when performing a bronchoscopy.

[Joint Statement of the German Respiratory Society and German Society of Thoracic Surgery in Cooperation with the German Radiological Society: Structural Prerequisites of Centers for Interventional Treatment of Emphysema]. / Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Thoraxchirurgie in Kooperation mit der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft: Strukturvoraussetzungen von Zentren für die interventionelle Emphysemtherapie.

Interventional treatment of emphysema offers a wide range of surgical and endoscopic options for patientes with advanced disease. Multidsciplinary collaboration of pulmonology, thoracic surgery and imaging disciplines in patient selection, therapy and follow up ensures treatment quality. The present joint statement describes the required structural and quality prerequsites of treatment centres.

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia diagnosed by transbronchial lung cryobiopsy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Micronodular lesions are common findings in lung imaging. As an important differential diagnosis, we describe a case of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia; it is notable that the diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia is often delayed. This case provides supporting evidence to establish lung biopsy by cryotechnique as the option of first choice when considering a diagnostic strategy for micronodular lung lesions. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 65-year-old white woman who presented with obstructive symptoms of chronic coughing and dyspnea confirmed by conventional lung function tests. A computed tomography scan presented disseminated micronodules in all the lobes of her lungs. With the help of bronchoscopic cryobiopsy it was possible to obtain a high yield sample of lung parenchyma. On histologic examination, the micronodules correlated with a diffuse neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. In the context of clinical symptoms, radiological aspects, and histomorphological aspects we made the diagnosis of a diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Obstructive symptoms were treated with inhaled steroids and beta-2-mimetics continuously. A comparison between current computed tomography scans of our patient and scans of 2014 revealed no significant changes. Last ambulatory checks occurred in January and May of 2016. The course of disease and the extent of limitation of lung function have remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia is best made in a multidisciplinary review including clinical presentation, lung imaging, and histomorphological aspects. This report and current literature indicate that transbronchial lung cryobiopsy can be used as a safe and practicable tool to obtain high quality biopsies of lung parenchyma in order to diagnose micronodular lesions of the lung.

Docetaxel/gemcitabine or cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of a multicentre randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Most patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive either single agents or chemotherapy doublets. Recent studies have demonstrated that triple-agent therapies may improve the response rate, but are associated with significant toxicity, and frequently do not prolong survival. A sequential triple-agent schedule may combine acceptable tolerability and good efficacy. We therefore conducted a multicentre, prospectively randomized study that evaluates a sequential three-drug schedule and a platinum-free doublet regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pts with union international contre le cancer (UICC) stage IV NSCLC were randomized to one of two schedules: in arm Doc-Gem, they received gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2), 30 min infusion) on days 1 and 8, and docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), 1 h infusion) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks up to six cycles. In arm Cis-Gem-->Doc, gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (70 mg/m(2), 1 h infusion, day 1) were given for three cycles, followed by three cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), day 1, repeated every 3 weeks). RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen pts were randomized to arms Doc-Gem (55 pts) and Cis-Gem-->Doc (58 pts). With Doc-Gem, 20.4% of pts responded to the treatment whereas 31.0% responded in arm Cis-Gem-->Doc (overall response, intent-to-treat, difference not significant). The median time to progression was 3.6 months in arm Doc-Gem [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4, 5.9] and 5.2 months in arm Cis-Gem-->Doc (95% CI 3.1, 7.3). The median survival was 8.7 months with treatment Doc-Gem (95% CI 5.7, 11.6) and 9.4 months with treatment Cis-Gem-->Doc (95% CI 7.8, 11.0). The 1-year survival rates were 34 and 35%, respectively. Mild to moderate leukopenia was frequently seen with both schedules. Other common adverse events (AE) were nausea/vomiting, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, diarrhoea, and infections. No significant differences in AEs were observed between the schedules except for nausea/vomiting, which occurred more frequently with Cis-Gem-->Doc. CONCLUSION: The sequential therapy comprising cisplatin, gemcitabine, and docetaxel demonstrated promising tumour control whereas the platinum-free combination (docetaxel/gemcitabine) was very well tolerated. However, the schedules resulted in comparable survival to recent large trials in pts with advanced NSCLC. The present results do not justify further phase III investigation.

Coding strategies, perceptual grouping, and the "variability effect" in free recall.

Three experiments examined the effects of constant vs. varied input of letter strings on recall, and then examined the effects of such training in the learning of new lists of letter strings. Letter strings were constructed from pairs of trigrams spatially grouped, and were presented either consistently or with different spatial groupings on successive presentations. In Experiments I and II, varied input produced substantially greater recall than constant input. When transferred to a new list of letter strings, containing either the same general structure or a new scrambled structure, recall of the second list was determined primarily by conditions of first-list input, and unaffected by second-list structure. Although the "variability effect" did not appear in the training phase of Experiment III, Varied input led subjects to regroup or integrate the letter sequences more frequently and produced similar transfer effects as in Experiments I and II.