Intrapericardial fibrinolysis in purulent pericarditis-case report.

Purulent pericarditis (PP) continues to result in a very serious prognosis and high mortality. The most serious complication of pericarditis is constriction. Intrapericardial administration of fibrinolytic agents, although controversial, can prevent the development of constrictions. We present the case of a 63-year-old man with purulent inflammation of the right knee who was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) via emergency room orthopedic evaluation because of purulent pericarditis. Subxiphoid pericardiotomy was urgently performed, with 1200 ml of thick purulent fluid evacuated. As prevention for pericardial constriction, it was decided to administer fibrinolysis to the patient's pericardial cavity. Administration of streptokinase was complicated by the occurrence of a severe retrosternal pain and intrapericardial bleeding. Due to insufficiency of antibiotic therapy, 17 days after complicated fibrinolytic therapy with streptokinase, it was decided to administer 20 mg of r-tPA directly into the pericardium. In the following days, there remained a high drainage of purulent secretions. Fever up to 38 °C was still observed despite the use of antibiotics. Nine days after first administration of r-tPA, it was decided to apply the next dose. Daily drainage decreased from 50 to 20 ml in successive days. No fluid accumulation and symptoms and signs of constrictions were observed in clinical examinations as well as in echocardiography performed during 7 years follow-up after discharge.

Diagnosis of malignant pericarditis: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Malignancy is the most common cause of effusive pericarditis with a haemodynamically significant amount of pericardial fluid. Early diagnosis and management of malignant pericarditis may significantly improve outcomes. AIM: To evaluate retrospectively the rate and clinical presentation of malignant pericarditis among patients undergoing invasive treatment, with a view to identification of optimal diagnostic modalities to distinguish this group among other patients. METHODS: We studied 191 patients (100 men and 91 women, median age 57 years, range 19-88 years) with effusive pericarditis who underwent invasive treatment in the National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Warsaw in 1982- -2008 due to a significant amount of pericardial fluid and/or echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade. Pericardiocentesis was performed in 93 cases, pericardioscopy in 61 cases, and substernal pericardiotomy in 37 cases. Pericardial fluid was sent for examination in all patients, and a pericardial specimen was obtained in 96 patients. The patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 included patients with malignant pericarditis (malignant cells found in the cytological examination of the pericardial fluid and/or neoplastic infiltration in the histological examination of the pericardial specimen), Group 2 included patients with probable malignant pericarditis (pericardial fluid without malignant cells with histologically confirmed malignancy at some other location), and Group 3 included patients with non-malignant pericarditis (negative cytological examination of pericardial fluid and histological examination of the pericardial specimen, with no evidence of malignancy during hospitalization and one-year follow-up). RESULTS: Malignancy was found in 111 (58%) of 191 patients, including 66 (35%) patients with definite malignant pericarditis and 45 (23%) patients with probable malignant pericarditis. Lung cancer, including adenocarcinoma, was the most common type of malignancy, present in 44 (67%) patients. Non-malignant pericarditis was found in 80 (42%) patients. Among patients with the diagnosis of malignancy (Groups 1 and 2), a positive result of the cytological examination of the pericardial fluid was obtained in 52 cases (sensitivity of 46%). Among patients without malignancy, a negative result of the cytological examination of the pericardial fluid was obtained in all 80 cases (specificity of 100%). Malignant infiltration was found in 20 of 44 patients with the diagnosis of malignancy (sensitivity of 46%) and in none among 52 patients without malignancy (specificity of 100%). Compared to patients with non-malignant pericarditis, patients with malignant pericarditis significantly more commonly presented with tachycardia of >100 bpm in a resting electrocardiogram (ECG) (in 77% of patients with malignant pericarditis vs. 43% of patients with non-malignant pericarditis, p = 0.01), low QRS amplitude (52% vs. 34%, respectively, p = 0.03), electrical alternans (19% vs. 3%, respectively, p = 0.001), echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade (67% vs. 34%, respectively, p = 0.0001), enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes by chest computed tomography (CT) (90% vs. 29%, respectively, p <0.00001), pericardial thickness >8 mm by chest CT (62% vs. 16%, respectively, p <0.0001), and bloody pericardial effusion (94% vs. 43%, respectively, p <0.0001). Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment-19 (CYFRA 21-1) in the pericardial fluid were higher in patients with malignant pericarditis compared to patients with non-malignant pericarditis, with median values of 40.8 ng/mL vs. 0.9 ng/mL, p <0.0001, and 162.85 ng/mL vs. 13.35 ng/mL, p <0.0001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Malignancy was found in 58% of patients undergoing invasive treatment due to large pericardial effusion. 2. Cytological examination of the pericardial fluid and histological examination of a pericardial specimen showed high specificity (100%) but low sensitivity (46%) in the diagnosis of malignant pericarditis. 3. The most important predictors of malignant pericarditis included tachycardia of >100 bpm as revealed by the physical examination and ECG, echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade, presence of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (>1 cm) and thickened pericardium (>8 mm) by chest CT, bloody pericardial effusion, and elevated levels of CEA (>5 ng/mL) and CYFRA 21-1 (>50 ng/mL) in the pericardial fluid.

Neoplastic pericardial disease in lung cancer: impact on outcomes of different treatment strategies. A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Local (intrapericardial) chemotherapy has been reported to be useful for the treatment of neoplastic pericardial disease, but it has never been compared to systemic chemotherapy, a combination of the two and simple pericardial drainage or sclerosis. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data of 119 patients, suffering of neoplastic pericarditis due to lung cancer (97 with non-small-cell), comparing the outcomes of four different treatment strategies (extended catheter drainage/sclerosis, systemic chemotherapy, local chemotherapy, and combined - local plus systemic - chemotherapy) at the last available follow-up or at the change of therapy after a treatment failure. The outcomes (based on semiquantitative evaluation of pericardial disease) were classified as complete, partial, no response and progressing disease. RESULTS: A complete response was achieved in 37/53 of patients with combined, in 12/22 with local, in 5/27 with systemic chemotherapy, respectively, and in 4/17 after drainage/sclerosis (p<0.001). Overall response was achieved in 51/53 with combined, 18/22 and 16/27 with local or systemic chemotherapy, respectively, and in 5/17 with drainage/sclerosis only (p<0.001). Survival was significantly better after combined chemotherapy (p<0.001) and 12/53 patients (23%) in this subgroup survived more than 1 year. The overall response rate was higher with intrapericardial cisplatinum than with other agents (98% vs 80%, χ(2)=7.69, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Local chemotherapy, alone or with systemic chemotherapy, is effective in treating pericardial metastases from lung carcinoma, leading to a good control of pericardial effusion in 92% of cases, and to complete disappearance of effusion and masses in 65%. Combined therapy is significantly better than any other treatment. Pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial chemotherapy should be used whenever possible in lung cancer neoplastic pericardial disease, not only in case of tamponade.

[The insufficiency of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis in patients with hereditary antithrombin (AT) deficiency]. / Nieskutecznosc heparyn drobnoczasteczkowych w pierwotnej profilaktyce przeciwzakrzepowej u chorego z wrodzonym niedoborem antytrombiny (AT).

A 39 year old man with normal, stable blood pressure was admitted to the Cardio-Pulmonary Intensive Care Unit due to diagnosed spiral CT pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In 1999, a hereditary antithrombin (AT) deficiency was confirmed in the presented case. In 2006, because of a knee injury, the patient was provided with a plaster cast and primary antithrombotic prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (80 mg of enoxaparin) was administered subcutaneously once a day (patient's weight was 80 kg). Despite prophylaxis PE and DVT occurred after 6 weeks of treatment. The patient was successfully treated with unfractioned heparin, repeated infusions of AT concentrate and oral anticoagulants (OA). Transient pulmonary hypertension documented by echocardiography and hemoptysis complicated course of PE. Secondary prophylaxis with OA, and INR maintenance between 2-3, was successfully continued.

[Thrombocytopenia probably heparin-induced in women with tumor of the heart and pulmonary embolism]. / Trombocytopenia prawdopodobnie poheparynowa (HIT) u chorej z guzem serca i zatorem tetnicy plucnej.

43 years old women with tumor of the right ventricle was admitted to ICU due to pulmonary embolism and suspicion for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia was successfully treated with Arixtra and the patient was qualified for the cardio surgery intervention. Heparin is widely used in treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and other diseases. One of the most important adverse effect of treatment with heparin is heparin-inducted thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is one of the most frequent drug-induced, immune-mediated type of thrombocytopenia. If it is unrecognized is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. According to our knowledge this is first report of Arixtra usage in patient with suspicion of HIT in Poland.

[Infective endocarditis in a patient with multiple myeloma. A case report]. / Infekcyjne zapalenie wsierdzia w przebiegu szpiczaka mnogiego -- trudnosci diagnostyczno-terapeutyczne. Opis przypadku.

A case of a 59 year old male with infective endocarditis is presented. Antibiotic therapy seemed effective, however, inflammation laboratory parameters increased two weeks after clinical improvement and body temperature normalisation. Subsequent extensive laboratory investigations revealed multiple myeloma. The patient underwent successful aortic valve replacement and received pharmacological therapy for multiple myeloma. Difficulties in diagnosing and treatment of patients with infective endocarditis who have other concomitant diseases, are discussed.

Effectiveness of intrapericardial administration of streptokinase in purulent pericarditis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Purulent pericarditis is very rare. However, among patients suffering from this disease the mortality rate is very high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of intrapericardial streptokinase administration in patients with confirmed purulent pericarditis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients, one 50-year-old man and two women aged 64 and 40 years, who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to purulent pericarditis, entered the study. In all three cases a subxiphoid pericardiotomy followed by insertion of a drainage line into the pericardial space was performed. Antibiotic therapy was started immediately on admission to the hospital. Despite continued antibiotic therapy in all three patients, daily drainage from the pericardium--during several days after surgery--staggered between 50-200 ml/day. Due to considerable purulent pericardial drainage loculations and/or fibrin deposits confirmed by echocardiography, streptokinase (500,000 IU dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline) was administered into the pericardial space over 10 min, using the previously inserted drainage catheter. This regimen was repeated after 12 and 24 h. The total dose of streptokinase was 1,500,000 IU. RESULTS: The clinical effect of intrapericardial streptokinase administration was excellent. Several days after intrapericardial administration of streptokinase, drainage of purulent pericardial fluid stopped. No complications associated with intrapericardial streptokinase administration were observed. In the follow-up echocardiography (in two patients repeated 6 and 9 months after delivery of streptokinase), pericardial fluid and echocardiographic signs of pericardial constriction were not observed. CONCLUSION: Intrapericardial administration of streptokinase in purulent pericarditis is effective and safe.