The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Access: Insights from First-Person Accounts in a Safety-Net Health Care System.

The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected populations that were already facing socioeconomic disadvantages and limited access to health care services. The livelihood of millions was further compromised when strict shelter-in-place measures forced them out of their jobs. The way that individuals accessed food during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed as a result of declines in household income, food chain supply disruptions, and social distance measures. This qualitative study examined the food access experiences of participants enrolled in a safety-net health care system-based, free, monthly fruit and vegetable market in the Metro Boston area during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings offer rich qualitative information to understand the financial repercussions of the pandemic on food access.

Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Attendance at a Free Health Center Produce Market.

INTRODUCTION: Patient participation in healthcare system‒sponsored efforts to address food insecurity varies widely. This mixed-methods study sought to understand the patient sociodemographic factors associated with and barriers and facilitators to the use of a monthly produce market held at Cambridge Health Alliance in partnership with The Greater Boston Food Bank. METHODS: Baseline surveys (N=715) were conducted from February 2019 to March 2020 before market attendance, followed by 1-year follow-up surveys (n=514) and qualitative interviews (n=45). Robust Poisson regression estimated associations between sociodemographic characteristics and market attendance. Analyses were conducted from 2021 to 2022. RESULTS: A total of 37.1% attended the market ≥1 time. Market attendance was associated with being aged 30-49 years (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.36, 95% CI=1.00, 1.86), having a monthly household income <$1,000 (RR=1.73, 95% CI=1.29, 2.32), identifying as Asian (RR=2.48, 95% CI=1.58, 3.89), having a preferred language for medical care other than English (RR=1.35, 95% CI=1.03, 1.76), being retired (RR=1.90, 95% CI=1.17, 3.08), and living in the city of the market's location (RR=1.36, 95% CI=1.12, 1.63). Barriers included limited time (28%), work conflict (23%), forgetfulness (23%), and not knowing market location/date (22%). Interviews revealed that accessibility barriers (e.g., limited market hours, transportation issues, competing demands, medical conditions, long lines) were obstacles to attendance, whereas access to novel, healthy foods motivated attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare-based food distributions have the potential to reach patients with unmet food needs who cannot or would not access other forms of food assistance. Time constraints, physical limitations, and transportation challenges impact attendance; program modifications are necessary to improve accessibility.

Providing Food Assistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of a Free Produce Market at a Health Care Center.

The COVID-19 pandemic has worsened economic precarity and nearly doubled food insecurity in the United States. We describe how a free produce market at a Massachusetts health center adapted to exponentially increase its reach and offerings while continuing to safely distribute food to a low-income community during the pandemic.

Participant Perceptions of a Free Fresh Produce Market at a Health Center.

OBJECTIVE: To examine participant perceptions of a free, monthly produce market at a health center in Massachusetts. DESIGN: Participants were recruited at a produce market between June 2019 and January 2020 and engaged in a 30-65-minute focus group (n = 3 English language; n = 2 Spanish; n = 2 Arabic) conducted by trained facilitators using a semistructured guide. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 49) who had attended the market at least twice in the previous 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant-reported facilitators, barriers, perceived benefits, and opportunities for improvement. ANALYSIS: Conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Reported facilitators included accessibility (eg, convenient location and timing), program experience (eg, positive volunteer interactions), and characteristics of goods and services (eg, acceptable variety of produce). Barriers fell under similar themes and included transportation challenges, poor weather, and insufficient quantity of produce for larger households. Participants perceived the market as improving diet and finances and offered suggestions for improvement: distributing nonproduce foods (eg, meat) or nonfood items (eg, toiletries) and augmenting existing initiatives aimed to help attendees make use of the produce (eg, handing out recipe cards). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The produce market was widely accepted, and targeted areas for improvement were identified. Findings may improve existing and future charitable produce markets among diverse populations.