Validation of dual-source single-tube reconstruction as a method to obtain half-dose images to evaluate radiation dose and noise reduction: phantom and human assessment using CT colonography and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a method for obtaining half-dose CT images for observer studies evaluating lower-dose CT. METHODS: Phantoms of varying sizes were scanned at multiple tube potentials using dose-matched dual-source (DS) and single-source (SS) protocols. Images from single-tube reconstruction of DS data were compared with SS images acquired at half-original CTDIvol. Thirty patients underwent supine SS and dose-matched prone DS CT colonography (CTC). Half-dose prone images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Two radiologists scored image quality on 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D images. RESULTS: Image noise was similar between half-dose SS images and DS images reconstructed from one tube only with tube potential of 120 kV or more for phantoms 40 cm or smaller (P < 0.05). For both readers, the patients' CTC image quality scores were more than 84% concordant between SS or DS CTC images, and half-dose-prone CTC images with SAFIRE had 84% or more concordance with routine-dose CTC except for 3D image noise. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately sized patients, DS acquisition with single-tube reconstruction can create half-dose images, permitting comparison to full-dose images. For CTC, there is comparable image quality for colonic evaluation between full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with SAFIRE.

Assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cardiac patients often undergo repeat diagnostic testing, resulting in relatively high cumulative medical radiation exposure. Low-dose CT scanning techniques used to decrease radiation exposure may result in reduced image quality. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates a prototype iterative reconstruction algorithm, sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE), to determine the effect on qualitative and quantitative measures of image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets, compared with a standard weighted filtered back projection (wFBP) algorithm. METHODS: Seventy-four datasets obtained on a 128-slice dual-source CT system were evaluated for image quality using both the wFBP and the prototype iterative reconstruction algorithm. Contrast, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and qualitative image quality were compared between groups. Data were analyzed as medians and 25th and 75th percentiles, and groups were compared with the use of the Wilcoxon singed-rank test or k sample equality of medians test. RESULTS: There was a 34% decrease in noise, a 41% increase in contrast-to-noise ratio, and a 56% increase in signal-to-noise ratio in the prototype iterative reconstruction, compared with wFBP. All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Qualitative measures of image noise and noise texture were also improved in the iterative reconstruction group (P < 0.001 for both). Diagnostic confidence was similar between reconstruction techniques. Median scan dose length product was 15.5 mGy · cm. CONCLUSION: The prototype iterative reconstruction algorithm studied significantly reduces image noise and improves qualitative and quantitative measures of image quality in low-dose pediatric CT datasets, compared with standard wFBP.