A woman in her fifties with a post-operative infection, generalised rash and organ failure. / En kvinne i 50-årene med postoperativ infeksjon, generalisert utslett og organsvikt.

Background: Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease caused by superantigen-producing Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Staphylococcal TSS received special attention from 1978 to 1981, when an epidemic was observed associated with the use of hyper-absorbent tampons. Today the disease is rare and generally not related to menstruation, but can occur postpartum or in post-surgical wounds, intrauterine devices (IUDs), burns or other soft tissue injuries, mastitis or other focal infections. The annual incidence of staphylococcal TSS is around 0.5/100 000 and around 0.4/100 000 for streptococcal TSS. The mortality in menstrual-related cases is < 5 % and up to 22 % in non-menstrual related cases. Case presentation: This article presents a case of a middle-aged woman who developed symptoms of toxic shock syndrome five days after elective breast cancer surgery, with high fever, multiorgan failure and a characteristic desquamation of the palms. Interpretation: Toxic shock syndrome is a potentially lethal, toxin-mediated disease. Symptoms develop quickly, within hours. Early recognition and appropriate surgical management, intensive care and antibiotics are therefore important to reduce mortality and sequelae.

Impact of the ESC Cardio-Oncology Guidelines Biomarker Criteria on Incidence of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.

Background: The impact of recent consensus definitions of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) from the European Society of Cardiology cardio-oncology guidelines on the reported incidence of CTRCD has not yet been assessed. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the: 1) cumulative incidence; 2) point prevalence during and after adjuvant therapy; and 3) prognostic value of CTRCD as defined by different asymptomatic CTRCD guideline criteria. Methods: The cumulative incidence and point prevalence of CTRCD were retrospectively assessed in 118 patients participating in the PRADA (Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy) trial. Asymptomatic CTRCD was assessed using alternative cardiac troponin (cTn) 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) to define cTnT and cTnI elevation. Results: The cumulative incidence of moderate or severe CTRCD was low (1.7%), whereas the cumulative incidence of mild asymptomatic CTRCD was higher and differed markedly according to the biomarker criteria applied, ranging from 49.2% of patients when cTnT greater than the sex-specific 99th percentile URL was used to define cTn elevation to 9.3% when sex-neutral cTnI was used. The point prevalence of CTRCD was highest at the end of anthracycline therapy (47.8%) and was driven primarily by asymptomatic cTn elevation. CTRCD during adjuvant therapy was not prognostic for CTRCD at extended follow-up of 24 months (Q1-Q3: 21-29 months) after randomization. Conclusions: Mild asymptomatic CTRCD during adjuvant breast cancer therapy was frequent and driven mainly by cTn elevation and was not prognostic of subsequent CTRCD. The incidence of mild, asymptomatic CTRCD differed markedly depending on the cTn assay and whether sex-neutral or sex-dependent URLs were applied. (Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy [PRADA]; NCT01434134).

"It was an important part of my treatment": a qualitative study of Norwegian breast Cancer patients' experiences with mainstreamed genetic testing.

BACKGROUND: In South-Eastern Norway, genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is offered to breast cancer patients by their treating surgeon or oncologist. Genetic counselling from a geneticist or a genetic counsellor is offered only to those who test positive for a pathogenic variant or have a family history of cancer. This practice is termed "mainstreamed genetic testing". The aim of this study was to learn about patients' experience of this healthcare service. METHODS: Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 breast cancer patients who had been diagnosed during the first half of 2016 or 2017 at one regional and one university hospital and who had been offered testing by their treating physician. A six-phase thematic approach was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The participants had varied experiences of how and when testing was offered. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: 1. informational and communicational needs and challenges during a chaotic time, 2. the value of genetic testing and 3. the importance of standardised routines for mainstreamed genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the shock of their diagnosis and the varying experiences they had in respect of how and when testing was offered, all of the participants emphasised that genetic testing had been an important part of their diagnosis and treatment. Our results indicate that there is a need for continuous collaboration between geneticists, surgeons, oncologists and laboratory specialists in order to establish simple and robust routines so as to ensure that all eligible breast cancer patients are offered testing at a point when the test result can have an impact on treatment.

Lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal and steroidal aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients: the potential role of the adipokine leptin.

PURPOSE: The aromatase inactivator exemestane may cause clinical disease stabilization following progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors like letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer, indicating that additional therapeutic effects, not necessarily related to estrogen-suppression, may be involved in this well-known "lack of cross-resistance". METHODS: Postmenopausal women with ER positive, HER-2 negative, locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled in the NEOLETEXE-trial and randomized to sequential treatment starting with either letrozole (2.5 mg o.d.) or exemestane (25 mg o.d.) followed by the alternative aromatase inhibitor. Serum levels of 54 cytokines, including 12 adipokines were assessed using Luminex xMAP technology (multiple ELISA). RESULTS: Serum levels of leptin were significantly decreased during treatment with exemestane (p < 0.001), regardless whether exemestane was given as first or second neoadjuvant therapy. In contrast, letrozole caused a non-significant increase in serum leptin levels in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an additional and direct effect of exemestane on CYP-19 (aromatase) synthesis presumably due to effects on the CYP19 promoter use that is not present during therapy with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole. Our findings provide new insights into the influence of clinically important aromatase inhibitors on cytokine levels in vivo that contribute to the understanding of the clinically observed lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal and steroidal aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on March 23rd 2015 in the National trial database of Norway (Registration number: REK-SØ-84-2015).

Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy (PRADA): Extended Follow-Up of a 2×2 Factorial, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Candesartan and Metoprolol.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant breast cancer therapy containing anthracyclines with or without anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 antibodies and radiotherapy is associated with cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction. In the PRADA trial (Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy), concomitant treatment with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan attenuated the reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in women receiving treatment for breast cancer, whereas the ß-blocker metoprolol attenuated the increase in cardiac troponins. This study aimed to assess the long-term effects of candesartan and metoprolol or their combination to prevent a reduction in cardiac function and myocardial injury. METHODS: In this 2×2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-center trial, patients with early breast cancer were assigned to concomitant treatment with candesartan cilexetil, metoprolol succinate, or matching placebos. Target doses were 32 and 100 mg, respectively. Study drugs were discontinued after adjuvant therapy. All 120 validly randomized patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome measure was change in LVEF assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging from baseline to extended follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included changes in left ventricular volumes, echocardiographic peak global longitudinal strain, and circulating cardiac troponin concentrations. RESULTS: A small decline in LVEF but no significant between-group differences were observed from baseline to extended follow-up, at a median of 23 months (interquartile range, 21 to 28 months) after randomization (candesartan, 1.7% [95% CI, 0.5 to 2.8]; no candesartan, 1.8% [95% CI, 0.6 to 3.0]; metoprolol, 1.6% [95% CI, 0.4 to 2.7]; no metoprolol, 1.9% [95% CI, 0.7 to 3.0]). Candesartan treatment during adjuvant therapy was associated with a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume compared with the noncandesartan group (P=0.021) and attenuated decline in global longitudinal strain (P=0.046) at 2 years. No between-group differences in change in cardiac troponin I and T concentrations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer was associated with a decline in LVEF during extended follow-up. Candesartan during adjuvant therapy did not prevent reduction in LVEF at 2 years, but was associated with modest reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume and preserved global longitudinal strain. These results suggest that a broadly administered cardioprotective approach may not be required in most patients with early breast cancer without preexisting cardiovascular disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01434134.

Changes in serum estrogenic activity during neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole and exemestane.

The aromatase inhibitors (AIs), letrozole (Femar®/Femara®) and exemestane (Aromasin®), are widely used to treat estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer in postmenopausal patients. In the setting of metastatic breast cancer, these drugs may be used after another causing new responses in selected patients after progressing on the first choice. The precise explanation for this "lack of cross resistance" is still missing. NEOLETEXE is a neoadjuvant, randomized, open-label, cross-over trial. Postmenopausal patients with ER-positive, HER-2 negative, locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled. All patients were randomized to treatment starting with either letrozole or exemestane for at least 2 months followed by another 2 months on the alternative AI. The total estrogenic activities in blood samples were determined using the AroER tri-screen assay developed in the Chen laboratory. Using this highly sensitive assay, estrogenic activity was detected at three time points for all patients. Importantly, a significantly higher total estrogenic activity was found during therapy with exemestane compared to letrozole in 21 out of 26 patients. When letrozole was included in the AroER tri-screen assay, the estrogenic activities in most samples collected during exemestane treatment were further reduced, suggesting that low levels of androgens remained in specimens obtained after exemestane treatment. Our results suggest the AroER tri-screen to be a very sensitive method to estimate the overall estrogen-mediated activity in human samples even during therapy with highly potent aromatase inhibitors. In the present study, serum estrogen activity was significantly higher during exemestane therapy when compared to letrozole therapy.

Mainstreamed genetic testing of breast cancer patients in two hospitals in South Eastern Norway.

Studies have shown that a significant number of eligible breast cancer patients are not offered genetic testing or referral to genetic counseling. To increase access to genetic testing in South Eastern Norway, testing has since 2014 been offered directly to breast cancer patients by surgeons and oncologists. This practice is termed "mainstreamed genetic testing". The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent patients in South Eastern Norway are offered testing. Three hundred and sixty one patients diagnosed in 2016 and 2017 at one regional and one university hospital in South Eastern Norway were included. Data on whether the patients fulfilled the criteria, whether they had been offered testing and if they were tested were collected. In total, 26.6% (96/361) fulfilled the criteria for testing. Seventy five percent (69/92) of these were offered testing, and 71.7% (66/92) were tested. At the university hospital, 90.2% (37/41) of eligible patients were offered testing, and at the regional hospital 62.7% (32/51). Fifty two percent (12/23) of eligible patient not offered testing were younger than 50 years at time of diagnosis. As many as 95.4% (125/131) of all patients who were offered testing, wanted to be tested. The majority of patients who fulfilled the criteria were offered testing, supporting the practice of mainstreamed genetic testing. There were nevertheless differences in rates of testing between the hospitals that affected all groups of patients, indicating that genetic testing may not be equally accessible to all patients. We suggest that efforts should be made to increase awareness and improve routines for genetic testing of breast cancer patients in Norway.

The NEOLETEXE trial: a neoadjuvant cross-over study exploring the lack of cross resistance between aromatase inhibitors.

The aromatase inhibitor letrozole (Femar®/Femara®) and the aromatase inactivator exemestane (Aromasin®) differ in their biochemical effect on the aromatase enzyme. Letrozole is a competitive aromatase inhibitor while exemestane binds irreversibly to the aromatase enzyme. This pharmacological difference is of clinical interest since a lack of cross-resistance has been documented. It has been demonstrated in several clinical trials that exemestane may cause a disease regression following resistance to nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The exact mechanism(s) behind this phenomenon is yet unknown. Here, we present the NEOLETEXE trial with the aim of exploring the individual mechanisms involved behind the observed lack of cross resistance. Clinical trial registration: The trial has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of South-East Norway (project number 2015/84).

Effect of candesartan and metoprolol on myocardial tissue composition during anthracycline treatment: the PRADA trial.

Aims: Anthracycline treatment may cause myocyte loss and expansion of the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) fraction by oedema and fibrosis. We tested the hypotheses that adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer with the anthracycline epirubicin is dose dependently associated with increased ECV fraction and total ECV, as well as reduced total myocardial cellular volume, and that these changes could be prevented by concomitant angiotensin or beta-adrenergic blockade. Methods and results: PRevention of cArdiac Dysfunction during Adjuvant breast cancer therapy (PRADA) was a 2 × 2 factorial, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of candesartan and metoprolol. Sixty-nine women had valid ECV measurements. ECV fraction, total ECV, and total cellular volume were measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance before and at the completion of anthracycline therapy. ECV fraction increased from 27.5 ± 2.7% to 28.6 ± 2.9% (P = 0.002). A cumulative doxorubicin equivalent dose of 268 mg/m2 was associated with greater increase in ECV fraction than doses <268 mg/m2 (mean change 3.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 5.5] vs. 0.7% [95% CI 0.0, 1.5], P = 0.006), as well as greater increase in total ECV (1.9 mL [95% CI 0.4, 3.5] vs. 0.1 mL [95% CI -0.6, 0.8], P = 0.04). In patients receiving candesartan, total cellular volume decreased (-3.5 mL [95% CI - 4.7, -2.2], P < 0.001) while in patients not receiving candesartan, it remained unchanged (P = 0.45; between group difference P = 0.003). Conclusions: Anthracycline therapy is associated with dose-dependent increase in ECV fraction and total ECV. Concomitant treatment with candesartan reduces left ventricular total cellular volume.

Neurohormonal Blockade and Circulating Cardiovascular Biomarkers During Anthracycline Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results From the PRADA (Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy) Study.

BACKGROUND: Anthracyclines are associated with cardiotoxic effects. Cardiovascular biomarkers may reflect myocardial injury, dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis and may precede and predict the development of left ventricular impairment. The aim of this study was to assess: (1) longitudinal change in circulating cardiovascular biomarkers, (2) the effect of metoprolol succinate and candesartan cilexetil on the biomarker response, and (3) the associations between on-treatment changes in biomarker concentrations and subsequent left ventricular dysfunction in patients with early breast cancer receiving anthracyclines. METHODS AND RESULTS: This report encompasses 121 women included in the 2×2 factorial, placebo-controlled, double-blind PRADA (Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy) trial with metoprolol and candesartan given concomitantly with anticancer therapy containing the anthracycline, epirubicin (total cumulative dose, 240-400 mg/m2). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, echocardiography images, and circulating levels of biomarkers were obtained before and after anthracycline treatment. Cardiac troponins I and T, B-type natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and galectin-3 increased during anthracycline therapy (all P<0.05). The troponin response was attenuated by metoprolol (P<0.05), but not candesartan. There was no association between change in biomarker concentrations and change in cardiac function during anthracycline therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with contemporary anthracycline doses for early breast cancer is associated with increase in circulating cardiovascular biomarkers. This increase is, however, not associated with early decline in ventricular function. Beta-blockade may attenuate early myocardial injury, but whether this attenuation translates into reduced risk of developing ventricular dysfunction in the long term remains unclear. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01434134.

Prevention of cardiac dysfunction during adjuvant breast cancer therapy (PRADA): a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of candesartan and metoprolol.

AIMS: Contemporary adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer is associated with improved survival but at the cost of increased risk of cardiotoxicity and cardiac dysfunction. We tested the hypothesis that concomitant therapy with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan or the ß-blocker metoprolol will alleviate the decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) associated with adjuvant, anthracycline-containing regimens with or without trastuzumab and radiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, we assigned 130 adult women with early breast cancer and no serious co-morbidity to the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil, the ß-blocker metoprolol succinate, or matching placebos in parallel with adjuvant anticancer therapy. The primary outcome measure was change in LVEF by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A priori, a change of 5 percentage points was considered clinically important. There was no interaction between candesartan and metoprolol treatments (P = 0.530). The overall decline in LVEF was 2.6 (95% CI 1.5, 3.8) percentage points in the placebo group and 0.8 (95% CI -0.4, 1.9) in the candesartan group in the intention-to-treat analysis (P-value for between-group difference: 0.026). No effect of metoprolol on the overall decline in LVEF was observed. CONCLUSION: In patients treated for early breast cancer with adjuvant anthracycline-containing regimens with or without trastuzumab and radiation, concomitant treatment with candesartan provides protection against early decline in global left ventricular function.

[Cardioprotective treatment during adjuvant cancer therapy]. / Kardioprotektiv behandling ved adjuvant kreftterapi.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac dysfunction in the form of reduced systolic and/or diastolic left ventricular function after adjuvant cancer therapy has recently attracted increasing attention. The best-known cardiotoxic agents are anthracyclines and the recombinant antibody trastuzumab. Patients treated with radiotherapy to the thorax are liable to develop coronary artery disease. There are no official guidelines for the preventive treatment of cardiac dysfunction induced by chemotherapy, antibody therapy or radiotherapy. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of cardiac dysfunction caused by adjuvant cancer therapies and to review possible preventive therapeutic principles. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This article is based on a review of the literature derived from a search in PubMed. RESULTS: 27% of those treated with anthracyclines and trastuzumab may develop some degree of cardiac dysfunction. The figure for patients receiving radiotherapy to the thorax is more uncertain. Small-scale studies suggest that anthracycline-induced cardiac dysfunction can be prevented wholly or partially by blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and by beta-adrenergic blockade. As yet, there are no results of prospective studies on cardiopreventive treatment during trastuzumab therapy or thoracic radiotherapy. INTERPRETATION: There is a need for randomised, placebo-controlled studies of homogeneous groups of patients in order to determine whether treatment with cardioprotective medication in parallel with chemotherapy, antibody therapy or radiotherapy can prevent or reduce cardiac dysfunction.

Rationale and design of the prevention of cardiac dysfunction during an Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy (PRADA) Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The PRevention of cArdiac Dysfunction during Adjuvant breast cancer therapy (PRADA) study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to determine whether angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), or beta-blockers or their combination may prevent the development of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in patients on standard adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. METHODS: Following surgical resection, 120 breast cancer patients scheduled for adjuvant epirubicin-containing chemotherapy and, if indicated, trastuzumab, will be included. They will be randomized to an ARB (candesartan), a beta-blocker (metoprolol) and matching placebos in a 2 × 2 factorial design. The primary objective of the PRADA study is to assess whether prophylactic ARB and/or beta-blockers may prevent a reduction in LV ejection fraction (EF) after adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer, as evaluated by serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed at randomization, after the first chemotherapy cycle and on its completion, and for subgroups, on completion of radiotherapy or trastuzumab. Secondary outcome measures include echocardiographic indices of LV diastolic dysfunction, structural myocardial alterations assessed by CMR and changes in cardiac biomarkers. CONCLUSION: PRADA may provide new information on the prophylactic effect of ARB and beta-blockers in patients with early breast cancer regarding the risk of developing cardiac dysfunction from adjuvant cancer treatment.

Sentinel node mapping does not improve staging of lymph node metastasis in colonic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the reliability of the sentinel node concept in colonic cancer. METHODS: Patent blue was used as tracer. The four blue nodes closest to the tumor were defined as the sentinel node(s) by the pathologist. All nodes were examined by routine microscopy (hematoxylin-eosin staining). If no metastases were detected, all lymph nodes were examined immunohistochemically with antibody to cytokeratin. RESULTS: Two hundred colon specimens were examined. Sentinel node(s) were identified in 93 percent. Sixty contained metastases in hematoxylin-eosin sections. In 32 these were found in sentinel nodes (sensitivity 53 percent). Twenty-eight patients had metastases in nonsentinel nodes only, giving a false-negative rate of 47 percent. Immunostaining revealed 39 (30 percent) micrometastases or submicrometastases in 131 TNM Stages I and II patients, and in 17 of these patients metastases were found in nonsentinel nodes only (false-negative rate 44 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node mapping shows low sensitivity for detection of ordinary metastases, micrometastases, and submicrometastases. If only the sentinel nodes had been examined, approximately half of the metastases would have been lost after routine staining, as well as half of the micrometastases and submicrometastases when immunohistochemical examination was added.