Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prog Urol ; 33(8-9): 427-436, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37169706

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After two consecutive kidney transplant failures, a third kidney transplantation improves survival for patients on the waiting list. The surgical outcomes and complications of third kidney transplantations remain poorly known. METHODS: We analyzed the last 100 third kidney transplantations performed in our center between January 2000 and August 2018. The data, relating to donors and recipients, were extracted retrospectively from medical records and from the prospective DIVAT database (computerized and validated data in transplantation). Continuous variables are expressed as means, medians, first and third quartiles (median, [Q1;Q3]). Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. Patient and transplant survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mean age of recipients was 46.4 years (47, [36;53]). Thirty-five percent had kidney failure due to urinary tract malformations. Mean age of donors was 48.2 years (52, [39.75; 58]) with 63% of donors with standard criteria. Mean cold ischemia time was 22.4hours (21, [16.5; 29.2]). Surgical mortality rate was 2% and surgical complication rate was 45%. Third kidney transplants survival was 73.1% and 58.8% at 5 years and 10 years. Mortality rate with a functioning transplant was 18%. CONCLUSION: A third kidney transplant offers satisfactory functional outcomes but remains associated with high morbi-mortality and a significant death rate with a functioning transplant.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Rejeição de Enxerto , Doadores de Tecidos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 18(3): 369.e1-369.e7, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35562267

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A wide range of surgical interventions have been described for the management of primary obstructive megaureter (POM). Endoscopic balloon dilatation has been developed through last decades as a minimally invasive alternative to classic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for placement of a double J stent after endoscopic balloon dilatation procedure, by comparing the post-operative related outcomes with and without double J placement. Secondary outcome was the success rate, considering the need for further procedure after endoscopic balloon dilatation and the improvement of the ureteral diameter in the two groups. STUDY DESIGN: Historical retrospective comparison of children treated by endoscopic dilatation for POM, with post-operative JJ stent left in place (2012-2014) or without ureteral JJ stent (since 2015). Post-operative complications were reported following Clavien-Dindo grading system and compared between the two groups. Success rate was defined as absence of need for further surgical reimplantation. Ureteral diameters on preoperative and postoperative renal ultrasounds were compared. RESULTS: Endoscopic dilatations were performed in 42 patients for 46 renal units during the study period. There was a significantly higher rate of post-operative complications in the group with JJ stenting compared to the group without double J stenting regarding all Clavien-Dindo grades (56% vs 15%, p = 0.014) and Clavien-Dindo grade III only (31% vs 0%, p = 0,0051) (Figure). The success rate was similar in the JJ group (75%, F-up: 70 months [13-101]) and the no JJ group (81%, F-up: 26 months [12-95]). There was a significant improvement of US renal pelvis and ureter dilatation in both groups, with a median follow-up of 35.5 months [12-101]. DISCUSSION: The overall rate of complications was slightly higher than in other reports and higher in the JJ group regarding Clavien-Dindo grade III complications. The success rate was comparable to previous studies reviewing endoscopic dilatations and equivalent in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, the omission of postoperative ureteral drainage by a JJ stent after endoscopic balloon dilatation of POM did not increase post-operative complications rate without demonstrable impact on the success rate.


Assuntos
Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Criança , Dilatação/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureter/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...