Impact of the use of an automated chest-compression device on airway management during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the PLAINT study.

INTRODUCTION: Automated chest-compression devices (ACCDs) have recently been proposed in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR). During CPR, it is still unknown whether the ACCD or intubation is to be first implemented. Knowing the impact of an ACCD on intubation conditions could strongly contribute to determine the best sequence. Therefore, we undertook an experimental study on intubation conditions on a mannequin with or without the use of an ACCD. METHODS: Emergency physicians and nurses experienced in the field of cardiac-arrest management (including orotracheal intubation) were randomly assigned to three scenarios to intubate a mannequin: patient lying on the floor without an ACCD (group 1), patient lying on the floor with the ACCD switched off (group 2) or switched on (group 3). The primary end point was intubation time. Estimated intubation difficulty evaluated on a visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible), number of attempts, Cormack grade and dental traumatisms associated with the intubation procedure were secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 44 operators performed the intubation. Times to intubation were 14 (11-22), 15 (10-21) and 18 (15-27)s for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The VAS difficulties were 12 (5-25), 15 (10-25) and 15 (5-21), respectively. Intubation conditions did not differ between the 'without an ACCD group' and the 'switched-off ACCD group'. In the 'switched-on ACCD group', time to intubation was significantly increased in comparison with groups 1 and 2 with a median difference of 4 (1-10) and 3 (0-7)s, respectively. The VAS difficulty was also significantly increased in the 'switched-on ACCD group'. Other secondary end-point criteria did not differ between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Due to the major role of compression during CPR, we suggest that the ACCD should not be systematically switched off for routine intubation.

Out-of-hospital use of an automated chest compression device: facilitating access to extracorporeal life support or non-heart-beating organ procurement.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the ease-of-use, safety, and usefulness of an automated external chest compression device for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: Adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) were included prospectively. The emergency medical services (EMS) in a large suburb northeast of Paris (France) recorded data for standard criteria for EMS care for CA and specific criteria on device use-application time, ease of application and use (visual analog scale score: 0, impossible; 5, very easy), technical incidents, and clinical complications. RESULTS: We attended 4868 OHCA patients (January 2005 to April 2010) and used the device in 285 patients (6%) (212 males [74%], 73 females [26%]; median age, 56 [43-70] years). Results (medians with 25-75 percentiles) were as follows: time to apply device, 30 seconds (20-60); ease of application and activation, 5 (4-5) and 5 (5-5), respectively; duration of use, 30 (20-41) minutes; return to spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 76 patients (27%); and time to ROSC, 19 (12-32) minutes after placement. Twenty-seven patients (9%) with refractory CA benefited from extracorporeal life support. Overall, 32 patients were alive after 24 hours, 11 at 7 days, and 3 at 1 month. An additional 23 patients (8%) with refractory CA were selected for non-heart-beating kidney procurement. Ten patients were used to harvest kidneys and 15 were transplanted. There were 21 technical incidents (7%) and 19 clinical complications (7%). CONCLUSION: The device was easy to use in routine emergency practice and of particular value in facilitating access to extracorporeal life support or non-heart-beating organ procurement. These uses should be itemized in all OHCA studies.