Outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty - Patient expectations versus experience.

Aims & objectives: With modern advancements in surgical techniques and rapid recovery protocols, incidence of outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is increasing. Previous literature has historically focused on cost, safety, and clinical outcomes, with few studies investigating patient expectations and experiences. The aim of this study was to survey preoperative patient expectations related to outpatient TJA surgery compared with perioperative perceptions and experience. Materials & methods: Prospective study of patients undergoing outpatient total hip or knee arthroplasty at a single Tertiary Academic center. Preoperative and postoperative surveys were administered during routine clinic visits. Results: One hundred and six patients completed preoperative surveys; 79 completed postoperative surveys and were included in the final data analysis. Fifty (63.3 %) patients reported being aware of outpatient TJA prior to undergoing the procedure. There was no difference between preoperative anticipated pain control and postoperative perceived pain control (6.64 vs. 6.88, p = 0.77). Most postoperative patients (N = 56, 70.9 %) rated outpatient surgery as "much better" or "better" than expected. Most postoperative patients (N = 68, 86 %) would opt to have outpatient surgery again. Fifty-two (65.8 %) of postoperative patients believed outpatient surgery sped up their postoperative rehabilitation. Conclusion: For most patients, the outpatient surgical experience met or exceeded expectations. Nearly 90 % of patients would prefer to have outpatient surgery in the future, further supporting the continued migration of elective arthroplasty away from inpatient sites of care.

Opioid Utilization After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Following Sequential Implementation of Statewide Legislation.

Background: Following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), increased opioid use is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This study investigates implications of Florida legislative mandates on prescribing practices and opioid utilization following primary THA and TKA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing primary TKA or THA between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020 at our academic medical center. Three groups were identified: procedures performed prior to mandates, after seven-day prescription limit, and after mandated electronic prescribing. A multivariate analyses of variance evaluated length of stay, morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), age, body mass index and number of prescription refills. Chi-square tests compared preoperative opioid use, readmissions, and discharge disposition. Results: There were 198 patients in group one, 238 patients in group two, and 215 patients in group three (N = 651). Prior to any mandates, patients were prescribed 822.3 + 626.7 MMEs. Following a seven-day prescription limit this decreased to 465.0 + 296.0 MMEs (P < .001), which further decreased after mandated electronic prescribing (228.0 + 284.4 MMEs [P < 0.001]). Patients undergoing THA were prescribed less MME than those undergoing TKA. There was a 2.6% 90-day readmission rate, with no pain-related readmissions. Conclusions: Florida legislative mandates for opioid prescription quantities and electronic prescribing have effectively reduced average MMEs prescribed following primary arthroplasty. Despite a shift towards ambulatory surgery, opioid utilization decreased without compromising patient outcomes. These findings underscore the significance of both legislative and surgical practices influencing opioid prescribing habits among orthopaedic surgeons.

Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for 90-Day Readmission of Total Joint Arthroplasty Using Comprehensive Electronic Health Records and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Background: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services currently incentivizes hospitals to reduce postdischarge adverse events such as unplanned hospital readmissions for patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study aimed to predict 90-day TJA readmissions from our comprehensive electronic health record data and routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: We retrospectively queried all TJA-related readmissions in our tertiary care center between 2016 and 2019. A total of 104-episode care characteristics and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures were used to develop several machine learning models for prediction performance evaluation and comparison. For interpretability, a logistic regression model was built to investigate the statistical significance, magnitudes, and directions of associations between risk factors and readmission. Results: Given the significant imbalanced outcome (5.8% of patients were readmitted), our models robustly predicted the outcome, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves over 0.8, recalls over 0.5, and precisions over 0.5. In addition, the logistic regression model identified risk factors predicting readmission: diabetes, preadmission medication prescriptions (ie, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, corticosteroid, and narcotic), discharge to a skilled nursing facility, and postdischarge care behaviors within 90 days. Notably, low self-reported confidence to carry out social activities accurately predicted readmission. Conclusions: A machine learning model can help identify patients who are at substantially increased risk of a readmission after TJA. This finding may allow for health-care providers to increase resources targeting these patients. In addition, a poor response to the "social activities" question may be a useful indicator that predicts a significant increased risk of readmission after TJA.

A Physician-led Care Redesign Blunts Predictors of Length of Stay after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

We questioned to what extent traditional predictors of care team burden (via increased length of stay [LOS] after total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) were able to be mitigated through alteration of the care pathway. The impact on LOS of traditional patient risk factors, as well as encounter variables, were analyzed for a consecutive set of patients undergoing surgery before and after a physician-initiated arthroplasty care pathway redesign. We analyzed the impact of these variables on LOS, discharge disposition, and 90-day readmission; separate analyses were performed pre- and post-redesign for LOS. Several patient factors (Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool, body mass index, age, insurance type, smoking) predicted longer LOS in the pre-redesign cohort; post-redesign, only ambulation on the day of surgery and anticoagulation type were predictive. The redesign also lessened the aggregate impact of the patient-specific risk factors, resulting in reduced variation in LOS. Physician leadership of care pathways can reduce the impact of factors that have portended longer LOS, thereby reducing variability in LOS and costs for disparate patient populations while driving improvements in value-based care indices. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(2):097-101, 2023).

Preoperative Prediction and Risk Factor Identification of Hospital Length of Stay for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Using Machine Learning.

Background: The aim of this study was to improve understanding of hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a high-efficiency, hospital-based pathway. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1401 consecutive primary and revision TJA patients across 67 patient and preoperative care characteristics from 2016 to 2019 from the institutional electronic health records. A machine learning approach, testing multiple models, was used to assess predictors of LOS. Results: The median LOS was 1 day; outpatients accounted for 16.5%, 1-day inpatient stays for 38.0%, 2-day stays for 26.4%, and 3-days or more for 19.1%. Patients characteristically fell into 1 of 3 broad categories that contained relatively similar characteristics: outpatient (0-day LOS), short stay (1- to 2-day LOS), and prolonged stay (3 days or greater). The random forest models suggested that a lower Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool score, unplanned admission or hospital transfer, and a medical history of cardiovascular disease were associated with an increased LOS. Documented narcotic use for surgery preparation prior to hospitalization and preoperative corticosteroid use were factors independently associated with a decreased LOS. Conclusions: After TJA, most patients have either an outpatient or short-stay hospital episode. Patients who stay 2 days do not differ substantially from patients who stay 1 day, while there is a distinct group that requires prolonged admission. Our machine learning models support a better understanding of the patient factors associated with different hospital LOS categories for TJA, demonstrating the potential for improved health policy decisions and risk stratification for centers caring for complex patients.

Lessons Learned From the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model at an Academic Tertiary Center: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

BACKGROUND: Our institution participated in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model from 2016 to 2020. Here we review lessons learned from a total joint arthroplasty (TJA) care redesign at a tertiary academic center amid changing: (1) CJR rules; (2) inpatient only rules; and (3) outpatient trends. METHODS: Quality, financial, and patient demographic data from the years prior to and during participation in CJR were obtained from institutional and Medicare reconciled CJR performance data. RESULTS: Despite an increase in true outpatients and new challenges that arose from changing inpatient-only rules, there was significant improvement in quality metrics: decreased length of stay (3.48-1.52 days, P < .001), increased home discharge rate (70.2-85.5%, P < .001), decreased readmission rate (17.7%-5.1%, P < .001), decreased complication rate (6.5%-2.0%, P < .001), and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Composite Quality Score increased from 4.4 to 17.6. Over the five year period, CMS saved an estimated $8.3 million on 1,486 CJR cases, $7.5 million on 1,351 non-CJR cases, and $600,000 from the voluntary classification of 371 short-stay inpatients as outpatient-a total savings of $16.4 million. Despite major physician time and effort leading to marked improvements in efficiency, quality, and large cost savings for CMS, CJR participation resulted in a net penalty of $304,456 to our institution, leading to zero physician gainsharing opportunities. CONCLUSION: The benefits of CJR were tempered by malalignment of incentives among payer, hospital, and physician as well as a lack of transparency. Future payment models should be refined based on the successes and challenges of CJR.

Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.

Background: The use of metaphyseal cones and sleeves has improved the ability to manage tibial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of three systems used for tibial metaphyseal reconstruction in revision TKA. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 723 revision TKAs, including 145 (20%) knee revisions using tibial cones or sleeves. We compared porous tantalum (TM) cones, titanium (Ti) cones and titanium sleeves. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Results: The rate of revision for any reason was similar among all groups. Revision-free survival rates were similar among all systems studied at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years (TM cones 93%, Ti cones 94%, titanium sleeves 89%). Ti cones had a lower complication rate (6%) compared to TM cones (24%) and sleeves (29%). TM cones (15%) and titanium sleeves (13%) had higher reoperation rates (for any cause) than Ti cones (2%). Radiographic loosening was higher for sleeves (11%) than TM and Ti cones (2%). Conclusion: Metaphyseal reconstruction for tibial bone loss in revision TKA using tantalum cones, titanium cones and titanium sleeves showed successful and comparable early clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years with higher rates of radiographic loosening for titanium sleeves. Level of Evidence: III.

Implementing a pragmatic clinical trial to tailor opioids for acute pain on behalf of the IGNITE ADOPT PGx investigators.

Opioid prescribing for postoperative pain management is challenging because of inter-patient variability in opioid response and concern about opioid addiction. Tramadol, hydrocodone, and codeine depend on the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme for formation of highly potent metabolites. Individuals with reduced or absent CYP2D6 activity (i.e., intermediate metabolizers [IMs] or poor metabolizers [PMs], respectively) have lower concentrations of potent opioid metabolites and potentially inadequate pain control. The primary objective of this prospective, multicenter, randomized pragmatic trial is to determine the effect of postoperative CYP2D6-guided opioid prescribing on pain control and opioid usage. Up to 2020 participants, age ≥8 years, scheduled to undergo a surgical procedure will be enrolled and randomized to immediate pharmacogenetic testing with clinical decision support (CDS) for CYP2D6 phenotype-guided postoperative pain management (intervention arm) or delayed testing without CDS (control arm). CDS is provided through medical record alerts and/or a pharmacist consult note. For IMs and PM in the intervention arm, CDS includes recommendations to avoid hydrocodone, tramadol, and codeine. Patient-reported pain-related outcomes are collected 10 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome, a composite of pain intensity and opioid usage at 10 days postsurgery, will be compared in the subgroup of IMs and PMs in the intervention (n = 152) versus the control (n = 152) arm. Secondary end points include prescription pain medication misuse scores and opioid persistence at 6 months. This trial will provide data on the clinical utility of CYP2D6 phenotype-guided opioid selection for improving postoperative pain control and reducing opioid-related risks.

Effects of Patient and Surgery Characteristics on Persistent Postoperative Pain: A Mediation Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Acute postoperative pain intensity is associated with persistent postsurgical pain (PPP) risk. However, it remains unclear whether acute postoperative pain intensity mediates the relationship between clinical factors and persistent pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants from a mixed surgical population completed the Brief Pain Inventory and Pain Catastrophizing Scale before surgery, and the Brief Pain Inventory daily after surgery for 7 days and at 30 and 90 days after surgery. We considered mediation models using the mean of the worst pain intensities collected daily on each of postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 7 against outcomes of worst pain intensity at the surgical site endpoints reflecting PPP (POD 90) and subacute pain (POD 30). RESULTS: The analyzed cohort included 284 participants for the POD 90 outcome. For every unit increase of maximum acute postoperative pain intensity through PODs 1 to 7, there was a statistically significant increase of mean POD 90 pain intensity by 0.287 after controlling for confounding effects. The effects of female versus male sex (m=0.212, P=0.034), pancreatic/biliary versus colorectal surgery (m=0.459, P=0.012), thoracic cardiovascular versus colorectal surgery (m=0.31, P=0.038), every minute increase of anesthesia time (m=0.001, P=0.038), every unit increase of preoperative average pain score (m=0.012, P=0.015), and every unit increase of catastrophizing (m=0.044, P=0.042) on POD 90 pain intensity were mediated through acute PODs 1 to 7 postoperative pain intensity. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest the mediating relationship of acute postoperative pain on PPP may be predicated on select patient and surgical factors.

A hybrid implementation-effectiveness randomized trial of CYP2D6-guided postoperative pain management.

PURPOSE: Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype-guided opioid prescribing is limited. The purpose of this type 2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial was to evaluate the feasibility of clinically implementing CYP2D6-guided postsurgical pain management and determine that such an approach did not worsen pain control. METHODS: Adults undergoing total joint arthroplasty were randomized 2:1 to genotype-guided or usual pain management. For participants in the genotype-guided arm with a CYP2D6 poor (PM), intermediate (IM), or ultrarapid (UM) metabolizer phenotype, recommendations were to avoid hydrocodone, tramadol, codeine, and oxycodone. The primary endpoints were feasibility metrics and opioid use; pain intensity was a secondary endpoint. Effectiveness outcomes were collected 2 weeks postsurgery. RESULTS: Of 282 patients approached, 260 (92%) agreed to participate. In the genotype-guided arm, 20% had a high-risk (IM/PM/UM) phenotype, of whom 72% received an alternative opioid versus 0% of usual care participants (p < 0.001). In an exploratory analysis, there was less opioid consumption (200 [104-280] vs. 230 [133-350] morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.047) and similar pain intensity (2.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.5 ± 0.7; p = 0.638) in the genotype-guided vs. usual care arm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implementing CYP2D6 to guide postoperative pain management is feasible and may lead to lower opioid use without compromising pain control.

A Learner-Centered Education Strategy: Optimizing an Interactive and Multimodal Learning Format in Orthopaedic Hip & Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery proposed The Orthopaedic Surgery Milestone Project. Training residency and fellowship programs have evolved accordingly adjusting academic curriculums. A new comprehensive Learner-Centered Education Curriculum (LCEC) was designed based on critical reviews and interactive collaboration between faculty, residents, and fellows using structured interviews and iterative feedback. We aim to evaluate the results at 4 years after implementation of a new curriculum. DESIGN: The new adult arthroplasty LCEC was implemented in 2015; data collected between 2015 and 2019 was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Our primary goal was to evaluate educational, research, and quality successes using objective and quantitative academic quality metrics including annual Orthopedic In-Training Examination scores for the Hip & Knee domain to evaluate the medical knowledge competency. SETTING: This study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery residency and fellowship program of Adult Arthroplasty and Joint Reconstruction Surgery, University of Florida (tertiary care center). PARTICIPANTS: Participants include 25 learners (PGY-1 to 5, Clinical fellows) and faculty of an ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery residency and adult arthroplasty fellowship program. RESULTS: Significant improvements in academic, research and quality metrics were obtained since implementation of the LCEC: Orthopedic In-Training Examination scores for Hip & Knee domain increased from 50th to 87th percentile (P=0.042), annual learner peer-reviewed publications and research awards from none before intervention to 20 and 8 respectively (p < 0.05). Resident and fellows conference attendance improved from 81% to 99% (p = 0.0001). The ACGME resident Likert-evaluations also improved from 4.6 to 4.8. CONCLUSION: This LCEC, by enhancing an interactive and active academic learning experience, positively influenced fund of knowledge, conceptual thinking, and interest in the specialty and learner attitudes. Significant and consistent improvements in academic, research, and quality metrics were obtained, while maintaining the highest resident evaluation scores in the program.

A Simple, Personalized Opioid Stratification Pathway Dramatically Reduces Opioid Utilization.

Orthopaedic surgeons account for the largest proportion of opioid prescriptions in the United States among surgical specialties. In total joint arthroplasty, increased opioid use has been associated with poorer clinical and functional outcomes. Despite an abundance of literature on opioid mitigation strategies, most fail to provide personalized prescriptions. Typically, most protocols prescribe the same opioid regimen regardless of patient factors or the extent of the planned procedure. We present a simple opioid stratification pathway that can be used by physicians and office staff as they prepare patients for arthroplasty. We have found this to be easy to implement, effective, and sustainable at a tertiary academic institution and allows for iterative improvements over time.

Outpatient total knee arthroplasty: is it economically feasible in the hospital setting?

BACKGROUND: With the removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Medicare inpatient-only list, outpatient TKA can now be offered, irrespective of payer, in multiple sites. We compared time- and cost-effectiveness of outpatient TKA performed in a hospital outpatient department (HOPD) to that at an inpatient academic medical center (AMC). METHODS: We reviewed all outpatient TKAs performed at our AMC and our HOPD from August 2018 to July 2019. Time efficiency by phase of care was determined, and cost data were obtained from the hospital financial department. Patient selection for outpatient surgery was identical for each site of care. RESULTS: We identified 21 knees that had surgery at the HOPD and 65 knees that had surgery at the AMC. Demographics were similar in both groups. The AMC group had significantly longer in-facility to operating room (Δ (difference) = 33.5 minute, P = .0003), postanesthesia care unit to discharge (Δ = 158.8 minute, P < .0001) and in-facility to discharge (Δ = 199.3 minute, P < .0001) time periods compared to the HOPD group. The HOPD was significantly more cost-effective for the preoperative period (Δ = $75.7, P < .0001), postoperative period (Δ = $315.1, P < .0001), and total cost (Δ = $241, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient TKAs performed in an HOPD spend significantly less time within the facility than the ones performed in an AMC and cost significantly less. It is expected that approval of Medicare TKAs at ambulatory surgery centers will further improve cost and efficiency.

The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool Accurately Predicts Discharge Destination After Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) was developed and validated to predict discharge disposition after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). To date, there are no studies evaluating the applicability and accuracy of RAPT for revision THA/TKA. This study aims to determine the predictive accuracy of the RAPT for revision THA/TKA. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from a single tertiary academic medical center were retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing revision THA/TKA between January 2016 and July 2019. RAPT score was used to predict their postoperative discharge destination and its predictive accuracy was calculated. Patient risk (low, intermediate, and high) for postoperative inpatient rehabilitation facilities or skilled nursing facilities were determined based on the predictive accuracy of each RAPT score. Other factors evaluated included patient-reported discharge expectation, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. RESULTS: A total of 716 consecutive revision THA/TKA episodes were analyzed. Overall, predictive accuracy of RAPT for discharge disposition was 83%. RAPT scores <3 and >8 were deemed high and low risk of discharge to a post-acute care facility, respectively. RAPT scores of 4 to 7 were still accurate 65%-71% of the time and were deemed to be intermediate-risk. RAPT score and patient-reported discharge expectation had the strongest correlation with actual discharge disposition. CONCLUSION: The RAPT has high predictive accuracy for discharge planning in revision THA/TKA patients. Patient-expected discharge destination is a powerful modulator of the RAPT score and we suggest that it be taken into consideration for preoperative discharge planning.

Revision Arthroplasty Does Not Require More Opioids Than Primaries: A Review of Prescribing Practices After Implementation of a Structured Perioperative Pain Management Strategy.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of literature on opioid mitigation strategies following total joint arthroplasty. However, these have almost exclusively been studied in populations undergoing primary procedures, with revision arthroplasty historically thought to be more resistant due to procedural variability and complexity. We report on opioid utilization for revision arthroplasty following implementation of a structured, standardized opioid reduction strategy. METHODS: Beginning January 2015, a comprehensive multidisciplinary pain protocol was developed and applied universally to all patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty, including revisions, without exclusion. We performed a retrospective review of opioid prescription trends for the revision arthroplasty subgroup between January 2014 and July 2018, with the first year serving as a baseline for comparison. Inpatient and outpatient opioid prescription data, inpatient satisfaction scores, and quality metrics were also reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 1273 revision arthroplasty cases in the study period. There was a significant reduction in average oral morphine equivalents utilized per procedure when comparing preintervention and postimplementation values. Overall, inpatient prescriptions decreased 24.1% and outpatient utilization decreased 62.4% over the study period. Significant reductions were seen in both the total hip (60.6%) and total knee (64.0%) subgroups. Although revision arthroplasty patients were prescribed 32.5% more oral morphine equivalents at baseline, at year 5 there was no significant difference in outpatient prescriptions between primary and revision subgroups. CONCLUSION: At our institution, a standardized opioid reduction strategy has resulted in marked reduction in opioid prescriptions for revision arthroplasty patients in line with generally successful reductions for primary arthroplasty. More importantly, with this approach, revision arthroplasty patients required no more outpatient opioids than their primary counterparts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Early Polyethylene Failure in a Modern Total Hip Prosthesis: A Note of Caution.

BACKGROUND: Historically, there has been excellent survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with newer implants expected to outperform prior generations. Review of our institutional database identified problems with one particular cross-linked polyethylene liner in mid-term follow-up, which has not been reported in the literature. We report on the technical aspects of this liner, as well as the clinical and radiographic factors associated with early failure of this bearing in our practice. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional database was performed from January 2009 to June 2019 of patients who presented with significant osteolysis in the setting of prior total hip arthroplasty with a contemporary polyethylene liner. Demographic and radiographic measures were collected for all patients. RESULTS: Twelve patients were identified, with nine undergoing revision surgery. All patients demonstrated radiographic osteolysis at the time of revision surgery. The average time to diagnosis of failure was 55.9 months (range: 12-120 months). Average cup position preoperatively was 44 degrees inclination (range: 36-53 degrees) and 21 degrees anteversion (range: 10-34 degrees). Nine patients underwent revision of the acetabular component, with two also undergoing femoral component revision. The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database revealed 22 reported cases of wear-related failure from 2009 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that no identifiable risk factors related to patient demographics or implant position were identified, the Exactech Connexion GXL liner may be prone to a high rate of early failure from wear and severe secondary osteolysis. We recommend close surveillance of patients with this bearing surface.