Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in a rat model of binge eating.

Binge eating (BE) is a difficult-to-treat behavior with high relapse rates, thus complicating several disorders including obesity. In this study, we tested the effects of high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) in a rodent model of BE. We hypothesized that BE rats receiving high-frequency DBS in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core would have reduced binge sizes compared with sham stimulation in both a 'chronic BE' model as well as in a 'relapse to chronic BE' model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (N=18) were implanted with stimulating electrodes in bilateral NAc core, and they received either active stimulation (N=12) or sham stimulation (N=6) for the initial chronic BE experiments. After testing in the chronic BE state, rats did not engage in binge sessions for 1 month, and then resumed binge sessions (relapse to chronic BE) with active or sham stimulation (N=5-7 per group). A significant effect of intervention group was observed on binge size in the chronic BE state, but no significant difference between intervention groups was observed in the relapse to chronic BE experiments. This research, making use of both a chronic BE model as well as a relapse to chronic BE model, provides data supporting the hypothesis that DBS of the NAc core can decrease BE. Further research will be needed to learn how to increase the effect size and decrease deep brain stimulation-treatment outcome variability across the continuum of BE behavior.

The circadian Per1 and Per2 genes influence alcohol intake, reinforcement, and blood alcohol levels.

BACKGROUND: Perturbations in the function of core circadian clock components such as the Period (Per) family of genes are associated with alcohol use disorder, and disruptions in circadian cycles may contribute to alcohol abuse and relapse. This study tested ethanol consumption, reinforcement, and metabolism in mice containing functional mutations in Per1 and/or Per2 genes on an ethanol-preferring background, C57BL/6J mice. METHODS: Mice were tested in: (A) free-access intake with ascending concentrations of ethanol (2-16%, v/v), (B) conditioned place preference using ethanol (2g/kg for males; 2.5g/kg for females) vs. saline injections, (C) recovery of the righting reflex following a 4g/kg bolus of ethanol, and (D) blood ethanol levels 1h after a 2g/kg bolus of ethanol. RESULTS: All Per mutant (mPer) mice showed increased ethanol intake and condition place preference compared to controls. There were also genotypic differences in blood ethanol concentration: in males, only mPer1 mice showed a significantly higher blood ethanol concentration than WT mice, but in females, all mPer mice showed higher blood ethanol levels than WT mice. CONCLUSIONS: Mutation of either Per1 or Per2, as well as mutations of both genes, increases ethanol intake and reinforcement in an ethanol-preferring mouse model. In addition, this increase in ethanol seeking behavior seems to result both from a change in ethanol metabolism and a change in reward responding to ethanol, but not from any change in sensitivity to ethanol's sedating effects.

Olanzapine and haloperidol in first episode psychosis: two-year data.

Few studies have assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of atypical and typical antipsychotic medications in patients within their first episode of psychosis. This study examined the effectiveness of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine and the typical antipsychotic haloperidol in patients experiencing their first episode of a schizophrenia-related psychotic disorder over a 2-year treatment period. Two hundred and sixty-three patients were randomized to olanzapine or haloperidol in a doubleblind, multisite, international 2-year study. Clinical symptoms and side effects were assessed at baseline and longitudinally following randomization for the duration of the study. Olanzapine and haloperidol treatment were both associated with substantial and comparable reductions in symptom severity (the primary outcome measure) over the course of the study. However, the treatment groups differed on two secondary efficacy measures. Patients were less likely to discontinue treatment with olanzapine than with haloperidol: mean time (in days) in the study was significantly greater for those treated with olanzapine compared to haloperidol (322.09 vs. 230.38, p<0.0085). Moreover, remission rates were greater in patients treated with olanzapine as compared to those treated with haloperidol (57.25% vs. 43.94%, p<0.036). While extrapyramidal side effects were greater in those treated with haloperidol, weight gain, cholesterol level and liver function values were greater in patients treated with olanzapine. The data from this study suggest some clinical benefits for olanzapine as compared to haloperidol in first episode patients, which must be weighed against those adverse effects that are more likely with olanzapine.

Concurrent validation of schizotaxia: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Many first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia show deficits in clinical, neuropsychological, neurobiological and social domains, in the absence of psychosis. We recently reformulated Meehl's concept of schizotaxia to conceptualize the liability to schizophrenia, and we proposed preliminary criteria based on the presence of negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Here we investigate the concurrent validity of schizotaxia by comparing a group of subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia with a group who did not on independent measures of clinical function, and on lifetime rates of selected comorbid psychiatric disorders. METHODS: Twenty-seven adults who were first-degree, biological relatives of patients with schizophrenia were evaluated for schizotaxia based on our predetermined criteria involving negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. Subjects also received portions of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, the Structured Interview for Schizotypy, the Family Interview for Genetic Studies, the DSM-IV Global Assessment of Functioning, the Physical Anhedonia Scale, the Social Adjustment Scale and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Subjects who met criteria for schizotaxia were compared with those who did not on each of the clinical measures, and on their rates of comorbid DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses. RESULTS: Eight subjects met criteria for schizotaxia, and 19 did not. Subjects with schizotaxia showed significantly lower levels of function on each of the clinical scales. Differences in comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were not significant, although the rate of lifetime substance abuse diagnoses in the schizotaxic group (50%) approached levels that are often seen in schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide the first evidence of concurrent validation for a proposed syndrome of schizotaxia. They are also consistent with the view that the vulnerability to schizophrenia may be defined, at least partially, although larger studies to assess both the concurrent and predictive validity of schizotaxia will be required to confirm these results.

"Schizotaxia": clinical implications and new directions for research.

We sought to show that (1) schizotaxia (Meehl's term for the predisposition to schizophrenia) is a clinically consequential condition, and (2) distinguishing it from schizotypal personality disorder may be useful from both clinical and scientific perspectives. We review the features of schizotaxia that may be relevant in clinical settings and discuss their implications for the diagnosis, psychosocial functioning, family intervention and treatment of people in schizophrenia families. Our review indicates that prior work finds some of the nonpsychotic and nonschizotypal relatives of schizophrenia patients to have a psychiatric syndrome characterized by negative symptoms, neuropsychological impairment, and psychosocial dysfunction. Following Meehl, we call this constellation of clinical and neurobiological features schizotaxia. The studies we review suggest it may be worthwhile to consider schizotaxia as a separate diagnostic class. Doing so would alert clinicians to a neurobehavioral syndrome not adequately covered by current diagnostic criteria and would motivate researchers to develop diagnostic and therapeutic approaches aimed at helping schizotaxic individuals and, perhaps, preventing the onset of schizophrenia.

Weight gain from novel antipsychotic drugs: need for action.

Obesity is common in schizophrenia, and people with schizophrenia appear to be at increased risk for certain obesity-related conditions, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Antipsychotic drugs, used chronically to control symptoms of schizophrenia, are associated with often-substantial weight gain, a side effect that is a special concern with the latest generation of highly effective "novel" agents. That the most effective (e.g., novel) antipsychotic medications lead to substantial weight gain presents the field with a critical public health problem. Although preliminary data have been reported regarding the beneficial use of behavior therapy programs for short-term weight control in patients with schizophrenia, the available data are quite limited, and there are no data regarding the long-term beneficial effects of these programs in this population. The obesity field recently has developed programs emphasizing "lifestyle changes" (e.g., diet, exercise, and problem-solving skills) to successfully manage weight in patients without schizophrenia. Such programs can be adapted for patients with schizophrenia through the use of highly structured and operationalized modules emphasizing medication compliance, social skills development, and participation in outpatient programs. Moreover, these programs can potentially be combined with the use of adjunctive pharmacotherapy to maximize and maintain weight loss. The field must solve the paradox that some of our most effective medications for schizophrenia produce substantial weight gain and its associated troubling health risks.

The effects of clozapine on alcohol and drug use disorders among patients with schizophrenia.

Several case studies indicate that clozapine use is associated with reductions in the use of nicotine, alcohol, or illicit drugs. Although not designed to assess clozapine, this study explored a posteriori the effects of clozapine on alcohol and drug use disorders among schizophrenia patients. Among 151 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and co-occurring substance use disorder who were studied in a dual-disorder treatment program, 36 received clozapine during the study for standard clinical indications. All participants were assessed prospectively at baseline and every 6 months over 3 years for psychiatric symptoms and substance use. Alcohol-abusing patients taking clozapine experienced significant reductions in severity of alcohol abuse and days of alcohol use while on clozapine. For example, they averaged 54.1 drinking days during 6-month intervals while off clozapine and 12.5 drinking days while on clozapine. They also improved more than patients who did not receive clozapine. At the end of the study, 79.0 percent of the patients on clozapine were in remission from alcohol use disorder for 6 months or longer, while only 33.7 percent of those not taking clozapine were remitted. Findings related to other drugs in relation to clozapine were also positive but less clear because of the small number of patients with drug use disorders. This study was limited by the naturalistic design and the lack of prospective, standardized measures of clozapine use. The use of clozapine by patients with co-occurring substance disorders deserves further study in randomized clinical trials.

Clozapine in the treatment of refractory psychotic mania.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of clozapine was examined in a group of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder, manic type with psychotic features. METHOD: Twenty-two subjects with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder with active manic and psychotic symptoms participated in a 12-week open-label trial of clozapine. After a 2-10-day drug washout period, patients began treatment with clozapine at 25 mg/day; the dose was increased 25 mg/day (as tolerated) to a maximum level of 550 mg/day. Patients were evaluated longitudinally over the course of the study with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale, and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 22 subjects in the study continued taking clozapine for at least 10 of the 12 weeks. Among the entire group, mean improvements of 56. 7%, 56.6%, and 39.1% were seen on the BPRS, Young Mania Rating Scale, and CGI, respectively. Seventeen of the 22 subjects (77.3%) experienced at least a 20% improvement in scores on all three scales. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this open-label study, which are consistent with previous retrospective studies, case reports, and one other open-label prospective study, suggest that clozapine is an effective agent for patients with treatment-refractory psychotic mania.

Effects of clozapine on substance use in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a retrospective survey.

Substance use disorders, particularly those involving alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine, are highly prevalent among patients with schizophrenia and contribute markedly to its overall morbidity. Unfortunately, standard (typical) antipsychotic medications do not seem to reduce substance use in patients with schizophrenia and may even increase it. Recently, however, a few anecdotal case reports and two previous small "N" surveys have found that clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic medication, seems to decrease substance use in patients treated with this drug for their psychoses. The authors report data from a retrospective survey of substance use in 58 patients treated with clozapine who had a history of comorbid schizophrenia (or schizoaffective disorder) and substance use disorder. Of these 58 patients, 43 were being treated with clozapine at the time of the survey; the remaining 15 patients had discontinued clozapine before the survey. The survey involved chart review and clinician interview to assess change in substance use and global clinical symptoms while receiving treatment with clozapine. More than 85% of the patients who were active substance users at the time of initiation of treatment with clozapine decreased their substance use over the course of clozapine administration. For patients who continued treatment with clozapine up to the present, the decrease in substance use was strongly correlated with a decrease in global clinical symptoms. Data from this retrospective survey further support the previous observations that clozapine reduces substance use among patients with schizophrenic disorders. Moreover, the data suggest the need for prospective controlled studies of the effects of clozapine on substance use in this population.

Clozapine for comorbid substance use disorder and schizophrenia: do patients with schizophrenia have a reward-deficiency syndrome that can be ameliorated by clozapine?

Alcohol and other drugs of abuse are commonly used by persons with schizophrenia and contribute to the overall morbidity of the disorder. Standard, or typical, antipsychotic drugs do not limit such substance use and may even render it more likely. However, preliminary data from our group and others suggest that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine may decrease substance use in this population. While recognizing the likelihood that substance use decreases negative symptoms (as well as extrapyramidal symptoms) in persons with schizophrenia, we hypothesize that the biological basis of substance use relates to a "reward-deficiency syndrome" secondary to dysfunctional dopamine-mediated mesocorticolimbic neurons in these individuals. We further suggest that clozapine's beneficial effect in patients with comorbid schizophrenia and substance use disorders may relate to its presumed ability to ameliorate the deficits in both the mesocortical and mesolimbic dopaminergic neuronal projections through its various actions on dopaminergic, serotonergic, and particularly noradrenergic neurons.

Treatment of nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia: four case studies.

BACKGROUND: Substantial evidence now shows that the genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia can be manifested clinically in first-degree relatives of people with schizophrenia, even without the full manifestations of the disorder. One pattern of problems observed involves the combination of negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits. We have investigated whether a low dose of a novel antipsychotic medication, risperidone, could attenuate these clinical problems in non-psychotic, first-degree relatives, and report here findings from our first 4 cases. METHODS: Twelve adults who were first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia were evaluated for the presence of negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits (in attention and working memory, long-term verbal memory and executive functions). Four subjects who met our predetermined criteria, and who did not demonstrate medical contraindications, were enrolled in a 6-week trial of risperidone. Clinical and medical measures were assessed before, during and after treatment. Doses of risperidone started at 0.25 mg and were increased to 1.0-2.0 mg/day. RESULTS: These subjects showed substantial reductions in negative symptoms, and one subject showed modest reductions. All four subjects showed substantial improvements on some tests of attention and working memory. Side effects of risperidone were temporary and mainly mild. CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings support two conclusions. First, clinical deficits in non-psychotic first-degree relatives of people with schizophrenia are identifiable, and to a significant extent, reversible. Second, risperidone may eventually serve as an effective treatment for people whose lives are impaired by similar or related problems.

The evaluation of women with schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia affects approximately 1 percent of the population worldwide. Its manifestation and response to treatment are often different in women and men and sex hormones, such as estrogen, may help to explain some of these phenomenological and clinical differences. This article reviews important sex differences in symptom expression and treatment response of schizophrenia and focuses on gender-specific factors, such as motherhood, that require specific methods of assessment in women with the disorder. The evaluation of suicide risk, substance abuse, and medical comorbidity in women with schizophrenia is also addressed. Particular attention is paid to the evaluation needs of women receiving antipsychotics, some of which elevate serum prolactin levels.

Obsessions and compulsions as a distinct cluster of symptoms in schizophrenia: a neuropsychological study.

Using neurocognitive testing, the present study assessed whether obsessions and compulsions could represent a distinct cluster of symptoms in schizophrenia. We formulated our hypothesis based on data from nonschizophrenic patients, expecting to find that schizophrenic patients with obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms would experience more difficulties in the same cognitive areas as nonschizophrenic patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Patients had separate psychiatric and cognitive evaluations. The OC and non-OC schizophrenic subjects did not differ significantly on the positive and negative symptom scores. However, compared with non-OC schizophrenic patients, those with OC symptoms performed worse on cognitive areas thought to be impaired (i.e., visual-spatial skills, delayed nonverbal memory, and cognitive shifting abilities). In addition, the severity of OC scores correlated with poor performance in these areas of cognition. Our results support our hypothesis, specifically that OC symptoms may constitute a distinct cluster separate from psychosis in schizophrenia and raise the possibility of a distinct subtype of schizophrenia. The theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Olanzapine: a new antipsychotic agent with efficacy in the management of schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy data, and adverse effects of olanzapine as a treatment for schizophrenia and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of this atypical antipsychotic agent compared with currently marketed agents. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE computer literature search was conducted to retrieve all English-language studies and review articles involving olanzapine published as of October 1, 1996. The manufacturer of the drug, Eli Lilly and Company, provided the clinical investigator's brochure and abstracts of unpublished Phase III clinical trials. STUDY SELECTION: Animal studies evaluating the pharmacology of olanzapine were evaluated, as were all open-label and double-blind studies involving the evaluation of olanzapine for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. DATA EXTRACTION: All available clinical studies were reviewed and the interpretation of data for each study was influenced by the size of the study sample, the nature of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data analysis techniques used. DATA SYNTHESIS: Olanzapine is a thienobenzodiazepine analog with an in vitro receptor affinity profile similar to that of clozapine. Olanzapine exhibits linear kinetics over the dosage range studied and is extensively metabolized in humans. Clinical evaluations to date have shown olanzapine to be at least as efficacious as typical antipsychotic agents in the treatment of the acute phase of schizophrenia. The drug was well tolerated, with significantly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than haloperidol. Current data suggest that olanzapine may be more effective than haloperidol for the treatment of negative symptoms; moreover, preliminary data suggest that fewer relapses occur over the course of treatment in patients treated with olanzapine compared with those taking haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: The exact place of olanzapine in the therapy of psychotic patients remains unclear, as more data are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this agent, its impact on negative symptoms, and its potential use in patients resistant to the standard agents. Despite limitations in the current database, olanzapine is a promising treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.

Differential relationships between positive and negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia.

UNLABELLED: This study assessed the relationships between positive and negative clinical symptoms and specific neuropsychological deficits in a group of stable schizophrenic patients. METHOD: Thirty patients were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia and a battery of cognitive tests. The PANSS assessments were done by a group of raters blind to the results of cognitive tests, while the cognitive tests were conducted by a different group of raters who remained blind to the PANSS scores. RESULTS: We found that, although positive and negative symptoms showed a trend toward direct correlation with each other, they correlated with distinct cognitive deficits. Patients with higher negative scores had more perseverative responses, perservative errors, and completed fewer categories on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; they also experienced more difficulties on trail making and verbal fluency tests. On the other hand, positive symptoms were associated with poor performance on the Digit Span, particularly the Digit Span Forward. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are in agreement with previous reports that negative symptoms may be associated with poor performance on cognitive tests reflecting particularly frontal function. Positive symptoms, on the other hand, seem to be associated with poor attention, specifically of auditory type, and thus, possibly with dysfunction within the more widespread neural networks underlying attention. Our findings support the hypothesis that positive and negative symptoms may be associated with distinct neuropsychological deficits and thus with distinct neurological substrates and point to the need to address both positive and negative dimensions when studying schizophrenia.

How do genes influence marijuana use? The role of subjective effects.

This study investigated determinants of the subjective effects of marijuana and the relationship of subjective effects to marijuana use. Subjects were 8169 twins drawn from the Vietnam Era Twin Registry. Subjects who used marijuana more than five times (n = 2513) reported whether they experienced each of 23 subjective reactions. Factor analysis identified a positive (pleasant) reaction factor and a negative (unpleasant) reaction factor. Both factors were related to duration and frequency of use. Pairs in which both members used marijuana more than five times (MZ = 352 pairs; DZ = 255 pairs) were examined to assess determinants of subjective effects. Approximately one-quarter of the variance in each factor was determined by additive genetic influences; the remaining variance was determined by environmental factors that are not shared by members of a twin pair. The shared or family environment had no detectable influence on either subjective reaction factor.