Real-life experience with remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19 among older adults: a multicentre retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of remdesivir on COVID-19 mortality remains conflicting. Elderly individuals are at risk for poor COVID-19 outcomes. We aimed to assess the effect of remdesivir on COVID-19 mortality among elderly individuals, using real-world data. METHODS: Retrospective multinational cohort of individuals aged ≥65 years, hospitalized with COVID-19 in six medical centres between January 2020 and May 2021. Associations with in-hospital mortality were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model with propensity score adjustment for remdesivir therapy and while implementing generalized estimating equations to control for centre effect. Sensitivity analysis was performed by stratification according to the degree of respiratory support. RESULTS: Of 3010 individuals included, 2788 individuals required either oxygen supplementation or non-invasive/invasive mechanical ventilation, 489 (16%) were treated with remdesivir, and 836 (28%) died. Median age was 77 (IQR 70-84) years and 42% were women. Remdesivir was the only therapeutic intervention associated with decreased mortality [adjusted OR (aOR) 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.66, P < 0.001]. This protective effect was shown for individuals requiring oxygen support and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, while no association was found among individuals necessitating invasive mechanical ventilation.Risk factors for mortality included invasive ventilation (aOR 5.18, 95% CI 2.46-10.91, P < 0.001), higher serum creatinine (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.43, P = 0.001) and dyspnoea (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.84, P = 0.015) on presentation, and other non-modifiable factors, such as comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly individuals hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir carries survival benefit for those with moderate to severe disease. Its role among individuals with critical illness should be further assessed.

Predictors of survival in elderly patients with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the hospital: derivation and validation of the FLAMINCOV score.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of 30-day survival in elderly patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients with COVID-19 aged ≥65 years hospitalized in six European sites (January 2020 to May 2021). Data on demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected. A predictive score (FLAMINCOV) was developed using logistic regression. Regression coefficients were used to calculate the score. External validation was performed in a cohort including elderly patients from a major COVID-19 centre in Israel. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the derivation and validation cohorts. Survival risk groups based on the score were derived and applied to the validation cohort. RESULTS: Among 3010 patients included in the derivation cohort, 30-day survival was 74.5% (2242/3010). The intensive care unit admission rate was 7.6% (228/3010). The model predicting survival included independent functional status (OR, 4.87; 95% CI, 3.93-6.03), a oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) ratio of >235 (OR, 3.75; 95% CI, 3.04-4.63), a C-reactive protein level of <14 mg/dL (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.91-3.04), a creatinine level of <1.3 (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.62-2.52) mg/dL, and absence of fever (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.66). The score was validated in 1174 patients. The FLAMINCOV score ranges from 0 to 15 and showed good discrimination in the derivation (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.81; p < 0.001) and validation cohorts (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; p < 0.001). Thirty-day survival ranged from 39.4% (203/515) to 95.3% (634/665) across four risk groups according to score quartiles in the derivation cohort. Similar proportions were observed in the validation set. DISCUSSION: The FLAMINCOV score identifying elderly with higher or lower chances of survival may allow better triage and management, including intensive care unit admission/exclusion.

Re-Admission of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized with Omicron Variant-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

In accordance with previous publications, re-admission rates following hospitalization of patients with COVID-19 is 10%. The aim of the current study was to describe the rates and risk factors of hospital re-admissions two months following discharge from hospitalization during the fifth wave due to the dominant Omicron variant. A retrospective cohort study was performed in Rabin Medical Center, Israel, from November 2021 to February 2022. The primary outcome was re-admissions with any diagnosis; the secondary outcome was mortality within two months of discharge. Overall, 660 patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of the 528 patients discharged from a primary hospitalization, 150 (28%) were re-admitted. A total of 164 patients (25%) died throughout the follow-up period. A multi-variable analysis determined that elevated creatinine was associated with a higher risk of re-admissions. Rates of re-admissions after discharge during the Omicron wave were considerably higher compared to previous waves. A discharge plan for surveillance and treatment following hospitalization is of great importance in the management of pandemics.

Short versus prolonged antibiotic treatment for complicated urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation.

There is no consensus regarding the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infection (UTI) following kidney transplantation (KT). We performed a retrospective study comparing short (6-10 days) versus prolonged (11-21 days) antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI among KT recipients. Univariate and inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) adjusted multivariate analysis for composite primary outcome of all-cause mortality or readmissions within 30 days and relapsed UTI 180 days were performed. Overall, 214 KT recipients with complicated UTI were included; 115 short-course treatment (median 8, interquartile range [IQR] 6-9 days), 99 prolonged course (median 14, IQR 12-21 days). The composite outcome occurred in 33 (28.6%) in the short-course group and 30 (30%) in the prolonged-course group; relapsed UTI occurred in 19 (16.5%) vs. 21 (21%), respectively. Duration of antibiotic treatment was not associated with any of these outcomes. The only risk factor for mortality/readmissions in multivariate analysis was deceased donor. No differences between groups were demonstrated for length of hospital stay, rates of bacteraemia, resistance development, and serum creatinine at 30 and 90 days. In conclusion, we found no difference in clinical outcomes between KT recipients treated for complicated UTI with short-course antibiotic (6-10 days) versus longer course (11-21 days).

Risk-factors for re-admission and outcome of patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19.

Burden of COVID-19 on Hospitals across the globe is enormous and has clinical and economic implications. In this retrospective study including consecutive adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 who were admitted between 3/2020 and 30/9/20, we aimed to identify post-discharge outcomes and risk factors for re-admission among COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Mortality and re-admissions were documented for a median post discharge follow up of 59 days (interquartile range 28,161). Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for re-admission were performed. Overall, 618 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included. Of the 544 patient who were discharged, 10 patients (1.83%) died following discharge and 50 patients (9.2%) were re-admitted. Median time to re-admission was 7 days (interquartile range 3, 24). Oxygen saturation or treatment prior to discharge were not associated with re-admissions. Risk factors for re-admission in multivariate analysis included solid organ transplantation (hazard ratio [HR] 3.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.73-7.5, p = 0.0028) and higher Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23-1.46, p < 0.0001). Mean age of post discharge mortality cases was 85.0 (SD 9.98), 80% of them had cognitive decline or needed help in ADL at baseline. In conclusion, re-admission rates of hospitalized COVID-19 are fairly moderate. Predictors of re-admission are non-modifiable, including baseline comorbidities, rather than COVID-19 severity or treatment.

Change in Kidney Function and 2-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Importance: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is prevalent in the population of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data on the association of TAVR with kidney function are scarce, as are data on the relationship between changes in kidney function after TAVR and mortality. Objective: To describe the changes in kidney function (both periprocedural and at steady state) after TAVR and to explore the association of TAVR with midterm mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at a public, tertiary academic medical center, which serves as a regional referral center for valvular heart interventions. Consecutive cases of patients undergoing TAVR from November 5, 2008, to December 31, 2019, were included in the study, with available baseline and post-TAVR data on kidney function. Exposures: Steady state (1 month) change in kidney function after TAVR. Significant improvement or deterioration in renal function was defined as a greater than or equal to 10% change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall mortality at 2-year follow-up. Results: A total of 894 patients (mean [SD] age, 82.2 [7.1] years; 452 women ([51.2%]) were evaluated. A total of 362 patients (40.5%) were treated from 2017 to 2019, 348 patients (38.9%) were treated from 2013 to 2016, and 184 patients (20.5%) were treated from 2008 and 2012. Patients had a mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score of 5.2% (4.0%) and a mean (SD) eGFR of 65.1 (23.1) mL/min/1.73 m2. Acute kidney injury occurred in 115 (11.1%) patients by 48 hours, of whom 73 (63.5%) resolved by discharge. One month after TAVR, eGFR improved by at least 10% in 329 patients (36.8%) and deteriorated by at least 10% in 233 patients (26.1%). Overall, CKD stage remained stable or improved in 720 patients (80.6%), and only 5 patients (0.97%) progressed to stage 5 CKD 1 month after TAVR. A deterioration of 10% or greater in eGFR 1 month after TAVR was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.16 (95% CI, 1.24-5.24; P = .04) at 2-year mortality. Patients who showed CKD status resolution (eGFR improvement to >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 after TAVR) had a similar 2-year mortality to those with baseline eGFR greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and vice versa. Factors associated with steady state CKD status resolution after TAVR included lower STS score, higher left ventricular ejection fraction, higher baseline eGFR, no acute kidney injury at discharge from the TAVR admission, and lower contrast-eGFR ratio. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, kidney outcomes after TAVR were reassuring; greater than 80% of patients showed stable or improved kidney function 1 month after the procedure. Improvement in kidney function was associated with a lower 2-year mortality, whereas deterioration in kidney function was associated with increased mortality. Our data suggest that cardiorenal syndrome was a possible cause of CKD in patients in need of TAVR and that there was potential for improvement in both renal and cardiac function after this procedure.

Apixaban Level and Its Influence on Immunosuppression and Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited information on the level of apixaban in kidney transplant (KT) patients with atrial fibrillation and the influence of apixaban therapy on the level of immunosuppression and graft function. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional prospective study of 19 KT patients treated with apixaban. The levels of apixaban were measured using a chromogenic assay calibrated for apixaban and compared with those predicted by the manufacturer. Mean immunosuppression trough levels before and after apixaban treatment initiation were calculated using 3 consecutive measurements. Apixaban levels were compared with a historical control group comprising of 20 nontransplant patients with atrial fibrillation who were treated with the standard 5-mg bid apixaban dosage. RESULTS: All KT patients should have been treated with the standard 5-mg bid apixaban dosage according to the clinical parameters; however, 7 were inappropriately treated with a reduced dosage (2.5-mg bid). There was no significant difference in apixaban level between KT patients treated with the 5-mg bid dosage and nontransplant patients. No KT patient administered the standard dose had out-of-range levels. Peak GM level was significantly lower in KT patients administered an inappropriately reduced dose (P = 0.05). Two patients had below-range peak levels. Apixaban treatment initiation had minimal influence on the level of immunosuppression. Furthermore, it had no adverse impact on graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to nontransplant patients, KT patients administered the standard 5-mg bid dosage had apixaban levels that were well within the recommended manufacturers' expected ranges. In addition, this dosage had minimal influence on immunosuppression and no effect on graft function.

Immunosuppression reduction in kidney transplant recipients during bacterial infection-A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression reduction is a common practice in the management of bacterial infection among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This practice, however, is based on limited evidence. METHODS: Retrospective study comparing clinical outcomes of KTRs whose antimetabolite was discontinued vs continued during hospitalization due to bacterial infection, considering calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) levels. Primary outcome was a composite of clinical failure at day 5; all-cause mortality; and/or re-hospitalization at 90 days. Multivariable analysis of risk factors for the primary outcome was performed using a propensity-matched cohort. RESULTS: We included 183 KTRs hospitalized with bacterial infection. Neither discontinuation of antimetabolites nor lower levels of CNI at infection onset were associated with a significant decrease the composite primary outcome. No significant difference in graft loss or rejection was demonstrated between patients with low vs high CNI levels or discontinuation vs continuation of antimetabolite. In multivariable analysis, CNI levels and management of antimetabolite were not significantly associated with adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression reduction in hospitalized KTRs with bacterial infection did not offer a clinical advantage in terms of mortality, re-hospitalization, or clinical success. An interventional study evaluating continuation of immunosuppression vs reduction should be considered.

Immunosuppression reduction in liver and kidney transplant recipients with suspected bacterial infection: A multinational survey.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal management of immunosuppression during bacterial infections among solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey, of high-volume kidney and liver transplant centers across US and Europe. Structured questionnaires including six multiple-choice questions concerning the management of immunosuppression during infection were distributed among 381 centers. RESULTS: A total of 124 (33%) centers fully completed the questionnaire: 67 liver, 57 kidney centers. Participating centers reported heterogenous approaches to immunosuppression management for all types of immunosuppressive drugs. Notably, kidney centers reported similar frequencies of either discontinuation (19%), continuation (19%), or dose reduction (17.5%) of antimetabolites; discontinuation only for life-threatening infection (17.5%) or case by case decisions (27%). Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) management was heterogenous mostly among liver centers, with 8% discontinuing the CNI, 18% continuing, and 22% reducing dose. Heterogenous approaches to management of steroids and inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin were also demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression management during bacterial infection is heterogenous in US and European centers. Immunosupression reduction (ISR) during infection is a common practice, though supported by limited evidence. Demonstrating high heterogeneity in the approach to ISR, together with the equivocal results of clinical studies, support consideration of an interventional clinical trial.

Long-term results of desensitization protocol with and without rituximab in sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization protocols have been developed in order to overcome the immunological barrier of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). METHODS: During 2006-2012, we implemented a program for desensitizing sensitized (positive DSA, negative NIH-CDC crossmatch) living-donor recipients. The long-term outcome of 36 sensitized recipients, treated with IVIG and plasmapheresis (PP), with or without rituximab (added when > 7500 MFI), was compared to 252 non-sensitized living-donor recipients. RESULTS: Median peak DSA level before desensitization was 7223 (range 3567-16 000) MFI. During a mean follow-up of 121.9 months, graft loss occurred in 6/36 (17%) of the sensitized and 15/251 (6%) of the non-sensitized recipients (P = 0.021). Five-year and 10-year death-censored graft survival rates were 85% and 81% compared to 95% and 92%, respectively, for the non-sensitized recipients. There was no difference in recipients' survival. Slightly more episodes of acute rejection occurred in the sensitized group but had not influence on graft survival. At the last follow-up, 28 recipients had functioning graft; seventeen (47%) did not have detectable DSA. Eleven recipients had excellent graft function despite having detectable DSA. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes of sensitized recipients who underwent desensitization are encouraging. Adding rituximab to PP + IVIG in candidates with very high titers may result in improved outcome.

Reduction of exposure to tacrolimus trough level variability is associated with better graft survival after kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: High tacrolimus trough drug level variability was found to be associated with reduced graft survival. The primary goal of this study was to find whether reduction of exposure to high tacrolimus trough level variability in patients in which previously had high variability was associated with better graft survival. METHODS: All tacrolimus drug level values in patients that underwent kidney transplantation at our center between 2006 and 2015 were collected. Exposure to variability was calculated using a time-weighted coefficient of variability (TWCV). Time-dependent univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the primary outcome of graft survival and to determine a cutoff value for TWCV as a predictor of this outcome. RESULTS: A total of 878 patients were included in the study with a median follow-up of 1263 days. TWCV above 25% was significantly associated with reduced graft survival (HR3.66, 95% CI 2.3-5.8, p < 0.001). Of the 480 patients (54.7%) who had a cumulative TWCV of > 25% at a certain time during the follow-up, 110 (22.9%) later returned to a cumulative TWCV of less than 25%. Reduction of TWCV to values below 25% was associated with a hazard of graft loss that was not different from patients who had cumulative TWCV of less than 25% during the entire follow-up period (HR 1.81, 95% CI 0.71-4.62, p = 0.218 and HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.39-2.99, p = 0.780) in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring TWCV can help detect the high-risk patients. Interventions intended to reduce variability on long-term graft survival may have a positive effect on graft survival.

Apixaban Levels in Octogenarian Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on apixaban levels among octogenarians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We aimed to compare apixaban levels between octogenarians (with and without dose reduction) and younger patients, to assess the frequency of high and above-range drug levels. METHODS: A cross-sectional, prospective study of 80 patients treated with apixaban for NVAF was conducted. Apixaban levels were compared among octogenarians treated with 5 mg twice daily (bid), octogenarians with appropriately reduced dose (2.5 mg bid), octogenarians with inappropriately reduced dose and younger patients (age < 70 years). Trough and peak levels were measured by a chromogenic assay calibrated for apixaban and compared to predicted manufacturer levels. RESULTS: A significant proportion of the cohort had above-range trough [n = 11 (13.8%)] and peak [n = 16 (20%)] levels, especially octogenarians with the 5-mg bid dosage [n = 6 (30%) for trough and n = 8 (40%) for peak]. No significant differences were found in the trough or peak geometric mean (GM) levels among the groups, apart from the peak GM levels between the 5-mg octogenarian group and the other two 2.5-mg bid octogenarian groups (p = 0.0004). The frequency of apixaban peak levels within the upper quartile was significantly higher in the 5-mg octogenarian group compared to the other groups [n = 12 (60%) of measurements, p = 0.019), whereas trough levels were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: High and above-range peak apixaban steady-state levels are highly prevalent in octogenarians receiving the appropriate dosage of 5 mg bid for NVAF stroke prevention. Age above 80 strongly affects apixaban levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number NCT02623049.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus conservative treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.

AIMS: There are no studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to conservative management in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3-5 and severe aortic stenosis. We sought to compare the mortality rate and change in renal function in this patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study that included all patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3-5 and severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI or were treated conservatively between 2010 and 2015. Three hundred and sixty patients were included (162 TAVI and 198 conservatively treated patients). Several statistical methods were used, including propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting. Mean follow-up was 1.9 years. Conservative management was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.95 (95% CI: 2.59-6.02) for mortality compared with TAVI. After one year there was a significant decrease in renal function in the control group (39.6±13.9 ml/min to 34.4±15.3 ml/min), but not in the TAVI group (41.7±13 ml/min to 42.9±14.5 ml/min) (p-value=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI is associated with improved survival in patients with aortic stenosis and chronic kidney disease stage 3-5 compared to conservative management and protects from further decline in renal function up to one-year follow-up.

Gram-negative bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients: A retrospective study
.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are an important cause of hospitalizations and mortality among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Epidemiology of these infections is changing, with increasing rates of Gram-negative pathogens, including resistant ones. Few studies have focused on the characteristics and outcomes of these infections. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to document the causative pathogens of BSIs in HD patients and their clinical outcomes during 2008 - 2015, and to compare risk factors, clinical features, appropriateness of therapy, and outcomes between patients with Gram-negative vs. Gram-positive BSIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Charts of 120 HD patients hospitalized with first BSI were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included, 61 episodes of Gram-negative (51.8%) and 59 episodes of Gram-positive bacteria (49.2%). Source of infection was significantly more likely to be urinary or abdominal among patients with Gram-negative infection. Otherwise, no statistically significant differences were documented between groups in terms of baseline characteristics, presentation of infection and outcomes. Most Gram-negative BSIs were caused by enterobacteriaceae, followed by Pseudomonas spp. Previous clinical or surveillance cultures added little to accurate prediction of the causative organism. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of HD patients with BSI, no significant differences were found between Gram-negative and Gram-positive BSIs, besides source of infection. A urinary or abdominal source strongly suggests a Gram-negative pathogen. Otherwise, patient's characteristics, clinical presentation, and previous cultures, all cannot accurately predict the causative pathogen of BSI, and broad-spectrum antibiotics should be used empirically.
.

Early double J stent removal in renal transplant patients to prevent urinary tract infection - systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ureteral stents are routinely used in renal transplant and are associated with reduced urological complications but increased urinary tract infections (UTIs). There is no agreement on the preferred time to removal of stents after transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stent duration of <14 days vs > =14 days. Electronic databases were searched to identify RCTs that compared early vs late stent removal. Primary outcome was urinary tract infections. Secondary outcomes included various urological complications. No significant difference in UTI rates was demonstrated between short and long stent duration (relative risk (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.64), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 86%). Sensitivity analysis evaluating studies with low risk of bias for allocation concealment demonstrated statistically significant lower rates of UTI with short stent duration (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.71) with no heterogeneity. No significant difference was demonstrated for the outcome of major urological complications (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50-1.05), without heterogeneity. Ureteral stenosis rates were significantly lower in the short duration arm (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98). Early removal of ureteral stents after renal transplant may be associated with reduced rates of UTI and ureteral stenosis. Additional RCTs are needed.

Familial Mediterranean Fever Is Associated With Increased Mortality After Kidney Transplantation-A 19 Years' Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Current data regarding the outcome of kidney transplantation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) who reach end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to reactive amyloidosis A (AA) are scarce and inconclusive. METHODS: The outcomes of 20 patients with FMF and biopsy-proven AA amyloidosis that were transplanted between 1995 and 2014 were compared with 82 control patients (32 with diabetes mellitus and 50 with nondiabetic kidney disease). Major outcome data included overall patient and graft survivals. RESULTS: During a mean overall follow-up of 116.6 ± 67.5 months 11 patients (55%) with FMF died versus 26 patients (31%) in the control group. Median time of death for patients with FMF was 61 months (range, 16-81) after transplantation. Estimated 5-year, 10-year, and actuarial 15-year overall patients survival rates were 73%, 45%, and 39%, respectively, for patients with FMF, versus 84%, 68% and 63%, respectively, for the control group (P = 0.028). FMF was associated with more than twofold increased risk for death after transplantation, and with a threefold increased risk for hospitalization because of infections during the first year. Infections and cardiovascular disease were the cause of death in the majority of patients with FMF. Overall graft survival was similar between the groups. Recurrence of AA amyloidosis was diagnosed in 2 patients during the first year after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: FMF is associated with increased risk of mortality after kidney transplantation.

The incidence of post-transplant cancer among kidney transplant recipients is associated with the level of tacrolimus exposure during the first year after transplantation.

PURPOSE: Immunosuppressive therapy plays a major role in the development of post-transplant cancer. In this nested case-control study of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), we investigated whether the incidence of post-transplant cancer is associated with the level of tacrolimus exposure over time. METHODS: We screened the Rabin Medical Center database for adults who received kidney transplants between 2001 and 2014 and developed post-transplant cancer (excluding basal and squamous cell skin cancers). They were matched against KTRs without cancer. All patients received a maintenance immunosuppressive treatment with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. The degree of exposure to tacrolimus was estimated as the time-weighted average (tTWA) value of tacrolimus blood levels. The tTWA was calculated as the area under the curve divided by time at 1, 6, and 12 months after transplantation and at time of cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Thirty-two cases were matched against 64 controls. tTWA values above 11 ng/mL at 6 and 12 months after transplantation were associated with odds ratio (OR) of 3.1 (95% CI 1.1-9) and 11.7 (95% CI = 1.3-106), respectively, for post-transplant cancer; and with OR of 5.2 (95% CI 1.3-20.5) and 14.1 (95% CI = 1.5-134.3), respectively, for cancer diagnosed more than 3 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Exposure to a tacrolimus time-weighted average level above 11 ng/mL at 6 or 12 months after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of developing cancer.

Chills During Hemodialysis: Prediction and Prevalence of Bacterial Infections - A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Chills are a complication of patients undergoing hemodialysis. The rate of infection among hemodialysis patients presenting with chills is not well established, and empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics are usually the rule. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study aiming to assess the rates of infection and bacteremia in hemodialysis patients presenting with chills. We evaluated risk factors for infection and bacteremia and tested a prediction model for infection. RESULTS: Overall, 269 hemodialysis patients with a first episode of chills were included. Ninety patients (33.5%) had bacteremia and 162 (60.2%) had an infection. Risk factors for bacteremia in multivariate analysis included fever (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.3; P = .009) and vascular catheter as dialysis access (OR 6.2; 95% CI, 3.2-12.0, P <.001). Leukocytosis was an additional risk factor in multivariate analysis for any type of infection (OR 1.265; 95% CI, 1.113-1.438; P <.001). Using a prediction model to evaluate patients without obvious source of infection, we found that patients with fistula or graft as their access, without fever, abnormal leukocytes, or hypoalbuminemia, had a low rate (1/17, 6%) of bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis patients presenting with chills during dialysis, with or without fever, have high rates (∼60%) of infection. Patients with no obvious source of infection, with fistula or graft as access, presenting without fever, leukocytosis, or hypoalbuminemia have low risk for bacteremia and may be investigated without prompt antibiotic treatment. All other patients should receive antibiotic coverage immediately following a chills episode.

Association of the combination of time-weighted variability of tacrolimus blood level and exposure to low drug levels with graft survival after kidney transplantation.

Background: The variability of tacrolimus blood levels has been shown to be associated with inferior graft survival. However, the effect of variability during the early post-transplantation period has not been evaluated. We sought to evaluate the association between time-weighted variability in the early post-transplantation period and graft survival. We also explored the interaction between drug level variability and exposure to inadequate drug levels. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent kidney transplantation in the Rabin Medical Center and were treated with tacrolimus. Time-weighted coefficient of variability (TWCV) was defined as time-weighted standard deviation divided by the mean drug level. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used with the primary outcome of patients and graft survival. Results: The study population included 803 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1 January 2000 and 29 September 2013. The high tertile of TWCV of tacrolimus blood levels was associated with reduced graft survival by univariate and multivariate analyses [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-2.53, P = 0.01 and HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.14-2.63, P = 0.01, respectively]. The interaction between high TWCV and exposure to inadequately low drug levels was significantly associated with reduced survival (P = 0.004), while the interaction between TWCV and high drug blood levels was not. One hundred and thirty patients (16.2%) had the combination of high TWCV and exposure to low drug values (<5 ng/mL). These patients had reduced graft survival by univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.57-3.74, P < 0.001 and HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.65-4.11, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The combination of high TWCV and exposure to low drug levels might identify high-risk patients in the early post-transplantation period.

Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase is Elevated in Ischemic Acute Tubular Necrosis but Not in Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels may help to distinguish ischemic acute tubular necrosis (ATN) from acute rejection after kidney transplantation. METHODS: All kidney biopsies performed in the years 2010 to 2012 were reviewed. Serum LDH, creatinine level, clinical variables, and presence of donor-specific antibodies were recorded before the biopsy. RESULTS: Overall 150 biopsies were included. Ischemic ATN was diagnosed in 45 biopsies and acute cellular-mediated rejection and/or antibody-mediated rejection in 59 biopsies, 38 of which were accompanied by ATN. Serum LDH was elevated in 23 (51%) of 45 cases with ischemic ATN versus 15 (14%) of 105 cases with other diagnoses ( P < .0001). Median serum LDH was 478 U/L (range 277-2018) for ischemic ATN and 372 U/L (range 191-748) for all other diagnoses ( P < .001). When delayed graft function or primary nonfunctioning grafts were caused by ischemic ATN, serum LDH was elevated in 58% of cases, but when caused by acute rejection, LDH was normal in 88% of cases ( P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association between elevated serum LDH 1 to 3 days before performing kidney biopsy and the diagnosis of ischemic ATN after kidney transplantation, especially at the immediate posttransplantation period. Normal serum LDH at this period should raise a suspicion of acute rejection.