An Analysis of Global Surgery Opportunities in American Otolaryngology Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVES: To depict the current state of global surgery opportunities in United States ACGME-approved Otolaryngology residency programs and compare the characteristics of programs with and without these opportunities. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, websites of ACGME-accredited Otolaryngology residency programs were analyzed for information on program size, rank, age, and geographic region as obtained through the Doximity platform in 2023. Additional parameters were obtained for programs listing global surgery opportunities such as funding, faculty oversight, location/region, focus, and relationship to the community served. Data were tabulated and analyzed in Microsoft Excel and Stata. RESULTS: Of the 131 ACGME-accredited Otolaryngology residency programs, 26 (20%) of programs advertised a global surgery opportunity. Nine (35%) of these promoted funding, 15 (58%) offered a clinical focus, one (4%) offered a research focus, and 10 (38%) offered a combined approach. The Midwest region had the most programs with global surgery opportunities (n = 8, 31%). Less than half (42%) of programs had an established partnership with local partners within low and middle-income countries (LMICs). When comparing programs, the average Doximity rank, average program age, and average program size of programs that offered global surgery opportunities was significantly higher than those that did not (37.2 vs. 71.5, 54 vs. 41, 19.5 vs. 13.7; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-fifth of Otolaryngology training programs have a global surgery opportunity. Programs that offer these opportunities had a higher Doximity ranking, older program age, and a larger trainee cohort. These results highlight potential areas for expanding global surgery opportunities in academic institutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

The Lawnmower and the Pediatric Lower Extremity: A Catastrophic Combination.

Background: Lower extremity (LE) trauma within the pediatric population may be debilitating and have different implications and etiologies than in adults. Specifically, lawnmower injuries can cause catastrophic sequelae to the lower extremities, often requiring complex reconstruction or resulting in amputation. This study aims to present our experience with pediatric LE lawnmower injuries at one of the busiest level 1 trauma centers in the United States. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective analysis was performed studying pediatric patients (age <18 years) who experienced LE trauma due to a lawnmower injury over a 5-year period (2012-2017). Patient demographics, perioperative data, and types of reconstruction were reviewed. Univariate analysis of the data was performed to examine trends in exposure and management of pediatric LE lawnmower injuries. Results: Twenty-three patients were identified with pediatric LE lawnmower injuries, of whom 82.6% were male. The patients had a median age of 6 years and a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 4. Over one-third (34.8%) of this cohort required immediate amputation. Additionally, 26.1% and 8.7% required local and free flap reconstruction, respectively. In comparison, only 3.6% and 2.3% of all traumatic pediatric LE injuries from the same time frame required local and free flaps, respectively. Conclusions: Lawnmower injuries to the LE can be devastating, causing long-term physical, emotional, and psychosocial consequences for pediatric patients and their families. The data in this study suggest that pediatric LE injuries from lawnmowers more often require complex reconstruction than other traumatic LE injuries. Rapid and effective decision-making by experienced surgeons is necessary to optimize the potential for limb salvage in pediatric LE lawnmower injuries. An algorithm of recommendations on when to transfer these types of injuries to more experienced tertiary centers is provided. Additional resources should be dedicated toward improving public awareness and industrial safety features to help prevent lawnmower injuries in pediatric patients.

The Hidden Risks of Perioperative Transfusions in Traumatic Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions have been associated with surgical complications; however, these studies are not specific to lower extremity (LE) reconstruction. We evaluated the effect of perioperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions on LE free flap outcomes in trauma patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing LE free flap reconstruction following acute injuries from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative period for transfusions was defined as ± 3 days from the procedure. Parameters included demographics, perioperative characteristics, and outcomes. Major complications were complications requiring reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations. RESULTS: Of the 205 patients, 48% received PRBCs perioperatively. There was a trend toward higher major complications rate in the transfusion group (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.09). Wound size, injury severity score (ISS), and intraoperative estimated blood loss were greater in the transfusion group (p < 0.01). Preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were lower in the transfusion group (p < 0.001). Units of PRBCs transfused were independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.70, p = 0.015) and length of hospital stay (LOS; OR = 1.05, CI: 1.02-1.08, p = 0.002). Infection, wound size, ISS, and preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were independently associated with increased LOS (p < 0.05) but not with major complications. CONCLUSION: The number of units of PRBCs given perioperatively was the only variable independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis and was one of many variables associated with increased LOS. These findings suggest the usage of restrictive transfusion protocols in trauma patients requiring LE reconstruction.

It's Hip to Go Home: An Evaluation of Outpatient Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Cleft Palate.

INTRODUCTION: Secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is a common procedure performed at cleft care centers used to fill the alveolar cleft. The advent of techniques such as minimally invasive trephine drill harvest and placement of continuous-infusion pain pumps at the donor site has made outpatient ABG an increasingly feasible and cost-effective procedure. However, enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to maximize pain control and recovery times for this patient population have not been well established. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was conducted of pediatric patients with cleft palate who underwent iliac crest bone graft ABG at a large urban academic children's hospital from 2017 to 2022. Patient age, alveolar cleft repair laterality, pain scores, surgery duration, hospital LOS, readmissions, and re-operations within 30 days were examined. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients met our inclusion criteria. Fifty patients (92.6%) received a pain pump during the operation. The median duration of surgery and LOS in the post-anesthesia care unit were 1.28 and 1.75 hours, respectively. Fifty-two patients (96.3%) were discharged on the same day as their surgery whereas 2 patients (3.7%) stayed in the hospital overnight. The median pain score at the time of discharge was 0 (interquartile range 0, 0). There were 6 (11.1%) minor complications including 5 pain pump malfunctions and 1 recipient site wound breakdown. There was 1 readmission (1.9%) for development of a surgical site infection at the hip and no re-operations within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSION: The described outpatient ABG protocol demonstrates effective postoperative pain control, short hospital LOS, and few complications requiring hospital readmission or reoperation.

Online personalized feedback intervention reduces cannabis-related problems among college students with high problem distress.

Despite experiencing problems related to using cannabis, very few undergraduate cannabis users are interested in treatment for cannabis-related problems or benefit from cannabis-focused online personalized feedback interventions (PFIs). Thus, it may be important to determine whether individuals perceive their problems as distressing, as only those who are distressed by their problems may be motivated to change their cannabis use or benefit from cannabis-related interventions. The current study examined cannabis-related problem distress, its relation to motivation to change cannabis use, and whether problem distress impacted outcomes of a problem-focused online PFI. Past-month cannabis-using undergraduates who endorsed experiencing at least one cannabis-related problem in the past 3 months were randomized to a PFI (n = 102) or a personalized normative feedback (PNF)-only condition (n = 102). Problem distress was robustly related to readiness, importance, and confidence to change cannabis use at baseline. Among those with high levels of problem distress at baseline, those in the PFI condition reported a greater decrease in problems than those in the PNF-only condition. This was not the case among those with lower levels of problem distress. Further, the number of cannabis-related problems did not moderate intervention outcomes. Cannabis users who perceive their problems as more distressing may be more motivated to change their cannabis use and more likely to benefit from a problem-focused PFI relative to a PNF-only intervention. Results have implications for the personalization of cannabis-focused interventions to maximize the impacts of interventions and decrease cannabis-related problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).