The queen bee phenomenon in Canadian surgical subspecialties: An evaluation of gender biases in the resident training environment.

BACKGROUND: The queen bee phenomenon (QBP) describes the behavioural response that occurs when women achieve success in a male-dominated environment, and in this position of authority, treat their female subordinates more critically. It has been demonstrated in business, academia, the military, and police force. The goal of this study was to determine whether the QBP occurs in surgical specialties. We hypothesized that female surgeons, fellows, and senior surgical residents would be more critical in their assessment of junior female residents than their male counterparts. METHODS: A scenario-based survey was distributed via email to all Canadian surgical programs between February and March 2021. Scenarios were designed to assess either female or male learners. Centers distributed surveys to attending surgeons, surgical fellows, resident physicians, and affiliate surgeons. Respondents average Likert score for female-based and male-based questions were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on gender, age, seniority, and surgical specialty. RESULTS: 716 survey responses were collected, with 387 respondents identifying as male (54%) and 321 identifying as female (45%). 385 attending surgeons (54%), 66 fellows (9%), and 263 residents (37%) responded. The mean Likert scores for female respondents assessing female learners was significantly lower than male learners (p = 0·008, CI = 95%). During subgroup analysis, some specialties demonstrated significant scoring differences. DISCUSSION: The QBP was shown to be present among surgical specialties. Female respondents assessed female learners more critically than their male counterparts. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of tackling organizational biases to create more equitable educational and work environment in surgery.

C3 geriatric distal femoral fracture - ORIF or replace with a distal femoral replacement (DFR).

HISTORY: A 83yo female tripped on a rug at home. She fell onto her left knee. She had immediate left knee pain. She had never hurt her left knee before. PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: She takes medication for her blood pressure and has no allergies. She has had prior successful bilateral total hip arthroplasties 5 years ago. Her BMI is in the normal range. She has had no problems with her bilateral total hip arthroplasties. SOCIAL HISTORY: She lives alone, but her daughter is close by to help her with activities like heavy cleaning. This woman is still driving and doing her own shopping and uses no walking aids. She is a retired secretary. PHYSICAL EXAM: Distal function is good in the leg. She has no other injuries. Her neck and head are uninjured. XRAY AND CT: There is a C3 left sided comminuted distal femoral fracture. The bilateral total hip arthroplasties are in good position and appear normal (Fig. 1).

The Orthopedic Trauma Symposium: improving care of orthopedic injuries in Haiti.

BACKGROUND: Although single-trip volunteer medical teams can provide much-needed acute trauma care following natural disasters, their ability to leave a legacy of improved care in the region is often limited. One way to improve treatment of traumatic injuries is through conference-based teaching, such as the Orthopedic Trauma Symposium (OTS), which took place in Haiti in 2014. However, there is little research evaluating the effectiveness of such teaching tools. We evaluated the OTS and the potential benefits of future iterations of the course. METHODS: A survey consisting of 5-point Likert scale questions as well as qualitative open feedback assessed respondents' opinions regarding the value, content and delivery of the OTS. Respondents were classified dichotomously in terms of their role in the OTS (instructor v. participant) to measure any meaningful difference in feedback. RESULTS: In total, 84% of all participants agreed that course content was clearly communicated, and 98% agreed that instructors were knowledgeable in the topics covered. Moreover, 87% of all participants responded that they would apply the training in their medical practices going forward. CONCLUSION: Haitian physicians, residents and medical students responded favourably to the OTS. Open-ended questions offered concise, attainable improvements for future iterations of the course. Organizations committed to improving medical care in low- and middle-income countries should take note of these findings while continuing to develop the OTS and similar initiatives globally.

CONTEXTE: Les équipes médicales bénévoles qui font des interventions ponctuelles sont en mesure de prodiguer des soins essentiels en traumatologie aigüe après des désastres naturels, mais elles laissent souvent un héritage limité pour ce qui est de l'amélioration des soins dans la région touchée. Or, il est possible d'améliorer le traitement des blessures post-traumatismes par le biais de conférences didactiques, telles que le Symposium de traumatologie-orthopédie (STO) tenu en Haïti en 2014. Peu de recherches ont toutefois mesuré l'efficacité de ce type d'outil didactique. Nous avons voulu faire un bilan du STO et des avantages potentiels qu'il y aurait à répéter l'expérience. MÉTHODES: Un questionnaire prenant la forme d'une échelle de Likert en 5 points, ainsi que des questions qualitatives ouvertes, ont permis de recueillir l'opinion des répondeurs au sujet de l'utilité, du contenu et du déroulement du STO. Nous avons scindé les répondeurs en 2 groupes en fonction de leur rôle lors du STO (soit instructeurs, soit participants) pour mesurer les différences notables sur le plan des perceptions. RÉSULTATS: En tout, 84 % de l'ensemble des participants ont affirmé que le contenu du cours avait été clairement communiqué et 98 % ont affirmé que les instructeurs connaissaient les thèmes abordés. En outre, 87 % de tous les participants ont répondu avoir l'intention d'appliquer dorénavant la formation à leur pratique médicale. CONCLUSION: Les médecins, résidents et étudiants en médecine haïtiens ont répondu favorablement au STO. Les questions ouvertes ont suscité des suggestions concises et réalistes pour améliorer les futures éditions du cours. Les organisations vouées à l'amélioration des soins médicaux dans les pays à revenu faible et moyen devraient prendre note de ces observations tout en continuant d'exploiter la formule des STO et autres initiatives similaires ailleurs dans le monde.