Tissue imprints: assessing their potential for routine biobanking collection.

Biomedical research depends on the availability of good quality biospecimens. Unfortunately, certain specimens are scarce due to disease rarity or size restrictions of surgical materials. To increase access to limited surgical specimens, Biobanks need to reassess and adjust their collection programs. We evaluated the feasibility of adapting "touch imprints" to gain access to limited surgical specimens as well as to maximize the use of "precious" specimens. We utilized 12 kidney samples for touch imprints on defined areas of microscope glass slides and FTA paper. DNA was isolated from glass slides on the day of preparation, Day 0, and from glass slide and FTA paper preparations after two weeks of storage at room temperature and -80°C. Yield and purity of DNA from reference kidney samples were compared to DNA from the touch imprints and the quality determined by real-time PCR using the amplification of Cyclophilin A (Cyc A) as an index. DNA quality for glass slides at Day 0 was not significantly different from DNA after two weeks at room temperature (glass at room temperature; p=0.111 and 0.097, yield and purity, respectively) and after two weeks at -80°C (glass -80°C; p=0.358 and 0.281, yield and purity, respectively). Glass slide DNA at room temperature and -80°C were not significantly different (p=0.795 and 0.146 for yield and purity, respectively). DNA from FTA paper at room temperature and from FTA paper at -80°C were significantly different from glass at room temperature and glass at -80°C (p=0.002, respectively). Threshold values for Cyc A were ≤28 for the reference DNA and ≤32 for DNA from glass and FTA paper. This study demonstrates that touch preparations on microscope glass slides and FTA paper can provide sufficient and good quality DNA suitable for PCR. Touch imprints could therefore be adopted by biobanks to collect and bank biological materials from limited surgical specimens.

Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality.

Human biospecimens are subject to a number of different collection, processing, and storage factors that can significantly alter their molecular composition and consistency. These biospecimen preanalytical factors, in turn, influence experimental outcomes and the ability to reproduce scientific results. Currently, the extent and type of information specific to the biospecimen preanalytical conditions reported in scientific publications and regulatory submissions varies widely. To improve the quality of research utilizing human tissues, it is critical that information regarding the handling of biospecimens be reported in a thorough, accurate, and standardized manner. The Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality recommendations outlined herein are intended to apply to any study in which human biospecimens are used. The purpose of reporting these details is to supply others, from researchers to regulators, with more consistent and standardized information to better evaluate, interpret, compare, and reproduce the experimental results. The Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality guidelines are proposed as an important and timely resource tool to strengthen communication and publications around biospecimen-related research and help reassure patient contributors and the advocacy community that the contributions are valued and respected.

Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Human biospecimens are subject to a number of different collection, processing, and storage factors that can significantly alter their molecular composition and consistency. These biospecimen preanalytical factors, in turn, influence experimental outcomes and the ability to reproduce scientific results. Currently, the extent and type of information specific to the biospecimen preanalytical conditions reported in scientific publications and regulatory submissions varies widely. To improve the quality of research utilizing human tissues, it is critical that information regarding the handling of biospecimens be reported in a thorough, accurate, and standardized manner. The Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ) recommendations outlined herein are intended to apply to any study in which human biospecimens are used. The purpose of reporting these details is to supply others, from researchers to regulators, with more consistent and standardized information to better evaluate, interpret, compare, and reproduce the experimental results. The BRISQ guidelines are proposed as an important and timely resource tool to strengthen communication and publications around biospecimen-related research and help reassure patient contributors and the advocacy community that the contributions are valued and respected.

Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Human biospecimens are subjected to collection, processing, and storage that can significantly alter their molecular composition and consistency. These biospecimen preanalytical factors, in turn, influence experimental outcomes and the ability to reproduce scientific results. Currently, the extent and type of information specific to the biospecimen preanalytical conditions reported in scientific publications and regulatory submissions varies widely. To improve the quality of research that uses human tissues, it is crucial that information on the handling of biospecimens be reported in a thorough, accurate, and standardized manner. The Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ) recommendations outlined herein are intended to apply to any study in which human biospecimens are used. The purpose of reporting these details is to supply others, from researchers to regulators, with more consistent and standardized information to better evaluate, interpret, compare, and reproduce the experimental results. The BRISQ guidelines are proposed as an important and timely resource tool to strengthen communication and publications on biospecimen-related research and to help reassure patient contributors and the advocacy community that their contributions are valued and respected.

Use of robotic telepathology for frozen-section diagnosis: a retrospective trial of a telepathology system for intraoperative consultation.

Telepathology is the practice of digitizing histological or macroscopic images for transmission along telecommunication pathways for diagnosis, consultation, or continuing medical education. Previous studies have addressed static versus dynamic imaging in several specimen types with a wide variety of systems and communication pathways. The goal of this paper was to assess the validity of a Web-based telepathology system for frozen section consultation within the Army Medical Department. The system provides real-time, dynamic remote control of a robotic microscope over standard Internet connections. Oftentimes, a solo pathologist is called on to provide diagnostic services without the support of immediate second or expert consultation during an intraoperative consultation. The use of telepathology is attractive because it provides an opportunity for pathologists to obtain immediate consultation. For purposes of the study, 120 consecutive frozen section cases were diagnosed at a distance using the system. Intraobserver agreement between the telepathology diagnosis and glass slide diagnosis was observed. Diagnostic agreement was 100% for a wide variety of specimens. This study suggests that such a system will help support pathologists located at distant sites.