Prescription digital therapeutics: Applying Medicaid experience to value assessment and formulary management.

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are a rapidly growing therapeutic category with more than 150 clinical trials evaluating US Food and Drug Administration-regulated DTx to develop additional evidence by the end of 2022. Investments in DTx development have doubled since 2019, reaching $14.7 billion in 2021. Prescription DTx are regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration and require demonstration of efficacy and safety prior to commercialization and reimbursement by payers. Drawing insights from the Massachusetts Medicaid program's early experience with prescription DTx, we provide an overview of this new category of therapeutics and suggest a roadmap for payers and policymakers to evaluate the value of prescription DTx for their member population. Finally, we propose solutions to potential challenges that may be encountered in the DTx coverage and reimbursement management.

Cost-benefit analysis of sacubitril/valsartan in a Medicaid population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in adults with heart failure (HF) enrolled in a state Medicaid plan to prevent HF-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, claims-based, cost-benefit study. METHODS: This exploratory cost-benefit study evaluated Massachusetts Medicaid (MassHealth) members with HF who had an initial pharmacy claim for sacubitril/valsartan between July 7, 2015, and August 31, 2018 (index date). Efficacy outcomes, HF-related hospitalizations and ED visits, and cost outcomes for HF-related medical and pharmacy claims were compared 1 year pre- and post index date. Benefit-cost ratio and net benefit were calculated for all members. A subgroup analysis evaluated the outcomes for members who were adherent to sacubitril/valsartan. RESULTS: A total of 22 members were identified for the study. There were fewer hospitalizations and ED visits post sacubitril/valsartan initiation in the overall population (post vs pre-: 23 vs 26) and among 12 members adherent to sacubitril/valsartan (10 vs 12). The median (IQR) cost for hospitalizations and ED visits was lower during the postindex period ($576 [$19,439] vs $132 [$11,692]) whereas the median (IQR) cost for HF pharmacotherapies was greater during the postindex period ($4578 [$3033] vs $270 [$255]). The benefit-cost ratio and net benefit were 0.91 and -$336, respectively, for all members and 1.43 and $2337, respectively, for members adherent to sacubitril/valsartan. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit as demonstrated by the cost avoidance of HF-related hospitalizations and ED visits did not outweigh the additional costs of sacubitril/valsartan, but cost-benefit was observed in members who were adherent to sacubitril/valsartan.

Uptake of hepatitis C virus treatment in a multi-state Medicaid population, 2013-2017.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the direct acting antiviral (DAA) uptake in a multi-state Medicaid population with hepatitis C virus (HCV) prior to and after ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) approval and changes in prior authorization (PA) requirements. DATA SOURCES: Analyses utilized enrollment, medical, and pharmacy claims in four states, December 2013-December 2017. STUDY DESIGN: An interrupted time series examined trends in uptake (1+ claim for a DAA) before and after two events: LDV/SOV approval (October 2014) and lifting of PA requirements for 40% of members (July 2016). Analyses were also performed in subgroups defined by the number and dates of change in PA requirements in members' Medicaid plans. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Members aged 18-64 years with an ICD code for HCV were included in the sample from diagnosis date until treatment initiation or Medicaid disenrollment. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The annual sample size ranged from 38,302 to 45,005 with approximately 30% ages 18-34 years and 40% female. In December 2013, 0.08% was treated, rising to 0.74% in December 2017 (p < 0.001). Uptake increased from 0.34%/month in October 2014 to 0.70%/month after LDV/SOF approval, (p < 0.001), and increased relative to the pre-LDV/SOV trend through June 2016 (p = 0.04). Uptake increased to 1.18%/month after PA change, (p < 0.001) and remained flat through 2017 (p = 0.64). Cumulatively, 20.1% were treated by December 2017. In plans with few/no requirements through 2017, uptake increased to 1.19%/month after LDV/SOF approval (p < 0.001) and remained flat through 2017 (p = 0.11), with 22.2% cumulatively treated. Among plans that lifted PA requirements from three to zero in mid-2016, uptake did not increase after LDV/SOF approval (p = 0.36) but did increase to 1.41%/month (p < 0.001) after PA change, with 18.1% cumulatively treated. CONCLUSIONS: HCV Treatment increased through 2017. LDV/SOF approval and lifting PA requirements led to an increase in uptake followed by flat monthly utilization. Cumulative uptake was higher in plans with few/no PA requirements relative to those with three requirements through mid-2016.

Introduction: Pharmacy Reimbursement.

DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this article. The author has nothing to disclose.

Effect of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor on Pulmonary Exacerbation Rates in Members with Cystic Fibrosis in a Medicaid Population.

BACKGROUND: Lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) is indicated for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene. In clinical trials, LUM/IVA decreased pulmonary exacerbation rates. To our knowledge, there is no published data evaluating real-world outcomes for Medicaid patients receiving LUM/IVA. OBJECTIVE: To compare CF pulmonary exacerbation rates before and after initiation of LUM/IVA in 1 state's Medicaid program. METHODS: This pre-post claims analysis screened fee-for-service and managed Medicaid members who had ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for LUM/IVA between July 2, 2015, and September 30, 2016. Members were included if they were aged ≥ 6 years with a CF diagnosis and homozygous for the F508del mutation, consistent with the indication at study initiation. Exclusion criteria included Medicaid as a secondary payer or any break in coverage during the study. The index date was defined as the first claim for LUM/IVA. Demographics and outcomes were derived from pharmacy and medical claims. Outcomes included overall rate of pulmonary exacerbations (reported as the total events for the study population 6 months before and after the index date and average annualized rate). Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as any combination of medical claims for an emergency room (ER) visit or inpatient hospitalization with a CF pulmonary exacerbation or respiratory infection (ICD-9/10-CM codes) or pharmacy claims for an oral or intravenous antibiotic (excluding macrolides). A gap of > 7 days was considered a new pulmonary exacerbation. Paired t-test was used to test significance. RESULTS: 21 patients met inclusion criteria with an average age at treatment initiation of 20.1 years. Average proportion of days covered (SD) was 0.62 (0.29). The number of pulmonary exacerbations increased from 45 to 48 during the 6 months before and after the index date, respectively, and the annualized rate increased from 4.37 to 4.66 (P = 0.69). While the number of pulmonary exacerbations associated with antibiotics alone increased (23 to 33; P = 0.08), those associated with at least 1 ER visit or inpatient hospitalization decreased (22 to 15; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis did not find a decrease in pulmonary exacerbation rate for Medicaid members receiving LUM/IVA; however, adherence was low. Further study of similar populations is needed to better understand the long-term effect of treatment. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose. A poster of this project was presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2018 in Boston, MA, on April 23-26, 2018.

Impact of Sequential Opioid Dose Reduction Interventions in a State Medicaid Program Between 2002 and 2017.

Policies that address opioid dose limits may help to decrease high-risk opioid prescribing. We evaluated 3 sequential and progressive decreases in high-dose (HD) opioid limits implemented by Massachusetts Medicaid over 15 years. The study population included members ages 18 to 64 years with ≥1 claim for a schedule II opioid between January 2002 and March 2017. The 3 interventions consisted of prior authorization requirements for prescriptions exceeding the morphine equivalent dose (MED) HD dose limits: >360 mg (intervention 1a and 1b), >240 mg (intervention 2), and >120 mg (intervention 3). A segmented regression evaluated the change in natural log of the average daily MED (AD_MED). The natural log of the AD_MED decreased during the 6 quarters after intervention 1a (P < .001), immediately after intervention 1b (P = .0002), and continued to decrease over the following 8 quarters (P = .023). The natural log of the AD_MED decreased immediately after intervention 2 (P = .002) and again after intervention 3 (P < .001). The percentage of users exceeding the HD limits of 360 mg, 240 mg, and 120 mg MED decreased by 87.3%, 79.8%, and 75.2% from baseline, respectively. The natural log of the AD_MED decreased among members after implementation of 3 sequential and progressive HD prior authorization limits, as did the percentage of members exceeding each of the HD limits. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates the longitudinal impact of a prior authorization policy-based HD limit in a Medicaid population. This study contributes to options for policymakers and other Medicaid programs as a potential strategy to assist in addressing the opioid epidemic.

Effectiveness of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir and Predictors of Treatment Failure in Members with Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Medicaid Population.

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is eradication of HCV ribonucleic acid, which is predicted by achievement of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12). Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was approved by the FDA in 2014 and 2015 as a once-daily regimen for the treatment of HCV genotype 1 and HCV genotypes 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Although its efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, there is an unmet need for real-world effectiveness data and studies that assess the association of rates of SVR12 with specific clinical and demographic factors in the Medicaid population. OBJECTIVES: To (a) evaluate the effectiveness of HCV genotype 1 treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir as measured by the rate of SVR12 overall and within the subgroups of 8-, 12-, and 24-week regimens and (b) identify predictors of treatment failure in the Massachusetts Medicaid (MassHealth) population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the rate of SVR12 among 796 MassHealth Primary Care Clinician and fee-for-service plan members who completed treatment with at least one 8-, 12-, or 24-week treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for HCV genotype 1 infection between October 10, 2014, and November 1, 2016. The following variables were evaluated to identify predictors of treatment failure: sex, history of treatment failure, cirrhosis, substance use disorder, human immunodeficiency virus coinfection, and concomitant use of interacting medications. The proportion of members who achieved SVR12 was calculated for the entire study population and stratified by treatment regimen. Chi-square tests were used to compare the proportion of members who achieved SVR12, stratified by clinical and demographic variables. RESULTS: SVR12 was achieved in 95% (756/796) of members. High proportions of members who received 8 weeks of treatment or 12 weeks of treatment without concomitant ribavirin achieved SVR12 (96.0% [285/297] and 95.7% [382/399], respectively). A slightly lower proportion of members who received 12 weeks of treatment with concomitant ribavirin or 24 weeks of treatment achieved SVR12 (89.9% [62/69] and 87.1% [27/31], respectively). The proportion of members who achieved SVR12 with each treatment regimen was consistent when stratified by clinical and demographic variables. None of the included variables were found to be associated with statistically significant differences in odds of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: In the Medicaid population of 1 state, treatment of HCV genotype 1 infection with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was associated with a high rate of SVR12. The outcomes of treatment of HCV genotype 1 infection with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in the Medicaid population are comparable with outcomes observed in other patient populations. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no financial disclosures. A poster of this manuscript was presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2017 Annual Meeting, March 27-30, 2017, in Denver, Colorado.

A systematic review of community-based interventions to improve oral chronic disease medication regimen adherence among individuals with substance use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Poor medication adherence has been shown to cause medical complications, death, and increased healthcare costs and may be of particular importance in patients with substance use disorder (SUD). Concerns regarding adherence in this population may influence a healthcare provider's decision to prescribe a medication requiring high adherence. Guidance defining best practices that promote adherence among individuals with SUD is lacking. METHODS: A review of English articles in Medline and PsycINFO databases, published between October 1, 1994 and October 31, 2017, was conducted in order to identify studies of interventions intended to improve adherence to oral chronic disease medication regimens among patients with SUD. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental study designs, and case series were included. Article quality was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 854 abstracts were retrieved, of which 24 met inclusion criteria. Adherence interventions were categorized as those: 1) addressing the chronic disease state; 2) addressing SUD; or 3) both. Studies varied greatly with respect to intervention length, method of measuring adherence, and quality. Statistically significant improvement in adherence was observed in 12 of 24 studies (50%). Specific interventions that improved adherence included incentive-based interventions, directly observed therapy, and telephonic/home visits. Counseling-based interventions such motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy presented mixed results. CONCLUSIONS: While effective interventions were identified, heterogeneity of study designs and study quality preclude determination of optimal interventions to promote adherence in this population. Further evaluation with sound study design may inform the development of best practices for treating chronic disease in patients with SUD.

Evaluation of Progesterone Utilization and Birth Outcomes in a State Medicaid Plan.

OBJECTIVES: Progesterone (hydroxyprogesterone caproate injection and vaginal progesterone) has been shown to reduce preterm birth (PTB) rates by a third among pregnant women at high risk. The purpose of this analysis is to report birth outcomes and medication adherence among Massachusetts Medicaid (MassHealth) members receiving progesterone, evaluate the association between member characteristics and birth outcomes and medication adherence, and compare cost of care with a prior preterm pregnancy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used medical claims, pharmacy claims, and prior authorization (PA) request data for MassHealth members who had a PA submitted for progesterone between January 1, 2011, and March 31, 2015. Members were excluded due to breaks in coverage, progesterone was not indicated for prevention of PTB, and if current gestational week or date of delivery was unavailable. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 418 members were screened for inclusion of whom 190 met criteria and 169 filled progesterone. Mean age was 29.2 years (SD = 5.23), and clinical comorbidities were identified in 90.5% of members. Consistent with clinical trials on progesterone effectiveness, 62.1% of members had a term delivery (37 wks of gestation). Among members with prior gestational age at delivery available, the average difference in gestational age between pregnancies was 8.25 weeks (SD = 6.11). In addition, 66.3% of members were adherent to progesterone based on proportion of days covered (PDC) of 0.8 or higher. The overall mean PDC was 0.79 (SD = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Despite similar birth outcomes in clinical trials and national trends, medication adherence is low in this state Medicaid program. Therefore, members may benefit from adherence support.

The Effect of a Federal Controlled Substance Act Schedule Change on Hydrocodone Combination Products Claims in a Medicaid Population.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, hydrocodone combination products (HCPs) were the most prescribed medications in the United States. Under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970, hydrocodone alone was classified as a Schedule II drug, while HCPs were classified as Schedule III, indicating a lower risk for abuse and misuse. However, according to a Drug Enforcement Agency analysis, the addition of nonopioids has not been shown to diminish abuse potential of hydrocodone. In response to concerns for drug abuse and overdose, the Drug Enforcement Agency rescheduled HCPs to Schedule II in October 2014, with the intent of limiting overprescribing and increasing awareness of their abuse potential. However, it is unknown whether this has affected the overall claims for HCPs in a Medicaid population. OBJECTIVES: To (a) compare the trend in HCP prescription claims with select non-HCP (opioid and nonopioid) analgesic claims before and after the HCP schedule change in the Massachusetts Medicaid fee-for-service/Primary Care Clinician plan population and (b) identify if there was a change in HCP new start member and claim characteristics before and after the HCP schedule change. METHODS: This quasi-experimental, retrospective study used enrollment and pharmacy claims data to evaluate all members in the study population 1 year before and after the HCP schedule change. The number of claims for HCPs and select non-HCP analgesics was reported as the monthly rate per total population, and an interrupted time series analysis compared the change in the monthly rate of claims across groups. Members with 1 or more pharmacy claims for a new HCP prescription during a 5-month period before or after the HCP schedule change were analyzed to determine member demographics (age, gender, and number of claims) and claim characteristics (average daily dose, average quantity per claim, and days supply). RESULTS: The rate of HCP claims increased before and decreased after the HCP schedule change. Controlling for the trend during the period before the HCP schedule change, the rate of HCP claims per 1,000 members per month decreased at a greater rate than non-HCP analgesics in the period after the HCP schedule change (P < 0.001). The percentage of HCP claims for new start members decreased after the HCP schedule change (44.9% vs. 34.1% of all HCP claims pre- to post-schedule change; P < 0.001). In the group of new starts, there was not a significant difference in the average daily dose (26.3 mg vs. 26.4 mg; P = 0.69), while there was a decrease in average number of tablets dispensed per claim (from 37.1 to 20.3 tablets; P < 0.001) and an increase in the percentage of claims for a shorter days supply (from 57.7% to 81.6%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the HCP schedule change may have contributed to the decrease in claims for HCPs in a Medicaid population. After the HCP schedule change, there was a trend towards decreased HCP use among new starts. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose. Study concept and design were contributed by all authors except for Arnold and Clements. Tran, Arnold, and Clements took the lead in data collection, along with Peristere, and data interpretation was performed by all the authors, except Arnold. The manuscript was written primarily by Tran, along with Lavitas, Stevens, and Greenwood, and revised by all the authors except Arnold and Peristere. A poster of this research project was presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy's 2016 Annual Meeting in San Francisco, California, April 2016.

Evaluation of the impact of a prescribing guideline on the use of intraoperative dexmedetomidine at a tertiary academic medical center.

Objective: To evaluate usage patterns of dexmedetomidine in the operating room after implementation of a prescribing guideline. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of a prescribing guideline on usage patterns of dexmedetomidine in the operating room at a tertiary, academic medical center during one-month period pre- (July 2010) and post-guideline (July 2011 and July 2012) implementation. Results: A total of 267 patients received intraoperative dexmedetomidine during the study period. Dexmedetomidine use in surgical procedures decreased post-guideline implementation [5.7% (pre) vs. 1.9% and 3.3% (post)]. The most common guideline-based indication for intraoperative dexmedetomidine was for anesthesia during bariatric surgery (41% and 38% in 2011 and 2012, respectively). We estimated a cost-avoidance of $308,856 over the two-year period after guideline implementation. Conclusion: Our results suggest that implementation of a prescribing guideline for the use of dexmedetomidine in the operating room is feasible and associated with improved utilization patterns.

Overview of Comprehensive Hepatitis C Virus Medication Management in a State Medicaid Program.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough direct-acting antivirals set a new standard in the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with regard to cure rates and improved tolerability; however, the health care system is challenged by the cost of these medications. OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of a comprehensive HCV medication management program on optimized regimen use, prior authorization (PA) modifications, and medication cost avoidance in a state Medicaid program. METHODS: This program consists of a 2-tiered prescriber outreach: (1) regimen outreach to promote optimized regimen selection and (2) refill outreach to support medication adherence. PA criteria were developed to identify optimized regimens, taking into account member- and virus-specific factors as well as cost. Prescriber outreach was conducted to recommend the use of an optimized regimen as applicable. Successful regimen outreach was defined as the number of members for whom a recommendation was accepted. A refill report identified members without a subsequent paid HCV medication claim within 25 days of the previous claim and outreach to the prescriber's office was performed. The outcome measure for refill outreach was the number and type of PA modifications made secondary to outreach (closure or extension). Cost avoidance was calculated for members who completed treatment with an optimized regimen. Return on investment (ROI) was calculated for the program. RESULTS: Between December 18, 2013, and January 31, 2015, 911 members had PA requests approved for simeprevir, sofosbuvir, or ledipasvir/ sofosbuvir. Of these members, 223 (24.5%) met the criteria for regimen outreach. Pharmacist interventions to treat with an optimized regimen were accepted for 135 members (60.5%). Following implementation of prescriber outreach to promote refills, between March 10, 2014, and January 31, 2015, offices were informed of an upcoming refill for 515 members. As a result of outreach, 19.6% of members had a subsequent PA modification. Sixty-nine approved PAs (for 68 members) were closed after correspondence with the prescriber, and 33 approved PAs (for 33 members) were extended. The total projected cost avoidance was $3,770,097. The comprehensive HCV medication management program demonstrated an ROI of $10.28 for every $1 spent. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive HCV medication management program can help contain costs while ensuring that members have access to most clinically appropriate regimens. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. Lavitas reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from University of Tennessee, Advanced Studies in Medicine and grant funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. The poster "Overview of a Hepatitis C Medication Monitoring Program in a State Medicaid Program" was presented October 8, 2014, by Lavitas at the AMCP Nexus 2014 meeting in Boston, Massachusetts. A program update was presented at the 2015 American Drug Utilization Review Society Meeting on February 27, 2015. Study concept and design were contributed by Price, Lenz, and Jeffrey, with assistance from Lavitas, Tesell, and Hydery. Lavitas, Tesell, and Hydery collected the data, assisted by Price, Lenz, and Jeffrey, and data interpretation was performed by all authors. The manuscript was written by Greenwood, Lavitas, Tesell, and Hydery, with assistance from the other authors, and was revised by all authors.

Pharmacodynamic target attainment with high-dose extended-interval tobramycin therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Utilization of high-dose extended-interval aminoglycoside therapy (HEAT) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is supported by primary literature and national guidelines. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a local aminoglycoside guideline to achieve pharmacodynamic goals in patients with CF that received ≧3 doses of HEAT from 2005 to 2011. Patients with renal dysfunction at baseline, status-post-lung transplant, or receiving inhaled tobramycin were excluded. In the 282 patient admissions, the average initial tobramycin dose was 10·3 mg/kg with an average initial peak of 21·5 mg/l. At least one dose titration was seen in 39% of patients. Patients who achieved the pharmacodynamic goal received a higher dose (10·4 mg/kg versus 9·7 mg/kg; P<0·001). A mean starting dose of tobramycin at 10·3 mg/kg every 24 hours achieved an average peak above goal. Higher initial dosing resulted in a higher likelihood of achieving the pharmacodynamic goal.

Evaluation of the maximum beyond-use-date stability of regular human insulin extemporaneously prepared in 0.9% sodium chloride in a polyvinyl chloride bag.

BACKGROUND: Regular human insulin 100 units added to a sufficient quantity of 0.9% sodium chloride, to yield a total volume of 100 mL within a polyvinylchloride bag, is accepted to be stable for 24 hours due to physical denaturation and chemical modification. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extended stability of such extemporaneously prepared regular human insulin, stored under refrigeration, to the maximum beyond-use-date allowed by United States Pharmacopeia chapter 797. METHODS: At time "0" three admixtures of regular human insulin were prepared by withdrawing 1 mL of regular human insulin with a concentration of 100 units/mL and adding it to a sufficient quantity of 0.9% sodium chloride for injection in a polyvinylchloride bag to yield a total volume of 100 mL. The three admixtures were stored under refrigeration (2°C-8°C [36°F-46°F]), and one sample of each admixture was withdrawn and tested in duplicate at 0, 6, 24, 48, 72, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 312, and 336 hours. Utilizing high performance liquid chromatography, each sample underwent immediate testing. The time points were stable if the mean concentration of the samples exceeded 90% of the equilibrium concentration at 6 hours. RESULTS: The equilibrium concentration was 0.89 units/mL. Time points were stable if the mean concentration was at least 0.80 units/mL. All time points retained at least 90% of the equilibrium concentration, with the exception of hour 168 (0.79 ± 0.03 units/mL). At 192 hours the mean concentration was 0.88 ± 0.03 units/mL. At 336 hours the mean concentration was 0.91 ± 0.02 units/mL. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, regular human insulin 100 units added to 0.9% sodium chloride for injection in a polyvinylchloride bag to yield a total volume of 100 mL is stable for up to 336 hours when stored at 2°C-8°C (36°F-46°F).

Evaluation of recombinant activated protein C for severe sepsis at a tertiary academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Early clinical trials of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) for severe sepsis excluded patients at high risk of bleeding. Recent literature suggests bleeding rates are higher in clinical practice and may be associated with worsened outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate baseline demographics; incidence, and risk factors for major bleeding; and mortality of patients receiving rhAPC for severe sepsis at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for all patients receiving rhAPC for treatment of severe sepsis at a tertiary academic medical center from January 2002 to June 2009. Demographic information, clinical variables, intensive care unit, and hospital outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 156 patients that received rhAPC, 54 (34.6%) did not meet institutional criteria for safe use at baseline due to bleeding precaution or contraindication. Twenty-three (14.7%) patients experienced a major bleeding event. Multivariate analysis demonstrated baseline International Normalized Ratio ≥2.5 (odds ratio [OR] 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-10.56; P = 0.03) and platelet count ≤100 × 10(3)/mm(3) (OR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.07-7.67; P = 0.01) as significant predictors of a major bleed. Overall hospital mortality was 57.7%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the presence of ≥3 organ dysfunctions (OR 2.46, 95% CI: 1.19-5.09; P < 0.05) and medical intensive care unit admission (OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.00-3.98; P = 0.05) were independent variables associated with hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving rhAPC at our institution had higher APACHE II scores, mortality, and major bleeding events than published postmarketing studies. Risk factors for major bleeding other than package-labeling contraindications and bleeding precautions were identified in our patient population.

Use of antiepileptics for seizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: Antiepileptics used for seizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are reviewed. SUMMARY: Of the 275,000 people who are hospitalized with TBI each year, approximately 5-7% experience a posttraumatic seizure (PTS). According to the latest guidelines issued by the Brain Trauma Foundation and the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) for the management of severe TBI, PTS prophylaxis is recommended only during the first seven days after TBI. Of the available antiepileptic drugs, phenytoin has been the most extensively studied for the prophylaxis of PTS. Phenobarbital, valproate, and carbamazepine have not been as extensively researched, and, given their adverse-effect profiles and pharmacodynamic properties, there is no advantage to using these agents over phenytoin. Levetiracetam has demonstrated comparable efficacy to phenytoin for PTS prophylaxis and is associated with fewer adverse effects and monitoring considerations; it may be a reasonable alternative to phenytoin. However, levetiracetam has been associated with an increased seizure tendency. The Brain Trauma Foundation recommends using phenytoin for early PTS prophylaxis. The guidelines also state that valproate has demonstrated similar efficacy to phenytoin but warn that its use may be associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: The available literature supports the use of antiepileptics for early PTS prophylaxis during the first week after a TBI. Phenytoin has been extensively studied for this indication and is recommended by the AAN and Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for early PTS prophylaxis. Levetiracetam has demonstrated comparable efficacy to phenytoin for early PTS prophylaxis and may be a reasonable alternative to consider in this patient population.

Evaluation of compliance with a paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients and is an independent risk factor for in-hospital morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with a paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in a 720-bed urban, academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. During a 1-month period, compliance with and the consequent safety and efficacy of the Brigham and Women's Hospital paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol was evaluated. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of protocol compliance, defined as correct adjustment to insulin infusion rate and correct timing of bedside blood glucose concentration (BBGC) checks +/-10 minutes of prespecified BBGC check according to the Brigham and Women's Hospital Intravenous Insulin Protocol (BHIP), was 47.2%. Seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria. Appropriate adjustment of infusion rates occurred 68.2% (1206/1768) of the time. Compliance with the timing of BBGC checks was found to be the majority of protocol violations. BBGCs were monitored +/-5 minutes of indicated time per the protocol 26.2% (463/1768) of the time. Blood glucose concentration checks within extended timing of +/-10 minutes of indicated time per the protocol occurred 793 (44.8%) times. Blood glucose concentration monitoring took place greater than 20 minutes past indicated time 450 (25.5%) times. In 1768 measurements, blood glucose concentrations between 40 and 60 mg/dL occurred 23 (1.3%) times in 12 (16.7%) patients. Blood glucose concentrations 40 mg/dL or less were detected 3 (0.17%) times in 2 (2.7%) patients. None of these hypoglycemic events led to documented complications. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a rather low level of compliance with a paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol was observed, which warrants further investigation. Compliance rates in this evaluation were found to be similar to the rates observed in previously evaluated fixed-dose intravenous insulin protocols. Protocol noncompliance may be associated with hypo- and hyperglycemia.

Improving glycemic control in medical inpatients: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient hyperglycemia is associated with poor patient outcomes. Current guidelines recommend that in an inpatient non-ICU setting there be treatment to achieve a glucose level below 180 mg/dL. METHODS: Objectives of this prospective quality-improvement pilot study were to implement a subcutaneous insulin protocol on a general medicine service, to identify barriers to implementation, and to determine the effect of this protocol on glycemic control. Eighty-nine patients with a preexisting diagnosis of type 2 diabetes or inpatient hyperglycemia were eligible. Study outcomes included resident acceptance of the protocol, insulin-ordering practices, and mean rate of hyperglycemia (glucose > 180 mg/dL) per person. Results were compared with those of a previously conducted observational study. RESULTS: Residents agreed to use the protocol in 56% of cases. Reasons for declining the protocol included severity of a patient's other disease states, desire to titrate oral medications, and fear of hypoglycemia. Basal and nutritional insulin were prescribed more often in the pilot group compared with at baseline (64% vs. 49% for basal, P = .05; 13% vs. 0% for nutritional, P < .001). Basal insulin was started after the first full hospital day in 42% of patients, and only one-third of patients with any hypo- or hyperglycemia had any subsequent changes in their insulin orders. The mean rate of hyperglycemia was not significantly different between groups (31.6% of measurements per patient vs. 33.3%, P = .85). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to a new inpatient subcutaneous insulin protocol was fair. Barriers included fear of hypoglycemia, delays in starting basal insulin, and clinical inertia. Quality improvement efforts likely need to target these barriers to successfully improve inpatient glycemic control.