Effects of a monocarboxylate transport 1 inhibitor, AZD3965, on retinal and visual function in the rat.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inhibition of monocarboxylate transport 1 (MCT1) is of interest in targeting highly glycolytic tumours. However, MCT1 is expressed in retina, and so inhibition of MCT1 could affect retinal function. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: AZD3965, an MCT1 inhibitor selected for clinical development, and two additional MCT1 inhibitors were evaluated for effects on visual acuity in albino (Han Wistar) rats. The effects of AZD3965 on visual acuity and electroretinography (ERG) were further investigated in pigmented (Long-Evans) rats, with dosing for up to 7 days. KEY RESULTS: All three MCT1 inhibitors reduced visual acuity within 2 h of dosing, suggesting a class effect. The deficit caused by AZD3965 (1,000 mg·kg-1 p.o. per day for 4 days) in Long Evans rats recovered to pre-dose levels 7 days after cessation of dosing. AZD3965 (50 to 1,000 mg·kg-1 p.o.) reduced the amplitude of scotopic a- and b-waves, and photopic b-wave of the ERG in a dose-related fashion, within 2 h of dosing. The effects on the scotopic ERG had diminished by Day 7 of dosing, demonstrating partial restoration of function despite continued treatment. Seven days after cessation of dosing at the highest dose tested (1,000 mg·kg-1 ), there was recovery of both scotopic a- and b- waves and, to a lesser extent, photopic b-wave. ERG was affected at lower plasma exposures than was visual function. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study clarifies the role of the MCT1 transporter in retinal function. The monitorability of the functional effects on the retina enabled safe clinical use of AZD3965.

The functional observational battery and modified Irwin test as global neurobehavioral assessments in the rat: Pharmacological validation data and a comparison of methods.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system in preclinical safety pharmacology studies utilises a global neurobehavioral assessment, usually in the rat. This either takes the form of the functional observational battery (FOB) or modified Irwin Test, both of which evaluate effects across 4 functional domains: autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor and behavioral. Although there is a great deal of overlap in the parameters they address, the two tests approach the assessments slightly differently. We undertook a broad pharmacological validation of both the FOB and the Irwin test, and compared the two outcomes. METHODS: Male rats (6 per treatment group) were used to assess each of 12 reference drugs alongside vehicle controls in separate FOB and Irwin studies. The drugs compared in the two study types were chlorpromazine, chlordiazepoxide, clonidine, baclofen, (+)-amphetamine, harmaline, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, buspirone, physostigmine, picrotoxin, yohimbine and atropine. There is a high degree of semantic equivalence in the parameters assessed in the autonomic domain between the two tests, with a lower degree of equivalence for neuromuscular and behavioral domains, whereas sensorimotor reflex testing in the FOB is far more extensive than in the Irwin test. RESULTS: Across the set of reference drugs, concordance between the two tests was generally good across the 4 functional domains at the 'domain' level (i.e., detecting 'an effect'), whereas there was generally a poor concordance at the individual parameter level. However, this was partially explained by variability between repeated studies on a single reference drug using the same test (FOB or Irwin). CONCLUSIONS: Both tests are 'fit-for-purpose' in detecting effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system. We would encourage the global safety pharmacology community to consider whether (a) the tests could be combined into one industry standard; (b) candidate drugs could be triaged according to CNS penetration, with the level of scrutiny in the CNS core battery assessment adjusted accordingly and (c) whether new home cage technology could be applied to semi-automate the preclinical neurobehavioral assessment.