Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous fixation in the treatment of Bennett fractures: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Bennett fractures is increasingly preferred over closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRIF) in an attempt to prevent the development of post-traumatic arthrosis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the preference for ORIF is justified based on the available literature regarding functional outcome and complications after surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of science, and Google scholar. Duplicates were removed and title and abstract were screened after which full text articles were analysed. The reference lists of selected articles were screened for additional relevant studies. Study characteristics were recorded and methodological qualities were assessed after which data was extracted from the included articles. The Eaton-Littler score for post-traumatic arthrosis (primary outcome) on follow-up X-rays was used as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were Grip strength, Pinch strength, persistent pain, fixation failure, functional impairment, infection and surgery time. RESULTS: Ten studies were included; three retrospective comparative studies and seven retrospective case series. Of the 215 patients in these studies, 138 had been treated using an open technique and 77 by a closed percutaneous technique. The pooled rate of post-traumatic arthrosis was 57.5% (26.6-85.5) in the ORIF group versus 26.1% (3.9-59.0) in the CRIF group. Mean surgical operation time was 71.9 min for ORIF and 30.2 min for percutaneous patients. Fixation failure was significantly more often seen in the ORIF patients, 8.2% (0.7-22.8) vs. 2.9% (0.8-9.1), Risk Ratio 1.132 (0.01-176.745); p = 0.048. Infection was only seen in 5 CRIF patients. Persistent pain was seen in 32.9% (0.6-83.1) in ORIF patients versus 22.3% (8.1-41.1) in the CRIF patients. The pooled means Grip strength was 48.3 kg (95% CI; 39.7-56.9) versus 43.4 kg (95% CI; 22.9-63.8) for ORIF and CRPF, respectively. Functional impairment was similar between the two groups, 1.4% (0.1-4.4) vs 1.8% (0.1-5.7) respectively. CONCLUSION: The analysed data do not confirm ORIF to prevent post-traumatic arthrosis, secondly more fixation failure and pain was seen in the ORIF group. The pooled data show percutaneous fixation to be preferable over ORIF in the surgical treatment of Bennett fractures.

Bennett's fracture: Comparative study between open and closed surgical techniques.

The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of surgically treated Bennett fractures, while comparing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF). Patients treated between 1994 and 2010 were assessed retrospectively during an outpatient visit using a validated questionnaire (i.e. DASH, pain assessed through VAS), sensory testing, grip- and pinch-strength and radiographic analysis for post-traumatic arthritis. Fifty patients were included. Mean follow-up was 10 years. Mean age at trauma was 34 years. ORIF was used in 35 patients. CRPF was used in 15 patients. No differences in grip- and pinch-strength were found. Re-operations were needed in five ORIF-treated patients. Higher Pain Scores (VAS) were seen in the ORIF-treated patients. No correlation was found between surgical technique and functional outcomes. A persistent step-off or gap larger than 2 mm after surgical fixation was significantly correlated with post-traumatic arthritis at 10 years' follow-up. The need to perform ORIF for anatomical reduction seems to be less important in preventing post-traumatic arthritis as a persistent step-off or gap of more than 2 mm was found to be significantly correlated with the development of post-traumatic arthritis. Secondly, both techniques lead to good functional outcomes, although persistent pain was seen in the ORIF-treated patients. Bennett fractures can therefore be safely treated with CRPF when the persistent step-off and gap after fixation do not exceed 2 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Open reduction and internal fixation versus percutaneous transverse Kirschner wire fixation for single, closed second to fifth metacarpal shaft fractures: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of single, closed metacarpal shaft fractures is increasingly preferred over closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (K-wire). The aim of this systematic review is to determine whether the preference for ORIF can be substantiated based on the available literature regarding the functional outcome and complications after surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using a computer-based search on MedLine and Embase, following the preferred reporting items for systematic and meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Five non-comparative studies were found. Two studies reported on 36 ORIF-treated patients. Three studies reported on 65 K-wire-treated patients. Complications were reported in 8 ORIF-treated patients (22 %) and in 23 K-wire-treated patients (35 %). Functional outcome was generally reported as good for both techniques. Nonetheless functional impairment requiring reoperation was reported in 6 ORIF-treated patients (17 %) and in none of the K-wire-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although for both techniques good functional outcomes were reported, the significance of the functional impairment after ORIF requiring reoperation suggests ORIF to be a less favorable technique for single, closed metacarpal shaft fractures.

Accuracy of fluoroscopy in the treatment of intra-articular thumb metacarpal fractures.

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of fluoroscopic imaging during closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of intra-articular thumb metacarpal fractures. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation was assessed in eight simulated intra-articular thumb metacarpal fractures, using fluoroscopy and digital radiographs. Displacement and fracture step-off were measured during fluoroscopy, on plain radiographs, and by direct visualization after careful dissection. Displacement on fluoroscopy was 0.8 (SD 1.0) mm and 1.2 (SD 1.4) with radiographic imaging. Direct visualization showed displacement of 0.9 (SD 1.2) mm. Intra-articular step-off on fluoroscopy was 0.8 (SD 1.0) mm and 0.8 (SD 0.8) with radiographic imaging. Direct visualization showed an intra-articular step-off of 0.8 (SD 1.2) mm. Statistical analysis showed excellent compatibility between fluoroscopy and direct visualization. Fluoroscopic visualization during surgery provides an adequate assessment of articular step-off and displacement in comparison with radiographs and direct visualization.

Closed reduction intermetacarpal Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of unstable fractures of the base of the first metacarpal.

The purpose of this study was to describe the results of extra-articular and intra-articular fractures, at the base of the first metacarpal, treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with intermetacarpal Kirschner wires. Outcome was evaluated by experienced pain, functional outcome and radiographic indications for arthritis. In total, 25 patients with unstable fractures at the base of the first metacarpal underwent closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of the fracture. Prospectively collected data of 25 consecutive patients were evaluated retrospectively, assessing stability of fixation, operation time and the occurrence of fracture dislocation during and after treatment. All patients were assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 24 months. Follow-up included questionnaires: functional tests including grip and pinch measurement and radiographic analysis for post-traumatic arthritis, using the modified Eaton-Littler classification. In total, 15 patients with extra-articular fractures and 10 patients with intra-articular fractures were treated with this technique. In the group of extra-articular fractures of 15 patients, only one patient had loss of grip strength greater than 20% in comparison with the contra-lateral side (corrected for hand dominance). No clinically important difference was found for pinch strength. One patient experienced functional limitations and was unable to return to a previous hobby. In the patients group with intra-articular fractures, seven patients had a Bennett fracture and three a Rolando fracture. One patient with a Bennett fracture had a loss of pinch strength greater than 20% corrected for hand dominance. One of the three patients with a Rolando fracture had grip loss greater than 20%. None of the patients with intra-articular fractures experienced any functional limitations. The described fixation procedure results in a stable fixation of the fracture fragments, and no secondary dislocation of the fracture occurred. Fractures consolidated within 32 (26-50) days and no new fractures were observed. These results suggest that this technique can be safely used in the treatment of extra-articular fractures as well as intra-articular fractures at the base of the first metacarpal.

Outcome of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

PURPOSE: Ruptured aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (RAAA) is a condition associated with high mortality rate. If Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is required, outcome is considered even worse. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of CPR on 30-day mortality of RAAA patients. Furthermore the Hardman index was evaluated. METHODS: 109 patients with RAAA during a 5 year period (2001-2005) were analysed retrospectively. 30-day mortality, the presence of CPR and Hardman risk factors were recorded. The presence of CPR and the Hardman index were related to clinical outcome. RESULTS: 104 patients were included in our analysis. Eighteen patients received CPR. Overall 30-day mortality was 40%. Patients receiving CPR had a higher mortality rate than patients who did not (89% vs. 30%, p <0.0001). Patients receiving CPR prior to surgery had a mortality rate of 100% (n = 12). In patients with a Hardman Index of < or = 1, 2 and > or = 3 the 30-day mortality was respectively 15%, 47% and 81%. CONCLUSION: Requirement of CPR has a detrimental effect on RAAA-patient outcome. Patients receiving CPR prior to surgery have no survival chance. We advocate that surgery in these patients should not be undertaken. Hardman Index has a predictive value concerning 30-day mortality.