A composite element that binds basic helix loop helix and basic leucine zipper transcription factors is important for gonadotropin-releasing hormone regulation of the follicle-stimulating hormone beta gene.

Although FSH plays an essential role in controlling gametogenesis, the biology of FSHbeta transcription remains poorly understood, but is known to involve the complex interplay of multiple endocrine factors including GnRH. We have identified a GnRH-responsive element within the rat FSHbeta promoter containing an E-box and partial cAMP response element site that are bound by the basic helix loop helix transcription factor family members, upstream stimulating factor (USF)-1/USF-2, and the basic leucine zipper member, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), respectively. Expression studies with CREB, USF-1/USF-2, and activating protein-1 demonstrated that the USF transcription factors increased basal transcription, an effect not observed if the cognate binding site was mutated. Conversely, expression of a dominant negative CREB mutant or CREB knockdown attenuated induction by GnRH, whereas dominant negative Fos or USF had no effect on the GnRH response. GnRH stimulation specifically induced an increase in phosphorylated CREB occupation of the FSHbeta promoter, leading to the recruitment of CREB-binding protein to enhance gene transcription. In conclusion, a composite element bound by both USF and CREB serves to integrate signals for basal and GnRH-stimulated transcription of the rat FSHbeta gene.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulates prolactin release from lactotrophs in photoperiodic species through a gonadotropin-independent mechanism.

Previous studies have provided evidence for a paracrine interaction between pituitary gonadotrophs and lactotrophs. Here, we show that GnRH is able to stimulate prolactin (PRL) release in ovine primary pituitary cultures. This effect was observed during the breeding season (BS), but not during the nonbreeding season (NBS), and was abolished by the application of bromocriptine, a specific dopamine agonist. Interestingly, GnRH gained the ability to stimulate PRL release in NBS cultures following treatment with bromocriptine. In contrast, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, a potent secretagogue of PRL, stimulated PRL release during both the BS and NBS and significantly enhanced the PRL response to GnRH during the BS. These results provide evidence for a photoperiodically modulated functional interaction between the GnRH/gonadotropic and prolactin axes in the pituitary gland of a short day breeder. Moreover, the stimulation of PRL release by GnRH was shown not to be mediated by the gonadotropins, since immunocytochemical, Western blotting, and PCR studies failed to detect pituitary LH or FSH receptor protein and mRNA expressions. Similarly, no gonadotropin receptor expression was observed in the pituitary gland of the horse, a long day breeder. In contrast, S100 protein, a marker of folliculostellate cells, which are known to participate in paracrine mechanisms within this tissue, was detected throughout the pituitaries of both these seasonal breeders. Therefore, an alternative gonadotroph secretory product, a direct effect of GnRH on the lactotroph, or another cell type, such as the folliculostellate cell, may be involved in the PRL response to GnRH in these species.

Synergy between activin A and gonadotropin-releasing hormone in transcriptional activation of the rat follicle-stimulating hormone-beta gene.

Both activin and GnRH can independently stimulate expression of the FSHbeta subunit gene. In this study, we used the gonadotrope-derived LbetaT2 cell line to investigate the potential interaction between activin and GnRH in regulating the transcriptional activity of the rat FSHbeta gene promoter. Activin A and GnRH synergistically enhanced rat FSHbeta transcriptional activity. Overexpression of SMAD3 (mediator of decapentaplegic-related protein 3), but not of SMAD2, increased transcriptional activation of the rat (r) FSHbeta gene promoter, which was further enhanced by the combined overexpression of SMAD3 and 4 (3+4). The stimulatory effects of SMAD3 overexpression were localized to -472/-256 of the rFSHbeta gene promoter, and activin- and GnRH-responsive proteins were shown to bind to region -284/-252. Sequence analysis identified a consensus palindromic SMAD-binding site at -266/-259 of the rFSHbeta gene promoter. Mutation of two bases located in the center of this palindrome effectively abrogated SMAD4 binding, markedly reduced SMAD3 and 3+4 stimulation of the rFSHbeta gene promoter, and significantly decreased the synergistic enhancement of promoter activity by both activin A and GnRH, and SMAD3 and GnRH. Blockade of the MAPK-signaling pathway did not significantly affect the response to combined stimulation with activin and GnRH. In contrast, interference with SMAD3 signaling caused a significant reduction in activin and GnRH synergy. The results indicate that SMAD3 plays an important role in the synergistic effects of activin and GnRH and demonstrate that this synergy is mediated by a palindromic cis-element located at -266/-259 of the rFSHbeta gene promoter.

Regulation of gonadotropins by inhibin and activin.

Inhibin, activin, and follistatin were first identified as gonadal hormones that could exert selective effects on follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion without affecting luteinizing hormone (LH). Although the primary source of inhibin remains the gonad, both activin and follistatin are produced in extragonadal tissues and can exert effects on FSH through an autocrine-paracrine mechanism. These proteins can effect the regulation of the gonadotropins at many levels. First, activin can directly stimulate FSH biosynthesis and release from the gonadotrope cells of the pituitary gland. Second, activin up-regulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR) gene expression, leading to alterations in the synthesis and release of both gonadotropins in response to GnRH. Third, activin can stimulate GnRH release from GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus and thereby affect FSH and LH secretion. Both inhibin and follistatin can negatively regulate these effects by preventing activin binding to the activin receptor at the cell membrane and blocking activation of downstream signal transduction pathways. This review concentrates on the mechanisms through which inhibin, activin, and follistatin regulate the gonadotropins. We discuss the expression of inhibin/activin subunits and receptors throughout the hypothalamus and pituitary and their role in the regulation of FSH and LH. The mechanisms of inhibin and activin signaling are also reported, with particular attention to developments in our understanding of inhibin receptor action and activin-induced transcriptional regulation of the FSHbeta gene promoter. Finally, we present recent findings that other members of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily may also play an important role in transcriptional regulation of the pituitary gonadotropins.

Effects of prolactin on the luteinizing hormone response to gonadotropin- releasing hormone in primary pituitary cell cultures during the ovine annual reproductive cycle.

In the sheep pituitary, the localization of prolactin (PRL) receptors in gonadotrophs and the existence of gonadotroph-lactotroph associations have provided morphological evidence for possible direct effects of PRL on gonadotropin secretion. Here, we investigated whether PRL can readily modify the LH response to GnRH throughout the ovine annual reproductive cycle. Cell populations were obtained from sheep pituitaries during the breeding season (BS) and the nonbreeding season (NBS), plated to monolayer cultures for 7 days, and assigned to receive one of the following treatments: 1) nil (control), 2) acute (90- min) bromocriptine (ABr), 3) chronic (7-day) bromocriptine (CBr), 4) ABr and PRL, 5) CBr and PRL, 6) PRL alone, or 7) thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Cells were treated as described above, with the aim of decreasing or increasing the concentrations of PRL in the culture, and simultaneously treated with GnRH for 90 min. The LH concentrations in the medium were then determined by RIA. GnRH stimulated LH in a dose-dependent manner during both stages of the annual reproductive cycle. During the NBS, single treatments did not significantly affect the LH response to GnRH. However, when PRL was combined with bromocriptine, either acutely or chronically, GnRH failed to stimulate LH release at all doses tested (P < 0.01). In contrast, during the BS, the LH response to GnRH was not affected by any of the experimental treatments. These results reveal no apparent effects of PRL alone, but an interaction between PRL and dopamine in the regulation of LH secretion within the pituitary gland, and a seasonal modulation of this mechanism.

Developmental changes in the hormonal identity of gonadotroph cells in the rhesus monkey pituitary gland.

To help elucidate the regulatory mechanism responsible for divergent gonadotrophin secretion during sexual maturation, we examined the gonadotroph population and hormonal identity of gonadotroph subtypes in pituitary glands of juvenile (age, 1.7 +/- 0.2 yr) and adult (age, 12.3 +/- 0.8 yr) male rhesus monkeys (Macacca mulatta). Serum LH and testosterone concentrations were, respectively, 3 and 7 times lower in juveniles than in adults, thus confirming the different stages of development. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the proportion of LH gonadotrophs in relation to the total pituitary cell population in the juvenile animals was significantly smaller than in the adults. In a subsequent study, double immunofluorescent labeling identified three distinct gonadotroph subtypes in both age groups: ones expressing either LH or FSH and another one expressing a combination of both gonadotrophins. Whereas the number of monohormonal LH cells per unit area was greater in the adults than in the juveniles, the number of monohormonal FSH gonadotrophs was remarkably lower. However, the proportion of FSH cells (whether mono- or bihormonal) within the gonadotroph population was similar between groups. Interestingly, the proportion and number of bihormonal gonadotrophs as well as the LH/FSH gonadotroph ratio were significantly greater in the adults than in the juveniles. Taken together, these data reveal that during the juvenile-adult transition period, not only does the pituitary gonadotroph population increase, but a large number of monohormonal FSH gonadotrophs are likely to become bihormonal. Because this morphological switch occurs when marked changes in plasma gonadotrophins are known to occur, it may represent an intrapituitary mechanism that differentially regulates gonadotrophin secretion during sexual development.