Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prog Neurol Surg ; 20: 43-49, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17317975

RESUMO

Beside basic physical notions such as ionizing radiation, beam production and beam characteristics, this chapter will focus on two major principles that should always be considered in a radiosurgery procedure: conformity and selectivity. Those parameters are influenced by different physical beam properties, by the type of beam delivery device and by the way the dose is delivered. Conformity and selectivity should be evaluated for each treatment with the help of some specific indices, i.e. target volume ratio and normal volume ratio based on the dose-volume histograms.


Assuntos
Radiocirurgia/instrumentação , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Radioisótopos de Cobalto , Humanos , Aceleradores de Partículas , Seleção de Pacientes , Dosagem Radioterapêutica
2.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 24(2): 319-24, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16786565

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and pathology in patients with undefined breast lesion, to validate how accurately ADC is related to histology, and to define a threshold value of ADC to distinguish malignant from benign lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients (110 lesions) were referred for positive or dubious findings. Three-dimensional fast low-angle shot (3D-FLASH) with contrast injection was applied. EPI diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with fat saturation was performed, and ROIs were selected on subtraction 3D-FLASH images before and after contrast injection, and copied on an ADC map. Inter- and intraobserver analyses were performed. RESULTS: At pathology 22 lesions were benign, 65 were malignant, and 23 were excluded. The ADCs of malignant and benign lesions were statistically different. In malignant tumors the ADC was (mean +/- SEM) 0.95 +/- 0.027 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second, and in benign tumors it was 1.51 +/- 0.068 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we found a threshold between malignant and benign lesions for highest sensitivity and specificity (both 86%) around 1.13 +/- 0.10 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second. For a threshold of 0.95 +/- 0.10 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second, specificity was 100% but sensitivity was very low. Inter- and intraobserver studies showed good reproducibility. CONCLUSION: The ADC may help to differentiate benign and malignant lesions with good specificity, and may increase the overall specificity of breast MRI.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Adulto , Idoso , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Gadolínio DTPA/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA