[Long-term efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 2-year treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' dvukhletnei terapii divozilimabom u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg every 24 weeks during 100 weeks for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS (NCT05385744) included 338 adult patients with MS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and teriflunomide (TRF) 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks, then entered an additional period from weeks 49 to 100, which included three cycles of therapy. The efficacy was assessed based on the results of brain MRI and registration of data on relapses. RESULTS: 308 subjects completed 5 therapy cycles according to the study protocol. An analysis of the effectiveness of DIV therapy over 2 years showed a persistent suppression of MRI and clinical activity of the disease in comparison with TRF, which was confirmed by all the studied MRI indicators (including CUA; total number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions on T1-weighted scans ; number of new or enlarged lesions on T2-weighted scans; lesions volume change on T2-weighted scans; change in the volume of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted scans). The use of DIV was associated with a statistically significant decrease in ARR compared to TRF (p=0.0001). The ARR in the DIV group was 0.057, in the TRF group - 0.164 with 95% confidential interval for the frequency ratio [0.202; 0.593]. The incidence of GdE lesions on T1-weighted scans in the DIV group was significantly lower than in the TRF group. The average number of such lesions was 0.0±0.08 and 1.0±4.46 in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Progression of EDSS was detected in 18 (10.7%) and 36 (21.3%) patients in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p=0.0075). The proportion of patients with relapses was 11.2% (n=19) in the DIV group and 23.1% (n=39) in the TRF group (p=0.0039). In the subpopulation of patients with SPMS, no cases of increase in EDSS were detected, and not a single case of exacerbation was recorded over 2 years of using DIV. Also, DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and laboratory abnormalities, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS CT indicate a high sustained efficacy and safety of long-term use of DIV in comparison with TRF during 2 years of therapy.

[Efficacy and safety of antiCD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab during 48-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' 48 nedel'nogo primeneniya monoklonal'nogo antitela protiv CD20 divozilimaba u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom: rezul'taty randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in comparison with the teriflunomide (TRF). The study of the efficacy and safety of the use of the drug DIV was carried out for 48 weeks of therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS included 338 adult patients with RRMS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and TRF 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks. The primary end point was «Mean annualized relapse rate 48 weeks after the last patient is randomized in the study¼. RESULTS: 321 subjects completed 48 weeks of therapy according to the study protocol. The analysis of the of efficacy data for the primary endpoint successively proved the hypothesis of superiority of the test drug DIV at a dose of 500 mg over the reference drug TRF. A rapid suppression of acute disease activity according to the brain MRI and clinical manifestations of the disease was shown after the first infusion of DIV in patients with RRMS. Thus, after 48 weeks of therapy in patients treated with DIV, there were no T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, while in the TRF group such lesions were observed in 20.7% (35/169) of subjects. Evaluation of the CUA per scan showed that the mean values for the estimated period were statistically significantly lower in the DIV drug group compared to the TRF group: the ratio of the adjusted per scan rates (DIV/TRF) was 0.125 [95% CI: 0.089; 0.177]. Over the 48 weeks of therapy, the proportion of subjects with relapses was 9.5% (n=16/169) in the DIV group and 19.5% (33/169) in the TRF group (p=0.0086). DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and deviations of laboratory data, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the clinical study indicate the high efficacy and safety of DIV in comparison with TRF.

[Efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 24-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-2]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' 24 nedel' primeneniya divozilimaba sredi patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-2.

OBJECTIVE: To find the optimal therapeutic dose of the anti-B cell mAb divozilimab (DIV) based on the efficacy and safety data of intravenous administration at a dose of 125 mg or 500 mg in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) compared to placebo (PBO) and teriflunomide (TRF). To study the efficacy and safety of DIV within 24 weeks of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-2 involved 271 adult patients with RRMS from 25 centres In Russia. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1) into 4 groups: TRF, DIV 125 mg, DIV 500 mg and PBO. After screening patients entered to the main period, which consisted of one cycle of therapy for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions (Gd+) observed on brain MRI scans after 24 weeks (per scan - involves estimating the mean value of the score from all the MRI assessments performed for each participant in the study). RESULTS: 263 patients completed 24 weeks of treatment. Most of the patients in the DIV groups had no lesions on T1-weighted MRI after 24 weeks of treatment (94.44% on 125 mg and 93.06% on 500 mg). In the TRF and PBO groups the values were significantly lower: 68.06% and 56.36% respectively (both p<0.05). The proportions of relapse-free patients in the DIV groups were 93.06% and 97.22% (125 mg and 500 mg, respectively). As expected, DIV reduced the CD19+ B-cells. However, the repopulation rate of CD19+ B-cells in the 125 mg group was more pronounced (mainly due to the recovering pool of CD27-naive B-cells) compared to the 500 mg group. DIV showed a favorable safety profile at both doses. CONCLUSION: Thus, the assessment of 24 weeks treatment demonstrated that DIV is a highly effective, safe and convenient option for the treatment of RRMS patients, both naive and previously treated with disease modifying therapy. A dose of 500 mg is recommended for further efficacy and safety evaluation during phase 3 CT.

[Nonimmunogenic staphylokinase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (FRIDA trial results)]. / Neimmunogennaya stafilokinaza ­ novyi tromboliticheskii preparat v lechenii ishemicheskogo insul'ta (rezul'taty issledovaniya FRIDA).

AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the efficacy and safety of non-immunogenic staphylokinase (NS) compared with alteplase (A) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 h after symptom onset. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 336 patients with IS within 4.5 h after symptom onset were included in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, non-inferiority comparative trial of NS vs A (168 patients in each group). NS was administered as an intravenous bolus in a dose of 10 mg, regardless of body weight, over 10 s, A was administered as a bolus infusion in a dose of 0.9 mg/kg, maximum 90 mg over 1 hour. The primary efficacy endpoint was a favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-1 on day 90. Safety endpoints included all-cause mortality on day 90, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and other serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: At day 90, 84 (50%) patients reached the primary endpoint (mRS 0-1) in the NS group, 68 (41%) patients - in the A group (p=0.10, OR=1.47, 95% CI=0.93-2.32). The difference between groups NS and A was 9.5% (95% CI= -1.7-20.7) and the lower limit of the 95% CI did not cross the margin of non-inferiority (pnon-inferiority<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the frequency of deaths between the groups: on day 90, 17 (10%) patients in the NS group and 24 (14%) in the A group had died (p=0.32). There was a trend towards significant differences in the frequency of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage: NS group - 5 (3%) patients, A group - 13 (8%) patients (p=0.087, OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.1-1.13). There were significant differences in the number of patients with SAEs: in the NS group - 22 (13%) patients, in the A group - 37 (22%) patients (p=0.044, OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.28-0.98). CONCLUSION: The presented results of the FRIDA trial are the first in the world to use a drug based on NS in patients with IS. It has been shown that a single bolus (within 10 s) administration of NS at a standard dose of 10 mg, regardless of body weight, allows to conduct fast, effective and safe thrombolytic therapy in patients with IS within 4.5 h after symptom onset. In further clinical tials of NS, it is planned to expand the therapeutic window beyond 4.5 h after symptom onset in patients with IS.

[Primary-progressive multiple sclerosis in Russia: a medical-sociological study involving patients and neurologists]. / Pervichno-progressiruiushchii rasseiannyi skleroz v Rossii: mediko-sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie s uchastiem patsientov i nevrologov.

The main results of a medical-sociological study aimed at the evaluation of the level of satisfaction with treatment in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) are presented. The survey was conducted in 19 regions of the Russian Federation and involved 437 patients with confirmed diagnosis of PPMS and 80 neurologists specialized in multiple sclerosis. The research was carried out by the All-Russian Public Organization of Disabled People with Multiple Sclerosis with the participation of the Russian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. This is the first medical-sociological study in the Russian Federation involving patients with PPMS and neurologists. The study revealed typical medical and social problems patients with PPMS faced. A significant decrease in quality-of-life of PPMS patients was shown.

[Experience of using genfaxon for treating patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the Russian Federation].

UNLABELLED: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. Nowadays some disease-modifying drugs (DMD) in the Russian Federation (RF) are biosimilars. Their full spectrum of tolerability and efficacy is to be determined. Here we present results of two retrospective-prospective studies on efficacy and safety of a biosimilar interferon beta-1a (genfaxon) in treatment of MS in the RF. AIMS: determination of safety and efficacy profile of genfaxon in a routine neurological practice in the RF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trials were performed in 18 MS centers in the RF. A total of 649 patients aged from 18 to 68 years with the EDSS score no more than 6.0 were treated with genfaxon for 12 months. The first group was comprised of 'naïve' patients without previous history of DMD administration. There were patients in the second group which have already received some of DMD. Statistical analysis was performed with the help of significance criteria (χ-square), t-criteria of Student for analysis of independent samplings. RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events during the period of the study. "Naïve" patients had significantly lower number of adverse events, than patients with previous history of DMD usage. Efficacy results were comparable with results published for the Rebif. CONCLUSIONS: Data, received from the studies show equal efficacy and tolerability of genfaxon compared with original DMD Rebif.